Скачать презентацию Universidad de Chile Department of Mechanical Engineering Laminar Скачать презентацию Universidad de Chile Department of Mechanical Engineering Laminar

d40901b313ecf41e129119b84eb2987b.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 46

Universidad de Chile Department of Mechanical Engineering Laminar unsteady flow and heat transfer in Universidad de Chile Department of Mechanical Engineering Laminar unsteady flow and heat transfer in confined channel flow past square bars arranged side by side Professor Alvaro Valencia University of Notre Dame Tuesday, December 4, 2001

Motivation n n Laminar flow in a channel low heat transfer Heat transfer Enhancement Motivation n n Laminar flow in a channel low heat transfer Heat transfer Enhancement in channels: Q=Ah T h with fluid mixing transverse vortex generators Streaklines around a square bar for Re=250, and Re=1000 Davis, (1984)

Turbulent flow near a wall, Re=22000, experimental results, Bosch ( 1995) Numerical results, k- Turbulent flow near a wall, Re=22000, experimental results, Bosch ( 1995) Numerical results, k- turbulence model

Anti-phase and in-phase vortex shedding around cylinders Williamson, (1985) Re=200 G/d=2. 4 Anti-phase and in-phase vortex shedding around cylinders Williamson, (1985) Re=200 G/d=2. 4

Wake interference of a row of normal flat plates arranged side by side in Wake interference of a row of normal flat plates arranged side by side in a uniform flow, Hayashi, (1986) a) G/Hc=0, 5 Rec=59 b) G/Hc=1, 0 Rec=100 c) G/Hc=1, 5 Rec=100 d) G/Hc=2, 0 Rec=100 e)

Numerical simulation of laminar flow around two square bars arranged side by side with Numerical simulation of laminar flow around two square bars arranged side by side with free flow condition. Bosch (1995) Rec=100 G/Hc=0, 2 1 bar behavior

Rec=100 G/Hc=0, 75 Bistable vortex shedding For G/d >1. 5 synchronization of the vortex Rec=100 G/Hc=0, 75 Bistable vortex shedding For G/d >1. 5 synchronization of the vortex shedding in anti-phase or in-phase

Geometry of the computational domain n Re. H=800 (Rec=100) Pr=0, 71 (Air) Transverse bar Geometry of the computational domain n Re. H=800 (Rec=100) Pr=0, 71 (Air) Transverse bar separation distance, G/H or G/Hc

Mathematical formulation y. Continuity y. Navier Stokes equations (momentum) y. Thermal energy The variables Mathematical formulation y. Continuity y. Navier Stokes equations (momentum) y. Thermal energy The variables were non-dimensionalized with Uo, H, and To.

Boundary Conditions n Inlet: n Fully developed parabolic velocity profile n Constant temperature To Boundary Conditions n Inlet: n Fully developed parabolic velocity profile n Constant temperature To Walls: Constant wall temperature Tw=2 To Thermal entrance region

Boundary conditions n Outlet: wake equation to produce little reflection of the unsteady vortices Boundary conditions n Outlet: wake equation to produce little reflection of the unsteady vortices at the exit plane

Numerical solution technique n n n Differential equations were solved with an iterative finitevolume Numerical solution technique n n n Differential equations were solved with an iterative finitevolume method described in Patankar( 1980). The convection terms were approximated using a powerlaw sheme The method uses a staggered grid and handles the pressure -velocity coupling with the SIMPLEC algorithm, van Doormal (1984). A first-order accurate fully implicit method was used for time discretization in connection with a very small time step. 1. 5 Uo t/ x=0. 1 A tipical run of 70. 000 time steps with the 192 x 960 grid points takes about 4 days in a personal computer Pentium III.

Grid selection n n The confined flow around a square bar mounted inside a Grid selection n n The confined flow around a square bar mounted inside a plane channel was chosen for evaluate the numerical method and grid size. A lot of data was found in the literature for the confined laminar flow past a square bar, it was found also a great dispersion of the results. M. Breuer et al presented accurate computations of the laminar flow past a square cylinder based on two different methods, (2000). The present numerical results were compared with their results

Grid size CV on St* bar Cd* 1000 x Cl* Cd* 32 x 160 Grid size CV on St* bar Cd* 1000 x Cl* Cd* 32 x 160 4 0. 000 3. 06 0. 00 8. 26 47. 9 48 x 240 6 0. 118 1. 46 0. 19 0. 13 8. 40 48. 9 64 x 320 8 0. 124 1. 50 5. 82 0. 29 8. 43 50. 7 80 x 400 10 0. 128 1. 48 8. 93 0. 36 8. 45 50. 8 96 x 480 12 0. 131 1. 47 11. 96 0. 43 8. 47 51. 1 112 x 560 14 0. 133 1. 45 14. 58 0. 48 8. 49 51. 3 128 x 640 16 0. 135 1. 44 16. 76 0. 51 8. 50 51. 7 144 x 720 18 0. 137 1. 43 18. 64 0. 54 8. 50 52. 0 160 x 800 20 0. 138 1. 42 20. 17 0. 56 8. 51 52. 4 176 x 880 22 0. 139 1. 41 21. 52 0. 58 8. 51 52. 7 192 x 960 24 0. 139 1. 40 22. 54 0. 60 8. 52 53. 1 208 x 1040 26 0. 140 1. 39 23. 39 0. 61 8. 52 53. 6 Nu 1000 xf *: Strouhal numbers St, Drag coefficient and Lift coefficient are based here on the maximum flow veliocity

Grid size Grid size

Grid size Grid size

Grid size Grid size

Conclusion on grid selection n The grid with 192 x 960 control volumes CV Conclusion on grid selection n The grid with 192 x 960 control volumes CV was chosen because delivery good results with a reasonable calculation time

Cases studied n The computations were made for 11 transverse bar separation distances n Cases studied n The computations were made for 11 transverse bar separation distances n Re=800 n Pr=0. 71 air flow n Hc/H=1/8 bar height n L/H=5 channel length

Flow pattern (11 – 4) Flow pattern (11 – 4)

Flow pattern (3) Flow pattern (3)

Flow pattern (2) Flow pattern (2)

Flow pattern (1) Flow pattern (1)

Instantaneous temperature field Case 1 Instantaneous temperature field Case 1

Instantaneous local skin friction coefficient on the channel walls. Case 1 Cf= / (1/2 Instantaneous local skin friction coefficient on the channel walls. Case 1 Cf= / (1/2 Uo**2) : wall shear stress Inferior wall Superior wall

Local skin friction coefficient on the inferior channel wall. Cases 11 to 6 Local skin friction coefficient on the inferior channel wall. Cases 11 to 6

Local skin friction coefficient on the channel walls. Cases 5 to 1 Superior wall Local skin friction coefficient on the channel walls. Cases 5 to 1 Superior wall Inferior wall

Local Nusselt numbers: Cases 11 to 6 Local Nusselt numbers: Cases 11 to 6

Local Nusselt numbers: Cases 5 to 1 Inferior wall Superior wall Local Nusselt numbers: Cases 5 to 1 Inferior wall Superior wall

Frequency: Case (2) Velocity U, Position: 2 Hc behind the bar Inferior bar Superior Frequency: Case (2) Velocity U, Position: 2 Hc behind the bar Inferior bar Superior bar

Frequency: Case (2) Velocity V, Position: 2 Hc behind the bar Inferior bar Superior Frequency: Case (2) Velocity V, Position: 2 Hc behind the bar Inferior bar Superior bar

Frequency: Case (2) Drag coefficients Inferior bar Superior bar Frequency: Case (2) Drag coefficients Inferior bar Superior bar

Frequency: Case (2) Lift Coefficients Inferior bar Superior bar Frequency: Case (2) Lift Coefficients Inferior bar Superior bar

Strouhal numbers and Frequencies St=fd/Uo Struhal number F=f. H/Uo non dimesional frequency F: frequency Strouhal numbers and Frequencies St=fd/Uo Struhal number F=f. H/Uo non dimesional frequency F: frequency of Velocity V St=F/8

Dominant frequency of the flow frequency modulation in cases: G=0. 0625, 0. 09375, and Dominant frequency of the flow frequency modulation in cases: G=0. 0625, 0. 09375, and 0. 125 H f G/H=0 = 1. 14

Skin friction coefficient on channel wall Cf= / (1/2 Uo**2) : wall shear stress Skin friction coefficient on channel wall Cf= / (1/2 Uo**2) : wall shear stress

Drag coefficients for the lower and superior bar Cd=D/(1/2 Uo**2)d Cd G/H=0 =5 Drag coefficients for the lower and superior bar Cd=D/(1/2 Uo**2)d Cd G/H=0 =5

Lift coefficients: lower bar, superior bar Cl=L/(1/2 Uo**2)d Lift coefficients: lower bar, superior bar Cl=L/(1/2 Uo**2)d

Mean Nusselt number : inferior wall and superior wall Nu=h. H/k q=h T wall Mean Nusselt number : inferior wall and superior wall Nu=h. H/k q=h T wall heat flux nu G/H=0 =11

Apparent friction factor f= PH/(Uo**2)L f G/H=0 = 0. 164 Apparent friction factor f= PH/(Uo**2)L f G/H=0 = 0. 164

Mean Heat Transfer enhancement and Pressure drop increase Nuo and fo for a plane Mean Heat Transfer enhancement and Pressure drop increase Nuo and fo for a plane channel without built-in square bars Nu 0= 7, 68 and f 0= 0, 01496 Nu with 1 square bar=8. 52 f with 1 square bar =0. 053

Conclusions n The effect of two square bars placed side by side in a Conclusions n The effect of two square bars placed side by side in a laminar flow in a plane channel on pressure drop and heat transfer was numerically investigated. n The flow pattern for equal sized square bars in side-by-side arrangements were categorized into three regimes: steady flow, in-phase vortex shedding and bistable vortex shedding.

n In the cases with vortex-shedding synchronization the frequency of the unsteady flow are n In the cases with vortex-shedding synchronization the frequency of the unsteady flow are almost four times that in the cases without synchronization of the periodic unsteady flow.

n The results show that the local and global heat transfer on the channel n The results show that the local and global heat transfer on the channel walls are strongly increased by the unsteady vortex shedding induced by the bars.

References [1] H. Suzuki, Y. Inoue, T. Nishimura, K. Fukutani, k. Suzuki, Unsteady flow References [1] H. Suzuki, Y. Inoue, T. Nishimura, K. Fukutani, k. Suzuki, Unsteady flow in a channel obstructed by a square rod (crisscross motion of vortex). International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 14 (1993) 2 -9. [2] A. K. Saha, K. Muralidhar, G. Biswas, Transition and chaos in two-dimensional flow past a square cylinder, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 126, (2000), 523 -532. [3] M. Breuer, J. Bernsdorf, T. Zeiser, F. Durst, Accurate computations of the laminar flow past a square cylinder based on two different methods: lattice-Boltzmann and finite-volume, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 21, (2000), 186196. [4] J. L Rosales, A. Ortega, J. A. C. Humphrey, A numerical simulation of the convective heat transfer in confined channel flow past square cylinders: comparison of inline and offset tandem pairs, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 44, (2001), 587 -603. [5] K. Tatsutani, R. Devarakonda, J. A. C. Humphrey, Unsteady flow and heat transfer for cylinder pairs in a channel, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 36, (1993), 3311 -3328. [6] A. Valencia, Numerical study of self-sustained oscillatory flows and heat transfer in channels with a tandem of transverse vortex generators, Heat and Mass Transfer, 33, (1998), 465 -470. [7] D. Sumner, S. J. Price, M. P. Païdoussis, Flow-pattern identification for two staggered circular cylinders in cross-flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 411, (2000), 263 -303. [8] C. H. K. Williamson, Evolution of a single wake behind a pair of bluff bodies, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 159, (1985), 118. [9] J. J. Miau, H. B. Wang, J. H. Chou, Flopping phenomenon of flow behind two plates placed side-by-side normal to the flow direction, Fluid Dynamics Research, 17, (1996), 311 -328. [10] M. Hayashi, A. Sakurai, Wake interference of a row of normal flat plates arranged side by side in a uniform flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 164, (1986), 1 -25. [11] S. C. Luo, L. L. Li, D. A. Shah, Aerodynamic stability of the downstream of two tandem square-section cylinders, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 79, (1999), 79 -103. [12] G. Bosch, Experimentelle und theoretische Untersuchung der instationären Strömung um zylindrische Strukturen, Ph. D. Dissertation, Universität Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe, Germany, (1995). [13] S. Patankar, Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere Publishing Co. , New York, (1980). [14] J. P. van Doormaal, G. D. Raithby, Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numerical Heat Transfer, 7, (1984), 147 -163.