University of Washington Capital Planning & Development Public Body Recertification for GC/CM and Design-Build July 28, 2016
Presenters § § Steve Tatge - Executive Director, Major Capital Projects John Palewicz - Project Director, Major Capital Projects, DBIA Alan Nygaard - Director, Business Services James Evans - Assistant Director, Business Equity Slide 2
Capital Planning & Development Slide 3
Major Capital Projects Slide 4
Alternate Public Works Projects Last 3 Years GC/CM Odegaard Undergraduate Learning Center Completed May-13 $17 M Housing - Phase 1 [Cedar, Elm, Poplar, & Alder Halls] Completed June-13 $148 M Housing - Mercer Hall Replacement Completed August-13 $118 M Housing - Lander Hall Replacement Completed November-13 $77 M UW Bothell Phase 3 Completed March-14 $68 M Health Sciences Roofing Completed September-14 $8 M Housing - Maple and Terry Halls Completed June-15 $133 M Montlake Triangle Completed June-15 $25 M UW Bothell SAC Completed July-15 $19 M UW Police Department Facility Completed June-16 $20 M Denny Hall Renovation Underway August-16 $53 M Nano Engineering Research Building Underway April-17 $53 M Animal Research and Care Facility Underway April-17 $124 M Fluke Hall Underway April-17 $38 M UWMC Expansion Ph 2 - Montlake Tower Underway June-17 $186 M UW Tacoma Urban Solutions Center Underway August-17 $20 M New Burke Museum Underway April-18 $79 M Life Sciences Building Underway June-18 $161 M North Campus Student Housing Underway July-18 $240 M Computer Science and Engineering Phase 2 Underway January-19 $105 M SUBTOTAL GC/CM PROJECTS $1. 691 B DB Husky Ball Park Completed March-14 $20 M UW Tacoma University YMCA Student Center Completed January-15 $20 M UW Tacoma Tioga and Mc. Donald Smith Renovation Completed September-15 $5 M West Campus Utiltiy Plant Underway February-17 $31 M SUBTOTAL DB PROJECTS TOTAL PROJECTS $75 M $1. 766 B Slide 5
UW as a leader in Design and Construction § Public Agency Roundtable § Capital Projects Advisory Review Board [CPARB] § CPARB Sub Committees § Project Review Committee [PRC] § Training & Education § Capital Cost Initiative Slide 6
Industry and Professional Committees § Architects, Engineers & Agencies Committee, Department of Enterprise Services § Associated General Contractors, Facilities Committee § American Institute of Architects § Construction Owners Association of America § Design-Build Institute of America § Dispute Review Board Foundation § Construction Management Association of America § Northwest Construction Consumer Council Slide 7
Business Equity Goal: Leadership in Business Equity § Lead/Define the discussion § Identify universe of minority and women-owned firms § Enlist support of Board of Regents § Proactively track and report all utilization § More stringent and discriminating evaluation of bidders/proposers Slide 8
Past and Present Business Equity Utilization § CPD had consistent utilization rate of less than 1% among OMWBE- certified businesses. § UW Board of Regents proactively embraced outreach to all small, minority and womenowned businesses. § CPD increased utilization to 6% on projects currently in progress. OMWBE Certified Primes Only OMWBE Certified Primes and Subs Certified and Non. Certified Primes and Subs Slide 9
Panel Questions Question #1 § The Project Delivery Strategy matrix is a helpful tool. The matrix notes challenges with current RCW restrictions for DB and GC/CM. As one of the more experienced owners using these processes, does UW have any suggestions for revising any of the RCW 39. 10 requirements to make the delivery method more suitable? Slide 10
Response to Question #1 Potential revisions to RCW 39. 10 § Ability to engage more subcontractors earlier § Allow “Design-Build” within certain bid packages – either RCW 39. 10 or RCW 39. 04. 290 § Have the same lower limits for DB as for GC/CM Slide 11
Panel Questions #2 § Please provide more information on the University’s “management plan” (as noted in RCW 39. 10. 270) for alternative delivery projects following selection of the project delivery method. Slide 12
Response to Question #2 Project Governance Slide 13
Panel Questions #3 § Does the University rely on outside contracted resources for the delivery of its capital program? If so how does this reconcile with the RCW 39. 10 requirement for “personnel with appropriate construction experience. ” Slide 14
Response to Question #3 § In-house components of our organization are all experienced with GC/CM and DB Project Managers Construction Managers Planning Project Controls Sustainability Accounting Environmental Contracts Safety Business Equity § Contracted staff to handle special needs or work load peaks § Deep organizational resources support outside consultants Slide 15
Panel Questions #4 I don’t have any other than a suggestion to address lessons learned or significant issues that arose during past projects. Slide 16
Response to #4 Lessons Learned Discussion § Use of EC/CM and MC/CM § Audit § Integrated Project Team § Progressive Design-Build Slide 17
Thank You! Questions? Slide
Скачать презентацию University of Washington Capital Planning Development Public
34001360c2a51590b7c4acdebca20ff1.ppt