The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes Findings International Expert Meeting, November 2008, The Hague, Netherlands 6 February 2012
Participating panels in 2008 Finland Sweden Norway Denmark Scotland England / Wales Canada The Netherlands 2 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes | 6 February 2012
Scope of assessment up to 2008 Behavioural programmes - Delivered in prison and community - Targeting generic and or specific risk factors - Participants: minor and or adults offenders Sites - Delivery of programmes (“site accreditation”) Added value - Promoting evidence-based services - Discouraging programs which are not based on sound scientific knowledge or lead to results not relevant for the justice system 3 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes | 6 February 2012
Evaluation of accredited programmes Many accredited programmes don’t come back for re-accreditation! - Evaluating is considered expensive and time consuming - There are ethical and methodological discussions 4 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes | 6 February 2012
Proximity to the field Independence and impartial accreditation How to combine impartiality with advice and giving guidance? 5 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes | 6 February 2012
Should the scope of accreditation be widened? E. g. : - Activities to invest in social capital offenders - Interventions to reach intermediate goals or stepping stones - More emphasis on other parts of systems (like: staff training, diagnostic instruments) 6 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes | 6 February 2012
Room for innovation - How to combine the requirements of evidence with the need for renewal of services? 7 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes | 6 February 2012
Скачать презентацию The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes Findings International Expert
a44f14267ac416ddadf8e983ec2a26cb.ppt