The Department of Labour Annual Report 01 April 2015 – 31 March 2016 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee – 12 October 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS q INTRODUCTION q LEGEND q OVERALL ACHIEVEMENTS 2015 -16 q PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR OF 2015 -16 q APPROPRIATION STATEMENT Chief Directorate Communication | 2011. 00 2
INTRODUCTION - The Constitutional Mandate of the Do. L - The Policy Mandate of the Do. L 3
INTRODUCTION THE CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE OF THE DOL Section 9, to ensure equal access to opportunities. Section 10, promotion of labour standards and fundamental rights at work. Section 18, Freedom of association. Section 23, To ensure sound Labour relations. Section 24, To ensure an environment that is not harmful to the health and wellbeing of those in the workplace. • Section 27, To provide adequate social security nets to protect vulnerable workers. • Section 28, To ensure that children are protected from exploitative labour practices and not required or permitted to perform work or services that are inappropriate for a person of that child’s age or their well‐being, education, physical or mental health or spiritual, moral or social development is placed at risk. • Section 34, Access to courts and access to fair and speedy labour justice. • • • 4
INTRODUCTION THE POLICY MANDATE OF THE DOL Improved economic efficiency and productivity. Creation of decent employment. Promoting labour standards and fundamental rights at work. Providing adequate social safety nets to protect vulnerable workers Sound labour relations. Eliminating inequality and discrimination in the workplace. Enhancing occupational health and safety awareness and compliance in the workplace. • Give value to social dialogue in the formulation of sound and responsive legislation and policies to attain labour market flexibility for competitiveness of enterprises which is balanced with the promotion of decent employment • • 5
LEGEND Implication: Achieved Performance Indicator is on track or reflects complete implementation. Target achieved 100% + Complete Implication: Not Achieved Performance Indicator behind schedule. Target not achieved 0% - 99% Complete 6
ANNUAL REPORT - PERFORMANCE: 2015/16 • OVERALL ACHIEVEMENTS PER STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE • FINANCIAL YEAR 2015/16 REPORTING PERIOD: 01 APRIL - 31 MARCH 2016 7
THE DOL 2015/16 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE: ENE INDICATORS ENE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ENE TARGETS OVERALL ACHIEVEMENT 1. Number of workplaces/employers inspected and reviewed per year to determine compliance with various labour legislation 2. Number of work seekers registered on the Employment Services of South Africa system per year 172 334 186 871 600 000 634 503 3. Number of work seekers registered on the system provided with employment counselling per year 250 000 208 989 4. Number of work seekers placed in registered employment opportunities per year 25 000 10 927 4 4 5. Number of pay scales accessed per year to reduce gaps in minimum wage determinations 8
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PER STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE: APP 2015/16 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 ACTUAL OUTPUT - VALIDATED STRATEGIC GOALS Promote Occupational health services Contribute to decent employment creation Overall Performance Planned Indictors Achieved Not Achieved % This strategic goal is covered in terms of indicators that are applicable in strengthen occupational safety protection. 9 4 5 44% Protect vulnerable workers Strengthen multilateral and bilateral relations Strengthen occupational safety protection 7 4 3 57% 1 1 0 100% 6 4 2 67% Promote sound labour relations 2 0% 1 0 100% Monitor the impact of legislation 1 Strengthen the institutional 8 10 44% capacity of the Department 18 Development of the Occupational This strategic goal is covered in terms of indicators that are applicable in strengthen occupational safety protection. Health and Safety policies Promote Equity in the labour 5 1 market 6 83% OVERALL PERFORMANCE % 50 27 54% 23 46% 54% 9
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PER PROGRAMME: APP 2015/16 ANNUAL REPORT 2015/16 Planned Achieved Not Achieved Overall Achievement % Administration 18 8 10 44% Inspections and Enforcement Services 16 10 6 63% Public Employment Services 9 4 5 44% Labour Policy and Industrial Relations 7 5 2 71% Branch OVERALL PERFORMANCE % 50 27 23 54% 46% 54% 10
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE: APP 2015/16 PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APRIL 2015 – MARCH 2016 11
PROGRAMME 1: ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2015/16 ANNUAL ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR REMEDIAL ACTION TARGET VARIANCE 1. 1 Strategic Plan and Annual Strategic Plan and ACHIEVED Performance Plan approved and Annual APP and SP were tabled as per prescribed Performance Plan tabled on & March timeframes approved by end 2016. of February for VS: Letters to tabling in Parliament to table the Parliament by 31 APP and SP dated 7 March 2016. 1. 2 Improve the 55% of total NOT ACHIEVED Department’s performance Department’s 43% of total Do. L MPAT based on the Management M‐PAT standards Performance Assessment Tool standards per KPI are at per KPI at level 3 (M‐PAT) assessment criteria level 3 and 4 VS: and 4 by 31 March 55% of total Department’s Moderated MPAT 1. 5 M‐PAT standards per KPI at level 2016 Moderated Report 3 and 4 1. 3 Number of monitoring NOT ACHIEVED 4 monitoring reports on Service Delivery The SDIP QR 4 reports on SDIP Improvement Plan (SDIP) approved on 16 May produced within 30 days after 2016 30 days after quarter end/year end VS: SDIP Document quarter end/year end None Reference to M‐ PAT 1. 5 Moderated Report 2015/16 Better coordination and prioritization of M‐PAT by the Do. L; This is an Indicator for the Do. L Strategic Plan and APP 2016/17 CF and PES inputs on SDIP were not submitted within the reporting timelines Timely submission of documents by all Branches 12
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2015/16 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR REMEDIAL ACTION ANNUAL VARIANCE TARGET 2. 1 Number of Risk Reports set to minimize risk exposure and improve Risk Maturity level. 3. 1 Percentage of fraud cases received or detected finalised per year within 90 work Days **Indicator may not be achieved by March 2016 4 95% ACHIEVED 4 Risk Reports set to minimize risk exposure and improve risk maturity levels available VS: Approved Risk report NOT ACHIEVED 42% (of the 86 fraud cases received or detected) 36 cases were finalized within 90 working days by the year end. 2% (2 of the 86 cases were finalized outside 90 working days). 56% (48 of the 86 cases received were not finalized). VS: Fraud register None HQ investigation still in progress as there is reliance placed on our strategic partners (e. g. state organs) Due to the complex nature of some HQ cases the finalization rate was greatly hampered. To recruit on the vacant funded positions in 2016/2017 financial year. Organizational reconfiguration and matrix management. On the job training and transfer of skills where services of forensic firms are procured. HQ investigator replaced in April. SNG service provider assisting with backlog 13 resolving.
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 4. 1 Departmental Communication Strategy approved and implemented by end of March 2019 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET • Communication Strategy and annual action plan approved • 95% implementation of the activities in the annual action plan ACTUAL PERFORMANCE NOT ACHIEVED Communication strategy 2016‐ 2021 reviewed with the PCOs and entities. Awaiting approval from EXCO Verification Source: Communication Strategy Document available as evidence REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION Several new inputs had to be obtained. Consulted with GCIS, Entities, PCOs as well as Deputy Director General : Corporate Services 14
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 5. 1 Percentage of : 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET (a)women in SMS, (b)youth and a) 50% (c)persons with disability (Pw. D) employed in line with the EE Plan by 31 March each year b) 38% c) 3% ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION NOT ACHIEVED By the 31 st March 2016: a) 39. 7% (48 of the 121 SMS filled posts) was women. Due to lack of funds the department had to suspend the filling of vacancies that were unfunded. b) 32. 5% (2 499 of the 7 692 filled posts) youth were appointed in the department. Youth is a moving target and poses a challenge for the department to achieve on it. c) 2. 9% (221 of the 7 692 filled posts) People with Disabilities were appointed in the department. VS: PERSAL REPORTS The 2. 9% is above the government threshold of 2%. Re‐establish the task team to deal with filling of posts Task team to produce regular reports 15
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION 5. 2 Percentage of vacancy rate reduced by 31 March 8% NOT ACHIEVED 12. 4% (Of the total 8 778 funded posts, 1 086 were vacant). ‐ 4. 4% Due to lack of funds the department had to suspend the filling of vacancies that were VS: PERSAL REPORTS unfunded. Re‐establish the task team to deal with filling of posts Task team to produce regular reports 16
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET INDICATOR 5. 3 Percentage 100% disciplinary of disciplinary cases resolved in 90 cases resolved in working‐days 90 working‐days ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE NOT ACHIEVED 76% of misconduct cases resolved in 90 days. This is calculated from 253 cases that were received and 191 resolved throughout the financial period. 191/253=76% Verification Source: Manual reports from Provinces and Funds 24% The outstanding cases are complex and due to postponements not possible to finalize within the timeframe. REMEDIAL ACTION Road shows planned for 2016/17 to create awareness on misconduct. 17
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 6. 1 Percentage of Court Papers to resolve Litigation filed with the Court within 10 working days of receipt 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 90% ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE ACHIEVED None 100% (118 Litigation cases were received for the financial year 2015/2016. All 118 cases were attended to within 10 days of receipt) VS: Data Base and Files. REMEDIAL ACTION None 18
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 7. 1 Implement effective ICT governance Framework 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET Review and implement an ICT governance and ICT Policy frameworks ACTUAL PERFORMANCE NOT ACHIEVED REASON FOR VARIANCE The SITA outsourced ICT The SITA outsourced strategic plan was ICT strategic Plan was finalized and ready very late in the financial year finalised and ready (22/03/2016) thus very late in the financial year (22‐ 03‐ making it impossible to 2016) thus making it implement IT governance as proposed impossible to in the strategy. implement IT governance as proposed in the Strategy. VS: SITA Tender: Consolidated ICT Strategy (Doc Ensqs 38_2 -0. pdf)) REMEDIAL ACTION The ICT strategy is now in place. IT governance shall be implemented in alignment with the proposals of the strategy. 19
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 7. 2 Annually review and implement the ICT strategy of the Department 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE Implementation of the agreed strategic objective as specified in the Annual Action Plan NOT ACHIEVED The SITA outsourced ICT strategic Plan was finalised and ready very late in the financial year (22‐ 03‐ 2016) thus making it impossible to identify and implement the ICT strategic objectives and the related workplan. VS: SITA Tender: Consolidated ICT Strategy (Doc Ensqs 38_2 -0. pdf)) REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION The SITA outsourced ICT The implementation strategic plan was of the 2016/17 work finalized and ready very plan. late in the financial year (22/03/2016) thus making it not possible to identify and implement the ICT strategic objectives and related work plan. 20
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 8. 1 Number of Annual Financial Statements (AFS) and Interim Financial Statements (IFS) compiled per year that comply with guidelines issued by the National Treasury 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 1 AFS by 31 May, and 3 Interim reports 30 days after each quarter. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR REMEDIAL ACTION VARIANCE None ACHIEVED 2014/15 Annual Financial Statements was compiled and submitted to the National Treasury by 31 May 2015. None 3 Interim Financial Reports were compiled and submitted to the National Treasury on due dates as determined by the National Treasury VS: Submission of the AFS and IFS signed by the Director. General. 21
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 8. 2 Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) and Estimates of National Expenditure (ENE) prepared according to National Treasury (NT) prescripts 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET Departmental budget compiled and published ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED Rollover submission, MTEF, AENE, draft ENE for 2016/17 and final ENE for 2015/16 submitted to National Treasury according to due dates as determined by the National Treasury VS: Submission of the MTEF, AENE and the draft ENE for 2015/16 financial year to National Treasury. REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None 22
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE 2015/16 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION INDICATOR ANNUAL TARGET 9. 1 Percentage of 100% compliant invoices paid within 30 days of receipt NOT ACHIEVED 99. 54% (16 939 of the 17 018) of invoices were paid within 30 days of receipt VS: BAS & LOGIS Reports 9. 2 Percentage detection and reporting of irregular, fruitless and wasteful and unauthorised expenditure (TR 9. 1. 2) 100% Only 0. 46% not paid within 30 days of receipt System errors occurred when the payments were processed None ACHIEVED 100% Detected and reported. A total of thirteen (13) -100% cases amounting to R 29 477 147. 66 for irregular expenditure were detected and reported for the 2015/16 financial year. A total of (sixteen (16) ‐ 100% cases amounting to R 82 074. 92) for fruitless & wasteful expenditure were detected and reported for the 2015/16. VS: BAS and LOGIS reports Implementation of CSD (Central Supplier Database) by National Treasury where banking details are verified before suppliers are made available on the database. None 23
ADMINISTRATION Strategic Goal 8: Strengthening the institutional capacity of the Department (OUTCOME 12: AN EFFICIENT, EFECTIVE AND DEVELOPMENT ORIENTED PUBLIC SERVICE ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2015/16 ANNUAL ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR REMEDIAL ACTION TARGET VARIANCE 10. 1 Procurement of fleet vehicle in line with Departmental Benchmark 100% 10. 2 Vehicle maintenance in accordance with the manufactures specifications 100% None ACHIEVED 172 Vehicles procured as approved by the Departmental Transport Advisory Committee. VS: Asset register None ACHIEVED Of the 1046 vehicles in the Department 259 vehicles were due for service in the reporting period and all 259 vehicles were serviced according to the manufactures specifications which equates to 100%. VS: Reports from the maintenance service providers None 24
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE: APP 2015/16 PROGRAMME 2: INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT SERVICES (IES) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2015 -16 APRIL 2015 – MARCH 2016 25
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS: Q 4 TARGETS INDICATORS 1. 1 Number of designated employers reviewed per year to determine compliance with employment equity legislation BRANCH EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC TOTAL Target: 750 118 24 192 48 30 60 36 36 206 750 170 38 197 54 9 80 40 38 205 831 Actual ACHIEVED. 831 employers were reviewed against a target of 750 with a variance of 75. 1. 2 Percentage of non‐compliant Target: 100% employers of those reviewed in reference to 1. 1 issued with a recommendation within 90 days Number of employers of the review. ** 155 not complying NOT ACHIEVED. Of the No. issued 831 employers reviewed, 668 were with non‐compliant. recommend 86% (574 the 668) non ations within 155 compliant employers) were issued 90 days with recommendations within 90 days against a target of 100%. TOTAL 38 75 54 7 80 35 37 187 668 4 82 54 7 80 14 36 142 574 (86%) 26
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS 1. 3 Number of designated employers inspected per year to determine compliance with Employment equity legislation ACHIEVED 5 022 employers were inspected against a target of 4 176 with a variance of 846. 1. 4 Percentage of non‐ complying workplaces inspected per year with reference to 1. 3. dealt with in terms of the Employment Equity Act. ACHIEVED Of the 5 022 workplaces inspected, 1036 were non‐ compliant. 100% (1040 of the 1036 non‐ compliant workplaces) was dealt with in terms of the Employment Equity Act. BRANCH Target 4176 Actual Inspected Target 100% EC 382 FS 168 GP 1946 KZN 648 LP 120 MP 96 NC 72 NW 132 WC 612 Total 4176 479 247 2335 782 144 152 85 157 641 5 022 260 67 1 232 116 39 66 34 221 1 036 260 67 1 232 116 39 66 34 225 1 040 (100%) Number not complying Number dealt with 27
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS BRANCH EC 1. 5 Percentage of Target employment Equity Plans of 80% those companies inspected/ reviewed in 1. 1 and 1. 3 above No. of 170 assessed annually. employers reviewed in 1. 1 ACHIEVED. 92% (766) No. of Equity 170 employment equity plans of Plans the 831 employers reviewed assessed in 1. 1 above, were assessed 1312 against an annual target of 100 80%. No. of 479 ACHIEVED employers 91 % (4 597) employment inspected in equity plans of the 5 031 1. 3 employers inspected in 1. 3 No. of Equity above, were assessed against 479 Plans an annual target of 80%. assessed 100 FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total 38 197 54 9 80 40 38 205 831 29 195 54 9 37 36 31 205 766 76 99 100 46 90 82 100 92% 247 2335 782 144 161 85 157 641 5 031 149 2334 639 114 88 54 126 614 4 597 60 99 82 79 55 64 80 96 91% 28
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS BRANCH EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total 2. 1 Number of work places inspected per year Target 16128 10680 28848 29784 11960 9984 5712 7956 14304 135 356 to determine compliance 135 356 with labour legislation. ACHIEVED A total of 146 307 workplaces were inspected. Actual No. 19144 11729 30985 33299 12284 10721 6111 inspected 9580 12454 146 307 29
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS BRANCH EC FS GP KZN 2. 2 Percentage of non‐ Target: complying workplaces 100% inspected per year with 3044 876 4798 5907 No. of reference to 2. 1 dealt with in workplaces terms of the relevant labour not legislation complying 3044 804 5011 5907 No. of workplaces NOT ACHIEVED Of the 146 307 workplaces dealt with inspected, 27 494 were non‐ Actions taken: compliant. 3044 766 5437 6001 No. of 97% ( 29 015 the 27 400 non notices ‐compliant workplaces) was issued dealt with in terms of the 52 28 41 Referred to 19 relevant labour legislation court against a target of 100%. LP MP NC NW WC 3646 1358 851 828 6092 3646 1274 845 828 5324 Total 27 400 26 683 97% Total 5807 1691 890 1019 45 20 12 0 4360 29 015 0 217 30
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS 2. 4 Percentage of inspections on request for work permits conducted within 5 working days** NOT ACHIEVED Of the 994 requests received, 626% (63%) inspections were conducted within 5 working days against a target of 90%. BRANCH EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total 96 13 528 108 84 69 9 3 84 994 No. inspected within 5 working days 96 11 189 96 84 57 7 3 83 626 % inspected within 5 working days 100 85 36 89 100 83 78 100 99 63% Target 90% No. of requests received 31
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS BRANCH 3. 1 Number of workplaces Target inspected per year to determine 20 476 their compliance with the OHS Actual No. legislation. Inspected ACHIEVED 22 423 against a target of 20 476 workplaces were inspected with a variance of ‐ 1947. 3. 2 Percentage of non‐complying Target workplaces inspected with 100% reference to 3. 1 dealt with in No. of terms of the OHS legislation. workplaces not complying NOT ACHIEVED 100% of Of the 22 423 inspected, 8 168 workplaces were non‐compliant. dealt with 99% (8 144 of the 8 168) non‐ Actions taken compliant workplaces) was dealt with in terms of OHS legislation No. of notices against 100% target. issued No. referred to court EC 2 124 FS 1 896 GP 5604 KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total 4344 1428 820 420 1 2484 20 356 476 2 319 2 064 5908 4977 1725 930 449 1 2398 653 22 423 Total 610 712 2122 1845 936 352 219 484 888 8168 100 100 99% 78 100 Total 671 802 2279 20 4 0 2000 1095 445 185 919 1094 9490 0 6 0 4 34 32
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS BRANCH Target 60% EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total incidents 136 62 380 179 56 83 48 110 255 1309 133 34 390 113 34 40 33 48 255 1080 97 55 103 63 61 48 69 44 100 82% 3. 3 Percentage of reported incidents investigated within 90 days. No. of reported ACHIEVED Of the 1 309 reported incidents, 82% (1 080) were investigated within 90 days against a target of 60%. No. investigated within 90 days % investigated within 90 days 33
PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS 3. 4 Target: 100% Percentage of applications for registration of entities processed within 4 weeks. NOT ACHIEVED Of the 4 828 applications received, 71% (3 453) were processed within 4 weeks. HQ TOTAL Verification Source Number of applications received 4 828 Number processed within 4 weeks 3 453 % processed within 4 weeks 72% 34
PROVINCIAL PERFORMANCE ON IES INDICATORS 3. 6 Number of employer payroll audits conducted per year to determine employers contribution to the Unemployment Insurance Fund. ACHIEVED A total of 12 288 employer audits were conducted against a target of 11 576. BRANCH Target 11 576 EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC Total 1140 1188 2196 1772 1284 960 780 708 1548 11576 1272 2262 2021 1360 989 916 756 1543 12288 Actual conducted 1169 35 35
PROGRAMME 2: INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT SERVICES PROMOTE EQUITY IN THE LABOUR MARKET(OUTCOME 14: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY AND UNITING THE COUNTRY) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR QUARTER 4 TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION AND DATE OF MPLEMENTATION 1. 2 Percentage of non‐ 100% compliant employers of those reviewed in reference to 1. 1 issued with a recommendation within 90 days of the review NOT ACHIEVED Limited number Of the 170 employers of employers to reviewed, 154 were be reviewed non‐compliant. 91% (154 of the 170 non‐compliant employers) were issued with recommendations within 90 days. 2. 4 Percentage of inspections on request for work permits conducted within 5 working days NOT ACHIEVED Of the 151 requests received, 52% (78) inspections were conducted within 5 working days. 90% To prepare companies for the next financial year 5 days period as Amendment/ prescribed by review done SOP is unreliable and not achievable 36
PROGRAMME 2: INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT SERVICES STRENGTHEN OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY PROTECTION (OUTCOME 4: DECENT EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INCUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH ) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR QUARTER 4 TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 3. 2 Number of non‐ complying workplaces inspected with ref to 3. 1 dealt with in terms of the OHS legislation 100% NOT ACHIEVED Of the 22 423 inspected, 8 168 were non‐compliant. 99% (8 144 of the 8 168) non‐compliant workplaces) was dealt with in terms of OHS legislation against 100% target. OHS posts were frozen due to budget constraints Request funding for filling of OHS posts in 2016/17. explore alternative funding model 3. 4 Percentage of applications for registration of entities processed within 4 weeks 100% NOT ACHIEVED Of the 1 106 applications received, 75% (829) were processed within 4 weeks. Incomplete documentation received from stakeholders. Staff in certain areas overloaded (high admin traffic) Methodology/pr ocesses have been reviewed and will be effected in 2016/17 financial year. **Indicator may not be achieved by March 2016 REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION AND DATE OF MPLEMENTATION 37
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE: APP 2015/16 PROGRAMME 3: PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT SERVICES (PES) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APRIL 2015 – MARCH 2016 38
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 1. 1 Number of final regulations in terms 3 regulations related to PES published of the Employment by the Minister in Government Gazette Service Act by March 2016 published by the Minister in the Government Gazette Not Achieved (25%) The 3 Regulations couldn’t be published by March 2016 since the establishment of the ES Board was not yet finalised. 39
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1. 2 Number of PES provincial and local advocacy campaigns conducted per year ANNUAL TARGET 18 provincial advocacy campaigns conducted by March 2016 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE Achieved 24 Provincial campaigns conducted Number of Provincial advocacy campaigns conducted Actual Number conducted as at Prov. Target 31 March 2016 2 EC 4 2 FS 2 2 GP 3 2 1 KZN 2 LP 2 2 MP 2 2 NC 2 2 NW 7 2 WC 1 18 NATIONAL 24 Variance 2 0 1 -1 0 0 0 5 -1 6 40
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 DEC OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 2. 1 Number of PES Advocacy campaigns 378 Local campaigns Achieved conducted 648 Local advocacy campaigns conducted Number of advocacy campaigns conducted Prov. EC Target 48 Actual 93 Variance 45 FS 33 48 15 GP 78 74 -4 KZN 48 119 71 LP 39 84 45 MP 42 42 0 NC 21 85 64 NW 30 66 36 WC 39 37 -2 378 648 270 NATIONAL 41 41
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 2. Number of work seekers registered on ESSA 600 000 work seekers registered Work-seekers registered on the system Prov. Target Actual Number Registered Achieved A total of 634 503 work‐seekers registered Variance Percentage EC 72 000 77 440 5 440 108% FS 48 000 35 098 -12 902 73% GP 126 000 105 908 -20 092 84% KZN 108 000 126 168 18 168 117% LP 54 000 50 965 -3 035 94% MP 54 000 57 300 3 300 106% NC 24 000 27 059 3 059 113% NW 36 000 39 297 3 297 109% WC 78 000 70 791 -7 209 91% Online NATIONAL 0 600 000 44 477 634 503 44 477 34 503 #DIV/0! 106% 42
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 1. 4 Number of registered work‐seekers provided with employment counseling 250 000 work‐seekers provided Not Achieved with employment counseling 208 861 were provided with employment counseling Work-seekers provided with employment counseling Prov. Target Actual Variance % EC 36 760 -9 043 75% 27 717 FS 20 096 -1 687 92% 18 409 GP 51 760 -12 316 76% 39 444 KZN 27 904 3 551 113% 31 455 LP 25 300 -1 238 95% 24 062 MP 27 904 -4 817 83% 23 087 NC 17 488 -8 120 54% 9 368 22 696 -831 96% NW 21 865 20 092 -7 549 62% WC 12 543 0 911 #DIV/0! OTHER 911 250 000 -41 139 84% NATIONAL 208 861 43
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 4. Number of work-seekers 25 000 Not achieved placed in registered employment 10 927 work‐seekers were placed in Opportunities registered employment opportunities Job-seekers placed Prov. EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC OTHER NATIONAL Target 3 250 2 250 4 750 3 250 2 750 1 250 Actual placed 2 369 783 1 268 2 832 1 397 780 Variance -881 -1 467 -3 482 -418 -1 353 -1 970 -470 Percentage 73% 35% 27% 87% 51% 28% 62% 1 750 3 000 0 25 000 174 520 24 10 927 -1 576 -2 480 24 -14 073 10% 17% #DIV/0! 44% 44
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 1. 6 Number of opportunities registered on 62 000 Achieved ESSA 102 631 opportunities registered Table 4 Job-seekers referred to opportunities Prov. EC FS GP KZN LP MP NC NW WC OTHER NATIONAL Target 8 060 5 580 11 780 8 060 6 820 3 100 4 340 7 440 0 62 000 Actual registered 9 620 8 412 16 099 10 332 14 260 10 395 6 330 5 177 19 562 2 444 102 631 Variance 1 560 2 832 4 319 2 272 7 440 3 575 3 230 837 12 122 2 444 40 631 Percentage 119% 151% 137% 128% 209% 152% 204% 119% 263% #DIV/0! 166% 45 45
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 6. 1 All Private Employment Agencies and All complete PEA and TES Not achieved Temporary Employment Services registered applications processed within 281 processed within 60 days and 116 within 60 days of receipt beyond 60 days Number of Private Employment Agencies registered. Prov. EC FS GP KZN LP MP *NC NW WC NATIONAL Received 28 9 148 40 18 27 3 3 97 373 Processed within 60 days 28 11 107 15 18 4 1 0 97 281 Processed after 60 days 0 0 53 29 0 23 2 3 6 116 46
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 2. 1 Applications foreign nationals All complete applications for Not achieved corporate and individual work visa foreign nationals corporate 34 were processed within 30 days. 57 were processed within 30 working days and individual work visa processed after 30 working days processed within 30 working days CORPORATE Prov. Applications Received Applications processed No of workers Positive recommendation Negative recommendation Finalised within 30 days Finalised beyond 30 days EC 0 0 0 0 FS 4 4 547 197 350 2 2 GP 9 9 743 546 197 3 6 KZN 3 1 69 69 0 0 1 LP 58 62 6 127 4 936 1 191 25 37 MP 16 11 587 562 25 4 7 NC 4 0 0 0 NW 2 2 775 370 405 0 2 WC TOTAL 3 2 225 0 0 99 91 9 073 6 905 2 168 34 2 47 57 47
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE All complete applications foreign Not Achieved nationals and corporate and 314 were processed within 30 days. 1 252 individual work visa processed were processed after 30 days INDIVIDUAL PERMITS within 30 days. Prov. Applications Received Applications processed No of workers Positive recommendation Negative recommendation Finalised within 30 days beyond 30 days EC 81 99 99 9 78 48 51 FS 11 12 12 0 12 2 10 GP 386 856 61 790 77 779 KZN 65 150 7 141 29 121 LP 41 47 47 5 42 22 25 MP 57 50 50 3 36 21 29 NC 6 8 8 0 7 5 3 NW 23 25 25 2 23 7 18 WC 279 319 23 291 103 216 TOTAL 949 1 566 110 1 420 314 1 252 48
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 3. 1 Number of Mo. As signed between the 8 Mo. As signed Achieved DG and CEOs of statutory bodies and between DG and CEOs of designated organisations, funding statutory bodies, and designated 9 Mo. As were signed between the DG and transferred and performance monitored organizations and the CEOs of the statutory bodies. (8 with per year. funding transferred and Workshops for the Blinds and National Performance monitored by the Councils for the Blinds: 1 for Productivity end of March 2016 SA)Performance agreements were concluded with the CEO of SEF and the CF Commissioner as the DG is an Accounting Officer of the two entities. Performance of the statutory bodies, designated organizations and entities monitored. Funding transferred. 49 49
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE 3. 1 Number of Mo. As signed between 8 Mo. As signed ACHIEVED the DG and CEOs of statutory bodies between DG and CEOs and designated organisations, funding of statutory bodies, and PROGRESS AGAINST TARGET: Mo. A’s with the transferred and performance designated organizations and workshops monitored per year. funding transferred and Mo. A’s for the 3 years (2015‐ 2018) signed by the performance monitored by the DG end of March 2016 1. Performance was reviewed for all workshops. 2. Funding transferred for the year‐ 2015/16 is R 10 340 538. 32 PROGRESS AGAINST TARGET: Mo. A’s with Councils/Federations 1. Mo. A’s for the 3 years (2015‐ 2018) signed by the DG 2. Performance was reviewed for all the Councils 3. Funding transferred for the year 2015/16 is R 725 070. 80 50 50
KEY STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ACHIEVEMENTS AS AT 31 MARCH OUTCOME 4: Improve the quality and accessibility of labour market services to contribute to decent employment through inclusive economic growth Do. L Strategic Objective 1: Contribution to decent employment creation KEY PERFORMANCE ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 3. 1 Number of Mo. As 8 Mo. As signed Supported Employment Enterprises (SEE signed between the between DG and CEOs 1. Drawdown agreement for 2015/16 signed by the DG DG and CEOs of of statutory bodies, and 2. Performance of the Supported Employment Enterprises reviewed statutory bodies and designated organizations 3. Funding transferred for the year 2015/16 is R 134 164 001 designated and funding transferred Productivity SA organisations, funding and performance transferred and monitored by the end of 1. Mo. A for 2015/16 signed by the DG performance March 2016 2. Performance of Productivity SA reviewed monitored per year. 3. Funding transferred for the year 2015/16 is R 45 531 000 Verification Source/s: SEE Drawdown agreement for 2015/16 signed by the DG Productivity SA Mo. A signed by the DG Workshops for people with Disabilities Mo. As signed by the DG National Councils/Federations for people with Disabilities Mo. As signed by the DG Quarterly reports Payment Stubs 51 51
REASONS FOR MAJOR VARIANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INDICATOR REASON FOR MAJOR VARIANCE CORRECTIVE ACTION 1. 1 Number of final regulations in terms of the Employment Service Act published by the Minister in the Government Gazette Delays in the promulgation of the ES The establishment of the Act impacted on the Employment Board is being expedited. Services Board establishment process 1. 2 Number of PES advocacy campaigns conducted Over‐achievement was due to Community demand for the service as a result of the high rate of unemployment NONE 52
REASONS FOR MAJOR VARIANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INDICATOR 1. 3 Number of work‐seekers registered on ESSA per year REASON FOR MAJOR VARIANCE CORRECTIVE ACTION • The advocacy campaigns conducted NONE increased the number of clients registering as work seekers 1. 4 Number of registered work Under‐achievement was due to: seekers provided with employment counselling per • Insufficient staff resources year • ESSA system challenges –Extensive downtime due to Citrix • Review targets for 2016/17 and beyond. • Allocation of dedicated IT resource for PES 53
REASONS FOR MAJOR VARIANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INDICATOR 1. 5 Number of registered work • ‐seekers placed in registered employment • opportunities per year REASON FOR MAJOR VARIANCE Insufficient staff resources ‐ • employment counselors and ESPs. Insufficient focus in recruitment, • selection & matching of registered work‐seekers CORRECTIVE ACTION Review targets for 2016/17 and beyond Provincial support to be provided to NW, MP, GP, WC 54
REASONS FOR MAJOR VARIANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INDICATOR REASONS FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION 1. 6 Number of employment opportunities registered on ESSA per year • More local advocacy campaigns conducted increased the number of opportunities registered by employers. NONE 1. 7 Private Employment Agencies and Temporary Employment Services registered • Delays in the inspection of premises of PEA applicants. • • Delays in adjudication processes. Secure agreement with IES on inspection timeframes and check list. • Introduce Automation to track applications received • Review composition of adjudication committee Review indicator • 55
REASONS FOR MAJOR VARIANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION INDICATOR REASONS FOR VARIANCE • Changes introduced in the new 2. 1 Applications for • foreign nationals Immigration Regulations that corporate and individual became effective from 26 May 2014 work visa processed and insufficient staff to deal within 30 working days • increased volumes of applications • ESSA system challenges –Extensive downtime due to Citrix. • . REMEDIAL ACTION Review targets for 2016/17 and beyond Provincial support to be provided to NW, MP, GP, WC Allocation of dedicated IT resource for PES 56
Improved audit performance for PES in 2015 2014 Selected programme Programme 3: Public Employment Services Usefulness Reliability 2015 Selected programme Qualification Disclaimer Programme 3: Public Employment Services Usefulness Unqualified Reliability Qualified 57
Improved QPR 1 performance OUT OF THE 8 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: v 5 WAS ACHIEVED (63%) v 3 WAS NOT ACHIEVED (37%) 58
PROGRAMME PERFORMANCE: APP 2015/16 PROGRAMME 4: LABOUR POLICY AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (LP&IR) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APRIL 2015 – MARCH 2016 59
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) Strategic Goal 10: PROMOTE EQUITY IN THE LABOUR MARKET (OUTCOME 14: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY AND UNITING THE COUNTRY) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 1. 1 Employment Equity Amendment Act implemented within set time Frames 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE Conduct 9 workshops on Code on Equal Pay for Work of Equal value by 30 September 2015 ACHIEVED 9 workshops conducted on Code on Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value by 30 September 2015. Verification Source (VS): Closeout report on the 9 workshops REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None 60
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) Strategic Goal 10: PROMOTE EQUITY IN THE LABOUR MARKET (OUTCOME 14: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY AND UNITING THE COUNTRY) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 1. 1 Employment Equity Amendment Act implemented within set time Frames 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET Amended Code on Employment of People with Disabilities published by March 2016. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None Amended Code of Good Practice on Employment of People with Disabilities published in Government Gazette on 11 November 2015. VS: Government Gazette no: 39383 on 11 November 2015 61
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) Strategic Goal 10: PROMOTE EQUITY IN THE LABOUR MARKET (OUTCOME 14: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY AND UNITING THE COUNTRY) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 1. 1 Employment Equity Amendment Act implemented within set time Frames 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 2014‐ 2015 Annual Employment Equity Report Public Register published by 30 June 2015 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None 2014‐ 2015 Annual Employment Equity Report and Public Register published by 30 June 2015. VS: Copy of the 2014 -2015 Annual Employment Equity Report and Public Register published in Government Gazette no: 38587 on 25 March 2015 62
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) Strategic Goal 10: PROMOTE EQUITY IN THE LABOUR MARKET (OUTCOME 14: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY AND UNITING THE COUNTRY) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 1. 1 Employment Equity Amendment Act implemented within set time Frames 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 2015‐ 2016 Annual Employment Equity Report and Public Register developed by 31 March 2016 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None 2015‐ 2016 Annual Employment Equity Report and Public Register developed by 31 March 2016. VS: EE report 2015/16 and Public Register 63
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) PROMOTE EQUITY IN THE LABOUR MARKET (OUTCOME 14: TRANSFORMING SOCIETY AND UNITING THE COUNTRY) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 1. 1 Employment Equity Amendment Act implemented within set time frames 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 30 Companies’ Income Differentials assessed to promote the principle of Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value. ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None 30 companies’ Income Differentials assessed to promote the principle of Equal pay for Work of Equal Value by 31 March 2016. VS: Copies of DG Recommendations signed by the DG 64
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) PROTECT VULNERABLE WORKERS (OUTCOME 4: DECENT EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 2. 1 To grant/refuse applications for exemption within a set time frame by March 2016 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET Application for variation on the BCEA processed within 60 days by March 2016 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED All 81 applications for variations were received and processed within 60 days VS: Signed letters of approval REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None 65
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) PROTECT VULNERABLE WORKERS (DECENT EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 3. 1 Number of new and existing sectoral determinations reviewed and investigated by March 2016 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION Review 4 Sectoral Determinations by March 2016 ACHIEVED All 4 sectoral determinations (Private Security; Wholesale and Retail; Forestry; and Farmworker sectoral determinations) reviewed. VS: Government Gazettes None 1 New sector investigated for possible setting of minimum wages and conditions of employment ACHIEVED 1 New Abattoir sector was investigated for possible setting of minimum wages and conditions of employment. Reported was submitted to the ECC. VS: ECC report, ECC Minutes and Ministerial Submission None Though investigation into the new sectoral determination was achieved, the report was put in the abeyance due to the national minimum wage discussion 66
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) STRENGTHEN MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL RELATIONS (OUTCOME 11: CREATE A BETTER SOUTH AFRICA, A BETTER AFRICA AND A BETTER WORLD) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 4. 1 Number of reports on ILO article 19 and 22 submitted by 30 September 2015 and 31 March 2016 respectively 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 7 Reports 1 Article 19 and 6 Article 22 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED Finalised 1 Article 19 Report REASON FOR VARIANCE None REMEDIAL ACTION None VS: ILO Confirmation ACHIEVED Finalised 6 Article 22 reports VS: Letter signed by Minister & ILO Confirmation 67
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) PROMOTE SOUND LABOUR RELATIONS (OUTCOME 4: DECENT WORK THROUGH INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 5. 1 Number of Collective agreements extended within 60 days of receipt 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 18 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE NOT ACHIEVED 32 collective agreements extended to non-parties for reporting period: - 1 collective agreement extended to non‐parties within 60‐days of receipt. 31 collective agreements extended to non‐parties in longer than 60‐days of receipt 14 additional collective agreements received from Bargaining Councils for extension and only 1 agreement extended within 60 days of receipt. VS: Copies of LRA Forms 3. 5 & 3. 6. Copies of Agreements published in Government Gazette with Minister’s signature REMEDIAL ACTION LRA Amendments to section 32 (5) does not make provision for the extra 21 days when extensions of collective agreements are published for comments. This has been the main reason for delays in processing agreements collective agreements. Further amendments to LRA under consideration. 68
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) PROMOTE SOUND LABOUR RELATIONS (OUTCOME 4: DECENT WORK THROUGH INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH) KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 5. 2 Hundred Percent of competent and completed labour organisation applications processed within 90 days of receipt 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 100% ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR VARIANCE REMEDIAL ACTION NOT ACHIEVED – 97% of labour organisation applications processed within 90 days of receipt. 134 – APPLICATIONS CONSIDERED AND FINALIZED FOR REPORTING PERIOD: 10 approved within 90‐days 119 refused within 90‐days 3 approved in longer than 90‐ days 1 refused in longer than 90‐ days VS: Copies of LRA 6. 1 & 6. 2, signed letter of approval/ refusal; copies of finalized applications from the LO system and summarized 4 cases were processed in longer than the required 90 day period due to internal process delays. Further delegations from Registrar to Deputy Registrar to be considered to minimize process delays. 69
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) MONITOR THE IMPACT OF LEGISLATION (OUTCOME 4: DECENT EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH KEY PERFORMANCE 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET INDICATOR 6. 1 Impact of legislation and labour market trends monitored and evaluated ACTUAL PERFORMANCE REASON FOR REMEDIAL ACTION VARIANCE 4 Annual Labour Market ACHIEVED None Trend reports published 2 Annual Labour Markey trend reports by September 2015 produced by 30 March 2016. These reports include: Industrial Action Report 2015 and Annual Administrative Statistics Report 2015, 2 other annual reports will be produced by 30 June 2016. These are Annual Labour Market Bulletin 2015/16 and Job Opportunity and Unemployment in the South African Labour Market report 2015/16 None VS: Ministerial submissions for Industrial Action report 2015 and Annual Administrative Statistics report 2016. All four annual reports will be published by September 2016 70
LABOUR POLICY & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS: (LP & IR) MONITOR THE IMPACT OF LEGISLATION (OUTCOME 4: DECENT EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 6. 1 A number of Labour market trends reports published and research reports produced 2015/16 ANNUAL TARGET 4 Literature review reports and data collection instruments for RME agenda 4 completed by March 2016 ACTUAL PERFORMANCE ACHIEVED The following were developed: REASON REMEDIA FOR L ACTION VARIANCE None 1. National Minimum wage: Data collection instruments developed, discussed and approved. Final research report was signed‐off by the committee. 2. Analysis of bursary recipient s’ performance: Data collection instruments developed, discussed and approved. Data collected, analyzed and draft report developed. 3. Active Labour Market Policy: Data collection instruments developed, discussed and approved. 4. Resource Adequacy Data collection instruments developed, discussed and approved. Interview commenced with internal stakeholders. VS: Literature review reports, Data collection instruments; Final research reports for NMW and Bursary analysis. 71
OBSERVATION • The Average Performance for the Department is 54% for the financial year 2015/16 up from 42% in 2014/15. ADMINISTRATION: • Performance has dropped for quarter 4 and stringent monitoring of 2016/17 remedial plans has been adopted for all Branches of the Do. L. IES: • Has significantly improved performance from quarter 1 to quarter 4. PES: • There is a large number of Indicators that have been consistently performing below par in the Financial Year. Provinces are managing change from manual to automated systems and this has resulted in tighter controls and stringent quality assurance measures. Due to this new approach, a number of reports that cannot be validated by the system have been disqualified resulting in reduced performance. Once provinces have adjusted to the new system PES performance will improve in 2016/17. LP&IR: • Has significantly improved performance from quarter 3 to quarter 4. 72
MILESTONES The introduction of stringent quality assurance measures in the Provinces have yielded positive results and audits for Do. L Performance Information: • The AG Interim Management Report 2015/16 reflects significant improvement by PES and LP&IR Branches. • PES received an unqualified audit finding on Performance Information from adverse in the previous financial year. • IES has improved its performance significantly from Q 1. however, the Branch received a qualified opinion on usefulness and a disclaimer on reliability of performance information. Full implementation of the IES Case Management System will yield positive results. Do. L will: • Continue to maintain the highest level of integrity on Performance Information whilst improving its systems and performance. 73
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR VOTE: 28 2015/2016 APPROPRIATION STATEMENT: ANNUAL REPORT October 2016
2015/2016 Expenditure Information 75
2015/2016 Expenditure Information • Major reasons for variances, per Main Division: – Administration (R 68, 4 m): • DPW claim of R 78 m disputed and a reduced value paid. • Delayed invoices for software licences could not be processed prior to year‐end – Public Employment Services (R 12, 2 m): • Less Io. D claims from the CF than budgeted for – Labour Policy and Industrial Relations (R 11, 6 m): • GCIS invoices for the EE Awards Awareness Campaign not received. • Research projects for RME Agenda 4 did not commence. 76
2015/2016 Expenditure Information 77
2015/2016 Expenditure Information 78
2015/2016 Expenditure Information 79
2015/2016 Expenditure Information Allocation less Transfers: Expenditure less Transfers: Variance (over)/under: % Expenditure: R 1, 690, 008, 000. 00 R 1, 601, 577, 000. 00 R 88, 431, 000. 00 94, 8% 80
2015/2016 Co. E Expenditure Information 81
2015/2016 Expenditure vs Performance 82
LEGEND Implication: Achieved Performance Indicator is on track or reflects complete implementation. Target achieved 100% + Complete Implication: Partially Achieved Performance Indicator is on track or reflects complete implementation. Target achieved 75 -99% Complete Implication: Not Achieved Performance Indicator behind schedule. Target not achieved immediate intervention is needed. 0% - 75% Complete 83
PERFORMANCE PER PROGRAMME: APP 2015/16 BRANCH Total Number of Indicators Achieved Partially Achieved Not Achieved Administration 18 8 5 5 Inspections and Enforcement Services 16 10 3 3 Public Employment Services 9 4 1 4 Labour Policy and Industrial Relations 7 5 - 2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE 50 27 (54%) 9 (18%) 14 (28%) 84
DOL AUDIT OUTCOME – 2015/2016 In its report, as contained in the 2015/16 Annual Report, the Office of the Auditor-General expressed an unqualified opinion on the regularity audit of the Department of Labour. One emphasis of matter was raised relating to the restatement of prior year figures relating to the reporting of mobile devices as a finance lease, and not an operational lease as previously stated. 85
Thank You… 86
Скачать презентацию The Department of Labour Annual Report 01 April
968492bd9b77a620ca5484958672c29a.ppt