Скачать презентацию UMR s Space Capacity to Grow UMR Trustees Скачать презентацию UMR s Space Capacity to Grow UMR Trustees

ada4a315abec87d4b3a2dc8f6d778b4d.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 45

"UMR's Space & Capacity to Grow" UMR Trustees Meeting – April 15, 2004

Enrollment Capacity Total enrollment depends on several factors: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Enrollment Capacity Total enrollment depends on several factors: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Financial resources and revenue from tuition Potential student availability UMR’s ability to attract students Mode of delivery Physical carrying capacity of campus – classrooms, laboratories and residential facilities

Financial Resources • Even with a 10% per year increase in tuition, enrollment Financial Resources • Even with a 10% per year increase in tuition, enrollment must continue to grow by approximately 200 students per year through 2008 for the campus to be financial solvent unless state appropriations grow. • Continued enrollment growth will result in 800 to 1, 000 additional students or 7, 000 students total by 2010

Does UMR Have the Capacity to Properly Serve 7, 000 Students? Does UMR Have the Capacity to Properly Serve 7, 000 Students?

UMR Enrollment Goals 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Freshmen 715 755 815 790 UMR Enrollment Goals 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Freshmen 715 755 815 790 897 825 865 900 Transfer 231 270 261 300 281 350 390 425 Graduate* 395 400 423 407 348 413 419 425 Total Enrollment 4987 5200 5304 5400 5504 5600 5800 6000 RED: Actual Enrollment BLACK: Enrollment Goals Graduate targets include MS, Ph. D, and certificate programs *Does not include final enrollment in off-schedule courses

Needed Goal Changes to Achieve an Enrollment of 7000 • • • Increase Freshman Needed Goal Changes to Achieve an Enrollment of 7000 • • • Increase Freshman Class: Increase Retention Rate: Increase Transfer Class: New Grad Students: Increase the Rolla campus enrollment: • Increase the Distance Education enrollment: 900 to 920 88% to 90% 425 to 450 425 to 350 5500 to 6000 500 to 1000

Achieve Current Enrollment Goals & 4% Increased Retention Rate Achieve Current Enrollment Goals & 4% Increased Retention Rate

UMR ENROLLMENT UMR ENROLLMENT

Impact on Existing Instructional Faculty 14: 1 ratio – has accommodated 517 more students Impact on Existing Instructional Faculty 14: 1 ratio – has accommodated 517 more students since 2001 » Ave. increase per class: 2 students 15: 1 ratio - approx. 260 more students 17: 1 ratio – approx. 1020 more students

UMR RETENTION GOAL UMR RETENTION GOAL

Key Factors • Achieve Overall Growth while Controlling Size and Quality of Engineering Programs Key Factors • Achieve Overall Growth while Controlling Size and Quality of Engineering Programs • Grow Enrollments in Mines and Metallurgy, Arts & Sciences, Management & Information Systems • Expanding Extended Learning Enrollment to 1000 students • Increasing the Number of Female Students • Increasing the Number of Minority Students • Building a Stronger UMR Brand Campus Presence

Capacity for Enrollment Growth • • • Academic Space Assessment Student Housing Capacity Parking Capacity for Enrollment Growth • • • Academic Space Assessment Student Housing Capacity Parking Capacity Student Market Assessment Enhancing the UMR Product / Academic Portfolio

Academic Space Assessment Academic Space Assessment

Relative Classroom Size Net Gain/Loss Relative Classroom Size Net Gain/Loss

Classroom Utilization Comparison 1982, 1995, 2001, 2002, 2003 Classroom Utilization Comparison 1982, 1995, 2001, 2002, 2003

Student Housing Capacity Student Housing Capacity

Student Housing Capacity 2003 -04 2004 -05 2005 -06 Residence Halls: 1270 Greek Houses: Student Housing Capacity 2003 -04 2004 -05 2005 -06 Residence Halls: 1270 Greek Houses: 1100 Apartments & Approved Housing: 1500 1100 1640 1100 150 Total: 2, 750 2, 890 2, 520

Students Living On Campus Students Living On Campus

Parking Capacity Parking Capacity

Stickered Spaces 1939 Metered Spaces 110 Residential (TJ Hall) 349 Total Spaces 2398 Stickered Spaces 1939 Metered Spaces 110 Residential (TJ Hall) 349 Total Spaces 2398

Fac/Staff Permits 878 Student Permits 271 Student Residential Permits 313 Staff Residential Permits Total Fac/Staff Permits 878 Student Permits 271 Student Residential Permits 313 Staff Residential Permits Total Permits 20 1482

Student Market Assessment Student Market Assessment

Changing Student Markets • We must offer the engineering specializations needed and wanted by Changing Student Markets • We must offer the engineering specializations needed and wanted by students. Essential for the future of engineering in America. • The culture of engineering and crossdisciplinary studies in a tech environment is fast in development. This student interest shift can benefit our non-engineering degree programs.

High School Graduates Interested in Engineering Majors High School Graduates Interested in Engineering Majors

Due to Low Market Interest, UMR Embraced a System to Increase Enrollment by Improving Due to Low Market Interest, UMR Embraced a System to Increase Enrollment by Improving the Yield of Admitted Undergraduate Applicants who Enroll, Not by Increasing the # of Applicants FS 2000 FS 2001 FS 2002 FS 2003 4 TH WEEK CENSUS Beginning Freshmen 41. 9% 43. 5% 46. 4% 51. 4% 696 715 897 w/ Admit to Enroll Yield % New Transfers 60. 7% 62. 2% 68. 9% 73. 0% 195 231 261 281 Graduates 43. 0% 32. 7% 28. 1% 25. 5% 348 395 423 348 TOTAL 1, 239 1, 341 1, 499 1526

Growth While Maintaining Academic Quality Growth While Maintaining Academic Quality

Proportion of Engineering Majors at Comparator Institutions Total % UG % Total UG Engineering Proportion of Engineering Majors at Comparator Institutions Total % UG % Total UG Engineering All Majors Students All UG Students UMR 72. 7% 71. 4% 3811 2750 5240 3849 GEORGIA TECH 56. 8% 55. 1% 9355 6308 16481 11456 ILL INST OF TECH 30. 2% 50. 1% 1870 955 6199 1905 MIT 42. 7% 36. 1% 4408 1507 10317 4178 MICHIGAN TECH 54. 6% 54. 9% 3615 3246 6619 5909 RPI 47. 2% 50. 4% 3621 2590 7670 5136 TEXAS A & M 16. 8% 15. 6% 7569 5725 45083 36775

UMR's Academic Major Distribution by Headcount: Fall 2003 UMR's Academic Major Distribution by Headcount: Fall 2003

Number of Majors by School/College 2003 -04 • 3950 • 1060 • 235 Engineering Number of Majors by School/College 2003 -04 • 3950 • 1060 • 235 Engineering Programs Arts & Sciences Management & Info Systems * FS 2003 Enrollment included 260 Non Degree Seeking Students

UMR's Ideal Academic Major Distribution by Headcount for 7000: Goal 2013 UMR's Ideal Academic Major Distribution by Headcount for 7000: Goal 2013

Approximate Range of Majors by School/College • 4200 - 4400 Engineering Programs • 1300 Approximate Range of Majors by School/College • 4200 - 4400 Engineering Programs • 1300 - 1500 Arts & Sciences • 1200 - 1400 Management & Info Systems

Proposed New Mission-based Academic Programs ENGINEERING DEGREES • Bio Engineering (BS, MS) • Architectural Proposed New Mission-based Academic Programs ENGINEERING DEGREES • Bio Engineering (BS, MS) • Architectural Engineering (MS) • Interdisciplinary Engineering (BS) COMPLIMENTARY TECH ORIENTED DEGREES • MBA* • Biology (Ph. D) • Technical Communication (BS, MS) • Multidisciplinary Studies (BA) • STEM Teacher Education Programs (BS, MAT*) * Intended as primarily executive style or evening programs

Prospective Student’s Top 10 Non-Engineering Majors 1. Undecided (interested in UMR in general) 2. Prospective Student’s Top 10 Non-Engineering Majors 1. Undecided (interested in UMR in general) 2. Computer Science 3. Biology and Medical Sciences (Pre Med) 4. Business and Information Systems 5. General Sciences: Chemistry, Physics 6. Psychology 7. Mathematics 8. Social Sciences 9. Teacher Education 10. Architecture/Arch. Design

Keys to Planning for 7000 Students • Achieve Retention Goal of 88% - 1 Keys to Planning for 7000 Students • Achieve Retention Goal of 88% - 1 st to 2 nd year • Enhance the New Student Marketing Efforts and Embrace the UMR Branding Strategy • Start department and faculty discussions on strategic course scheduling • Goal of 1000 distance education students is possible: Need enthusiasm for distance learning to continue to grow among faculty • Conduct a thorough parking study • Refine and adjust non-engineering recruitment/marketing programs • Scholarships will be vital to our success

"UMR's Space & Capacity to Grow" UMR Trustees Meeting – April 15, 2004

Student Success & Affluence • Family Income is still the best indicator of academic Student Success & Affluence • Family Income is still the best indicator of academic success and college persistence • Need-Based Aid Is Biggest Influence on Students' Ability to Attend College

Family Income / ACT Achievement Total Family Income N Avg About $0 to $18, Family Income / ACT Achievement Total Family Income N Avg About $0 to $18, 000 87983 17. 9 About $18, 000 to $24, 000 72018 18. 6 About $24, 000 to $30, 000 68584 19. 3 About $30, 000 to $36, 000 68405 19. 9 About $36, 000 to $42, 000 75454 20. 3 About $42, 000 to $50, 000 89232 20. 8 About $50, 000 to $60, 000 103333 21. 3 About $60, 000 to $80, 000 142386 21. 8 About $80, 000 to $100, 000 96504 22. 4 More than $100, 000 114639 23. 4

Missouri Students Family Income Total N Avg About $0 to $18, 000 2847 18. Missouri Students Family Income Total N Avg About $0 to $18, 000 2847 18. 8 About $18, 000 to $24, 000 2513 19. 3 About $24, 000 to $30, 000 2613 20. 0 About $30, 000 to $36, 000 2746 20. 5 About $36, 000 to $42, 000 3089 20. 8 About $42, 000 to $50, 000 3736 21. 3 About $50, 000 to $60, 000 4294 21. 7 About $60, 000 to $80, 000 5819 22. 1 About $80, 000 to $100, 000 3721 22. 6 More than $100, 000 4325 23. 6

Financial Need & Academic Persistence Levels Among Comparator Institutions Pell Recipients 6 year grad Financial Need & Academic Persistence Levels Among Comparator Institutions Pell Recipients 6 year grad rate 2 year retention Unmet Need Washington University 8. 0% 89% 96% 0% Carnegie Mellon 11. 4% 82% 94% 17% Harvey Mudd 11. 5% 79% 95% 0% MIT 12. 4% 91% 98% 0% GA Tech 12. 5% 68% 89% 34% Case Western Reserve 13. 6% 76% 91% 10% Co School of Mines 13. 9% 62% 86% 0% St. Louis University 14. 6% 71% 87% 29% Rose-Hulman 14. 8% 74% 93% 17% Worcester Poly Institute 14. 9% 75% 91% 9% Cal Tech 15. 3% 85% 96% 0% U of ILL - UC 15. 6% 80% 92% 13% ILL Inst of Tech 19. 2% 62% 86% 16% Stevens Inst of Tech 23. 4% 64% 88% 22% UMR 26. 3% 60% 84% 15% Pell Data: 2002 Century Foundation Issue Brief, Retention & Need Data: 2003 US News College Rankings

% of High Need Students (Pell Grant Recipients) Overall Student Persistence Levels Pell Data: % of High Need Students (Pell Grant Recipients) Overall Student Persistence Levels Pell Data: 2002 Century Foundation Issue Brief, Retention & Need Data: 2003 US News College Rankings

Private college graduation rates Public college graduation rates UMR graduation rate UMR receiving Pell Private college graduation rates Public college graduation rates UMR graduation rate UMR receiving Pell Public FTE receiving Pell Private FTE receiving Pell National average data based on NCAA 2001 Division I IPED data