Скачать презентацию TARRSON FAMILY ENDOWED CHAIR IN PERIODONTICS UCLA Скачать презентацию TARRSON FAMILY ENDOWED CHAIR IN PERIODONTICS UCLA

коронарно смещённый лоскут.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 36

TARRSON FAMILY ENDOWED CHAIR IN PERIODONTICS TARRSON FAMILY ENDOWED CHAIR IN PERIODONTICS

UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY

Presents Dr. E. Barrie Kenney Professor & Chairman Section of Periodontics Presents Dr. E. Barrie Kenney Professor & Chairman Section of Periodontics

E. Barrie Kenney, B. D. Sc. , D. D. S. , M. S. , E. Barrie Kenney, B. D. Sc. , D. D. S. , M. S. , F. R. A. C. D. S. Tarrson Family Endowed Chair in Periodontics Professor and Chairman, Division of Associated Clinical Specialties UCLA School of Dentistry

Coronally Placed Flaps A. Gingival Graft B. Membranes A. Gingival Graft Coronally Placed Flaps A. Gingival Graft B. Membranes A. Gingival Graft

Treatment of Gingival Recession Esthetic Problem Yes No Adequate Keratinized Gingiva Yes 3 Month Treatment of Gingival Recession Esthetic Problem Yes No Adequate Keratinized Gingiva Yes 3 Month Evaluation for Progression Adequate Keratinized Gingiva Yes No No Gingival Graft for Root Coverage or Gingival Graft and Coronally Repositioned Flap Recession More than 2 mm. Yes No Coronally Repositioned Semi-Lunar Flap Adequate Adjacent Donor Site Yes Lateral Sliding Flap No Adequate Palatal Donor Site Yes Connective Tissue Graft No Coronally Repositioned Flap with Membrane or Emdogain

Treatment of Gingival Recession Esthetic Problem Yes No Adequate Keratinized Gingiva Yes 3 Month Treatment of Gingival Recession Esthetic Problem Yes No Adequate Keratinized Gingiva Yes 3 Month Evaluation for Progression Adequate Keratinized Gingiva Yes No No Gingival Graft for Root Coverage or Gingival Graft and Coronally Repositioned Flap Recession More than 2 mm. Yes No Coronally Repositioned Semi-Lunar Flap Adequate Adjacent Donor Site Yes Lateral Sliding Flap No Adequate Palatal Donor Site Yes Connective Tissue Graft No Coronally Repositioned Flap with Membrane or Emdogain

Membranes BIO-GIDE RESORBABLE COLLAGEN Membranes BIO-GIDE RESORBABLE COLLAGEN

EMDOGAIN ENHANCES HEALING POSSIBLE STIMULATION OF BONE AND CEMENTUM EMDOGAIN ENHANCES HEALING POSSIBLE STIMULATION OF BONE AND CEMENTUM

Emdogain versus Connective Tissue Graft Enamel Matrix Derivative with Coronally Advanced Flaps vs. Connective Emdogain versus Connective Tissue Graft Enamel Matrix Derivative with Coronally Advanced Flaps vs. Connective Tissue Graft Technique in Gingival Recession Treatment Aleksic Z, Lekovic V, Vasilic N, AAP Boston 2004 • 17 paired recessions • Evaluated at 6 and 12 months

Results at 12 Months Root Coverage (%) Emdogain + C. P. F. 89. 7 Results at 12 Months Root Coverage (%) Emdogain + C. P. F. 89. 7 N. S. Connective Tissue Graft 91. 3 Gain in Width of Keratinized Tissue 1. 83 mm 3. 45 mm

Bio-Gide versus Connective Tissue Graft Guided Tissue Regeneration versus Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Bio-Gide versus Connective Tissue Graft Guided Tissue Regeneration versus Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession Treatment. Aleksic Z, Lekovic V, Vasilic N, AAP San Francisco 2003 • 12 paired recessions • Evaluated at 6 months

Results at 6 Months Root Coverage (%) Bio-Gide + C. P. F. 81. 5 Results at 6 Months Root Coverage (%) Bio-Gide + C. P. F. 81. 5 N. S. Connective Tissue Graft 84. 3 Gain in Width of Keratinized Tissue 0. 69 mm 3. 23 mm

B. Membranes B. Membranes

UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY