182d84b3cf5c9ed0732368d7fda50f6d.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 35
Towards Automated Detection of Gulf Stream North Wall From Concurrent Satellite Images Avijit Gangopadhyay Jeffrey Rezendes Kevin Lydon Ramprasad Balasubramanian Iren Valova 1
Outline • Feature Oriented Regional Modeling System (FORMS) for the Western North Atlantic • Gulf Stream path – issues • Manual Extraction process • Using SSH and SST • Neural Network Ideas • Back to SSH and SST • Future Pathways 2
Synoptic Ocean Prediction • Ocean Prediction is an Initial value problem • Features define the Initial State • Examples of Features: Fronts, Eddies, Jets, Upwelling, Cold pools • Time-scale of prediction: days-to-weeks
Gulf Stream Front, Eddies, Jets 2/11/02
Features in Western North Atlantic Deep Sea region (GSMR) • • • Gulf Stream Warm Core Rings Cold Core Rings Southern Recirculation Gyre Northern Recirculation Gyre Deep Western Boundary Current • Gangopadhyay et al. , 3 -part series in 1997: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Tech. (14) 1314: 1365 Coastal region (GOMGB) • • Maine Coastal Current NEC Inflow GSC Outflow Jordan Basin Gyre Wilkinson Basin Gyre Georges Bank Gyre Tidal Mixing Front • Gangopadhyay et al. 2003: CSR 23 (3 -4) 317 -353 Gangopadhyay and Robinson, 2002: DAO 36(2002) 201 -232 •
Gulf Stream Front, Eddies, Jets 2/11/02
In general, a coastal current (CC), a front (SSF) and an eddy/gyre (E/G) are represented by: CC: TM(x, η, z) =TMa(x, z)+ αM(x, z) M(η) SSF: Tss(x, y, z) = Tsh (x, z) + (Tsl (x, z) – Tsh(x, z)) ( , z) E/G: T(r, z) = Tc (z) - [Tc (z) - Tk (z) ] {1 -exp(-r/R)} where, TMa(x, z), Tsh (x, z) and Tc (z) are axis, shelf and core (η) = (0 W) ( , z) = ½ + ½ tanh[( -. Z)/ ] This is what is called “Feature Modeling”
Numerical Model Initialization and Forecast Data and Feature Models Brown et al. (2008 a, b), IEEE JOE
Feature Model SST July 30, 2001
FORMS Protocol • Identify Circulation and Water mass features • Regional Synthesis -- Processes from a modeling perspective • Synoptic Data sets -- in-situ and satellite • Regional Climatology (Background Circulation) • Multiscale Objective Analysis (Climatology + Feature Models) • Simulation -- Nowcasting/Forecasting • Assimilation
Gulf Stream path identification -Issues • Historically, we have looked at SST for guidance on the North Wall • Similar SST gradients exist elsewhere • Gulf Stream NW does not have a single isotherm signature on the surface • Clouds • Eddies convolute the path • Large amplitude meandering to the east often segmented 11
Two Approaches • Dynamics – Based (SST, SSH, other derived fields) • Neural Network – Learning from the past observed paths and applying to the detection 12
13
Identifying Features • Sea Surface Temperature (SST) • Sea Surface Height (SSH) • Sea Surface Velocity (SSUV) 14
Sea Surface Temperature 15
Sea Surface Height 16
Sea Surface Velocity 17
Extraction by Manual Operator 18
Extraction by Isoheight contouring Works better than using SST 19
Approach 2 Neural Network Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) • Type of neural network • Classification technique based on animals’ central nervous systems • Feed forward network • Input values passed through one or more hidden layers • Hidden layers connected between input and output buffers • Sigmoid function applied in hidden layers • Connections between nodes in layers are weighted • Supervised learning by backpropagation
Multilayer Perceptron visualized
The network visualized
Results visualized • Blue dots show all points classified by network as part of GSNW • Black line is constructed from average latitude of all blue points for a longitude • Red line is the manual, expert-plotted line
Results visualized cont.
Conclusions • Poor results overall • Lack of variation • Indicates a possible overfitting of the network • Overfitting results when a network fits output too closely to its training data • Too many points • Possibly too low requirements for classifying points as part of GSNW
Future plans for Neural Networks • New approach: clustering • Used successfully in the past for feature detection • GSNW is a feature with distinct attributes • More conducive to visual validation of results • As opposed to automated training of MLP • Could allow for identification of entire Gulf Stream as a feature • Takes context of points into account in a way that MLP does not
Back to Dynamics 27
28
Coming Back to SSHA Validation 0. 35 m isoheoght contour 29
0. 50 m isoheight contour 30
Difference between GSNW and Axis 31
Nowcast -- October 12, 2015 32
Forecast 20 October 2015 33
Future Directions with SSHA • Use the 0. 5 m isoheight contour to identify a near-axis stream path. Explore seasonality. • Use the zero-vorticity line to converge on a finer isoheight contour (closer to the axis). • Use a parametric model (offset-curvature dependence) to extract the North Wall • Validate and verify with concurrent SST and SSC • Develop a mixed isoheight-zero vorticity algorithm for eddies 34
Thank You! 35