Status of WATERSHED PROJECTS In JHARKHAND STATE By B. Nijalingappa CEO , JSWM-SLNA 20 -21 May 2010 New Delhi 1
ABSTRACT OF IWMP-JHARKHAND STATE S. Item No. 1 Total no. of micro-watersheds in the State Total no. of untreatable micro-watersheds 2 (Reserved Forest, Barren Rocky, flow irrigation) Total no. of treatable micro-watersheds in the 3 State No. of micro-watersheds covered under different 4 schemes Balance no. of micro-watersheds not covered till 5 date 11 th Plan 12 th Plan for covering balance micro 6 13 th Plan watersheds 14 th Plan Total Details No. Area (ha) 10, 798 7, 970, 080 2, 519 1, 439, 801 8, 279 6, 530, 279 1, 026 * 784, 334 7, 253 5, 945 761 745, 181 809 631, 091 2, 638 2, 233, 691 3, 045 2, 135, 982 7, 253 5, 745, 945 2
Details of sanctions under IWMP, 2009 -10 S. No. Details Item No. Micro-watersheds sanctioned during 2009 -10 No. of projects (clusters) Area (ha) 189 117824. 05 20 Estimated project cost (Rs. in lakhs) for the sanctioned projects: 14138. 85 • Central share • State share • Total Amount of 1 st installment of Central & State Share (20 %) (Rs. in lakhs)2827. 77 6% 14% Total 12724. 96 1413. 89 14138. 85 Central Share 763. 49 1781. 50 2544. 99 State Share 84. 83 197. 94 282. 77 Total 848. 32 1979. 44 2827. 77 3
Annual action plan and DPR • 16 -17 April 2010, a workshop was organized on preparation of PPR/DPR/MIS • 13 experts/staff have been engaged on contract basis at SLNA level. • Preparation of Annual action plan and DPR for 2010 -11 are in the process. • Project fund release to PIAs are in the process. • PG Diploma / Certificate courses will be organized by R K Mission in collaboration with university. • PIAs are in the Process of organizing PRA and EPA . • JSAC – are in the process of digitization of Cadastral sheets. • UNDP – is assisting for preparation of process mechanism manual / financial manual / technical manual / MIS /Capacity Building and Technical support to SLNA. 4
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE The state has UNDP assisted Jharkhand State support programmes which comprehensively, interalia, would be addressing the issue of capacity building on watershed management in Jharkhand Institutes of eminence, specifically, situated in Jharkhand shall be utilized in the SLNA’s endeavor to develop the capacity of villagers, SHGs, Users’ group, watershed committee, PIAs as well personnel in the government involved in the watershed management 5
Project Proposed by Soil Conservation Department for the Year 2010 -11 S. no. Name of the District Weightage Total Project Area(hac. ) Total Proposed Treatable Area Total Cost Rs. In lakh 1 Dumka 125. 5 1 11 6047. 71 5617. 00 674. 04 2 E. Singhbh um 105 1 9 5899. 00 5725. 00 687. 00 3 Giridih 118 1 9 6568. 00 6375. 00 765. 00 4 Koderma 118 1 8 4336. 00 4000. 00 480. 00 5 Latehar 108 1 7 7080. 00 7000. 00 840. 00 6 Simdega 120. 5 1 10 5326. 00 4588. 00 550. 00 6 54 35256. 71 33305. 00 3996. 60 Total no. No. of Microwat Cluster ershed Proposed 6
Project Proposed by Forest Deptt. For the year 2010 -11 S. no. Name of the District Block Total no. of Cluster No. Microwatersh ed Proposed Total Proposed Treatable Area Total Cost Rs. In lakh 1 Chatra Chandawa, huntergang 2 11 8529. 69 1023. 5628 2 Deoghar madhupur 1 3 1976. 86 237. 2232 3 East Singhbhum Bairagoda 1 3 2922. 72 350. 7264 4 Garwah Meral, Mazhiaon, Ranka 3 11 14393. 55 1727. 226 5 Giridhi Gawan 1 1 974. 56 116. 9472 6 Godda Sunderpahadi 1 4 9050. 71 1086. 0852 7 Gumla Basia 1 4 3116. 31 373. 9572 8 Hazaribagh Sadar 1 7 4829. 2 579. 504 9 Latehar sadr 1 5 6863. 87 823. 6644 10 Palamu Vishrampur, Chainpur 2 3 8747. 29 1049. 6748 11 Ranchi Bundu, Namkum 2 10 10823. 82 1298. 8584 12 West singhbhum Sonava 1 4 3193. 91 383. 2692 17 66 75422. 49 9050. 6988 Total 7
Status of IWDP/DPAP • Total no. of project sanctioned under DPAP during (2000 -01 to 2006 -07): 1332 • No. of Projects to be foreclosed under DPAP: 1000 • No. of Projects to be continued : 332 • Total no. of project sanctioned under IWDP: 25 • FIR has been filed under IWDP in Giridhi Dist. • Two projects of IWDP has merged as single project in GUMLA Distt. 8
Status of the projects under DPAP Rs. in Lakh Sn o. Name of the distri cts Total no. of Pr oj ec ts Unspent Balance (To Be Returned) Projects to be contine ud Projects to be foreclos ed Central State Total Remarks 1 Bokaro 31 XI & XII (8) VI to X (23) 98. 08 33. 15 131. 23 Refunded 2 Chatra 76 0 VI to XII (76) 15. 60 5. 20 20. 80 3 Deoghar 105 XII (17) VI to XII (88) 49. 58 16. 53 66. 11 Refunded by PIAs 4 Dumka 108 XI & XII (34) VI to X (74) 67. 28 22. 43 89. 71 5 Dhanbad 115 X to XII (43) VI to IX(72) 3. 47 1. 16 4. 62 6 Garhwa 182 XI & XII (64) VI to X (118) 58. 40 19. 46 77. 86 7 Godda 77 XI & XII (23) VI to X (54) 11. 01 3. 67 14. 68 8 Hazaribag 72 0 VII to XII(72) 43. 04 14. 35 57. 39 9 Jamtara 56 IX to XII (30) VI to VIII(26) 0. 36 0. 12 0. 48 10 Koderma 75 IX & XII (30) VI to VIII(45) 22. 91 7. 63 30. 54 11 Latehar 80 0 VI to XII (80) 64. 31 21. 44 85. 75 12 Pakur 74 0 VI to XII(74) 20. 27 6. 76 27. 03 Refunded 27. 03 13 Palamu 162 XI & XII (48) VI to X (114) 49. 07 16. 36 65. 42 14 Ramgarh 45 XII (4) VII to. XI (41) 2. 21 0. 74 2. 94 15 Sahebganj 74 X to XII (31) VI to IX(43) 11. 91 3. 97 15. 89 Total 1332 1000 517. 50 172. 96 690. 45 9
Status of the projects under DPAP Sno. Name of the districts QPR MPR 1 Bokaro Yes 2 Chatra 3 contd. Criminal Cases/FIR MTER UCs ASA Yes No Not Avail. No Yes No Not Avail. Deoghar March, 09 April, 10 No 2008 -09 March, 2009 FIR on PIAs 4 Dumka No March, 10 No Not Avail. 5 Dhanbad No April, 10 No Sept, 09/XI No Not Avail. 6 Garhwa No No No 2008 -09 No Not Avail. 7 Godda No April, 10 No 2008 -09 No Not Avail. 8 Hazaribag No March, 10 No Not Avail. 9 Jamtara No March, 10 No Not Avail. 10 Koderma No April, 10 No 2008 -09 B. -VI matter in vigilence 11 Latehar No April, 10 No 2009 -10 No Not Avail. 12 Pakur No March, 10 yes 2009 -10 Not Avail. 13 Palamu No April, 10 No Not Avail. 14 Ramgarh No March, 10 No Not Avail. 15 Sahebganj March, 10 No 2009 -10 No Not Avail. Total 10
Status of the projects under IWDP Rs. in Lakh No. of Clust er proje cts Total Central Share Released Total State Share Releas ed others reciept Total Avail able fund Sno. Name of the district s Total Exoendit ure 1 Bokaro 1 41. 25 3. 75 0 45 40. 96 4. 04 2 Chatra 1 41. 25 3. 75 0 45 45 0 3 Ramnchi and Khunti 2 244. 94 7. 5 0. 87 253. 31 172. 31 81 4 Saraikela Kharsa wan 3 514. 26 39. 86 14. 24 568. 36 449. 43 118. 93 5 E. Singhbhum 2 295. 19 20. 07 0 315. 26 312. 89 2. 37 6 Giridih 3 399. 57 37. 5 11. 25 448. 32 386. 52 61. 8 7 Palamu 1 123. 01 11. 33 0 134. 34 85. 67 48. 67 8 Lohardaga 1 146. 41 13. 5 2. 94 162. 85 145. 24 17. 61 9 W. Singhbhu m 3 152. 85 8. 25 5. 34 166. 44 131. 16 35. 28 10 Gumla 2 82. 5 7. 5 3. 26 93. 26 0 11 Simdega 2 246. 07 15 0 261. 07 159. 25 101. 82 12 Godda 1 122. 29 11. 25 0. 77 134. 31 111. 21 23. 1 13 Hazaribag 1 122. 62 11. 25 1. 23 135. 10 132. 65 1. 12 Total 25 2532. 21 190. 51 39. 9 2762. 62 2265. 55 497. 07 Balance 11
Status of the projects under IWDP Sno. Name of the districts QPR MPR contd. MTER UCs ASA Criminal Cases/FI R 1 Bokaro March, 2010 No 2009 -10 No Not Avail. 2 Chatra No No Not Avail. 3 Ramnchi and Khunti No April, 2010 No Not Avail. 4 Saraikela Kharsawan March, 2010 2008 -09 March, 10 Not Avail. 5 E. Singhbhum No April, 2010 No Not Avail. 6 Giridih March, 2010 No Not Avail. 7 Palamu No April, 2010 No Not Avail. 8 Lohardaga No March, 2010 No Not Avail. 9 W. Singhbhum No April, 2010 No Not Avail. 10 Gumla No No Not Avail. 11 Simdega No April, 2010 No Not Avail. 12 Godda No April, 2010 No Not Avail. 13 Hazaribag No April, 2010 No Not Avail. In Pro ces s 12
ORGANOGRAM FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF IWMP Institutional Structure Development Commissioner Secretary Rural Development CEO (SLNA) DWDU (DRDA) PIA Watershed Committee Go. I
SELECTION CRITERIA FOLLOWED BY THE STATE WHILE SELECTING NEW PROJECTS S. No. Criteria i Poverty index (% of poor to population) Applied or Not Applied ii iv v vi viii ix x xi % of SC/ ST population Actual wages % of small and marginal farmers Ground water status Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block Area under rain-fed agriculture Drinking water Degraded land Productivity potential of the land Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated Applied Applied Applied xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project) Applied 14
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE: Continued…… Activities Sub activities Preparation of • Local systems of planning, capacity building, Strategic plans for implementation and reporting. IWMP • Preparing basic data tables at Jharkhand with help from JSAC & other departments (Secondary data) as per the requirement of the Go. I. • Taking a view on the closer of previous watershed development projects. • Preparation of the perspective , Strategic & Annual action plans. 15
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE: Continued…… Activities Identification of CB institutions Sub activities • Preparation of a process document including criteria for selection of the organizations for capacity building need of all stakeholders at different levels. • Establishment of procedures for selection of organizations for capacity building. • Selection of organizations for CB. • Initial orientation of the CB organizations. Jharkhand –state • Sharing of experiences workshop-exploring local specific process experiences & innovations related to watershed guidelines for IWMP development programme and evolving broad frame work for process guidelines. • Identification of experts agency for preparation of state specific process guidelines for Jharkhand 16
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE: Continued…… Activities Sub activities Evolving monitoring, evaluation & learning systems • Evolving a frame work for on line monitoring and identification of an institutions for developing the online monitoring & reporting systems. Evolving a planning frame work for conversant livelihood action plans • Identification of four block based on different agro climatic regions/Zones. • Understanding the context of blocks identified in each Zone. • Identification of one representative in each agro-eco situation for preparation of action plan. • Orientation of field staff about the frame work. • Field testing in one village per block. 17
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE: Continued…… Activities Evolving a planning frame work for conversant livelihood action plans Sub activities • Preparation of detailed action plans for all major component of the rain fed farming systems in above representative villages. • Synthesis of above information into a block level plan with clarity about convergence of funds from different schemes. • Consolidation of above proposal into a district level plan with clarity about convergence of various schemes. 18
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE: The expertise & specialization of the following state and national level institutions shall be involved Continued…… Sl. Name of Institutions Type Specialization 1 Horticulture Agro forestry Research Programme, Palandu, Ranchi Research station (Indian Council for Agriculture Research) 2. Jharkhand Space Application Centre (JSAC) State Govt. Institute Space Application, GIS, Watershed etc. 3 Birsa Agriculture university Technical university Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Horticulture, Watershed management etc. 4. Watershed training Institute (Nagri) State Govt. Institute Watershed management, Soil conservation etc. 5 Training Institute on Soil conservation, Demotand, Hazaribagh State Govt. field training / production cum / agro tourism institute etc. Soil conservation and watershed management etc. 6 Soil conservation directorate, Damodar Valley Corporation, Hazaribagh Training Institute River valley management 7 Indian School of mines. Dhanbad Central Govt. Institute Mining, Mine disaster, Soil , water & other natural resource management. Horticulture, Watershed management etc. 19
CAPACITY BUILDING INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED BY THE STATE: The expertise & specialization of the following state and national level institutions shall be involved: 8 Indianl Institute of Natural Resin & Gums, Ranchi, (IINRG) Central Govt. Institute Gums & resins, natural resource and lac based livelihood management. 9 Institute of forest productivity (ICFRE) Regional research station Aforestation, silviculture, watershed management etc. 10 Central Ground Water board, Ranchi Central Govt. Institute Ground water management 11 MANAGE, Hyderabad Non-Govt. organization Watershed Management 12 WASSAN Non-Govt. organization Watershed Management 13 National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD), Hyderabad Central Govt. Institute Integrated Rural Development Management 14 Central Land use survey Institute Central Govt. Institute Water & Land management 15 Central soil survey, Kolkata Central Govt. Institute Soil & watershed management 20
Livelihoods interventions proposed by the State: Livelihoods q Livestock based livelihoods: Promotion of improved proposed for breed, improved rearing practices (such as broiler Asset less poultry) along with improved feeding practices, health and re-production q Forest and tree based activities such as lac cultivation, Tasar silk worm rearing, etc. q Non Timber Forest Produce collection, aggregation and primary processing q Micro enterprises development such Tasar reeling and spinning q Handicraft development q Services required for the area and livelihoods (product collecting, sorting -grading, marketing of produces, trading, other skill based services ) 21 21
Livelihoods interventions proposed by the State: Livelihoods q Production and productivity enhancement : proposed for Introduction of new & improved varieties of cereal, Farmers pulses, oilseed and vegetable crops, crop demonstration, farm mechanization, new production processes such as Systematic rice intensification (SRI) promotion of biofertilizer, integrated nutrient and pest management, vermi composting, promotion of organic farming , etc. q Area nearby upper ridges or upland under fruit and vegetables crops q Promotion of production clusters for specified crops q Promotion of pisciculture in water bodies created or rejuvenated q Establishment of Infrastructure such as sorting grading centers, mini cold storage , etc. through convergence q Conducting Value chain study for Agricultural produce and setting up primary processing units q Improved livestock mainly dairy q Promotion of people’s collectives for dealing with inputs – aggregation – marketing 22 22
Expected Outcomes S. No. Item Unit Pre-project Status Expected Post-project Status 1 Status of water table Meter 10 mtr 8 -9 mtr (facilitating infiltration of 300 -400 mm additional rain water into soil per unit area) 2 Water Harvesting structures repaired/ rejuvenated No. 3 Quality of drinking water Safe drinking water Unsanitized/collecting drinking water from farther places in summer shortening the distance for water collection and making it safe by providing roof etc. 4 Availability of drinking water Months in a year 8 months 10 -12 months Approx. 2, 400 structures All structures would be repaired / require repair / rejuvenated & brought under rejuvenation/Structures use, etc. . not in use 23
Expected Outcomes S. No Item 5 Increase in irrigation potential 6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern 7 Unit Pre-project Status Expected Post-project Status Ha. 15, 550 30, 000 Cropping intensity 110% • Fallow land • Uncultivable wasteland Cropping intensity 125 -135 % fallow land uncultivable wasteland converted as cultivable land Area under agricultural crop Percentage i Ha. 40, 183 30, 000 -35, 000 ii 8 Area under single crop Area under double crop Ha. 2, 500 20, 000 - 25, 000 (nearly 80 % irrigated area would be under double crop. ) Ha. 1, 250 3, 500 – 4, 000 Increase in area under vegetation 24
Expected Outcomes S. No. Item Unit Pre-project Status Expected Post-project Status 9 Increase in area under horticulture Ha. NA @15 hectare/ Micro watershed 10 Increase in area under fuel & fodder Ha. NA @ 15 ha / Micro watershed 11 Increase in milk production Lt/day Per animal . 5 – 1. 0 (on an Average) 1. 0 -3. 0 (Breed improvement, productivity enhancement with the support of BAIF and NDDB) 12 No. of SHGs No. Approx. 2000 functional SHGs More than 3500 SHGs would be functional and linked with livelihood activities or delivering services. 13 Increase in no. of livelihoods No. Approx. 45, 000 households require livelihoods support. 45, 000 households will get the benefit of increased livelihood support from expanded basket of livelihood through activities based on land, water, forest and livestock. 25
Expected Outcomes in farming system S. No. Item Unit Pre-project Status Expected Post-project Status Increase in income Rs. per annum per capita Own agricultural produce + Rs. 9, 000 – 10, 000 Year round food sufficiency + Rs. 12, 000 – 18, 000 (4000 -12000 from cereal and another 5000 -10000 from forest & enterprise) 15 SHG Federations formed No. 1 10 -14 (Based on one federation per block) 16 Credit linkage with banks No. 3000 Additional 15, 00 SHGs with credit linkage 17 Resource use agreements Nil Planning will incorporate use of assets created. Facilitation/training would be imparted by PIA to ensure the same (As a process, User Groups may sign an agreement with WC regarding utilization of resources and maintenance of assets). Similar arrangements shall be made for developed/treated land plantation related activities. ) 14 26
Thanks 27
Скачать презентацию Status of WATERSHED PROJECTS In JHARKHAND STATE By
4291cb56e8bb40c153f14d788c19cd69.ppt