WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Portland 22 nd – 23 rd October 2009 Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Group members Munich Kalgoorlie Portland Ramesh Sinhal (Chairman) UK Alfred Wenninger-Vycudil Austria Gerhard Eberl Austria Dominique Rafanomezana Madagascar Ricardo Solorio Murillo Mexico Sophia Tekie Namibia Bert de Wit Netherlands Chris Parkman New Zealand Donald Morrison Scotland Fernando Varela Soto Spain Richard Abell UK Stephen Gaj USA Viktor Bardoczky Hungary Rachid Tabbouchy Morocco Jose Ortiz-Garcia Colombia WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Group Task Strategies Identify best practice in asset management systems with key aspects for road authorities at different stages of development to consider when choosing a system. Review costs associated with asset systems and recommend where costs are focused. Main stages of the work • • Case Studies Benchmark development Benchmark confirmation Reporting WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Case Studies 1. Namibia – Draft prepared 2. New Zealand – Draft prepared 3. Netherlands – Draft prepared 4. UK: Scotland – Draft prepared 5. USA – Draft prepared 6. UK: England – Draft in preparation 7. Spain (PPP) – To be prepared 8. Mexico – To be prepared 9. Colombia ? WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Case Study Review 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Scotland - Netherlands Namibia - England USA - England Netherlands - Scotland New Zealand - Namibia England – USA Mexico – Spain – Mexico Overall synthesised report – WG Chairman Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Benchmarking Framework For Asset Management and Costs Subject Areas Aspects to be considered to show level of achievement WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Benchmarking Framework For Asset Management and Costs Subject Areas Goals and Objectives Organisational issues People and Culture Data and Information Risk Management Delivery and Resource Allocation Planning Systems and Processes Costs Benefits WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Benchmarking Framework For Asset Management and Costs Aspects to be considered Goals and Objectives Short and long-term goals Achievable objectives Stewardship of assets Meeting stakeholders requirements Performance driven decisions Measurable performance targets WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Call for Papers – proposed text Identification and benchmarking of best practice in approaches to asset management for road authorities at different stages of development. Issues that may be considered include : • Organisation, people and culture • Coverage and integration of asset types • Efficient and effective use of data • Risk management • Planning, decision making and delivery • Costs and benefits • Achievements and challenges WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Proposed work programme 2009 - 2010 1. Update case studies for Scotland, Namibia, USA, Netherlands, New Zealand England – Christmas 2009 2. Prepare case studies for Mexico and Spain (PPP) – Christmas 2009 3. Contact Colombia about preparation of case study – 9 th Nov 2009 4. Circulate draft benchmarking framework – 9 th Nov 2009 5. Comments on draft benchmarking framework - 1 st Dec 2009 6. Comments on case studies – 31 st January 2010 7. Final case studies - 28 th February 2010 8. Circulate updated benchmarking framework – 28 th February 2010 WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Work programme 2008 - 2011 Issue: WG 1 - Benchmarking of asset management methods Description of the selected strategies Identify best practice in asset management systems with key aspects for road authorities at different stages of development to consider when choosing a system. Review costs associated with asset systems and recommend where costs are focused. Working group leader Ramesh Sinhal Cooperation within PIARC TC-D 2 Cooperation with other organisations Austroads (Chris Parkman) COST Actions (To be identified - Alfred) ERANET roads (To be identified - Alfred) Outputs Calendar Technical reports Case Studies (Current Position and Best Practice) Overview and Benchmark (Requirements for Asset Management approaches) 2009 Q 4 2010 Q 4 Articles Summary of Case Studies (Current Position and Best Practice) 2011 Q 1 PIARC international seminars Presentations of case studies To be confirmed Sessions at XXIV World Road Congress Benchmarking of asset management methods 2011 Q 3 Other events ICMP 8 (Chile) EPAM 4 (Sweden) ? TRB 2012 2011 Q 4 2012 Q 3 ? 2012 Q 1 ? Aspects more specifically relevant to developing countries and countries in transition Case studies to identify current practices and potential areas for improvement. Seminar in Madagascar? WG 1: Benchmarking of asset management methods Munich 2008 Portland 2009
Скачать презентацию WG 1 Benchmarking of asset management methods Portland
9189bdacd2fc8cebb226be71f0ff171f.ppt