State of the School Presentation Friday, September 30, 2011 Russell D. Jones Superintendent
Who We Are Colegio Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the American School of Lima is an independent, international school providing a college preparatory program in English for students from age 3 through grade 12. • Accredited by Advan. Ed (SACS) • Authorized by the IBO
FDR Legal Structure Instituto Board of Directors Colegio Roosevelt Charitable Trust
Instituto Members • • U. S. Embassy Goodyear del Perú – John Ospina Newmont Peru - Luis Echevarría Southern Perú Copper - Marco Antonio García Thomas Findley Edward French Tony Hines Arturo Koenig
Colegio Roosevelt Charitable Trust Members • • • Bruno Bonierbale Dolores de Goytisolo Tony Hines Eduardo Hochschild Russell Jones Deidre Simon
Instituto Board of Directors Dolores Goytisolo Board President Jorge Basadre Soledad Gadea Ignacio Bustamante Maria Lee de Yoshiyama James Cunningham Flavio Mirella Martin Fariña Jaime Pinto Eric Flohr Jaime Raygada
School Administration Russell D. Jones Oli Tooher-Hancock Rachel Metcalf María Isabel Payet Mary Nakada Lorena Chavez-Molina John Kurtenbach Michael Hancock John Lakatos Superintendent Assistant Superintendent & Secondary School Principal Primary School Principal Business Manager Director of Communications & Alumni Relations Director of Admissions & Marketing Media Center Director Athletics Director Technology Director
Our Mission Statement “Our Mission is to empower our students to pursue their passion for learning, lead lives of integrity and create socially responsible solutions”
Our Vision Statement The school will provide an educational experience that: • is academically rigorous • enhances student learning through a diversity of teaching practices and styles • encourages independent thought, collaboration and artistic expression • offers choices in curricular and co-curricular activities • promotes environmental responsibility and social awareness • is competitive by international standards for a community that is united by the English language.
Our Core Values Colegio Roosevelt believes that: • Embracing diversity sustains and enriches life. • Service develops the individual and builds community. • Experience is the most profound source of learning. • Each person has the potential to contribute. • Individual integrity is fundamental to a healthy community. • Choice empowers. • Survival of humanity depends on the health of the environment.
IB World School The International Baccalaureate aims to develop inquiring, knowledgeable and caring young people who help to create a better and more peaceful world through intercultural understanding and respect. To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international organizations to develop challenging programs of international education and rigorous assessment. These programs encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate and lifelong learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right.
The Strategic Process
Our Strategies • Academics Assess student learning against the highest academic standards which will ensure that our EC 3 - Grade 12 curriculum reflects global educational excellence and is a vehicle to promote optimal student academic growth. • Faculty Maximize instructional effectiveness by attracting and supporting a high-performing faculty and staff who are actively engaged in ongoing professional development. • Finance and Resources Create a world-class learning environment through the sound management and optimization of our human, financial, and physical resources
Our Strategies • Community and International Mindedness Foster an inclusive and diverse school community which is supportive of our mission, vision and core values and within which all members understand, support and model the IB Learner Profile. • Public Relations Be the preferred educational choice among Peruvian and International families by effectively communicating what distinguishes FDR as a leading American international school.
Administrative Goals 1. Continued curriculum development and delivery including: – Mapping and articulating the curriculum – Re-writing our assessment policy and aligning assessment with our learning objectives – Continually seeking to improve our students’ results in all aspects of their learning and development– academic, social/emotional, physical, and community/global mindedness
Administrative Goals 2. Attract, train and retain a top quality faculty – Continued focus on hiring and keeping the best qualified teachers – Providing focused and relevant professional development – Building capacity for learning leadership for middle managers, subject area and year group leaders, and committee members.
Administrative Goals 3. Thematic Year - Building our Community – Implement the secondary school restructuring – Meet the milestones of the PAC project – Foster continued open communication throughout the community – Assure that our students learn in a safe and drugfree environment.
Initiatives, Projects and Accomplishments • • Restructuring of the Secondary School Global Issues Network Conference Oct 21 -23 Wind Turbine Project Inter Class Competition Robotics ADCA Art and Music Increased Afterschool Activities 65 th Anniversary May 26 th 2012
Colegio Roosevelt Academic Team PRIMARY SCHOOL Early Childhood (EC/K) EC 3 - Kindergarten EC 3 EC 4 K ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (ES) Grades 1 -5 ES 1 ES 2 ES 3 ES 4 PRIMARY YEARS PROGRAM (PYP) SECONDARY SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL (MS) Grades 6 -8 MS 6 MS 7 MS 8 HIGH SCHOOL (HS) Grades 9 -12 HS 9 MIDDLE YEARS PROGRAM (MYP) HS 10 HS 11 HS 12 DIPLOPMA PROGRAM (DP) ES 5
PRIMARY SCHOOL Primary School Principal: Rachel Metcalf ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (ES) Grades 1 -5 Early Childhood (EC/K) EC 3 - Kindergarten EC 3 EC 4 K EC/K Associate Principal: Cate Arnquist ES 1 ES 2 ES 3 ES 4 ES 5 Elementary School Associate Principal: Mark Exton PRIMARY YEARS PROGRAM (PYP) PYP Coordinator: Greg Parker
SECONDARY SCHOOL Secondary School Principal: Oli Tooher-Hancock MIDDLE SCHOOL (MS) Grades 6 -8 MS 6 MS 7 MS 8 MS Associate Principal: Cynthia Wissman HIGH SCHOOL (HS) Grades 9 -12 HS 9 HS 10 HS 11 HS 12 HS Associate Principal: John Horsington MIDDLE YEARS PROGRAM (MYP) DIPLOPMA PROGRAM (DP) MYP Coordinator: Jon Field DP Coordinator: Andrew Nicholson
School Climate & Communications • • • Recent issues (abduction, parent concerns) PTA Advisories & Parent Coffees Meet the Superintendent Coffees Monday Messenger & School division bulletins Roosevelt Magazine New Website for June 2012
Facility Improvements • • • Performing Arts Center Update Media Center Renovation Science lab remodel Synthetic grass soccer fields Elementary School furnishings PTA support for fitness room, tables umbrellas, etc.
Emergency Preparedness • • EQ, Fire and Lockdown Drills Phone Trees Evacuation Procedures GPS in School Buses Perimeter Security System First Aid and CPR Training Security Training for Families
Enrollment Trends
FDR Nationality Chart • Percentage of students by nationality in the academic year 2010 -2011. 25% 22% 53% Host Country Nationals US Citizens Other Nationalities
IB Diploma Results Diploma Student Information 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Number of candidates (including Certificate) registered in the May exam session 39 66 64 56 62 57 102 Number of subject entries in the session 214 366 394 403 416 358 539 Number of Diploma Program candidates (includes TOK, Extended Essay, CAS, 6 subjects) 22 35 38 42 40 37 57 Number of candidates who successfully passed the Diploma 19 32 36 40 34 31 55 Percentage of passing Diploma candidates 86 94 95 98 85 84 96. 5 Mean points obtained by candidates who passed the Diploma 32 34 32 32 30 30 32 Mean grade obtained at FDR by candidates who passed the Diploma 5. 11 5. 39 5. 07 5. 06 4. 85 4. 9/4. 6 5. 1/4. 6 39 42 39 41 39 40 42 Highest Diploma points awarded to an FDR candidate Future Projections: • May 2012: 66 Diploma students (Class with 92 students) = 72% • May 2013: 70 Diploma students (Class with 93 students) = 75%
MAP Results April 2011
Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) Grade Level % age Reading On or Above Grade Level Grade 1 80% Grade 2 54% Grade 3 54% Grade 4 50% Grade 5 74%
Class of 2011 College Placement
Class of 2011 College Placement Partial list of university acceptances UNIVERSITIES IN THE U. S. Babson College Boston University Brigham Young University Columbia University Cornell University George Washington University Georgetown University Michigan State University Middlebury College New York University Northeastern University Oberlin College Pepperdine University Princeton University Rhode Island School of Design Syracuse University Tufts University of California, Davis University of Colorado, Boulder University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of North Carolina, Wilmington University of Notre Dame University of Texas, Austin Vassar College Wake Forest University Williams College UNIVERSITIES IN PERU Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Universidad de Lima Universidad de Piura Universidad del Pacífico Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC) Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola OTHER UNIVERSITIES Mc. Gill University, CANADA University of British Columbia, CANADA University of Calgary, CANADA University of Guelph, CANADA University of Victoria, CANADA Universidad de Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE) IE University, SPAIN Les Roches International School of Hotel Mgmt. , SWITZERLAND Universiteit Utrecht, NETHERLANDS
Financial Report 2010 -2011
Total Income Other Income, 585, 643 Entrance Fees, 1, 804, 250 Transportation, 542, 250 Technology Fees, 398, 759 Tuition Fees Net, 14, 597, 762 Total Income Tuition Fees Net Technology Fees Transportation Entrance Fees Other Income 14, 597, 762 398, 759 542, 250 1, 804, 250 585, 643 17, 928, 664
Operational Income Technology 2% Transportation 3% Tuition 91% Operational Income Tuition Technology Transportation Others Total 14, 597, 762 398, 759 542, 250 499, 458 16, 038, 229 Others 3%
Operational Expenses Personnel 80% Non-Salary administrative expenses 8% Facilities Operating Instructional Supplies Expenses 6% 6% Operational Costs Personnel Facilities Operating Expenses Instructional Supplies Non-Salary administrative expenses Total Operational Costs 12, 643, 806 910, 241 922, 341 1, 338, 627 15, 815, 013
Capital Income Entrance Fees 89% 2010 -2011 Capital Revenue Others 11% Capital Income Entrance Fees Others Total Capital Income Capital Investment Capital Balance Initial Balance Bank loan Net capital balance 1, 804, 250 230, 262 2, 034, 512 4, 287, 233 (2, 252, 721) 1, 147, 000 1, 500, 000 394, 279
Capital Expenses Transportation Project 3% Facilities Renovation 13% Construction Projects 84% Capital Investments Facilities Renovation 572, 918 Construction Projects 3, 602, 515 Transportation Project Total Capital Investments 111, 800 4, 287, 233
Thanks! • • • Board Leadership Team Faculty PTA and Parents Students
Parent Survey
Скачать презентацию State of the School Presentation Friday September 30
d678d85ad6c09c32680be5ad14822a1e.ppt