Скачать презентацию XX So GAT Meeting Warsaw 12 13 June Скачать презентацию XX So GAT Meeting Warsaw 12 13 June

455633c0136ae51aeb1c531c37f41d8e.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 9

XX. So. GAT Meeting Warsaw 12. /13. June 2007 IU vs. NAT-Detectable Units Albrecht XX. So. GAT Meeting Warsaw 12. /13. June 2007 IU vs. NAT-Detectable Units Albrecht Gröner CSL Behring Virology Marburg, Germany

International Units vs. NAT-Detectable Units • International Units • inter-laboratory comparison of results (e. International Units vs. NAT-Detectable Units • International Units • inter-laboratory comparison of results (e. g. , virus load in samples) • release of pools for fractionation (e. g. , OMCLs) • NAT-detectable units (genome equivalent (GE)) • detection of virus genomes in samples • intra-laboratory comparison of results (if assay performance is very stable) 2 Gr 070613 2 – Gröner 13. June 2007

Conversion Factor IU GE • Necessity to define conversion factor • quantification of virus Conversion Factor IU GE • Necessity to define conversion factor • quantification of virus particles in sample defined by NAT in order to assess risk for virus transmission • CPMP/BWP/5180/03 (Guideline on assessing the risk for virus transmission – new chapter 6 of the note for guidance on plasma-derived medicinal products (CPMP/BWP/269/95)) requests a quantitative estimation of the probability of a virus contaminant being present in a defined dose of final product taking into account - as a conservative approach viral genomes as an indicator of potentially infectious virus particles in the starting material 3 Gr 070613 3 – Gröner 13. June 2007

Detection of Virus Genome in Sample Fig 1 a: 97/656 International Standard 14 NIBSC Detection of Virus Genome in Sample Fig 1 a: 97/656 International Standard 14 NIBSC - 2002 13 12 HIV 11 10 9 8 7 27 UCM 6 60 M 64 N 17 TMA 22 M 04 N 67 IH 17 M 63 M* 30 CAS 09 CM 61 M 59 IH 14 B 3 58 B 3 56 M 48 N 54 IH 45 AL 65 AS 05 CM 57 CM 5 4 3 2 1 0 12 IH neg 0. 0 0. 5 1. 0 1. 5 2. 0 2. 5 19 CAS 3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 4. 5 Ecstimated RNA Copies or PCR Detectable Units (log 10/ml) 4 Gr 070613 4 – Gröner 13. June 2007 5. 0 5. 5

Detection of Virus Genome in Sample Fig 1 h: RU 570 Subtype H (S Detection of Virus Genome in Sample Fig 1 h: RU 570 Subtype H (S 02) 14 13 NIBSC - 2002 HIV 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 61 M 4 3 2 1 0 30 27 CAS UCM 64 N 58 B 3 04 N 12 IH 0. 0 0. 5 67 IH 1. 0 1. 5 2. 0 54 IH 2. 5 60 M 09 CM 63 M* 17 TMA 48 N neg 56 M 14 B 3 22 M 05 CM 17 M 65 AS 45 AL 59 IH 19 CAS 57 CM 3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 4. 5 5. 0 Estimated RNA Copies or PCR Detectable Units (log 10/ml) Monitor assays 5 Gr 070613 5 – Gröner 13. June 2007 Nuclisens b. DNA 3 Abbott LCx In-House Ampliscreen TMA 5. 5

Detection of Virus Genome in Sample HIV NIBSC - 2002 6 Gr 070613 6 Detection of Virus Genome in Sample HIV NIBSC - 2002 6 Gr 070613 6 – Gröner 13. June 2007

Detection of Virus Genome in Sample HAV International Standard Saldanha et al. Vox Sang Detection of Virus Genome in Sample HAV International Standard Saldanha et al. Vox Sang 2005; 89: 52 -58 7 Gr 070613 7 – Gröner 13. June 2007

Detection of Virus Genome in Sample HCV International Standard Saldanha et al. Vox Sang Detection of Virus Genome in Sample HCV International Standard Saldanha et al. Vox Sang 1999; 76: 149 -158 8 Gr 070613 8 – Gröner 13. June 2007

Conversion Factor IU GE • Is a general conversion factor necessary (and justifiable)? • Conversion Factor IU GE • Is a general conversion factor necessary (and justifiable)? • Conversion factor can only be determined for each laboratory employing a validated assay • A generic conversion factor for IUs to GE is not appropriate due to differences in analytical sensitivity of assays in different laboratories • Quantitative infectivity of viruses (inf. units) vs. NAT detectable units unknown Relevance of Conversion Factor? 9 Gr 070613 9 – Gröner 13. June 2007