Status Eurogiro Applications Get connected to the future

Status Eurogiro Applications Get connected to the future Morten Bøge Executive manager Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 1

Eurogiro Application status since last time… • • • Overall perspective and general news Migration and version status Architecture challenges Development status and projects Test and Quality News from security groups Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 2

Connectivity - business perspective Urgent cash Semi urgent cash to account WU ECI 1 days UPU Core application HOST 2 days ELS 3 days Credit transfer Money order Settlement service (ESSP/USSP) Account to account (Banks!) <4 days FED/VISA/ CITI SWIFT/ESM Payments to/from accounts Cross payment Settlement service (ESSP) Account to account (Banks!) Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 3

…but what is important since last time • ELS v 1 not supported anymore • Deployment of ELS and ESM v. 3 is ongoing – many service calls in 2007 • Upgraded to ECI v. 3 (Former TMO) • Completed D/R site for Swift Net and ELS gateways • Employed 1 new IT consultant – More focus on Quality and Test • 3 new members/customers • Updated the web site • New ESG group • New LINUX approach We always try to service our customers needs Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 4

Major fixes 1 • ELS v 3. 0. 2 Oct 2007: – CO#34 (Expanding the import routing criteria by including the sender BIC in import routing functionality) – Verification of total amount – Currency changes to Euros (send screen) – MT 011 envelopes not forwarded to Host – MT 103 -61 was failing due to tag 72 exceeds lines defined in rule file – Signing of export envelopes were failed for reason 10180 in ESM – Export envelopes were picked up by ELS application while still being written, new parameter (HOST_POLLING_RETRY ) – Reconciling MT 910 it was failing due to trailing space in reference number – Error on validating 103 -61 – Env. with EG 09 and description in tag 79 rejected – ELS 2 rejecting MT 910 with 6 lines in field 72 Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 5

Major fixes 2 • ELS v 3. 0. 6 Dec 2007: – Mainly gateway problems and WU incidents • ELS v 3. 0. 8 Jan 2008 – All MT 011 rejected (does not follow EGN Swift format) • ELS v 3. 0. 10 Feb 2008 – Still MT 011 rejected (does not follow EGN Swift format) – Wrong formatted MT 202 tag 58 – Parsing failure when using charges in MT 103 Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 6

Major fixes 3 • ELS v 3. 0. 11 Mar 2007: – – – – CO#1171 (ELS cannot handle three decimals in fields 32 A or TOT) XXXXXXX values in the routing table of ELS Excess of maximum characters in tag 79 of MT 195 Error when sending to own BIC Unable to enter more than 34 characters in field 77 A for MT 196 Turn off verification of MT 192, MT 195, MT 196, MT 198 -93 and MT 29* messages MT 200 with 52 character line in field 72 accepted MT 103 rejected when information is added in tag 23 E Error message on MT 199 in tag 79 – to many characters Too small box for seeing whole reference in field 20 and 21 ELS not accepting spaces in creditor/debtor name MT 950 with colons in second line of tag 61 rejected Parsing problem in 50 F field. Envelope still present in "Send Return" after being returned – Illegal characters back from ELS 3 (RPC) like: < or > – Output date/time in MT 011 is not set by Eurogiro system – MT 011 rejected - "The file does not follow Eurogiro Swift format" Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 7

Major fixes 4 • ESM v 3. 0. 0 Aug 2007: – CO#30/31 (EBCDIC changes and manual creation of MT 202) – ELS_Member_info_Test/prod changes to trigger automatic refresh of GUI. – Add ESM v 2 support for Product types 103 -97, 103 -98 and 103 -99. – Unable to use absolute paths in esm_config. properties. • ESM v 3. 0. 1 Sep 2007: – Change the "XESM" to "XELS" branch code for manual generated – The message type 198 is not valid – Host Polling restarts successfully but still negative – Error in parsing MT 198 -93 because of wrong XML File – Unable to manually change sequence from 999999 to 000001 – Addition of bilateral product code 92 in MT 103 xml file Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 8

Major fixes 5 • ESM v 3. 0. 3 Dec 2007: – CO#32/34 (SEPA and Import routing changes) – Change the “XESM” to “XELS” branch code for manual generated. – MQ Configuration Error • TMO/ECI v. 3. 1. 4 (latest version) – Unable to parse field 50 F – Amount in MT 910 does not match TOT in envelope – Removal of currency validation – Addition of field 21 in MT 198 -66 envelopes – MT 910 reconciliation failed due to incorrect total calc – ELS cannot handle three decimals in fields 32 A or TOT Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 9

Facts (April 2008) • ELS/ESM v 1 – 29 sites in production (15 via SWIFT) • ELS v. 2/v. 3 – 28 sites in production, 14 still testing (15 via Internet) • ESM v. 2/v. 3 – 9 sites in test • TMO v. 3. 1. 4 (now ECI, Eurogiro Cash International) – 5 sites in production, 8 in test (Apr 2008) – 1/2 sites tests link to UPU • Western Union interface – 6 sites in production We will keep focus on delivering core Eurogiro requirements Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 10

Architecture • • D/R (Contingency) site – now in production New Turnkey Platform – now in production New validation software for FED Western Union compliance rules Future • SOA concept – unifying ELS/ESM? • JBoss middleware kit? • Multi database support? We will constantly improve architecture to meet today's demands Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 11

Projects in Pipeline 2008 2007 D/R site (test) 2009 2010 D/R site customers SWIFT ph. 2 R ELS Transaction Interface ELS/ESM v. 2. 0 (+firewall)R ELS/ESM v. 3. 0 (SEPA)R (SEPA direct debit ? ) WU regulations. R SOA definitions FED link. R FED (Nacha support) CRMR ECI/TMO v. 3. 0 Field 50 FR ELS/ESM v. 4. 0 (SOA, Web service, modules) WU compliance D/R site. R CMS (+) ELS Turnkey Semi automatic test (MBT) Structured quality service delivery (ITIL) PKI General ISO 20022 support MAC Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 12

Quality • Test and quality manager appointed • Main focus: – – General test management Define test processes Strengthen release management ITIL Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 13

Test management • Unit testing (modules/components) – All testing should be semi or full automated – Case driven (consists of event, action, input, output, expected result, and actual result) – Performed isolated by external team/group – Incl. regression test – Well documented • System Integration testing – Ex. Next page… • Acceptance testing (ENOC) Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 14

System integration test processes (ex. ) Test team Update Test data Build test environment Yes Perform System Integration test Synchronize Test data Perform End to end test Ok ? no Create test cases Create scripts For updating Test data Create data Description For each Test cycle Manual update Test data Create scripts For sync Test data Development team Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 15

ITIL • • Service delivery (HP) Service support (All) – Release management • • • Security management (EG, HP) Infrastructure management (EG, HP) Business perspective (EG) Application management (RI/L&T) – Lifecycle management • • Procedures of software configuration Version control Procedures for distribution and installation Procedures for checklists, roll out plans (use of tested version) Manage customer expectations (Mayor, Minor, Emergency changes, prioritization) Feedback handling Requirements → Design → Build and test → Implement and deploy →. . . Software asset management (EG, HP) Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 16

Feedback from Vienna • • Data validation on ELS/ESM Contingency procedures Reconciliation of ELS/ESM More user friendly GUI More user friendly log messages MT 011 distribution Knowledge management Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 17

And actions… • Data validation on ELS/ESM – Changes has been implemented (MT 192, MT 195, MT 196, MT 198) • Contingency procedures – Eurogiro finalized – next step at the customer site • Reconciliation of ELS/ESM – Discussed how to proceed ex. at this event (XML files) • More user friendly GUI – Not yet, will be discussed later • More user friendly log messages – Changes has been implemented (CO#34) • MT 011 creation in ESM – MT 011 forwarded to host? – To be concluded • Knowledge management – On website Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 18

On new website Release plan In the following section, Eurogiro will be announcing new releases. ESM Released Issues 3. 0. 4 Released IH 827 : Differences in the XML files ESM 2 - ELS 2 IH 854 : EUGIDKKT - ESM 2 - failed envelopes increase host sequence. IH 1185 : EURODK 0 T - Bulked envelope not following standard IH 1216 : POFICHBT - SC 4224 - Parsing failure when using charges in MT 103 IH 1229 : PCHQBEBT - SC 4247 - Field 50 F incorrectly formatted IH 1237 : ONPTMARA - SC 4261 - Addition of bilateral product MT 103 -22 IH 1247 : Turn off verification of MT 192, MT 195, MT 196, MT 198 -93 and MT 29* messages IH 1251 : ALEIGB 20 - SC 4292 - No message type displayed in logs for "Host not registered" IH 1281 : SYBKDK 2 T - SC 4356 - Failure renewing License in ESM, possible lost license-file Upcoming IH 866 : POFICHBT - SC 3756 - Extra carriage return on each line when creating envelope IH 1220 : ALEIGB 20 - SC 4237 - Skipped envelope after validation IH 1305 : EUGIDKKT - SC 4402 - ESM losing envelopes when missing routing entry IH 1307 : EUGIDKKT - SC 4403 - ESM losing envelopes when receiving large File. Act files 3. 0. 5 Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 19

Security 2008 Split of EASG to ESG and ECG ESG: Security and Audit ECG: Compliance for customers and prospects ESG handles site audits, advisories, security publications, monitoring contingency and Is the Eurogiro Security Authority Latest news: ENOC audit rated ‘Good’ – EGN security level rated ‘Very HIGH’ Next step: Focus on member contingency! ESG has no responsibility for the actual operation of security systems or procedures All Eurogiro customers, Eurogiro Holding and daughter companies and third party suppliers must adhere to the provisions of the Eurogiro Information Security Policy Important document: Eurogiro Information Security Policy Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 20

? Eurogiro Technical User Group, Brussels 2008 21