Скачать презентацию THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU Скачать презентацию THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU

1bf895cd6338020f6636635dc2d1140b.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 56

THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30. 04. 2009 v THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30. 04. 2009 v TNEB’s own generating stations (Hydel, Thermal, Gas and wind) 5690 MW v Private Sector Power Plants (IPP) 1180 MW v Shares from Central Sector Generating Stations 2825 MW v External Assistance (Eastern Grid) 305 MW v Others ( Captive Power Plants) 214 MW Total 10214 MW

RENEWABLE OR NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES v Wind Mill Private (infirm) 4310. 615 MW v RENEWABLE OR NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES v Wind Mill Private (infirm) 4310. 615 MW v Co-Generation 466. 100 MW v Bio-mass 109. 550 MW v Total (Renewable sources ) 4886. 265 MW

INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30. 04. 09 INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30. 04. 09

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009 -10 in MW Year 2009 – 10 Central State PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009 -10 in MW Year 2009 – 10 Central State Sector 1124 33 Wind Merchant Energy Power Plant 500 - Total 1157

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING NEXT 5 YEARS in MW Year Central State Sector Wind PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING NEXT 5 YEARS in MW Year Central State Sector Wind Merchant Energy Power Plant Total 2010 – 11 1174 660 600 - 2434 2011 – 12 717 1200 500 2600 5017 2012 – 13 847 --- 5000 6347 2013 – 14 760 600 5000 6860 2014 – 15 --- 2200 400 5540 8140 Total 3498 4660 2500 18140 28798

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009 -10 - Central Sector Sl. No Project Name Type PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009 -10 - Central Sector Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. Kaiga APP Stage-II Nuclear Unit-2 (Share) (220 MW) 36 December 2009 2. Neyvel TS-II Expansion Unit-I (250 MW) Thermal (Share) 163 February 2010 3. Kudankulam APS Unit-1 & 2 Nuclear (Share) 925 December 2009 & March 2010 2

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009 -10 - State Sector Sl. No Project Name Type PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009 -10 - State Sector Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. Periyar vaigai SHEP -I (2 x 2 MW) Hydel 4 December 2009 2. Periyar vaigai SHEP -II (2 x 1. 25 MW) Hydel 2. 5 December 2009 3. Periyar vaigai SHEP -III to. IV(2 x 2 MW) Hydel 4 December 2009 4. Periyar vaigai SHEP - IV (2 x 1. 25 MW) Hydel 2. 5 December 2009 5. Bhavani Barrage- I (2 x 5 MW) Hydel 10 February 2010 6. Bhavani Barrage- II (2 x 5 MW) Hydel 10 February 2010 Total 33

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010 -11 - Central Sector Sl. No Project Name Type PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010 -11 - Central Sector Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. NTPC – TNEB at Vallur Stage-I (2 X 500 MW) Thermal (Share 750 Unit-1 Aug-2010 Unit-2 Jan-2011 2. PFBR Kalpakkam (2 X 250 MW) Nuclear (Share) 167 2010 -2011 3. Simhadri Stage-II (2 Thermal X 500 MW) (Share) 95 Unit-III Nov-2010 4. Neyveli TS Unit-II (1 X 250 MW) 162 Jun 2010 Thermal (Share)

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010 -11 - State Sector Sl. No Project Name Type PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010 -11 - State Sector Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage – II (2 X 15 MW) Hydel 30 December 2010 2. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage – III (2 X 15 MW) Hydel 30 March 2010 3. North Chennai TPS Thermal Stage – II (1 X 600 MW) 600 Unit-1 December 2010 Total 660

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2011 -12 - Central and State Sector Sl. No Project PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2011 -12 - Central and State Sector Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. NTPC – TNEB Vallur Stage –II ( 1 X 500 MW) Thermal (Share) 375 Unit-3 Jul 2011 2. NLC – TNEB Tuticorin (2 X 500 MW) Thermal (Share) 247 Unit-1 Mar 2012 3. Simhadri Stage-II (2 X 500 Thermal MW) (Share) 95 Unit-4 May 2011 4. MTPS Stage-III Unit-1 (600 MW) Thermal 600 Jul 2001 5. NCTPS Stage – II Unit-2 (600 MW) Thermal 600 Unit-2 Jun 2011 Total 1917

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2012 -13 Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2012 -13 Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. NLC-TNEB at Tuticorin Unit-2 (2 X 500 MW) Thermal (Share) 247 Aug 2012 2. TNEB – BHEL at Udangudi Unit- 1 (2 X 800 MW) Thermal (Share) 600 Mar 2013 Total 847

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2013 -14 Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2013 -14 Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. TNEB – BHEL at Udangudi Unit - 2 (2 X 800 MW) Thermal (Share) 600 Unit-2 Sep 2013 2. Krishnapatnam (AP) UMPP ( 5 X 800 MW) Thermal (Share) 160 Sep 2013 3. Ennore Annexe (1 X 600 MW) Thermal 600 Sep 2013

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2014 -15 Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2014 -15 Sl. No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in MW Expected Commissioning 1. Kattupalli UMPP (5 X 800 MW) Thermal 1600 2014 -15 2. NCTPS Stage III (1 X 600 MW) Thermal 600 2014 -15 Total 2200

Power Evacuation System 2009 -10 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length (in c. Power Evacuation System 2009 -10 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length (in c. km) Approx. Cost (Rs. in lakhs) 1. Kudankulam a. Kudankulam-Abishekapatty 2 Nos. 400 KV DC (Quad) Line) b. Abishekapatty-Thrissur 2 Nos. 400 KV DC Line c. Abhishekapatty-Myvadi 400 KV DC Line d. Abishekapatty-Edaman e. LILO of Chekkanurani. Trivandrum at Abhishekapatty 400 KV SS Executed by PGCIL Commissioned

Power Evacuation System 2009 -10 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length (in c. Power Evacuation System 2009 -10 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length (in c. km) Approx. Cost (Rs. in lakhs) 2. Neyveli TS II – Expansion a. Neyveli TS II – Pugalur 400 KC DC Line Executed by PGCIL b. Pugalur – Chekkanurani 400 KV DC Line Commissioned c. Arasur-Myvadi 400 KV DC Line Executed by PGCIL d. Pugalur 400/230 KV SS Executed by PGCIL

Power Evacuation System 2009 -10 Sl. No 3. 4. 5. Name of Line Bhavani Power Evacuation System 2009 -10 Sl. No 3. 4. 5. Name of Line Bhavani Barrage PH I (2 X 5 MW) LILO of Pykara – Mettupalayam Bhavani Barrage I 110 KV DC Bhavani Barrage PH II (2 X 5 MW) LILO of Mettupalayam – Irumborai at Bhavani Barrage II 110 KV DC Periyar – Vaigai HEP – I to IV Barrages Gullapa Govindapatty 110/22 KV SS 22 KV link line Approx. Length (in c. km) Approx. Cost (Rs. in lakhs) 15 486. 90 5 162. 30 Power Evacuation at 22 KV to be executed by O&M

Power Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length (in c. Power Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length (in c. km) Approx. Cost (Rs. in lakhs) 1. NTPC-TNEB Joint Venture – North Chennai a. DC Line Vallur TPS – Alamathi 400 KV Line Executed by PGCIL b. DC Line Vallur TPS – Melakottaiyur 400 KV Line DC Line Tiruvalam – Chittor 400 KV Quad Line Executed by PGCIL c. d. e. DC Line Tiruvalam – Singarapet 400 KV Quad Line DC Line Tiruvalam – Alamathi 400 KV Line Executed by PGCIL 100 14000. 00 70 9880. 00

Power Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No 2. Name of Line Approx. Length Cost Power Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No 2. Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) Kalpakkam PFBR a. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Siruseri Executed by PGCIL b. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Arni c. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Kanchi 3. Simhadri Stage-II (2 X 500 MW) Unit-I DC Line LILO Vizag-Vermagiri 400 KV Line 4. North Chennai TPS Stage II Executed by Central Sector a. DC Line, NCTPS II- Alamathi 400 KV Line 68 11966. 00 b. DC Line, NCTPS II- SV Chatram 400 KV Line 168 18296. 00 c. DC Line, NCTPS II- TNEB JV 400 KV Line 8 912. 00

Power Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in Power Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 5. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage II 110 KV SC Line BKB II –Pallipalayam 110 KV SC Line BKB II– Thiruchengod 23 416. 30 6. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage III 110 KV SC Line BKB III –Nallur 110 KV SC Line BKB III– Kabilarmalai 15 272. 70

Wind Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in Wind Evacuation System 2010 -11 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 1. Kanarpatty 400/230 KV SS (TNEB) Kanarpatty-Abishekapatty – 400 KV DC Quad Line 30 14335. 32 2. 230 KV DC Line Kanarpatty-Maranthy 25 3175. 88 3. 230 KV DC Line Kanarpatty-Sayamalai 25 3229. 00 4. LILO of 230 KV Line Ponnapuram-Palladam at Velarsi Vadamalaipalayam 22 2187. 69

Wind Evacuation System 2010 -11 - Contd Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Wind Evacuation System 2010 -11 - Contd Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 5. Vannikonandal LILO of one of the circuits of Kayathar Chekkanurani-230 KV Line 100 4181. 00 6. Nallamanickenpatti-Vannikonandal 230 KV SC Lin 16 426. 00 7 Samugarangapuram Kanarpatty-Samugarangapuram 230 KVSC Line 80 2132. 00 8 Samugarangapuram-Kayathar 230 KV SS – 230 KV SC Line 100 2665. 00 9. Kethanur LILO of Palladam – Ingur 230 KV DC Line 40 1672. 00

Additional Lines 2010 -11 Sl. No 1. Name of Line LILO of Sriperumbudur-Kalivanthapattu 400 Additional Lines 2010 -11 Sl. No 1. Name of Line LILO of Sriperumbudur-Kalivanthapattu 400 KV SC Line at Sunguvar. Chatram Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 11 1100. 00 230 KV Lines 2. 230 KV SC Line, Sankaneri – Kanarpatty 80 2132. 00 3. DC Linking of Kudankulam Startup – TTPS 230 KV SC Line at Suitable Location and rearranging in such a way to connect the TTPS end to Kanarpatty SS and Kudankulam Startup bus to Samugarangapuram SS in order to avoid wind power injection at TTPS Bus 80 2132. 00 4. Basin. Bridge (GMR) – TNEB HQ) OCF – 230 KV SC Line UG 24 1723. 00

Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 5. Arasur-Karamadai 230 KV SC Line 48 1106. 00 6. Arasur-Palladam 230 KV SC Line 35 807. 00 7. Arasur 400/230 KV SS – Arasur 230 KV SS 24 376. 00 8. LILO of Pugalur – Palladam 230 KV SC Line 50 1332. 00 9. LILO of Pugalur – Alandur 230 KV SC Line 120 3198. 00 10. Mayvadi-Othakalmandapam and Othakalmandpam 2 nd Circuit 230 KV Line 115. 60 2327. 34

Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 11. Karaikudi 400 KVSS–Sempatty 230 KVSC Line 140 4228. 00 12. Tuticorin Sipcot – Chekkanurani 230 KV SC Line 13. Abishekapatty-Udayathur 230 KV SC Line 14. Palladam-Othakalamandapam 230 KV SC Line 130 95 50 3464. 50 2869. 00 1332. 00 15. Kalivanthapattu-Kadaperi 230 MC/DC Line 99. 6 5273. 57 16 Kalivanthapattu-Veerapuram 230 KV SC Line 23. 4 666. 00 17. Valuthur – Paramakudi 230 KV SC Line 50 1133. 50 18. Rearrangingof MTPS – Malco line in such a way to form MTPS – Govi and Malco – Pallakapalayam 230 KV SC Line 130 3464. 00

Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 19. LILO of one of the Tondiarpet-Mylapore at Basin. Bridge 230 KV DC 2 84. 00 20. Neyveli Zero Unit-Ulundurpet 230 KV SC Line 25 666. 00 21. Villupuram-Ulundurpet 230 KV SC Line 52 1385. 00 22. LILO of MTPS-Gobi 230 KV SC Line at Anthiyur 230 KV SS 92 2451. 80 23. LILO of Sriperumbudur-Koyambedu SC Line at Guindy 230 KV SS 26 692. 00 24 LILO of Tondiarpet-Basin. Bridge at Vyasarpadi SS 2 52. 30 25. Alamathi-Vyasarpadi 230 KV SC Line 30 799. 50

Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost Additional Lines 2010 -11 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 26 LILO of Kundah III – PUSHEP 230 KV DC Line at Karamadai SS 2 83. 62 27. LILO of Arasur-Ingur at Karamadai SS 6 250. 00 28. LILO of one of the circuits of Amathapuram. Chekkanurani at Nallamanickempatti 230 KV DC Line 16 669. 00

Power Evacuation System 2011 -12 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in Power Evacuation System 2011 -12 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 1. NTPC – TNEB JV North Chennai Scheme mentioned in Unit I & II (2010 -11) Covered in 2010 -11 2. NLC – TNEB JV Project (Tuticorin) 400 KV DC Quad Line from JV Project to Chekkanurani Executed by PGCIL 3. Simhadri Stage II (2 X 500 MW) Unit II Scheme already mentioned in Unit-I Executed by Central Sector 4. North Chennai TPS Stage II Scheme mentioned in Unit I (2010 -11) Covered in 2010 -11

Power Evacuation System 2011 -12 – Contd. Sl. No 5. Name of Line Approx. Power Evacuation System 2011 -12 – Contd. Sl. No 5. Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) MTPS Stage III 400 KV (TNEB) a. 400 KV DC Line MTPS – Arasur 280 200 17630 12593 a. 230 KV DC Line LILO of MTPS –Gobi 230 KV SC Line at MTPS Stage III 85 3554 b. 230 KV DC Line – LILO of Malco – Pallkapalayam 230 KV SC Line at MTPS Stage III 50 2091 b. 400 KV DC Line MTPS–Singarpet 400 KVSS 230 KV (TNEB)

Sl. No 1. Wind Evacuation System 2011 -12 Name of Line Approx. Length Cost Sl. No 1. Wind Evacuation System 2011 -12 Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) Kayathar 400/230 -110 KV SS (TNEB) i. 400 KV DC Line – Kanarpatty – Kayathar 18 4200 ii. 400 KV Kayathar-Karaikudi DC Quad Line 200 2800 iii. 400 KV Karaikudi-Pugalur DC Quad Line 250 35000 80 5 3344 209 5 209 230 KV Lines i. 230 KV DC Line Kayathar 400 KV–Valliyur SS ii. 230 KV DC Line, LILO of Kayathar – Anuppankularm SC Line at Kayathar 400 KVSS iii. 230 KV DC Line, LILO of Kayathar –Pasumalai SC Line at Kayathar 400 KVSS

230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be 230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by MPP -2011 -12 Sl. No Name of Line 1. Panneerkulam LILO of one circuit of Kayathar – Chekkanurani DC Line at Panneerkulam 7 332 230 KV SC Line Panneerkulam – Chekkanurani 100 2665 Villiseri LILO of Second Circuit of Kayathar. Chekkanurani DC Line at Villiseri 250 10500 Periyapatty LILO of Myvadi-Othakalamandapam SC Line at Periyapatty 80 3344 2. 3. Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs)

230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be 230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by MPP -2011 -12 – Contd. Sl. No Name of Line 4. Vagarai 230 KV DC Line LILO of Udumalpet-Sempatty SC Line at Vagarai 5. 6. 7. Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 50 2905 Kumarapuram 230 KV SC Line Kanarpatty – Kumarapuram 35 1463 Vagai Kulam 230 KV DC Line Vagaikulam – Sayamalai 15 627 30 129 Sankaralinkapuram 230 KV DC Line Sankaralingapuram. Kumarapuram

Other Proposed Lines - 2011 -12 Sl. No 1. Name of Line Approx. Length Other Proposed Lines - 2011 -12 Sl. No 1. Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) Karamadai 400/230 KV SS (TNEB) 400 KV DC Line, Arasur- Karamadai 80 11200 LILO of Kundah – Thudialur SC Line at Karamadi 10 418 230 KV SC Line Thudialur – Karamadai 7 186

Other Proposed Lines - 2011 -12 – Contd. Sl. No 2. Name of Line Other Proposed Lines - 2011 -12 – Contd. Sl. No 2. Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) Singarpet 400/230 KV SS (TNEB) 400 KV DC Line, Singarapet-Hosur 170 21155 16 2240 230 KV DC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Singarapet 230 KV SS 85 3553 SC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Singarapet 230 KV SS 135 3598 SC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Vinnamangalam 230 KV SS 165 4398 LILO of Pugalur-Ottiambakkam DC Line at Singarapet

Power Evacuation System 2012 -13 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in Power Evacuation System 2012 -13 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 1. TNEB – BHEL JV at Udangudi (2 X 800 MW) Unit-1 To be Evacuated by PGCIL at 765 KV 2. NLC – TNEB at Tuticorin To be Evacuated by PGCIL

Power Evacuation System 2013 -14 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in Power Evacuation System 2013 -14 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 1. TNEB – BHEL JV at Udangudi (2 X 800 MW) Unit-1 To be Evacuated by PGCIL at 765 KV 2. Krishnapatnam (AP), UMPP (4000 MW) (5 X 800 MW) Executed by Central Sector 3. ETPS Annexe 230 KV DC Line on MC Towers, ETPS Annexe -Korattur lake Korattur Lake – Ambattur Industrial Estate 230/110 KV SS – DC Korattur lake to Guindy (UG) 20 836 144 2340

Power Evacuation System 2014 -15 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in Power Evacuation System 2014 -15 Sl. No Name of Line Approx. Length Cost (in c. km) (Rs. in lakhs) 1. Kattupalli – UMPP (5 X 800 MW) Unit-1 Evacuation Scheme to be finalised 2. NCTPS Stage III (600 MW) Environmental Clearance under study

Investment Required for Power Evacuation System During Next Five Years Rs Cr Year Cental Investment Required for Power Evacuation System During Next Five Years Rs Cr Year Cental Sector 2010 -11 To be evacuted by PGCIL at 400 /765 KV 2011 -12 2012 -13 State Sector Wind Energy 1015. 13 826. 16 31. 76 Merchant Power Plant 569. 32 To be evacuted by 565. 79 PGCIL at 765 KV 141. 63 Total 1584. 75 1391. 95 173. 39 2013 -14 -- 141. 63 2014 -15 700. 00 141. 63 841. 63 Total 2573. 35 1560. 00 4133. 35

Investment Required for Transmission Schemes For Next Five Years Year Investment tp be made Investment Required for Transmission Schemes For Next Five Years Year Investment tp be made by TNEB for new Power Evacuation Lines (Rs. In crores) Investment proposed for other T&D Schemes (Rs. in crores) Total Investment required 2010 -11 1584. 75 1200. 00 2784. 75 2011 -12 1391. 95 1440. 00 2831. 95 2012 -13 173. 39 1728. 00 1901. 39 2013 -14 141. 63 2074. 00 2215. 63 2014 -15 841. 63 2489. 00 3330. 63 Total 4133. 35 8931. 00 13064. 35

TRANSMISSION FIXED ASSETS VALUE AS ON 31. 03. 2008 (Rs. in Crores) GROSS ASSETS TRANSMISSION FIXED ASSETS VALUE AS ON 31. 03. 2008 (Rs. in Crores) GROSS ASSETS : Rs. 6017. 42 DEPRICIATION : Rs. 2333. 38 NET VALUE : Rs. 3684. 04

AVENUES FOR INVESTMENTS Permitting private operator on “Build, Own Operate and Maintain” basis Joint AVENUES FOR INVESTMENTS Permitting private operator on “Build, Own Operate and Maintain” basis Joint venture with private operators Joint venture with financial institutions Funding by financial institutions

Permitting private operator ADVANTAGES Selection through competitive bidding Total risk of completion/execution of project Permitting private operator ADVANTAGES Selection through competitive bidding Total risk of completion/execution of project rests with the operator Total risk of availability lies with the operator Deployment of technology and expertise possible

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS Identify the project Selection of developers thro’ Tariff PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS Identify the project Selection of developers thro’ Tariff based competitive bidding. Appoinment of BPC Short listing thro’ RFQ Signing of TSA

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS- Cont. • Monthly transmission charges – Escalable charges PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS- Cont. • Monthly transmission charges – Escalable charges and non – escalable charges • Incentive - For availability of above 98% • Penalty - For availability of less than 95%

JOINT VENTURE WITH PRIVATE OPERATORS ADVANTAGES q Increased requirement of equity can be met JOINT VENTURE WITH PRIVATE OPERATORS ADVANTAGES q Increased requirement of equity can be met through the investor q Possible to get technology and expertise q DISADVANTAGES Finding a private operator - cumbersome process q Possibility of mutual conflict q Cost of capital likely to be high

DISADVANTAGES q Likely to be a costlier option q Utilities continue to pay for DISADVANTAGES q Likely to be a costlier option q Utilities continue to pay for 25 years at the escalated rate q No buy back q Flexibility for transmission utility absent

JOINT VENTURE WITH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVANTAGES Increased requirement of equity can be met through JOINT VENTURE WITH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVANTAGES Increased requirement of equity can be met through the investor q Easy to find partner DISADVANTAGES q Possibility of mutual conflict q Cost of capital likely to be high

FUNDING BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVANTAGES q The cost of capital is the least q FUNDING BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVANTAGES q The cost of capital is the least q Less conditionalities q Full exploitation of available expertise q Ensure continuous growth of utility DISADVANTAGES Mustering equity q Ability to complete the project on time q Ability to maintain availability

FEASIBILITY OF EXECUTION BY THE UTILITY PREREQUISITES Financial Capability Technical Capability Administrative Capability FEASIBILITY OF EXECUTION BY THE UTILITY PREREQUISITES Financial Capability Technical Capability Administrative Capability

FINANCIAL CAPABILITY Assumptions Gross asset as on 31/03/08 Equity (30%) Crs : Rs 6017 FINANCIAL CAPABILITY Assumptions Gross asset as on 31/03/08 Equity (30%) Crs : Rs 6017 Crs : Rs 1805 Outstanding Loan : Rs 1878 Crs ROE (17. 48%) : Rs 315 Crs Investment from 2009 -10 taken separately

Study of financial capability Investment 2009 -10 972 2010 -11 2784. 75 Capital cost Study of financial capability Investment 2009 -10 972 2010 -11 2784. 75 Capital cost 6017. 42 Crs 972 6017. 42 3700. 18 Notional Equity 1805. 22 Crs 291. 6 1805. 22 658. 15 Notional loan 4212. 19 Crs 680. 4 1521. 84 2447. 36 Cumulative Depreciation 2333. 38 Crs 56. 57 2553. 25 218. 64 Outstanding Loan 1690. 93 Crs 680. 4 1521. 84 2447. 36 Repayment 169. 09 Crs 68. 04 152. 18 244. 73 Closing Loan 1521. 84 Crs 612. 36 1369. 65 2202. 62 average Loan 1606. 38 Crs 646. 38 1445. 74 2447. 36 debt/equity ratio Return on Equity 17. 481% 0. 62 50. 97 315. 57 115. 05

Study of financial capability 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 Investment 2831. 95 1901. Study of financial capability 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 Investment 2831. 95 1901. 39 2215. 63 Capital cost 6017. 42 6313. 48 6017. 42 7831. 41 6017. 42 9609. 49 Notional Equity 1805. 23 1088. 77 1805. 23 1594. 67 1805. 23 2189 Notional loan 1369. 65 4603. 96 1232. 69 5539. 05 1109. 42 6606. 44 Cum. Depreciation 2773. 13 383. 46 2993. 01 437. 55 3212. 87 566. 5 Outstanding Loan 1369. 65 4603. 96 1232. 69 5539. 05 1109. 44 6606. 44 Repayment 136. 97 460. 39 123. 27 553. 9 110. 94 660. 64 Closing Loan 1232. 69 4143. 56 1109. 42 4985. 15 998. 50 5945. 8 debt/equity ratio Return on Equity 0. 48 315. 570 190. 326 0. 5 315. 570 278. 77 0. 52 315. 570 382. 66

INFERENCE Debt / Equity ratio remains above 43% Assured O & M Charges sufficient INFERENCE Debt / Equity ratio remains above 43% Assured O & M Charges sufficient to cover other expenses.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY ADVANTAGES Rich experience in executing 400 KV Sub Station and lines. Availability TECHNICAL CAPABILITY ADVANTAGES Rich experience in executing 400 KV Sub Station and lines. Availability of qualified professionals. DIS ADVANTAGES Not well suitable for project management

ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY ADVANTAGES Well Structured Proven system Committed Work Force ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY ADVANTAGES Well Structured Proven system Committed Work Force

DISADVANTAGES Tedious Time consuming Procedures Resistance to change with time Frequently changing leadership DISADVANTAGES Tedious Time consuming Procedures Resistance to change with time Frequently changing leadership

COMPARISON OF OTHER TRANSMISSION UTILITIES S. No DESCRIPTION TNEB PGCIL KPTCL APTRANSCO 1 Total COMPARISON OF OTHER TRANSMISSION UTILITIES S. No DESCRIPTION TNEB PGCIL KPTCL APTRANSCO 1 Total Sub Stations 694 120 382 367 2 Total EHT lines in circuit KM Total employees 21000 71500 36553 30450 12500 7500 3 4 5 6 7 Total revenue from operation Rs. in Crs. Employee cost Rs in Crs Equity Rs in Crs. As on 31/03/08 Debt Equity ratio 4000 6676 375 644 315 420 38 : 62 66 : 24 223