Скачать презентацию Tempus IV Second Call for proposals 2009 Overview Скачать презентацию Tempus IV Second Call for proposals 2009 Overview

9305befa4bf708a7384cd458faa8029b.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 27

Tempus IV, Second Call for proposals, 2009 Overview on the selection process and results Tempus IV, Second Call for proposals, 2009 Overview on the selection process and results EACEA (The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency) National Tempus Office – Ukraine 1 http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

11 проектів Темпус за участі України # Reference Participating Partner countries Participating MS E-Learning-Weiterbildungsnetzwerk 11 проектів Темпус за участі України # Reference Participating Partner countries Participating MS E-Learning-Weiterbildungsnetzwerk im Tourismus (Belarus- Georgien und Ukraine ) – We. Ne. T GE - UA- BY AT-DE-IT-SK 1 276 981, 00 Application Title EC Grant after budget revision 1 158739 -TEMPUS-DETEMPUS-JPHES 2 158886 -TEMPUS-UKTEMPUS-JPCR National Safeware Engineering Network of Centres of Innovative Academia-Industry Handshaking UA FI-IT-NL-ES 620 791, 00 3 159161 -TEMPUS-SETEMPUS-SMGR Implementing tools and policies for quality work at institutional level BY- UA - UZ EE-IT-ES-SE 1 187 380, 00 4 159173 -TEMPUS-DETEMPUS-JPCR EU Based Course in Foodstuff Expertise & Quality Control UA BG-DE-IT-PT 678 642, 00 5 159184 -TEMPUS-SETEMPUS-JPCR Development of New Land Governance Studies in Macedonia and Ukraine MK- UA FI-PL-SE 863 467, 00 6 159188 -TEMPUS-PLTEMPUS-JPCR Environmental curricula at agricultural universities RU - UA AT-BE-FR-PL 656 807, 00 http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

11 проектів Темпус за участі України # Reference Application Title Participating Partner countries Participating 11 проектів Темпус за участі України # Reference Application Title Participating Partner countries Participating MS EC Grant after budget revision 7 159239 -TEMPUS-SETEMPUS-JPGR Innovation cross-universities network for development of partnership with enterprises AZ - BY - RU- UA PL-SE-UK 8 159327 -TEMPUS-ATTEMPUS-SMGR E-internationalization for collaborative learning RU- UA AT-DE-UK-SI 615 915, 00 9 159338 -TEMPUS-LVTEMPUS-SMHES Higher Education System Development for Social Partnership Improvement and Humanity Sciences Competitiveness AM - GE- MD- UA LV-PT-UK 934 908, 00 10 159359 -TEMPUS-ESTEMPUS-JPHES Boosting the knowledge triangle by establishing Innovation Offices in Ukrainian higher education institutions UA AT-IT-ES-SE 571 279, 00 11 159371 -TEMPUS-DETEMPUS-JPCR Vernetzte und gestufte Aus- und Weiterbildung in Bildungsmanagement BY - RU- UA AT-DE-PL http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php 1 219 022, 00 1 259 525, 00

Total number of applications received Increased interest… 608 proposals submitted (15% more compared to Total number of applications received Increased interest… 608 proposals submitted (15% more compared to 530 received in 2008) 150 (25%) PC coordinator (grant-holder) (19% more compared to 126 received in 2008) € 950. 000 = average budget size 10 partners = average consortium size http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Applications from EU MS & PC Institutions 2009 2008 457 404 500 25% 450 Applications from EU MS & PC Institutions 2009 2008 457 404 500 25% 450 400 European Union 350 300 151 250 126 200 75% 150 100 50 0 2009 2008 http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php Partner Countries

Breakdown of applications by target region 2009 2008 http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php Breakdown of applications by target region 2009 2008 http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Breakdown of applications according to activity type http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php Breakdown of applications according to activity type http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Subject areas addressed for curriculum reform http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php Subject areas addressed for curriculum reform http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Освітні напрями проектних заявок, спрямованих на модернізацію освітніх програм Кількість проектних заявок Економіка, промисловість, Освітні напрями проектних заявок, спрямованих на модернізацію освітніх програм Кількість проектних заявок Економіка, промисловість, підприємництво 29 Туризм 13 Землекористування, сільське господарство, екологія, харчова промисловість 55 Соціальна робота, професійна підготовка і перепідготовка, навчання впродовж життя 44 Інженерія і прикладні науки 82 Менеджмент, державне управління, бізнес 37 Гуманітарні науки (мова, археологія, культура, право) 30 ІКТ, медіа, бібліотечна справа, е-навчання 40 Підготовка вчителів, реформи у вищій освіті 84 Медицина, ветеринарія, природні науки 31 Міждисциплінарні науки 74 http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Main steps in the selection process Reception of project proposals: 28 April 2009 Check Main steps in the selection process Reception of project proposals: 28 April 2009 Check of eligibility, exclusion and selection criteria Evaluation of proposals against award criteria Experts' briefing Assessment of proposals by academic experts Debriefing with lead experts to shortlist best proposals Inter-service selection panel at the Agency Consultations EC Delegations, NTOs and Ministries of Education in Partner countries Financial verification Inter-service selection panel at the Agency for final list of projects Award decision by the Authorising Officer (EACEA Director) http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Project assessment against award criteria by external experts Assessment v Each application assessed by Project assessment against award criteria by external experts Assessment v Each application assessed by two different experts, by teleworking, supported by the Agency on-line assessment tool v 1 st stage: Each expert carried out individual assessment v 2 nd stage: the 2 experts assessing the same proposals reached consolidated judgements and scores v Lead-experts responsible to mediate consolidations, ensure quality assessment outputs, final proofreading Debriefing panel with lead-experts v Discussion on the quality of the proposals v Suggestions for improvement of the evaluation exercise http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – 2 nd Call Most difficult Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – 2 nd Call Most difficult criteria to assess v Relevance v Budget and cost effectiveness http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – Tempus IV First Two Calls Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – Tempus IV First Two Calls (1) Part of application best completed § LFM § Work plan § Needs analysis § Description of partner institutions § Project summary http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – Tempus IV First Two Calls Feedback from experts after assessment on award criteria – Tempus IV First Two Calls (2) Part of application worst completed § Sustainability & dissemination § Outcome & activity tables § Quality control, monitoring and management § Budget http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Selection progress http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php Selection progress http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Selection progress: non-eligible applications § Wrong composition of consortium: • 1+1+1 + 3, or Selection progress: non-eligible applications § Wrong composition of consortium: • 1+1+1 + 3, or 1+1+1+ 2 § Minimum grant size not respected § Supporting documents not submitted § Untimely submission of application form § Other inaccuracies http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Overview of the selection progress on target regions Received applications Eligible applications Above the Overview of the selection progress on target regions Received applications Eligible applications Above the 50% threshold Proposed for consultation Recommended for funding Western Balkans 127 107 83 58 24 Central Asia 36 33 23 17 5 Eastern Neighbouring 148 120 90 52 12 Russian Federation 62 53 41 23 9 South Neighbouring area 157 129 106 33 16 Multiregional 78 53 34 21 3 495 377 204 REGION 608 TOTAL (81. 41%) (76. 16%) (54. 11%) http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php 69 (11. 34%)

Western Balkans – National vs Multi-country Country participation in projects recommended for funding Country Western Balkans – National vs Multi-country Country participation in projects recommended for funding Country Nat MC Tot al JP SM Total 13 12 25 19 6 Albania 0 3 3 3 0 Bosnia 2 5 7 4 3 Croatia 2 4 6 5 1 FYROM 1 9 10 9 1 Kosovo 2 4 6 5 1 Montenegro 1 3 4 4 0 Serbia 5 8 13 11 2 Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category. http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Country Southern Mediterranean countries - National vs Multicountry Country participation in projects proposed for Country Southern Mediterranean countries - National vs Multicountry Country participation in projects proposed for funding Nat MC Total JP SM Total 7 9 16 9 7 Algeria 1 5 6 4 2 Egypt 2 4 6 5 1 Israel 0 1 1 0 1 Jordan 0 4* 4* 3 1* Lebanon 0 3 3 2 1 Morocco 1 6 7 4 3 occ Palestinian territory 1 1 2 0 2 Syria 2 0 2 1 1 Tunisia 0 6 6 4 2 *Out of which a project including an association of Arabic universities, pan-Arabic organisation based in Jordan and covering the other countries involved in the consortium. Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category. http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Central Asia- National vs Multi-country Country participation in projects proposed for funding Country MC Central Asia- National vs Multi-country Country participation in projects proposed for funding Country MC Total JP SM Total 2 5 7 5 2 Kazakhstan 0 3 3 3 0 Kyrgyzstan 0 3 3 3 0 Tajikistan 1 2 3 3 0 Turkmenistan 1 0 1 Uzbekistan Nat 0 4 4 3 1 Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category. http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Eastern European countries - National vs Multi-country Country participation in projects recommended for funding Eastern European countries - National vs Multi-country Country participation in projects recommended for funding Country MC Total JP SM Total 13 12 25 19 6 Armenia 0 3 3 2 1 Azerbaijan 0 2 2 2 0 Georgia 0 4 4 3 1 Belarus 0 4 4 3 1 Moldova 1 1 2 0 2 Russia (incl. Bilateral) 9 5 14 12 2 Ukraine Nat 3 8 11 8 3 Country figures cannot be added as several countries can be involved in the same project. Multi-regional projects are included in the multi-country category. http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Number of applications coordinated by EU Member State institutions / Submitted vs Selected http: Number of applications coordinated by EU Member State institutions / Submitted vs Selected http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Number of applications coordinated by Partner Country institutions / Submitted vs Selected http: //eacea. Number of applications coordinated by Partner Country institutions / Submitted vs Selected http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Selection Conclusions Summary results 69 proposals recommended for funding 15 proposals have partner countries Selection Conclusions Summary results 69 proposals recommended for funding 15 proposals have partner countries as coordinator (21%) 50 Joint Projects 19 Structural measures (27, 5%) 34 proposals are multi-country (49%) € 815. 000 = average budget size 13 partners = average consortium size, out of which 9 partner country organisation in average / project Next steps Ü Notification of results - feedback to applicants Ü Contractualisation Ü Preparation of the Tempus IV – Third call for proposals http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Selection Conclusions: Ukraine Summary results 136 applications submitted 11 proposals recommended for funding 0 Selection Conclusions: Ukraine Summary results 136 applications submitted 11 proposals recommended for funding 0 proposals have Ukraine as a coordinator / grant-holder 8 Joint Projects 3 Structural measures 8 proposals are multi-country 3 are national Partners: Armenia (1), Azerbaijani (1), Moldova (1), Uzbekistan (1), Macedonia (1), Georgia (2), Belarus (4), Russia (4) http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Selection results § EACEA web-site http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/results_co mpendia/results_en. php § Projects Selection results § EACEA web-site http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/results_co mpendia/results_en. php § Projects recommended for funding: http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/results_co mpendia/documents/projects_recommende d_for_funding_publication_website_04_11_ 09_v 2. pdf http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php

Бажаємо успіхів у написанні та впровадженні проектів ТЕМПУС Національний Темпус-офіс в Україні телефон 38 Бажаємо успіхів у написанні та впровадженні проектів ТЕМПУС Національний Темпус-офіс в Україні телефон 38 044 286 66 68 е-адреса [email protected] org. ua веб-сайт www. tempus. org. ua http: //eacea. ec. europa. eu/tempus/index_en. php