The Justice System Civil Criminal US Criminal Justice

Скачать презентацию The Justice System Civil Criminal US Criminal Justice Скачать презентацию The Justice System Civil Criminal US Criminal Justice

39564-supreme_court.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 37

>The Justice System Civil  Criminal The Justice System Civil Criminal

>US Criminal Justice System Police   Courts      US Criminal Justice System Police Courts Discretion Prison

>Demographics Total US Population          Demographics Total US Population 310,000,000 European(White) 74% Hispanic 15% African American 12%

>

>Reasons for High Incarnation Rates Drug Laws  Availability of Guns  Aggressive Policing Reasons for High Incarnation Rates Drug Laws Availability of Guns Aggressive Policing Democracy

>2008 Total Prison Population 2,310,000 Men        2008 Total Prison Population 2,310,000 Men 2.1 Million Women 208 Thousand Black Males 35.4% White Males 33% Hispanic Males 18%

>7,000,000             7,000,000 Prison/Probation/Prole

>Terms Public Defenders Private Attorneys Prosecutor  Defense Judge  Jury Pro Plea Bargain Terms Public Defenders Private Attorneys Prosecutor Defense Judge Jury Pro Plea Bargain

>

>

>John  G. Roberts John G. Roberts

>Kagan Kagan

>Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia

>Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy

>Clarence Thomas Clarence Thomas

>Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth Bader Ginsburg

>Stephen Breyer Stephen Breyer

>Samuel Alito Samuel Alito

>Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor

>US Supreme Court Cases That  Changed Our Country US Supreme Court Cases That Changed Our Country

>Facts of the Case Facts of the Case

>Brown v Board of Education Black children were denied admission to public schools attended Brown v Board of Education Black children were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to the races. The white and black schools approached equality in terms of buildings, curricula, qualifications, and teacher salaries.

>Issue Does the segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of Issue Does the segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprive the minority children of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment? Is the race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools constitutional?

>Decision The race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools violates the Decision The race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is unconstitutional.

>Mapp v Ohio Mapp v Ohio

>Facts of the Case Dolree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an Facts of the Case Dolree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive.

>Issue The question before the Court involved 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and Issue The question before the Court involved 4th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures”

>Decision The court ruled evidence gained in violation of the fourth amendment cannot be Decision The court ruled evidence gained in violation of the fourth amendment cannot be used in court.

>Marianda v Arizona Marianda v Arizona

>Facts of the Case A kidnapping and sexual assault occurred in Phoenix, Arizona, in Facts of the Case A kidnapping and sexual assault occurred in Phoenix, Arizona, in March 1963. On March 13 Ernesto Miranda, 23, was arrested in his home, taken to the police station, identified by the victim, and taken into an interrogation room. Miranda was not told of his rights to counsel prior to questioning. Two hours later, investigators emerged from the room with a written confession signed by Miranda.

>Issue Was a confession an admissible document in a court of law if it Issue Was a confession an admissible document in a court of law if it was obtained without warnings against self-incrimination and without legal counsel—rights guaranteed to all persons by the 5th and 6th

>Decision The Court held that prosecutors could not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation Decision The Court held that prosecutors could not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of defendants unless they demonstrated the use of procedural safeguards

>Miranda Warnings “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and Miranda Warnings “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?”

>Roe v Wade Roe v Wade

>Facts of the Case Roe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by Facts of the Case Roe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life

>Issue Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion? Issue Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?

>Decision The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the Decision The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman total autonomy over the pregnancy during the first trimester