Скачать презентацию Theory Of Everything Goh Peng Ooi
03f95c3c6fc1eb0787aea7174a1dec89.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 35
Theory Of Everything? ? ? Goh Peng Ooi Strictly Confidential Page 1
Everything And Life As Long As We Refuse To Include Our Sense, Purpose And Language As Part Of Everything, “Theory Of Everything” Is Not Theory Of Everything The Study Of Our Primitive Senses Is Known As Foundation Of Mathematics (FOM). The Strategy Of Mathematics Is Based Solely On ‘Senses’, And It Turns Out To Be Also The Study Of ‘Senses’, Including ‘Purposes’. Strictly Confidential Page 2
Our Senses : Primitive And Complex The list of top mathematicians who have worked on foundation of mathematics are given below. Their works represent breakthroughs in our understanding of ‘how’ and ‘what’ of our ‘thinking or sensing’ processes. What these works reveal is that our brains are extremely ‘soft’ and are able to ‘choose’ from even ‘softer’ space-time to achieve our ‘purposes’. The two words ‘soft’ and ‘softer’ and an extra word ‘continuity’ provide us with another view of the origin of Life and at least a perspective to the philosophical questions of ‘where I come from’, ‘who am I’, and ‘Where I am going’. On What Basis (Senses) Platonists Intuitionists How To (Mental Actions) Set Theorists Logicists Group Theorists Category Theorists System Formalists Computing TOPOS Strictly Confidential Lead By Kurt Godel (1906– 1978), L. E. J. Brouwer (1882– 1966) Lead By Georg Cantor (1845 – 1918) Gottlob Frege (1848 -1925), Bertrand Russell (1872 -1970), Alfred North Whitehead (1861 - 1947) Galois Evariste (1811 – 1832), Sophus Lie (1842 – 1899) Samuel Eilenberg (1913 -1998), Saunders Mac. Lane (1909 – 2005) Lead By David Hilbert (1862 – 1943) Allan Turing (1912 – 1954) Alexander Grothendieck (1928 –), William Lawvere (1937 - ), Myles Tierney Page 3
Sense, Action And Nature (Natural Sciences) ‘Symmetry is ubiquitous. Symmetry has myriad incarnations in the innumerable patterns designed by nature. It is a key element, often the central or defining theme in art, music, dance, poetry, or architecture. Symmetry permeates all of science, occupying a prominent place in chemistry, biology, physiology, and astronomy. Symmetry pervades the inner world of the structure of matter, the outer world of the cosmos, and the abstract world of mathematics itself. The basic laws of physics, the most fundamental statements we can make about nature, are founded upon symmetry’. Symmetry and The Beautiful Universe, Leon Lederman, 1988 Noble Laureate Mathematical Representation For Symmetry: A. (B. C) = (A. B). C Other conditions like closure, inverse and identity The limit of symmetry is governed by the limit of the above equation and the related conditions. However, the foundation of mathematics is more than the above. Strictly Confidential Page 4
Sense, Action And Purpose: (Economy, Game) It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. Man is an animal that makes bargains: no other animal does this - no dog exchanges bones with another. Adam Smith (1723 -1790) Economics is not about things and tangible material objects; it is about men, their meanings and actions Ludwig Von Mises (1881 -1973) Economy Links Our Sense, Action, Even Our Languages To Our Purpose. However, Words Can Make All These Murky, Causing Serious Personal Or Academic Damages. For Example Interest = Purpose Exchange= Set Of Actions Economy = System Meanings = Sense, Purpose, Etc Theory Of Everything? ? Strictly Confidential Page 5 ? ? ?
Epistemology And Plastic Words Languages are designed for different purposes. Common languages are generally not suitable for Epistemology (Theory Of Everything? ? ? ). Words can sometimes carry the exact inverse intention and approach of Epistemology. ‘ ‘ It can be beautifully expressed to capture the heart of undiscerning listeners, imitators, and even the authors themselves with a cloud of hidden agenda to command power, economic gains and even minds and souls’, as put forward by German writer and linguist Uwe Poerksen (1935 - ) in his book ‘Plastic Words, The Tyranny Of Modular Languages’. ’ ‘Words can easily exploit our age of ‘abstraction’ and ‘over information’ in that the terms sound scientific to take on an aura of authority while cleverly evading investigation knowing that most people are not into knowledge foundation, measurement and executables. Each turns something indefinable into a limitless ideal which triggers a series of needs. These needs then become self-evident and quickly turn into necessities. Entities indulging in plastic words cleverly built up an ingenious system for perfect manipulation, gaining power, prestige, market and selfish benefits. Faithful followers or blind believers, on the other hand, are bewildered because they have no tools or weapons to tear down these clever deceits. ’ All Mission Critical Works Or Discussions Must Be Wary Of Malleability Of Languages And Devise A ‘Strategy’ To Counter Its ‘Softness’. Strictly Confidential Page 6
Language Shapes Our Thoughts On 19 Aug, 2004, New Scientists Magazine reported the work of Peter Gordon, the psychologist at Columbia University on a Brazilian tribe, the Piraha tribe, whose language does not define numbers above two, or the ‘one, two, many’ language. It was discovered that they were unable to reliably tell the difference between objects in a row when the number is as low as four or five. The result provides the strongest support yet for the so called ‘linguistic determinism’, where Ludwig Wittgenstein was one of the originators. Gordon says this is the first convincing evidence that a language lacking words for certain concepts could actually prevent speakers of the language from understanding those concepts. Language shapes our thoughts Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 – 1951) quote, ‘Language is a part of our organism and no less complicated than it’ ………. ‘philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of language. ’ Strictly Confidential Page 7
Sense, Action, Purpose And Words (Niels Bohr) We must be clear that when it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images and establishing mental connections. ‘Discussions About Language’ Niels Bohr (1885 – 1962) Our task is to communicate experience and ideas to others. We must strive continually to extend the scope of our description, but in such a way that our messages do not thereby lose their objective or unambiguous character. . . We are suspended in language in such a way that we cannot say what is up and what is down. The word “reality” is also a word, a word which we must learn to use correctly. ‘Philosophy Of Science’ Niels Bohr There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract physical description. It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics concerns what we can say about nature. . . "The philosophy of Niels Bohr" by Aage Petersen Every sentence I utter must be understood not as an affirmation, but as a question. “A Dictionary Of Scientific Quotation”, Niels Bohr How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress. “Niels Bohr: The Man, His Science, & The World They Changed”, Ruth Moore Strictly Confidential Page 8
Language Is A Game ‘When we talk of language as a symbolism used in an exact calculus, that which is in our mind can be found in the sciences and in mathematics. Our ordinary use of a language conforms to this standard of exactness only in rare cases. Why then do we in philosophizing constantly compare our use of words with one following exact rules? ’ ‘In practice we very rarely use language as such a calculus. For not only do we not think of the rules of usage – of definitions, etc – while using language, but when we are asked to give such rules, in most cases we aren’t able to do so. We are unable clearly to circumscribe the concepts we use; not because we don’t know their real definition, but because there is no real ‘definition’ to them. To suppose that there must be would be like supposing that whenever children play with a ball they play a game according to strict rules. ’ The Blue Book, (Language As A Game), Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 -1951) Strategy Language = A Game Sense Purpose Action Definition of A Game Strictly Confidential Page 9
Everything As A Game Today, "game theory is a sort of umbrella or 'unified field' theory for the rational side of social science, where 'social' is interpreted broadly, to include human as well as non-human players (computers, animals, plants)” Robert J Aumann, 2005 Nobel Laureate (1930 - ) Why Should Natural Science Be A Game? Natural sciences depend heavily on mathematics, including its ‘observation’ which is ‘sense based’. Without understanding our own sense, we do not understand our observations. On the other hand, if we were to trace the history of mathematics, and call ‘the study of knowledge’, or Epistemology a human purpose, then we cannot deny that mathematics is a game, as per our later definition. Natural sciences, with all the formulas and observations, is therefore a game. Strictly Confidential Page 10
A Game Let’s Do Not Be Confused By Our Past Use Of A Word. It Is Just A Word, A Piece Within The Whole Game. A Game Definition of A Game: A Concept Encompasses At Least ALL The Following: Strategy Sense Purpose Action 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. A Set Of Strategy A Set Of Actions A Set Of Choices A Purpose Passage Of Time Set = Collection A Game Is Partly Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely. Adapted From Soren Kierkegaard (1813 – 1855) Mathematics Is Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely. Physics Is Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely. Economy Is Something Originally Given, Partly That Which Develops Freely. Etc Therefore, Theory Of Everything Must At Least Shows What Is Originally Given Strictly Confidential Page 11
Axiomatic Set Theory (Study Of ‘Given’) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. What Is The Meaning Of A Word? Can You Tell Me The Meaning Of ‘Can’? Is The World Finite Or Infinite? How Many Points Are There On A Line? What Is Continuity? What Is Logic? What Is Higher Order Logic? What Is A Class Or A Set? What Is Probability? Why Has Euclidean Geometry Lasted For More Than Two Thousand Years? 10. What Is A Number? 11. What Is A Real Number? 12. What Is ‘Order’ and ‘Tuple’? 13. Does Transfinite Numbers Make Sense? 14. What Is Relation? What Is Function? 15. What Is Arithmetic? 16. What Is Frege’s Logic? 17. What Is Complete? What Is Incomplete? 18. What Is Pure? 19. What Is All? 20. How Can You Prove That A Proof Is Right? 21. What Is Direction? Strictly Confidential 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Primitive words If you sense you can, you can. Finite, infinite, possibly Infinite ? 1א Senses ? A broken cup filled with water? Primitive words with/without and TOPOS A concept, A mathematical game Arithmetizing of game? Because we did not know that the world is round. (The issue of parallel) 10. f, {f}, {f, {f}, {f}}}. . ? Nothing!!! 11. An Ordered 0 and 1? Yi Jing? 12.
Elementary TOPOS (Study Of ‘Given’) Given Choice Symmetry There Could Be Infinite Ways To Study ‘Given’. Greek Started With ‘Logic’, A Symmetry Of 2. That Evolved To Axiomatic Set Theory. The Introduction Of ‘Algebra’ By Islamic World Gave Another View, And That Evolved To ‘Category Theory’ And Higher Symmetry. The Chinese Tried To Attack ‘Symmetry’ And ‘Category’ At The Same Time, Went No Where. Not Surprising Because The Unification Was Finally Done Only In Early 1960, By Alexander Grothendieck. It Is Called A TOPOS, As Shown Above. It Is Just A Concept, Shapes Don’t Count. Strictly Confidential Page 13
History of TOPOS And Its Relationship To Language THEORY C ‘Internal Language’ Internal Language guarantees that all these can be programmed TYPE THEORY TOPOS Sheaf Category Set Topology Group Non Euclidean Geometry Algebra Logic Euclidean Geometry Strictly Confidential Human Language Page 14
Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory The discussions until now allow us to relook at Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory. If we were to read Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory as it is, it will be a tortuous experience. Since so many assumptions were made, all of which relate to either mathematical or scientific foundation. If we were to approach from mathematical or scientific foundation, we found that Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory is a given. It is a paradox. But he was great in that he discovered the paradox. Problems of Nash’s Proof: 1. The topic involves ‘senses’, ‘choices’, ‘arithmetic’, ‘languages’, ‘symmetry’, ‘probability’, etc, all of them foundational topics in science and mathematics. 2. What is the meaning of ‘pure’? What is the meaning of ‘points’? 3. Now that the foundation of science and mathematics is triggered, are the moves in a game more important than the game itself? Especially when we are trying to understand a game. Even if the moves are important, but because a ‘tuple’ is not a ‘set’, should we then just assume that a wrong move is okay? Or should we say, ‘after all’, it is just a game? 4. Now if we further trigger probability, which to me is the arithmetizing of a ‘game’, which is a game by itself, do we explain a game with a game, especially when one game is contained in another. For example, the so called ‘Long Tail Theory’ explains that ‘few can be more’, which is closely related to the fundamental issue of certain transformation from ideal normal distribution to very bias C² distribution. For the success evident in companies like Google, Amazon. com, does the success explain the game? This is just like asking a person ‘how did you make it’. It is always a story. Anyway, we like to listen to stories. Strictly Confidential Page 15
Generalizing Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory It could be easier to prove a generalized Nash Non Cooperative Game Theory, thanks to all the geniuses of our mathematical and scientific community. As Sir Isaac Newton said, ‘If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants. ’ It is important to note that this is by no means ‘ultimate’, it is just a model, a game. I prefer the word game because it is ‘active’. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Strictly Confidential Let’s assume that other than our sense and purpose, all things were symmetrical. Let the physicists prove this assumption. Symmetry can be both virtual and real. The virtual symmetry is represented by anything that can be expressed as associative axiom, inclusive of Topology, Group Theory, Category Theory, Axiomatic Set Theory, etc. (Let the mathematicians and scientists explain this assumption. ) Let’s assert that nobody is perfect, therefore all non perfect cooperation are non cooperative. It is a matter of degree. In other words, Nash Non Cooperative Games could possibly be generalized. Let’s define ‘Rational’ being mathematically valid, irrespective of whether the ‘thinking person’ is aware or not aware of that status. As Niels Bohr said, ‘you are not thinking, you are just being logical’. Borrowing Niels Bohr’s ‘floating thought framework’ concept, let’s assert ‘Elementary Topos’ is that framework, represents ALL rational thoughts we know today. All the above are primitive as of today, which means we are able to avoid most paradoxes discovered until today, whether due to various ‘games’ played, or representation. Since everything is about a model, let’s see how we can generalize Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory using elementary TOPOS. In fact, what we had done is to convert the word ‘model’ to ‘game’ by adding ‘sense’, including ‘common sense’ into the ‘model’. In this way, we convert the ‘non active’ word ‘model’ into ‘game’, which is ‘active’ and matches our sense of our everyday life, irrespective of what we are doing, whether as a student, linguist, mathematician or a businessman. Page 16
Generalized Nash Non Cooperative Games Theory ts Se Ac t & ns e d An Se cs gi n tio iza al Given Lo io n Axiom Of Choice rm Fo Se ns e Primitive Logic And Axioms Meta. Mathematics That explains various choices of AC, or various foundations for mathematics, confirming mathematics as an instance of Game. Strictly Confidential Page 17 A Game
Science And Economy As A Game gy te St y n en im tio er ra xp ra t l. E iza St a ric pi Em al eg Measurements /Standards/Constants/Theories, Etc Various Choices Of Mathematics rm Fo Strategy is a set of choices inclusive of actions made using a previously defined game ts Sense Sciences Theoretical Physics Various Choices Of Mathematics Money/Standards/Measurements, Organization, Etc eg y ra t St n tio va n tio iza al Page 18 er rm Strictly Confidential Economic Models bs O Fo Sense Economy
What So Big Deal Just a hundred years ago, the word ‘success’ was always linked to ‘sense’, ‘purpose’ and ‘strength’, or what we usually called ‘power and relationship’. However, as the Internet age kicks in, more and more cases of ‘few for more’, or what I called the phenomenon of ‘probability transformation’ (not probabilistic transformation, since it is the probability that is being transformed), allowed by the digitization of the world, starts to flex its muscles. That explains the successes of Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Amazon. com, Google, Yahoo, etc. These ‘successes’ are less about ‘power and relationship’, but more about the foundation of science and mathematics, appearing as a ‘game’ which very few people understand. An elementary TOPOS may be diagrammatically very simple, but together with Axiomatic Set Theory, it is nearly the ‘Theory Of Everything’. Even more importantly, it can be programmed. By giving this talk, I hope that some of you will start thinking about : ‘What is probability transformation? ’, and to those who still talk about ‘ 80 -20 rule’ and ‘six sigma’, I would like to say that the world has moved to ‘one million to one’ rule, and ‘more than twelve sigma’. This can easily be understood if we can grasp that time-space is ‘relatively soft’, or what Niels Bohr said, ‘what is real is made of unreal’. An example of ‘real’ could be so called ‘mental block’, an example of ‘unreal’ could be ‘computing’. Strictly Confidential Page 19
Quantification And Probability Transformation (1) (X. Y). Z = X. (Y. Z) (Association) Axiom Of Choice gy te ra St Evolution & Change gic Lo Given y& Ga m e or he t. T Se d ic at An iom Ax (2) (Categorical Commutation) Symmetry ‘How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought independent of experience, is so admirably adapted to the objects of reality? ’. Albert Einstein ‘It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change (=probability transformation). ’ Charles Darwin Strictly Confidential Page 20
Silverlake Business CHOICE DETERMINATION METHOD (CDM) RULE AND PURPOSE SECTION (RAPS) BUSINESS PROCESS AND STRATEGY ON DEMAND (BPSOD) CORE OBJECTS AND PROCESSES (COPS) SUSTENANCE/MAINTENANCE: OBJECT PROCESS METHOD (OPM) Given/ Invisible Hand The above diagram is an elementary Topos. The model is therefore suitable for any business, from banks to conglomerates to nations. As our people get more and more used to my theory, we are expanding into newer and more profitable territory. It is unfortunate that we are in the process of patenting the above, and by patenting rule, we must not demonstrate the solution to public until it is approved. I hope one day I can come back to demonstrate the solution, proving that the above can be computerized, and in human terms, that we can ‘see clearly’ what was discussed. Strictly Confidential Page 21
Just The Financial Model Is Mind Boggling But it is simple to ‘trained’ eyes and minds Call Centre Channel Interaction Corporate Desktop REPRESENTATION LOGISTICS JBIS CORE Branch Delivery System Internet Banking Airline Mobile Enterprise System Banking Retail Solution Provident Fund Passbook Bond Retail FX Management Customer Printer Investment & Capital Insurance Experience Customer Cash Market Middleware Liability Treasury Remittance Deposit Workflow Service Automobile Connectors Payment Check Trade Management Clearing & Connector Financing Deposit Customer Finance Settlement Safe Deposit Loyalty Marketing Credit & Loan POS & e-POS Structured Management K 2 Debit Card Origination Business Cash Deposit Workflow Sales Device Handler System Process Leasing Management Micro Banking Floor Electronic Banking Signature Filenet Contact Stocking Reader Factoring Management Compliance & MIS Dealer Pin Pad System Management Reporting Islamic Banking Activity Connector Financing Document Biometric Fraud Syndication Management Money Imaging Reader Smart Management Changer Hire Connector Block Card Anti Money Purchase Performance Discounting MIMIX Reader Portable Laundering Management Overdraft & Banking Asset Filenet Human Aldon Passbook Management Structured Credit Resource Printer Self Management Collection/ Control M Documentum Service Payroll Enforcement SDS Robot Connect Direct ATM Delivery Kiosk Service Processor CIF Loan Deposit GL Partial List of Solutions Illustrated Strictly Confidential Page 22
What So Big Deal Quality Process Accuracy Reliability Resilience Integrity Auto Document Validity Maintaina bility Visibility On Demand Flexibility Correctness Usability Understand ability Clarity Testability Interoperabi lity New Products New Strictly Confidential Strategy Command & Control Creativity IT As Strategy Not Cost Leadership Predictability Reusability Rich Functionality Portability Continuous Improvement Cultural Page 23 Economy Low Cost / Process Efficient Effective Share Price Winning Quality Winning Processes Winning Strategy New Incomes
One Current Project In China: Cloud Computing Note 1: A 2 A = Application to Application (G, B, E, F, L, P, C, etc) Everything Was Designed Based On Mathematics Note 2: The current model of B 2 B, B 2 C etc is over simplistic Strictly Confidential Page 24 24
Some Philosophical And Social Discussions Strictly Confidential Page 25
If Everything Is A Game, What Makes Sense? If Everything Is A Game, Are We Not Going To Be Even Less God Fearing? No, It Is The Reverse. In Fact, God Holds A Golden Card (Overriding Even The Ace) In The Game Of Our Lives. (In Nash’s Paper, That Is The Cause Of Strategies Being ‘Partial’. We Cannot Play Our Strategies Perfectly. ) What About Our Relationship With Other People? Answer: We Are Going To Be More Sincere, Because It Is Stupid To Play Game With n Players, Especially When n Is Large. It Is Not Only Torturing, But Also Least Effective. So, Focus On Your Strength And Learn What Is ‘Probability Transformation’. It Is ‘Less For More’, Or What We Called ‘A Better Life’ Or ‘Successes’. But It Is Also Environmentally Friendly. Life Is No More Just About ‘Power And Political Relationships’. And Most Importantly, You Find More Meaning And Time In Your Own Life. Strictly Confidential Page 26
No Brief History Of Time Finally, Timing Can Be Everything In Life If we scan through the whole of mathematics, we find that our strategy is always to limit time to nearly standing still, an ‘ideal’ approach that allows our sense to be in ‘order’. In other words, mathematics itself is a ‘non standard analysis’ from ‘time’ perspective. Since we assume an ideal in time, there can be ‘No Brief History Of Time’ using mathematical arguments. The argument that we may be able to generalize an ideal to the real situation is most likely not valid here because ‘we are already generalizing’, and we have yet to discover the second order or higher order ‘generalization’. In conclusion, ‘Timing’ is the most uncontrollable issue in our life, as the Chinese had observed as ‘天时’since ancient time. Since we can sense time, putting extreme effort in ‘Timing’ is one of the most important strategies for success, and that even applies to Mathematics. The following sentence may be difficult to understand, but it is the choice of correct timing that allows Mesopotamia/Greeks to discover Algebra and Geometry (even if they had borrowed the idea from somebody else). Strictly Confidential Page 27
Chinese Civilization Is Best Summarized By Kong Zi (孔子) (551 – 479) BC 天何言哉， 四时行矣，万物生矣。天何言哉 ‘Tien’ is silent (given), four seasons just keep rotating, and everything is born out of that. As Can Be Seen In Many Other Documents, Chinese Culture Originates From ‘Given’, Though They Appear As Different Words. That Explains Why Chinese Are So Keen On ‘Strategies’, Since It Is A Natural Extension Of ‘Given’ As Per TOPOS. In Fact, Most Of Chinese Famous Phrases Are About Strategies, Whether They Are About Life, Warfare, Scholarship, Or Whatever. Strictly Confidential Page 28
Lao Zi （老子）(600 BC) 道 ‘Tao’ As ‘Given’ 道可道， 非常道 If ‘Tao’ (something given) can be explained, then it is not ‘Tao’ 道生一， 一生二， 二生三， 三生万物 ‘Tao’ gives rise to ‘one’, ‘one gives rise to ‘two’, ‘two’ gives rise to ‘three’, then ‘three’ results in everything. In Group Theory, this is called ‘Burnside Theorem’ (1904) 道抱阴而负阳 ‘Tao’ finally divides into two, ‘Yin’ and ‘Yang’. Which surprisingly ‘fits’ into Feit Thompson Theorem (1968) In fact from the above, then everything should appear as ‘sixes’, which in Physics is known as the ‘Quark Model’, as proposed by Gell-mann Murray and others in 1964. In Mathematics, it is ‘equals’ to Fisher Theorem (1971). Strictly Confidential Page 29
Yi Jing (1182 BC) 易经 Literally Translated, Yi Jing Means ‘Book Of Change’. If We Push The Scheme Forward, What We Get Is Cantor’s Real Number. To Large Extent, That Is Also Equivalent To TOPOLOGY, something to do with our space/time. 太极 1 两仪 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 四象 1 0 1 八卦 Cantor’s Real Number Strictly Confidential Page 30
Eastern And Western Culture Choice Se ics at m he at ns e/ St ra te gy M e/ nc ie Sc Given S 2 CHINESE GREEK If you look at the above, we can easily conclude that the Westerners do not see something that the Chinese had easily seen. Just like two hundred years ago, most Chinese did not see what the Westerners saw. This explains why some Western professors cannot understand the ‘new’ Chinese economy. In my opinion, unless there is a catastrophe, the rise of Eastern economies is a given. However, there will be an extremely interesting interplay of Science and Economy. Strictly Confidential Page 31
Mathematics As A Game: Theory Of Everything As A Conclusion, Mathematics, Like Science, Is Just A Model. It ‘Strategizes’ To Remove ‘Action’ From The Equation So That Everything Is Played In Our Brains. However, In Order For Our Brains To ‘Play The Game’, Everything Must Be Associative, Or In Laymen Terms, Either Geometrical Or Recurrence Or Nearly Standing Still. That Is, We Limit ‘Time’ Until We Cannot ‘Sense’ It Anymore. That Does Not Mean Actual Things Behave That Way, Which Explains All The So Called Paradoxes. That Highlights To Us That It Is Time To Think About ‘Time’, And As Explained, Brief History Of Time Is Not About Time. Generalization Is Most Likely Not Valid In This Case. (Since Generalization Is A Kind Of Direction, Which Can Be Sensed And Is Already Part Of Our Mathematics. If We Call All Of These ‘Order’, Time Is Most Likely Something To Do With The Complement Of Order…. . Which I Dislike To Use The Word ‘Disorder’. I Would Rather Use The Word ‘Unknown’. ) While I Do Not Know How To Enter The Research Of Time, I Am However Sure That Is The Direction To New Epistemology Strictly Confidential Page 32
Kong Zi (孔子) 修身 Do Your Best (One Person Game) 斉家 Manage Your Family (Small Number Game) 治囯 Take Care Of Your People (Medium Number Game) 平天下 Serve Human Race (Large Number Game) Kong Zi’s Strategy On Success Strictly Confidential Page 33
Silverlake Computing Strategy: Unification 天人合一 物 天 地 事 人 人 CHOICE Unification Is Not As ‘Logical’ As Most People Thought. What They Meant By ‘Logic’ Are At Most Logic Of Order ‘Two’ Or ‘Three’. It Can Be Easily Proven That TOPOS Has Infinite Logics, That Makes Us Feel Good When We Look Up Into The Night Sky. It Shows That We Have Yet A Lot More To Learn, And Most Likely Even After We Die. Currently, Silverlake’s Logic Is Of Order 112, And It Is Improving Everyday. Strictly Confidential Page 34
Apologies I Was Asked Whether I Can Give A Talk On Behalf Of AAET About Two Months Ago. A Talk As Above Is Hard To Be Prepared In Two Months. If There Is Any Error In My Presentation, I Hope The Audience Will Be Kind Enough To Let Me Know. Strictly Confidential Page 35