Stochastic Opponent Modeling Agents SOMA A Case Study

Stochastic Opponent Modeling Agents (SOMA): A Case Study with Hezbollah Aaron Mannes Mary Michael Amy Pate Amy Sliva V. S. Subrahmanian Jon Wilkenfeld Laboratory for Computational Cultural Dynamics & The Center for International Development and Conflict Management University of Maryland 1

LCCD Approach: A Very Brief Overview – SOMA: a formal, logical-statistical reasoning language within which we can express knowledge about the behaviors of a group of interest, was used to compile a set of rules about Hezbollah behavior – Minorities at Risk Project (MAR)database tracks hundreds of variables about hundreds of minority ethnic groups worldwide and the organizations that represent them - including Hezbollah – Over 14, 000 rules on Hezbollah’s behavior were extracted – Built the SOMA Terrorist Organization Portal to facilitate analysis and social networking between the analysts – Questions? Don’t Ask Me! – An upcoming presentation, by the LCCD Director V. S. Subrahmanian will discuss the technical features in greater depth – For more on MAR see the University of Maryland’s Center for International Development and Conflict Management www. cidcm. umd. edu 2

Hezbollah Background “Hezbollah may be the A team of terrorists, and maybe al-Qaeda is actually the B team. ” - former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, Congressional Testimony September 2002 • Prior to 9/11 terrorist group responsible for the most deaths of Americans • One of the first groups to conduct suicide bombings, they’ve carried out terror attacks on three continents • Fought a capable conventional war against Israel in summer 2006 • Has a political party and provides social services in Lebanon • Has links to other terrorist groups, trans-national criminal networks, and Iran and Syria 3

Hezbollah: Politics & Terrorism • Rules indicated a clear shift in Hezbollah strategy depending on its relation to the Lebanese state – During the Lebanese Civil War there were no elections and one of Hezbollah’s top strategies was kidnapping – When the Civil War ended, Hezbollah ran in Lebanese elections, reduced their level of kidnapping and began to launching rockets at Israel 4

Hezbollah & Kidnapping • During the Lebanese Civil War Hezbollah was. 71 likely to engage in kidnappings in any given year – When the level of soliciting external support was minor the likelihood of kidnapping rose to 1. 0 – In years when Hezbollah was highly engaged in seeking external support likelihood was negligible. – Was Hezbollah subordinating its terrorist activities to the needs of its sponsors? 5

Hezbollah: Voting & Violence • Isolating between heavy involvement in electoral politics (election years) and lesser involvement however - is revealing – Base likelihood of attacks on Israel was. 62 – In off election years likelihood of attacks rises to. 78 – But in election years the probability is negligible – Hezbollah subordinates its military goals to its local political needs in election years – With Lebanese politics deadlocked over the Presidential election, this provides a working theory as to why Hezbollah has not renewed hostilities against Israel 6

Insights • First we see Hezbollah as an organization that makes careful and strategic calculations • Second we see how Hezbollah is pulled between competing influences - particularly their sponsors and their local political interests • Currently Hezbollah is appears caught between its patron’s needs and the pressures of Lebanese politics • Does this create an opportunity for a political strategy to counter-Hezbollah? 7

Contact Information Aaron Mannes Dept. of Computer Science AV Williams Building University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742. amannes@umd. edu www. aaronmannes. com LAB: www. umiacs. umd. edu/research/LCCD/ 8