Welcome 10 th September 2013
Attendees New faces Derbyshire Police MET Police North Wales Police West Mercia Police Warwickshire Police West Midlands Police MOI France Military Police Cheshire Police Gwent Police Policy Exchange Returning Apologies Avon and Somerset Inspector Daniel Inglis (Greater Manchester Police) Greater Manchester Police Cleveland Police Lincs Police Leics Police D&C Police MOD Home Office (borders) Beds Police Inspector Robert Able (Hampshire Police) Thames Valley Police
Agenda 10: 00 – BWVSG - How to execute a successful BWV 10: 10 program in your organisation Alasdair Field, CEO Reveal Media 10: 10 – Video showcase of 10: 40 best uses of BWV Sgt Stuart Murrell, MET Police 10: 40 – Staffordshire – 11: 10 The role of a project manager 1. Chief Inspector Neil Hulme, Staffordshire Police 2. Patricia Rich, Project Manager, technology services 11: 10 – Break - tea and coffee 11: 40 – Home Office, Immigration Enforcement. 12: 10 Cleaven Faulkner 1: 10 – 1: 25 Police and Crime Commissioner’s view PCC Matthew Ellis, Staffordshire Police Staffordshire’s PCC view on BWV as part of the PCC’s strategy. 1: 25 – Close Experience from American Experiment Darren Henstock, West Midlands Community Justice CPS – use of evidence Mark Paul, CPS (West Midlands and Staffordshire) Future of BWV as primary evidence Staffordshire policy and evidence handling process. Peter Hall, Superintendent Head of Justice Services.
Video Showcase Best uses of BWV Sgt Stuart Murrell – MET Police 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 4
Body Worn Video The role of a project manager Neil Hulme – Ch Insp Staffordshire Police Tricia Rich – ICT Project Manager 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 5
Body Worn Video Local Policing perspective on a managed project 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 6
This is where we were…. • • Two different cameras Localised approach Broken equipment Undefined approach to support – resulting in a lack of trust and confidence in the equipment 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 7
Let’s just get a few more cameras… • In reality, this meant – Too much technical change – Too much ground to cover across the whole county – Not enough, or the right people, to do all the doing 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 8
… hmmm, let’s get a project manager • Small operational team needed some dedicated support – Provide some structure – Provide technical to business translation – Herd the cats 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 9
Was it worth having a project manager? • • Resilience Assurance Sounding board Support 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 10
Body Worn Video The project manager’s perspective of a managed project 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 11
Is this your experience of a managed project ? 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 12
This is how it should be… 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 13
Ingredients of a managed project • A (competent and trained ) project manager • A business objective which is specific, measurable and achievable • Clear identification of all key stakeholders and their buy in • An agreed plan to achieve the business objective • Review and measurement of delivery against the plan • Review of the realisation of the business benefit 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 14
The BWV project products 1. Governance • Included business case, project brief, work package structure, highlight reports , project plan, risks and issues logs • The governance provides • • 3/17/2018 A definition of scope Capture and management of risks and issues Details of the tasks and responsibilities of both ICT and business Defines the plan to achieve the business objective Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 15
WP 4 Pilot and roll out Accountable Project manager Start up Initiate 12. 12 Description Implement 02. 13 Closure 04. 14 05. 14 Management of the pilot site and subsequent roll out 1. Products 2. 3. 4. Identify and plan scope and timing of pilot 1. Deploy cameras 2. Desktop software installation 3. Training and awareness 4. Implement draft processes 5. Draft support processes Pilot review 1. Communications and awareness plans 2. Modify policy and process 3. Modify support process Implement deployment method wp 1 for cameras across other LPTS 1. Communication rolled out 2. Training deployed for hardware, software and processes 3. Devices deployed Handover to live Responsible Neil Hulme, Roger Craig, Stuart Crowe, LPT Commanders, LPT SPOCS, Phil Davies, Tricia Rich Consulted Sarah Woods, Paul Evans, Chris Bowen, Sharon Athwal, Performance assessment Corporate comms, Peter Hall, Supplier, ACC Blazeby, PCC 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 16
The BWV project products 2. Processes • For each work package the required processes are identified, agreed and documented using working groups and work shops • Processes are published in the policy database or via IT policy library • eg ITIL processes • Processes provide clear definitions of what, when and who, so that when the project is completed Business as Usual can proceed seamlessly 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 17
Draft Process 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 18
The BWV project products 3. Collaboration & Communication • • • Involve subject matter experts from every area of organisational support and operations Make sure all stakeholders are engaged with regularly, with no surprises Make sure any risks and issues are addressed and managed by the senior stakeholders – • The project manager’s role is to collate and assess issues and risks but not make the decisions Collaboration ensures : – – That all the knowledge is at the disposal of the project That overlaps and resource bottlenecks are surfaced and managed That as far as possible everyone is in the picture, in a way relevant to their role That there is group ownership, not a single hero 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 19
Engagement model IT technical teams Reveal Project review Senior Management Support teams CPS 3/17/2018 Other forces Operational teams Home Office Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 20
Break Back at 11. 40 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 21
Restricted Immigration Enforcement use of Body Worn Video Supt Cleave Faulkner National Operations and Assurance September 2013
Why we are looking to use BWV • To increase number of successful illegal working Civil penalties and out of court settlements in favour of the Home Office • Reduce bureaucracy • Obtain better evidence to prosecute persistent offenders who continue to employ illegal workers
Other benefits for I E • Improve collating post critical incident data. • Reduce clearly unfounded/malicious complaints. • To capture evidence on contentious family visits • Improve officer safety. • Reassure the public. • Verify training/development needs by reviewing operational footage.
Plans for use of BWV We plan to issue BWV devices to Immigration Officers conducting enforcement visits. Officers will record entry to premises and interviews with those encountered. Evidence captured of illegal working will be made available to the team who pursue civil penalty action
Transcription Officers currently make verbatim notes of interviews With offenders and others encountered on the visit in Their personal notebook. They will no longer need to do this if the BWV Contextualizes what was actually seen and said. Officers will only need to produce a summary of the Interview and just exhibit the video in their statement
Pilot We will pilot the use of BWV with two Immigration Enforcement teams based in Manchester and Cardiff. A draft process will be amended in light of the result and findings of the pilot. Findings to support a national roll out to all Immigration Enforcement teams. WE NEED TO PROVE THE CASE AND DEMONSTRATE TANGIBLE BENEFITS
Business Benefits To reduce by 50% the time taken to complete illegal working interviews. 2012 saw over 14, 500 operations Increase the number of illegal working detections Income generate to self sustain the deployment of Body Worn Video
Training on the use of BWV will be delivered to officers on group team basis with a full hands on approach We envisage holding a 2 hour training session with officers at the various Immigration Compliance Engagement (ICE) team locations.
Challenges Convincing staff to revise current practice in light of benefit and use of BWV - CULTURE Dealing with noise contamination Consistent national approach in evidence gathering
Work completed so far • Terms of reference and project mandate complete and agreed by senior managers • Policy and legal advice sought • Workshops with operational staff, service providers and stakeholders held • Initial guidance and process drafted
BWV Any Questions ?
Lunch Back at 13. 10 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 33
West Midlands Police Serving our communities, protecting them from harm Body Worn Video Camera Experiment Rialto P. D. California T/Insp 3908 Darren Henstock Serving our communities, protecting them from harm
The problem Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • The public’s perception of police use of force continues to be a problem. • “Too many” incidents in which officers resort to use of force. • Misinterpretation of contact or aggressive behaviour? • “High number” of citizen complaints against police officers. • True officer misbehaviour or malicious complaints?
The Challenges Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • Reducing use of force and complaints without changing the frequency and nature of contact with the public • Requires third-party systematic observation that would scientifically measure both the implementation and the outcome of the practice • Cost effectiveness • Leadership – can we implement this research
Cameras in Police Use Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • 61% of police departments used video cameras in patrol cars in 2007. (U. S. Department of Justice 2010) • Cameras are likely to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Improve accountability Reduce complaints of police misconduct Save thousands of dollars in court costs Lower overtime costs for investigations and court appearances Improve ability to collect evidence for trial Increase professionalism by forcing officers to give more attention to following agency rules. (International Association of Police Chiefs, 2004)
Evidence on Cameras Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • Systematic review on CCTV – 44 studies show 16% reduction in crime compared to control conditions, but half accountable to car theft, not violent crime (Welsh and Farrington 2009). • Systematic review on cameras on roads – 35 studies show 44% reduction in fatal accidents (Wilson et al. 2010). • BWV – no formal evaluation.
Research Questions Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • Will wearing body-worn video cameras reduce the number of complaints against officers compared to the control group? • Will wearing body-worn video cameras reduce the number (instances) of use of force compared to the control group?
Research Design Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • Random assignment of all front-line officers to shifts with or without cameras • Taser Inc. HD cameras recording all police-public interactions for 12 months. • Went live 13 th February 2012 after two weeks of Phase 1.
Results - complaints Serving our communities, protecting them from harm
Results – Use of force Serving our communities, protecting them from harm
Summary Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • Reduction in use of force incidents from 61 to 25. • Of the 25 use of force incidents, 17 were in control group and 8 in the experiment. • Of the 8 use of force incidents on the experiment days, all 8 were recorded on video • Reduction in complaints from 24 to 3. • Contacts increased from the previous years – no backfiring effect. • Survey of all officers before and during RCT shows no significant changes in officers’ self-legitimacy
Further work Serving our communities, protecting them from harm • Randomised Control Trial in the West Midlands supported by Cambridge University in order to replicate Rialto project. • Full Rialto presentation and wider implications can be found at: http: //www. crim. cam. ac. uk/events/conferences/ebp/2013/slides/effects_of_body_worn_ tony_farrar. pptx
POLICE BODY WORN CAMERA: DISCLOSURE AND IDENTIFICATION ISSUES
DISCLOSURE ISSUES
REASONABLE LINES OF ENQUIRY • In conducting an investigation, the investigator should pursue all reasonable lines of inquiry, whether these point towards or away from the suspect- Code of Practice CPIA paragraph 3. 5 • Reasonable enquiries might involve a trawl for bodyworn camera evidence (akin to CCTV trawl or ANPR trawl etc)
RETENTION • It is important that bodyworn camera evidence is preserved for a reasonable period of time on the basis that it might become relevant material in any criminal investigation • Criminal investigation in respect of which the officer with bodyworn camera is in attendance or another investigation
ABUSE OF PROCESS • The criminal proceedings might be stayed for abuse of process if relevant bodyworn camera evidence is destroyed • The burden of proof is on the defence to prove that a fair trial is not possible • In any event, opportunities to bolster the prosecution case will be lost
RELEVANT MATERIAL • Once bodyworn camera footage is identified as relevant to an investigation, it must be retained by the investigator (Code of Practice CPIA paragraph 5. 1) • Retention for the time periods in paragraphs 5. 7 - 5. 10: NFA decision/ acquittal or 6 months after conviction or on the defendant’s release from custody (if later than 6 months after conviction ) • All relevant footage must be scheduled on MG 6 C
EVIDENTIAL FOOTAGE • Page 16 National File Standard (part of Director’s Guidance on Charging) • Copies of the footage must accompany the prosecution file and be served as Initial Details of the Prosecution Case (IDPC) i. e. first appearance • Nothing is more likely to trigger an admission and a guilty plea than the inclusion of this • Any footage that establishes the offence should be shown to the suspect in an interview
IDENTIFICATION ISSUES
PITFALLS • Where identification is in issue (or might be in issue) in the criminal prosecution, extreme care must be taken where it is intended to show the footage to witnesses
NO KNOWN SUSPECT (1) • The bodyworn camera footage is akin to CCTV. There will be occasions where it is appropriate to show the footage to persons (usually police officers) for the purposes of recognition • This must be done in accordance with PACE Code D 3. 34 - 3. 37
NO KNOWN SUSPECT (2) • D 3. 34 - 3. 37: persons must view the footage individually; no collusion; no names should be suggested; a contemporaneous record should be made of the viewing on which the court can gauge the reliability of the recognition • Wherever possible, avoid showing the footage to eye witnesses: the weight to be attached to any subsequent positive identification at parade will be reduced
KNOWN SUSPECT • The footage can be shown to persons who are not non-eye witnesses for the purposes of recognition even where there is a known suspect (i. e. at stage where there is sufficient evidence to arrest a suspect). Viewing procedure must comply with D 3. 34 - 3. 37 • At known suspect stage, the footage must not be shown to eye witnesses
ANY QUESTIONS
Future of BWV as primary evidence Superintendent Peter Hall – Staffordshire Police 3/17/2018 Body worn video - Steering Gp Sept 2013 59
Thanks for listening 10 th September 2013
Скачать презентацию Welcome 10 th September 2013 Attendees New
57b42d2eb0b38ccb9f2ec62a7edeb970.ppt