
b316627e4321210c224bcfc71ccb0d05.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 6
T 1 ITB Status • Phase 1“Proof of Concept” Field Test conducted Mc. Nary U 9 Dec 14 -16 05 • Although limited operating range tested, results promising • Continuous monitoring of unit to identify “steadystate” operation and when to log data • Interfaces with GDACS (security issues) • Numerous fixes & improvements identified • Once corrected, “unattended and automatic” collection of data possible
T 1 ITB Phase 1 • Test to verify bugs have been corrected • Parallel to IH index testing Feb ’ 06 • Off-cam (Fixed Blade) testing of Kaplan unit should prove applicability of ITB to Francis unit • Testing @ IH in lieu of previously proposed CJ verification test
Type 1 ITB Phase 2 • Procure non-GDACS ITB ~$12 k • Procure additional GDACS ITB ~$12 k • Demonstration Project Kaplan (GDACS): LGR 4 -6 proposed site (FY 07) • Demonstration project Francis (non. GDACS): Site tbd, DWO or CJ
T 1 Future Work • T 1 Implementation into GDACS: - ITB source code availability - ITB long term maintenance - Develop code for GDACS Est. $850 k next 3 yrs to develop
T 1 Future Work • W-K Rel Flow Signal into GDACS – X-ducers w/ automated flushing system on each unit • B 1, B 2, TD, JD, CJ, IH, LGR, LMO, LGO 97 Kaplan & 27 Francis installations • AF, Libby & Willamette Valley Projects – E&D FY 06 – Implementation FY 07 & FY 08 • Develop new discharge tables
Absolute Flow CJ & DWO • 2 units CJ, 3 units DWO currently installed – • Flow value into GDACS Decision on remaining units – Range of possibilities: 1) Acoustic flow meters on every unit $$$ 2) Gibson Test every unit $$$ 3) Acoustic flow single unit given family & index test remaining units of same family – – DWO testing to verify method (3) If successful, phased implementation at CJ
b316627e4321210c224bcfc71ccb0d05.ppt