Скачать презентацию The Justice System Civil Criminal US Criminal Скачать презентацию The Justice System Civil Criminal US Criminal

Supreme court.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 37

The Justice System Civil Criminal The Justice System Civil Criminal

US Criminal Justice System n n n Police Courts Discretion Prison US Criminal Justice System n n n Police Courts Discretion Prison

Demographics n Total US Population 310, 000 European(White) 74% Hispanic 15% African American 12% Demographics n Total US Population 310, 000 European(White) 74% Hispanic 15% African American 12%

Reasons for High Incarnation Rates n Drug Laws n Availability of Guns n Aggressive Reasons for High Incarnation Rates n Drug Laws n Availability of Guns n Aggressive Policing n Democracy

2008 Total Prison Population n n n Men Women 2, 310, 000 2. 1 2008 Total Prison Population n n n Men Women 2, 310, 000 2. 1 Million 208 Thousand Black Males 35. 4% White Males 33% Hispanic Males 18%

n 7, 000 Prison/Probation/Prole n 7, 000 Prison/Probation/Prole

Terms n n n n Public Defenders Private Attorneys Prosecutor Defense Judge Jury Pro Terms n n n n Public Defenders Private Attorneys Prosecutor Defense Judge Jury Pro Plea Bargain

John G. Roberts John G. Roberts

Kagan Kagan

Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia

Anthony Kennedy Anthony Kennedy

Clarence Thomas Clarence Thomas

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Stephen Breyer Stephen Breyer

Samuel Alito Samuel Alito

Sonia Sotomayor Sonia Sotomayor

US Supreme Court Cases That Changed Our Country US Supreme Court Cases That Changed Our Country

Facts of the Case Facts of the Case

Brown v Board of Education n Black children were denied admission to public schools Brown v Board of Education n Black children were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to the races. The white and black schools approached equality in terms of buildings, curricula, qualifications, and teacher salaries.

Issue n n Does the segregation of children in public schools solely on the Issue n n Does the segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprive the minority children of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14 th Amendment? Is the race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools constitutional?

Decision n The race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools violates Decision n The race-based segregation of children into “separate but equal” public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is unconstitutional.

Mapp v Ohio Mapp v Ohio

Facts of the Case n Dolree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after Facts of the Case n Dolree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive.

Issue n The question before the Court involved 4 th Amendment protection against “unreasonable Issue n The question before the Court involved 4 th Amendment protection against “unreasonable searches and seizures”

Decision n The court ruled evidence gained in violation of the fourth amendment cannot Decision n The court ruled evidence gained in violation of the fourth amendment cannot be used in court.

Marianda v Arizona Marianda v Arizona

Facts of the Case n A kidnapping and sexual assault occurred in Phoenix, Arizona, Facts of the Case n A kidnapping and sexual assault occurred in Phoenix, Arizona, in March 1963. On March 13 Ernesto Miranda, 23, was arrested in his home, taken to the police station, identified by the victim, and taken into an interrogation room. Miranda was not told of his rights to counsel prior to questioning. Two hours later, investigators emerged from the room with a written confession signed by Miranda.

Issue n Was a confession an admissible document in a court of law if Issue n Was a confession an admissible document in a court of law if it was obtained without warnings against self-incrimination and without legal counsel—rights guaranteed to all persons by the 5 th and 6 th

Decision n The Court held that prosecutors could not use statements stemming from custodial Decision n The Court held that prosecutors could not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of defendants unless they demonstrated the use of procedural safeguards

Miranda Warnings n “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can Miranda Warnings n “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you? ”

Roe v Wade Roe v Wade

Facts of the Case n Roe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy Facts of the Case n Roe, a Texas resident, sought to terminate her pregnancy by abortion. Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life

Issue n Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by Issue n Does the Constitution embrace a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?

Decision n The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within Decision n The Court held that a woman's right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman total autonomy over the pregnancy during the first trimester