Скачать презентацию Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc Company Valuation Sixuan Chen Advanced Скачать презентацию Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc Company Valuation Sixuan Chen Advanced

59ddcbb3cb2bcb0e0f4ca09afebf383c.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 24

Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company Valuation Sixuan Chen Advanced Corporate Finance Prof. Satya Gabriel April. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company Valuation Sixuan Chen Advanced Corporate Finance Prof. Satya Gabriel April. 11, 2006

Presentation Overview n n n Industry profile Current situation: company profile Forward looking: strategic Presentation Overview n n n Industry profile Current situation: company profile Forward looking: strategic plans Business environment: customers and competitors Financial performance Valuation (assumptions, merger analysis)

Industry Profile n n Global sales: $300 billion annually U. S. - largest market Industry Profile n n Global sales: $300 billion annually U. S. - largest market share, followed by Europe and Japan Brand drugs: customer loyalty, exclusive rights Generic drugs: bioequivalents, costefficient

Company Profile n n n Development, manufacture, marketing, sale and distribution of brand generic Company Profile n n n Development, manufacture, marketing, sale and distribution of brand generic drugs Fourth largest generic drugmaker by market cap (after Teva, Barr and Mylan) Key statistics: n n n Total revenue in 2005: $1. 6 billion Total assets 1: $3. 1 billion Market cap 2 : $3. 2 billion Footnote: 1: as of 12/31/2005 2: as of 4/3/2006

Generic vs. Brand segment n n 76% of total revenue More than 125 generic Generic vs. Brand segment n n 76% of total revenue More than 125 generic products 47 ANDAs on file Development in 2005: six new launches n n n 24% of total revenue More than 20 brand products Two sales groups: n n Specialty Products Nephrology

Branded Product Pipeline Branded Product Disease Market Alliance Status Silodosin. TM Benign-Prostatic Hyperplasia Kissei Branded Product Pipeline Branded Product Disease Market Alliance Status Silodosin. TM Benign-Prostatic Hyperplasia Kissei 2 nd Generation Oxybutynin Overactive Bladder Early Stage Trelstar® line extension Urology Early Stage Intrinsa. TM Female Sexual Dysfunction P&G Filed Em. Sam. TM Depression Somerset. BMS Approved Late Stage

Strategic Alliances and Collaborations n n n Somerset Pharmaceuticals, 50 -50 JV with Mylan Strategic Alliances and Collaborations n n n Somerset Pharmaceuticals, 50 -50 JV with Mylan (agreement w/ BMS) Feb. 2006, FDA approval for Emsam® Generics development alliance with Cipla n Citalopram (Q 4, 2004)

R&D Capacity n n R&D expense in 2005: $125. 3 million (7. 6% of R&D Capacity n n R&D expense in 2005: $125. 3 million (7. 6% of revenue) R&D facilities: n n n Corona, California Danbury, Connecticut Copiague, New York Salt Lake City, Utah Malmo, Sweden Changzhou, China

Strategic Plans Generic: n n Development of generic drugs that are difficult to formulate Strategic Plans Generic: n n Development of generic drugs that are difficult to formulate Market generic alternatives to brand products Distribute generic versions of third-party brands “Watson Lab”, “Watson Pharma”, “Rugby” Brand: n n n 2005 launches: Trelstar® and Oxytrol® Higher profit margin Continue to expand through n n Internal product development Strategic alliances and acquisitions

Business Environment n n High entry-barrier Customers: drug wholesalers, retailers, distributors Consolidation in distribution Business Environment n n High entry-barrier Customers: drug wholesalers, retailers, distributors Consolidation in distribution network Pricing pressure

Competitive Landscape n Brand products: n n n J&J, Novartis, Pfizer No competitive advantage Competitive Landscape n Brand products: n n n J&J, Novartis, Pfizer No competitive advantage Generic products n n Teva, Barr, Mylan, brand name companies in the generic market Key: timing of product’s regulatory approval and launch

Financial Performance n n Revenue growth 5 -year CAGR: 9. 13% In 2005, total Financial Performance n n Revenue growth 5 -year CAGR: 9. 13% In 2005, total revenue growth 0. 34% n Generics: -2. 51% n n n Brand: 4. 37% n n n Price declines on nicotine gum due to entry of a competitor Increase in R&D expenses Specialty - Trelstar® Nephrology - Ferrlecit® Impairment charge: $25. 1 million (2005)

Stock Performance Source: Datastream, Yahoo!-Finance Stock Performance Source: Datastream, Yahoo!-Finance

1 -year Stock Performance WPI vs. Industry 1 -year Stock Performance WPI vs. S&P 1 -year Stock Performance WPI vs. Industry 1 -year Stock Performance WPI vs. S&P 500 Source: Datastream, Yahoo!-Finance

Valuation – DCF n Key assumptions: n Operations: n Organic revenue growth n Gross/operating Valuation – DCF n Key assumptions: n Operations: n Organic revenue growth n Gross/operating margin n n Cap. Ex, Depreciation Working capital

Valuation – DCF (cont’d) n CAPM model: n n n n Risk free rate: Valuation – DCF (cont’d) n CAPM model: n n n n Risk free rate: 4. 86% Market risk premium: 6. 00% Beta: 1. 55 Default spread: 2. 00% (Bond rating: BBB-) Debt ratio: 15. 47% Tax rate: 37% WACC = 12. 65%

Valuation – DCF Result n n n 5 -year top-line growth: 6% Continued growth: Valuation – DCF Result n n n 5 -year top-line growth: 6% Continued growth: 5% Price per share: $30. 45 Current share price 1: $29. 01 Consensus estimates: n n Valueline 3 -5 year price range: $45 -$65 Thompson 12 -month target price: $32 1: Share price as of April 3, 2006

Valuation – DCF Sensitivity Analysis Continued growth rate 5 -year top-line growth Management 9. Valuation – DCF Sensitivity Analysis Continued growth rate 5 -year top-line growth Management 9. 25% prediction Valueline 6. 00% estimate Worst-case 4. 00% estimate 6% 5% 4% $34. 91 $31. 16 $28. 27 $34. 02 $30. 45 $27. 70 $33. 37 $29. 91 $27. 26

Valuation – DCF Sensitivity Analysis (cont’d) Continued growth rate WACC 6% 5% 4% 10% Valuation – DCF Sensitivity Analysis (cont’d) Continued growth rate WACC 6% 5% 4% 10% $59. 12 $48. 62 $41. 61 11% $46. 97 $40. 21 $35. 39 12% $38. 88 $34. 22 $30. 73

Valuation – Comps n n Brand: Pfizer, J&J, Glaxosmithkline, Novartis, Bayer Generic: Teva, Barr, Valuation – Comps n n Brand: Pfizer, J&J, Glaxosmithkline, Novartis, Bayer Generic: Teva, Barr, Mylan, King, Alpharma, Par Forward P/E 1: $27. 21 Forward Price/Sales 1: $44. 14 1: For both P/E and Price/Sales used Generic Median; Sales and EPS estimates from Thompson One

Potential Merger Analysis n n WPI agreed to acquire Andrx for $1. 9 billion Potential Merger Analysis n n WPI agreed to acquire Andrx for $1. 9 billion in cash ($25 per share, 32% premium) Andrx – Drug delivery n n n Total revenue in 2005: $1 billion Total assets: $1. 2 billion Total market cap: $1. 7 billion Current P/E: 27. 9 x Drug distribution (65%), manufacture (35%)

Potential Merger Analysis (cont’d) n Merger positives n n Third-largest generic drug maker, 60 Potential Merger Analysis (cont’d) n Merger positives n n Third-largest generic drug maker, 60 generic drugs in pipeline Synergies in SG&A Distribution network Merger negatives n n n Potential opposition Creditwatch by S&P Andrx production halted by FDA

SUMMARY n n n DCF valuation range: $27 -35 Potential upside Merger impact Industry SUMMARY n n n DCF valuation range: $27 -35 Potential upside Merger impact Industry prospect: aging population Recommendation: cautious buy at low

THANK YOU! Questions? THANK YOU! Questions?