the session literature review some issues models

the session

literature review: some issues models widening participation retention the first year experience PDP resources staff development

student access, retention and progression

widening participation

projected outcomes of degree completion (HESA 15/16)

HEA retention framework audit

first year experience

non-continuation of FT degree students (UK) after yr 1(HESA)

PDP

resourcing personal tutoring

staff development

current situation

7 major recommendations

transforming the institution

intervention programme by SSCs

staff development

review of PDP

costs/benefits of change FROM: current system supports a notional 2 hours/student/ year. If discontinue then notional saving of £ 350 k (in 2007) for current first year. TO: Student Support Coordinator in each School. Approx £ 300 k (2007) PDT meetings now within module resource envelope so resource neutral potential savings on retention/recruitment costs develop ‘trademark’

We are mindful that no student can be easily categorised and that all students require greater or lesser support to integrate, participate and make the most of their time at X. In particular, we want to focus over the next five years on expanding our support for academic writing for all students and to ensure that we support students to integrate well from the start. (2017)

NSS and Personal Tutoring?

University of Portsmouth

TEF review of Portsmouth’s metrics (June 2017)

Portsmouth’s role definition and meeting expectations

many theoretical models