5d2d0b75b5631b3fa691a2fd11d5548f.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 3
SMC April 2008; rev 19 Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution DEPSECDEF Oversight Do. D 7000. 14 -R Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System VCJCS Oversight CJCSI 3170. 01 F NSS-03 -01 SMC/XR Template NSS Decision Support Systems Effective Interaction is Essential Pre KDP-A Concept Studies JCIDS process, architecting process, and operators/using entities develop JCIDS products (e. g. , Initial Capabilities Development Document (CDD), Joint Operation Concepts, etc. ) with support from space acquisition organizations as requested. Once it is clear that a space system needs to be acquired, J 8 will notify Do. D Space MDA. National Security Space Acquisition Process NSS-03 -01 Phase A Concept Development Includes concept studies, assessments and requirements (e. g. , technology development, Capability Development Document). During this phase, baseline development is mature enough to enter the formal acquisition process. ICD Service/JROC Validation & Approval Concept Decision Meeting KDP A Mature Acquisition Strategy Key PM Topic Areas for KDP Preparation (Details on back side of chart) Program Management Usage Note: This flow chart has been modified using information from NSS 03 -01, Do. D 5000 and other applicable documentation for use by SMC/XR as a training aid/template (including some draft documentation) It has been tailored for that organizations use and other organizations may follow a different/modified version of what is presented here 2 a-c) Program Description & Organization 4 a-c) Requirements 5) SEP 2 a-d) Program Description, Organization & Progress 11 -14) High Level Document Approvals 2 f-j-8 -16) Prog Estimate/Executability & Cost Drivers 2 d) Technologies/Studies Accomplished 5) SEP 1) MDA Approved Acquisition Strategy 18) ADM 2 f-j) Detailed Budget Information Solution Identification 11 -15) High-Level Document Approvals 18) ADM/APB 16) Program Estimate, POM, CARD 10) Support Issues DSAB MDA ADM Exit Criteria Objectives: Mature Technologies to TRL 6 Develop a firm, cost effective program baseline meeting user requirements Deliverables: Approved System Specification and Function Baseline (Note: Key NSS 03 -01 requirement that differs from Do. D 5000) KDP B required documentation (see reverse side) Planning must allow time and schedule for iterative technology development – Maturing technology may not achieve SRR or SFR criteria on first attempt Phase 1: Tech Maturation AOA APB Phase 2: System Maturation Service/JROC Validation & Approval # of options reduced from 1000 + Pre KDP A to final solution by KDP B 3) Exit/Entry Criteria Analysis/Review 9) Detailed Risk Management & Probability of Program Success Assessment Objectives: Plan and Conduct an Ao. A to determine preferred materiel solution Match User Requirements to available technology Deliverables: Analysis of Alternatives Report Exit KDP A required documentation Criteria Met 7 -8) Cost Drivers & Trades 4) Requirements & Architecture Summary 17) IMS 9) Risk Management & Probability of Program Success Assessment Objectives: Develop & document a systems engineering process for developing pre- Ao. A materiel solutions Validate the process using a case study with a stated capability shortfall & document the results Deliverables: Systems Engineering Plan specifically tailored for pre- Ao. A material concepts Characterization & technical data of the materiel solutions developed for the stated ICD capability shortfall KDP B Service/JROC Validation & Approval CDD KPPs Exit Criteria Met DSAB MDA ADM Exit Criteria Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) SRR SFR Key Activities Flow Diagrams Describing Major Activities and their relationships Implementable Prgm Baseline Characterized Concept Preferred System Concept Characterization INPUTS OUTPUTS • Con. SEP • Concept Characterization & Technical Description • Inputs into: - Ao. A Plan - draft ICD - Preliminary Integrated Architecture - Demo Plan • Capability Shortfall • Proposed Materiel Solution CRA Analyze/Assess Capability Versus Defined User Needs & Environmental Constraints Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capability Shortfalls & Environmental Constraints Trades Technical Systems Engineering Test & Evaluation Supportability Assess/Analyze Capability & Verify Tradespace Performance Develop Capability Tradespace & Constraints & Verification Objectives Decompose Capability Tradespace into Solution Sets & Verification Objectives Decompose Capability Solution Sets into Component Solutions & Assessment Objectives Assess/Analyze Solution Sets Versus Functional Performance Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Component Solutions Versus Shortfalls Develop Component Solutions, i. e. , Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers OUTPUTS INPUTS • Analysis of Alternatives • System-Level CONOPS • Acquisition Strategy • Initial CDD • OV Arch Products • IPS • T&E Strategy • ICD • Ao. A Plan • Exit Criteria ITR Tech Demonstrations & Prototypes INPUTS OUTPUTS • Sys Performance Spec • TEMP • Validated Sys Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements • SEP • PESHE • PPP • TRA • Inputs to: - IBR - ISP - STA - CDD - Acq Strategy - Affordability Assessment - Cost/Manpower Est. • ICD & Draft CDD • Preferred Sys Concept • Exit Criteria • T&E Strategy • Support & Maintenance Concepts & Technologies • Ao. A • SEP ASR Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus Defined User Needs & Environmental Constraints Trades Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives Assess/Analyze Concept & Verify System Concept’s Performance Assess/Analyze System Concept Versus Functional Capabilities Decompose Concept Performance into Functional Definition & Verification Objectives Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts & Assessment Objectives Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Components Versus Capabilities Develop Component Concepts, i. e. , Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Versus Defined User Needs Interpret User Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Key Management Considerations • Program Structure • Interoperability • Acquisition Approach • Research & Tech Protection • Capability Needs • Information Assurance • Corrosion Prevention • Product Support • Data Management • Human Systems Integration • Life Cycle Sustainment • ESOH • T&E Considerations • MOSA • Risk Management • Business Considerations • Resource Management • Best Practices • Systems Engineering • Relief, Exemptions & Waivers • Information Technology Trades Develop System Perf (& Constraints) Spec & Enabling/Critical Tech Verification Plan Demo/Model Integrated System Versus Performance Spec Develop Functional Definitions for Enabling/ Critical Technologies & Associated Verification Plan Decompose Functional Definitions into Critical Component Definition & Tech Verification Plan Develop System Concepts, i. e. , Enabling/Critical Technologies, Update Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Demo System Functionality Versus Plan Full Funding in FYDP Demo Enabling/ Critical Technology Components Versus Plan CARD (Designated Programs) POE CCA ICE Affordability Assessment
9 Guiding Principles of Space Acquisition - Mission Success - Accountability - Streamlined / Agile - Inclusive - Flexible - Stable - Disciplined - Credible - Cost Realism
5d2d0b75b5631b3fa691a2fd11d5548f.ppt