Скачать презентацию Условия и продукты мантийного магматизма Илья Векслер лекция Скачать презентацию Условия и продукты мантийного магматизма Илья Векслер лекция

Условия и продукты мантийногомагматизма.pptx

  • Количество слайдов: 59

Условия и продукты мантийного магматизма Илья Векслер лекция в ПГНИУ, 8 октября 2013 Условия и продукты мантийного магматизма Илья Векслер лекция в ПГНИУ, 8 октября 2013

Core and mantle Core and mantle

The Earth’s mantle Upper mantle to 410 km (olivine → spinel) u Low Velocity The Earth’s mantle Upper mantle to 410 km (olivine → spinel) u Low Velocity Layer 60 -220 km Transition Zone as velocity increases ~ rapidly u 660 km (spinel → perovskite-type) Si. IV → Si. VI Lower Mantle has more gradual velocity increase

The Earth’s core Fe-Ni metallic alloy Outer Core is liquid u No S-waves Inner The Earth’s core Fe-Ni metallic alloy Outer Core is liquid u No S-waves Inner Core is solid

Variation in P and S wave velocities with depth. Compositional subdivisions of the Earth Variation in P and S wave velocities with depth. Compositional subdivisions of the Earth are on the left, rheological subdivisions on the right. After Kearey & Vine (1990).

Where does the heat come from? Where does the heat come from?

Sources of internal heat v Residual heat from accretion ~ 65% v Heat from Sources of internal heat v Residual heat from accretion ~ 65% v Heat from radioactive decay ~ 35% v Tidal heat - not important In the centre of the Earth T can be up to 6000 °C

The main heat-producing isotopes 44. 3% 39. 4% 14. 6% 1. 7% 40 K The main heat-producing isotopes 44. 3% 39. 4% 14. 6% 1. 7% 40 K 232 Th 238 U 235 U 3 b. y. ago heat production was 2 times greater

Mechanisms of heat transfer v Radiation v Conduction v Convection Mechanisms of heat transfer v Radiation v Conduction v Convection

The geothermal gradient Diagrammatic cross-section through the upper 200 -300 km of the Earth The geothermal gradient Diagrammatic cross-section through the upper 200 -300 km of the Earth

The geothermal gradient Estimate of the geothermal gradient to the center of the Earth The geothermal gradient Estimate of the geothermal gradient to the center of the Earth (after Stacey, 1992).

Heat flow The mean heat flux from the interior of the Earth is 87 Heat flow The mean heat flux from the interior of the Earth is 87 m. Wm− 2, for a global heat loss of 4. 42 × 1013 W Global heat flux variations (Pollack et al. , 1993) Cross-section of the mantle based on a seismic tomography model. (Li & Romanowicz, 1996).

Thermal structure in a 3 D spherical mantle convection model (red is hot, blue Thermal structure in a 3 D spherical mantle convection model (red is hot, blue is cold). J. H. Davies and H. -Peter Bunge http: //www. ocean. cf. ac. uk/people/huw/AGU 99/mantlecirc. html

The pressure gradient v. P increases = rgh v. Nearly linear through mantle ~ The pressure gradient v. P increases = rgh v. Nearly linear through mantle ~ 0. 03 GPa/km v. Core: r increases more rapidly since alloy more dense Dziewonski & Anderson (1981)

Bulk Earth’s mantle Al Ca S Ni 1. 41 2. 9 1. 8 1. Bulk Earth’s mantle Al Ca S Ni 1. 41 2. 9 1. 8 1. 54 Fe 5. 8 O 30. 1 Fe 32. 1 Mg 13. 9 Si 15. 1 Mg 22. 8 Al Ca 2. 2 2. 3 Si 21. 5 O 44. 8

Upper mantle (“Pyrolite”) composition (wt. %) Ringwood (1975) Si. O 2 Mg. O Fe. Upper mantle (“Pyrolite”) composition (wt. %) Ringwood (1975) Si. O 2 Mg. O Fe. O Al 2 O 3 Ca. O Na 2 O K 2 O Sum 45. 0 37. 8 8. 05 4. 45 3. 55 0. 36 0. 03 99. 24 Mineral assemblage Olivine Orthopyroxene Clinopyroxene Garnet 57. 9 13. 5 16. 3 12. 3

Products of mantle melting After Kushiro (2001). Products of mantle melting After Kushiro (2001).

Spider diagram for oceanic basalts increasing incompatibility Spider diagram for oceanic basalts increasing incompatibility

Nd and Sr isotopes of ocean basalts From Wilson (1989). Igneous Petrogenesis. Nd and Sr isotopes of ocean basalts From Wilson (1989). Igneous Petrogenesis.

Phase diagram for 4 -phase lherzolite Phase diagram for 4 -phase lherzolite

How does the mantle melt ? 1) Increase the temperature How does the mantle melt ? 1) Increase the temperature

2) Lower the pressure – Adiabatic rise of mantle with no conductive heat loss 2) Lower the pressure – Adiabatic rise of mantle with no conductive heat loss – Decompression partial melting could melt at least 30%

3) Add volatiles (especially H 2 O) 3) Add volatiles (especially H 2 O)

Magmatism at divergent margins Magmatism at divergent margins

Mid-ocean ridges Mid-ocean ridges

Deep sea drilling Deep sea drilling

Oceanic Crust and Upper Mantle Structure Typical Ophiolite Figure 13. 4. Lithology and thickness Oceanic Crust and Upper Mantle Structure Typical Ophiolite Figure 13. 4. Lithology and thickness of a typical ophiolite sequence, based on the Samial Ophiolite in Oman. After Boudier and Nicolas (1985) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. , 76, 84 -92.

Mantle melting model After Langmuir et al. (1992) Mantle melting model After Langmuir et al. (1992)

A modern concept of the axial magma chamber beneath a fastspreading ridge After Perfit A modern concept of the axial magma chamber beneath a fastspreading ridge After Perfit et al. (1994)

Model for magma chamber beneath a slow-spreading ridge, such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge v Model for magma chamber beneath a slow-spreading ridge, such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge v Dike-like mush zone and a smaller transition zone beneath well-developed rift valley v Most of body well below the liquidus temperature, so convection and mixing is far less likely than at fast ridges Depth (km) 2 After Sinton and Detrick (1992) Rift Valley 4 6 Moho Transition zone Gabbro Mush 8 10 5 0 Distance (km) 5 10

Global MORB production: 14 kg/y ~10 Global MORB production: 14 kg/y ~10

Magmatism at convergent margins Magmatism at convergent margins

Subduction zones Subduction zones

Typical thermal model for a subduction zone Temperature will be higher if a) Convergence Typical thermal model for a subduction zone Temperature will be higher if a) Convergence rate is slower b) Subducted slab is young and near the ridge (warmer) c) Arc is young (< 50 -100 Ma)

The principal source components of IA magmas 1. Crustal portion of the subducted slab The principal source components of IA magmas 1. Crustal portion of the subducted slab 2. Mantle wedge between slab and arc crust 3. Arc crust 4. Lithospheric mantle of subducting plate 5. Asthenosphere beneath slab

Island arc petrogenesis Island arc petrogenesis

Volcanic Rocks of Island Arcs • Complex tectonic situation and broad spectrum of volcanic Volcanic Rocks of Island Arcs • Complex tectonic situation and broad spectrum of volcanic products • High proportion of basaltic andesite – Most andesites occur in subduction zone settings Basalts are still very common and important!

Continental arc magmatism Continental arc magmatism

Continental Arc Magmatism Continental Arc Magmatism

Intraplate magmatism Intraplate magmatism

Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs)

Model of the plate movement Model of the plate movement

Ocean islands and seamounts Hotspots and trails from Crough (1983) with selected more recent Ocean islands and seamounts Hotspots and trails from Crough (1983) with selected more recent hotspots from Anderson and Schramm (2005). Also shown are the geoid anomaly contours of Crough and Jurdy (1980, in meters).

Flood basalt provinces of Gondwanaland prior to break-up and separation. After Cox (1978). Flood basalt provinces of Gondwanaland prior to break-up and separation. After Cox (1978).

Relationship of the Etendeka and Paraná large igneous provinces to the Tristan hot spot. Relationship of the Etendeka and Paraná large igneous provinces to the Tristan hot spot. After Wilson (1989).

Etendeka: basalts and rhyolites Etendeka: basalts and rhyolites

Etendeka: dyke swarms Etendeka: dyke swarms

Etendeka: granitic intrusions Etendeka: granitic intrusions

Tristan da Cunha Tristan da Cunha

Tristan da Cunha Tristan da Cunha

Various mantle convection models After Tackley (2000) Various mantle convection models After Tackley (2000)

A schematic crosssection through the Earth showing the three types of proposed by Courtillot A schematic crosssection through the Earth showing the three types of proposed by Courtillot et al. (2003). (1) “Primary” plumes, rising from the D" layer at the coremantle boundary (2) “Superplumes” are broader and less concentrated, and stall at the 660 -km transition zone where the spawn a series of “secondary” plumes. (3) “Tertiary” hotspots have a superficial origin.

Summary (I) Melting at convergent plate margins (mid-ocean ridges) Ø Mechanism: decompression Ø Degree Summary (I) Melting at convergent plate margins (mid-ocean ridges) Ø Mechanism: decompression Ø Degree of melting: high Ø Source: depleted upper mantle Ø Products: olivne tholeiitic basalts, narrow range of compositions

Summary (II) Melting at divergent plate margins (subduction zones) Ø Mechanism: wet melting Ø Summary (II) Melting at divergent plate margins (subduction zones) Ø Mechanism: wet melting Ø Degree of melting: high Ø Source: crust and mantle wedge Ø Products: boninites, tholeiitic basalts, andesites, rhyolites

Summary (III) Intraplate melting (continental rifts, ocean islands, LIPs) Ø Mechanism: rising plumes from Summary (III) Intraplate melting (continental rifts, ocean islands, LIPs) Ø Mechanism: rising plumes from deep mantle Ø Degree of melting: variable, often low Ø Source: lower mantle, upper mantle, crust Ø Products: alkaline and tholeiitic basalts, rhyolites, foidites, kimberlites, carbonatites, etc.