Скачать презентацию Risk Management And Internal Control Guidelines Tennessee Department Скачать презентацию Risk Management And Internal Control Guidelines Tennessee Department

d27ae367fabcd44998352cdcaab5848c.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 120

Risk Management And Internal Control Guidelines Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration Tennessee Comptroller Risk Management And Internal Control Guidelines Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury August 2007

INTRODUCTION MANAGEMENT’S GUIDE TO RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROL INTRODUCTION MANAGEMENT’S GUIDE TO RISK MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROL

INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o Enterprise Risk Management o Changing Political And Regulatory Environment n n INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o Enterprise Risk Management o Changing Political And Regulatory Environment n n n Sarbanes-Oxley Act General Accounting Office AICPA Auditing Standards

INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o o o Internal Control and Governance Problems Results of Texas State INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o o o Internal Control and Governance Problems Results of Texas State Comptroller’s ERM Implementation Texas State Auditor Considers Increased Accountability a Priority

INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o Committee Of Sponsoring Organizations Of The Treadway Commission n n Second INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o Committee Of Sponsoring Organizations Of The Treadway Commission n n Second report Enterprise Risk Management— Integrated Framework First report Internal Control—Integrated Framework

INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o o Guidance--Education and Tools Agency Heads Responsibility INTRODUCTION (CONT’D) o o Guidance--Education and Tools Agency Heads Responsibility

OVERVIEW OVERVIEW

Overview o o Relationship of COSO I and II COSO Cube (three-dimensional matrix) n Overview o o Relationship of COSO I and II COSO Cube (three-dimensional matrix) n n n o o Objectives Components Entity Unit Effectiveness Roles and responsibilities

Relationship of COSO I to COSO II o Internal Control—Integrated Framework (COSO I) n Relationship of COSO I to COSO II o Internal Control—Integrated Framework (COSO I) n o Still important for entities looking at internal control by itself Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework (COSO II) n n Broader than internal control Expands and elaborates on internal control Focuses more fully on risk Introduces the concepts of risk appetite, risk tolerance, and portfolio view

COSO Cube o o Direct relationship between objectives and enterprise risk components Focus on COSO Cube o o Direct relationship between objectives and enterprise risk components Focus on the entirety of an entity’s ERM, or by objectives categories, component, entity unit, or any subset thereof

Objectives Categories o o o Strategic Effectiveness and efficiency of operations Integrity and reliability Objectives Categories o o o Strategic Effectiveness and efficiency of operations Integrity and reliability of reporting Compliance with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements Stewardship of assets

Components o o o o Internal environment Objective setting Event identification Risk assessment Risk Components o o o o Internal environment Objective setting Event identification Risk assessment Risk response Control activities Information and communication Monitoring

Effectiveness o o Are the 8 components present and functioning effectively? The components are Effectiveness o o Are the 8 components present and functioning effectively? The components are criteria for effective ERM Present and functioning properly = no significant deficiencies and material weaknesses Test operating effectiveness of controls different from obtaining evidence of implementation n How controls were applied during the period Consistency with which controls were applied By whom and by what means they were applied

Roles and Responsibilities o o o Audit committee, board of directors, or other oversight Roles and Responsibilities o o o Audit committee, board of directors, or other oversight body Commissioner/director/department head Senior management Internal audit Other entity personnel

SECTION I INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION I INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT

SECTION I INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT What is it? o Risk Management Philosophy n n n SECTION I INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT What is it? o Risk Management Philosophy n n n Set of shared beliefs and attitudes Reflects the entity’s values, influencing its culture and operating style Affects how risks are identified, kinds of risks accepted, and how they are managed

Internal Environment (cont’d) o Risk Appetite n n o Amount of risk management is Internal Environment (cont’d) o Risk Appetite n n o Amount of risk management is willing to accept Influences the entity’s culture and operating style Oversight by Audit Committee n n Oversight by another group May significantly influence elements of Internal Environment

Internal Environment (cont’d) o Integrity and Ethical Values n n o Management’s values Code Internal Environment (cont’d) o Integrity and Ethical Values n n o Management’s values Code of conduct Commitment to Competence n n Knowledge and skills of staff How well tasks need to be accomplish

Internal Environment (cont’d) q Organizational Structure q q Assignment of Authority and Responsibility q Internal Environment (cont’d) q Organizational Structure q q Assignment of Authority and Responsibility q q Framework to plan, execute, control, and monitor activities Extent of authority and responsibility Human Resource Standards q Staff development, training, and evaluation

SECTION II OBJECTIVE SETTING SECTION II OBJECTIVE SETTING

Objective Setting o EVERY AGENCY FACES A VARIETY OF RISKS FROM EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL Objective Setting o EVERY AGENCY FACES A VARIETY OF RISKS FROM EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL SOURCES, AND A PRECONDITION TO EFFECTIVE EVENT IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT, AND RISK RESPONSE IS ESTABLISHMENT OF OBJECTIVES

Objective Setting o OBJECTIVES MUST EXIST BEFORE MANAGEMENT CAN IDENTIFY POTENTIAL EVENTS AFFECTING THEIR Objective Setting o OBJECTIVES MUST EXIST BEFORE MANAGEMENT CAN IDENTIFY POTENTIAL EVENTS AFFECTING THEIR ACHEIVEMENT o ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT (ERM) ENSURES THAT MANAGEMENT HAS IN PLACE A PROCESS TO SET OBJECTIVES AND THAT THE CHOSEN OBJECTIVES SUPPORT AND ALIGN WITH THE AGENCY’S MISSION AND ARE CONSISTENT WITH ITS RISK APPETITE

Objective Setting o WHILE AN AGENCY’S MISSION AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ARE GENERALLY STABLE, ITS Objective Setting o WHILE AN AGENCY’S MISSION AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ARE GENERALLY STABLE, ITS STRATEGY AND MANY RELATED OBJECTIVES ARE MORE DYNAMIC AND ADJUSTED FOR CHANGING INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONDITIONS o AS CONDITIONS CHANGE, STRATEGY AND RELATED OBJECTIVES ARE REALIGNED WITH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

Objective Setting o IN CONSIDERING WAYS TO ACHIEVE ITS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES, MANAGEMENT IDENTIFIES RISKS Objective Setting o IN CONSIDERING WAYS TO ACHIEVE ITS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES, MANAGEMENT IDENTIFIES RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH A RANGE OF STRATEGY CHOICES AND CONSIDERS THEIR IMPLICATIONS o VARIOUS EVENT IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES ARE USED IN THE STRATEGY-SETTING PROCESS

Objective Setting o o BY FOCUSING FIRST ON STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY, AN AGENCY Objective Setting o o BY FOCUSING FIRST ON STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGY, AN AGENCY IS IN A POSITION TO DEVELOP RELATED OBJECTIVES AGENCY WIDE OBJECTIVES ARE THEN LINKED TO AND INTEGRATED WITH MORE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES THAT CASCADE THROUGH THE ORGANIZATION TO SUBOBJECTIVES ESTABLISHED FOR VARIOUS ACTIVITIES

Objective Setting o o o OBJECTIVES NEED TO BE READILY UNDERSTOOD AND MEASURABLE ERM Objective Setting o o o OBJECTIVES NEED TO BE READILY UNDERSTOOD AND MEASURABLE ERM REQUIRES THAT PERSONNEL AT ALL LEVELS HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE AGENCY’S OBJECTIVES AS THEY RELATE TO THAT INDIVIDUAL’S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ALL EMPLOYEES MUST HAVE A MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED AND A MEANS OF MEASURING WHAT IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED

Objective Setting o THREE BROAD CATEGORIES OF OBJECTIVES n n n OPERATIONS REPORTING COMPLIANCE Objective Setting o THREE BROAD CATEGORIES OF OBJECTIVES n n n OPERATIONS REPORTING COMPLIANCE

SMART OBJECTIVES Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Timely Use specific terms rather than vague abstract SMART OBJECTIVES Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant Timely Use specific terms rather than vague abstract ones Include some method for objectively measuring their achievement Are challenging but realistic Follow the business strategy of the organization Specify a time period

Objective Setting o EFFECTIVE ERM PROVIDES REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT AN AGENCY’S REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE Objective Setting o EFFECTIVE ERM PROVIDES REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT AN AGENCY’S REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE OBJECTIVES ARE BEING ACHIEVED o BECAUSE, HOWEVER, ACHEIVEMENT OF OPERATIONS OBJECTIVES IS NOT SOLEY WITHIN AN AGENCY’S CONTROL (i. e. IT IS SUBJECT TO EXTERNAL EVENTS) ERM PROVIDES REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT MANAGEMENT IS MADE AWARE OF THE EXTENT TO WHICH AN AGENCY IS MOVING TOWARD THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THESE OBJECTIVES ON A TIMELY BASIS

Objective Setting • STRATEGIES OF THE BUSINESS • KEY BUSINESS OBJECTIVES • RELATED OBJECTIVES Objective Setting • STRATEGIES OF THE BUSINESS • KEY BUSINESS OBJECTIVES • RELATED OBJECTIVES THAT CASCADE DOWN THE ORGANIZATION FROM KEY BUSINESS OBJECTIVES • ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENTS AND LEADERS (LINKAGE)

Objective Setting o EFFECTIVE ERM DOES NOT DICTATE WHICH OBJECTIVES MANAGEMENT SHOULD CHOOSE, BUT Objective Setting o EFFECTIVE ERM DOES NOT DICTATE WHICH OBJECTIVES MANAGEMENT SHOULD CHOOSE, BUT THAT MANAGEMENT HAS A PROCESS THAT ALIGNS STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES WITH AN AGENCY’S MISSION AND ENSURES THAT THE ENTITY’S CHOSEN STRATEGIC AND RELATED OBJECTIVES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE AGENCY’S RISK APPETITE

Objective Setting – Risk appetite o o o RISK APPETITE IS A GUIDEPOST IN Objective Setting – Risk appetite o o o RISK APPETITE IS A GUIDEPOST IN STRATEGY SETTING THERE IS A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AN AGENCY’S RISK APPETITE AND ITS STRATEGY DIFFERENT STRATEGIES CAN BE USED TO ACHIEVE DESIRED RETURN, EACH HAVING DIFFERENT RISK

Objective Setting – Risk appetite RISK APPETITE IS THE AMOUNT OF RISK, ON A Objective Setting – Risk appetite RISK APPETITE IS THE AMOUNT OF RISK, ON A BROAD LEVEL, AN AGENCY IS WILLING TO ACCEPT IN PURSUIT OF ITS MISSION, VISION, BUSINESS OBJECTIVES AND VALUE GOALS o DIRECTLY RELATED TO AN AGENCY’S CULTURE, CAPABILITY, RISK CAPACITY AND STRATEGY o SHOULD CONSIDER RISK APPETITE BOTH QUALITATIVELY AND QUANTITATIVELY - IT IS MANY TIMES EXPRESSED IN ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE OUTCOMES OR LEVEL OF RISK o

Objective Setting – Risk appetite o SOME POSSIBLE QUESTIONS n n n WHAT RISKS Objective Setting – Risk appetite o SOME POSSIBLE QUESTIONS n n n WHAT RISKS WILL THE AGENCY NOT ACCEPT? (For example, environmental or quality compromises) ARE THERE SPECIFIC RISKS THAT THE AGENCY IS NOT PREPARED TO ACCEPT? (For example, risks that could result in non-compliance with federal regulations) IS THE AGENCY PREPARED TO ENTER INTO PROGRAMS WITH LOWER LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS BUT LARGER POTENTIAL RETURNS?

Objective Setting – Risk appetite o o o USE OF A LIKELIHOOD-IMPACT ASSESSMENT (MATRIX) Objective Setting – Risk appetite o o o USE OF A LIKELIHOOD-IMPACT ASSESSMENT (MATRIX) IS A GOOD TOOL IN DOCUMENTING RISK APPETITE FOR EACH RISK FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE (PROBABILITY) AND WORST OUTCOME (IMPACT) ARE ASSESSED AND CAPTURED IN A MATRIX THE MATRIX IS THEN COMPARED WITH A CHARTED RISK APPETITE MAP THAT OUTLINES THE MAXIMUM ADVERSE RISK AN AGENCY IS WILLING TO ACCEPT

Impact vs. Probability High I M P A C T Low Exceeds Risk Appetite Impact vs. Probability High I M P A C T Low Exceeds Risk Appetite Within Risk Appetite PROBABILITY High

Objective Setting – Risk tolerance RISK TOLERANCE, THE ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF VARIATION AROUND OBJECTIVES, Objective Setting – Risk tolerance RISK TOLERANCE, THE ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF VARIATION AROUND OBJECTIVES, MUST BE ALIGNED WITH RISK APPETITE o REQUIRES THE ARTICULATION OF ACCEPTABLE VARIABILITY FROM THE SPECIFIED RISK APPETITE FOR ALL POSSIBLE OUTCOMES o OPERATIONALIZES THE RISK APPETITE o GENERALLY EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF RISK MEASURES OR OUTCOMES o

Objective Setting – Risk tolerance o SHOULD BE SET SUCH THAT THE AGGREGATION OF Objective Setting – Risk tolerance o SHOULD BE SET SUCH THAT THE AGGREGATION OF RISK TOLERANCES ENSURES THE ORGANIZATION OPERATES WITHIN THE RISK APPETITE

SECTION III EVENT IDENTIFICATION SECTION III EVENT IDENTIFICATION

EVENT IDENTIFICATION o o INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EVENTS AFFECTING ACHEIVEMENT OF AN AGENCY’S OBJECTIVES EVENT IDENTIFICATION o o INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EVENTS AFFECTING ACHEIVEMENT OF AN AGENCY’S OBJECTIVES MUST BE IDENTIFIED, DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES MANAGEMENT IDENTIFIES POTENTIAL EVENTS THAT, IF THEY OCCUR, WILL AFFECT THE AGENCY, AND IN WHAT MANNER

Event identification o o EVENTS WITH A POSITIVE IMPACT REPRESENT OPPORTUNITIES THAT SHOULD BE Event identification o o EVENTS WITH A POSITIVE IMPACT REPRESENT OPPORTUNITIES THAT SHOULD BE CHANNELED BACK INTO MANAGEMENT’S STRATEGY OR OBJECTIVE-SETTING PROCESSES EVENTS WITH A NEGATIVE IMPACT REPRESENT RISKS, WHICH REQUIRE MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSE

Event identification o o AN EVENT IS AN INCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE ARISING FROM INTERNAL Event identification o o AN EVENT IS AN INCIDENT OR OCCURRENCE ARISING FROM INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL SOURCES THAT AFFECTS IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGY OR ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES A NUMBER OF EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL FACTORS DRIVE EVENTS

Event identification o CONTRIBUTING EXTERNAL FACTORS n ECONOMIC n NATURAL ENVIRONMENT n POLITICAL n Event identification o CONTRIBUTING EXTERNAL FACTORS n ECONOMIC n NATURAL ENVIRONMENT n POLITICAL n SOCIAL o CONTRIBUTING INTERNAL FACTORS n INFRASTRUCTURE n PERSONNEL n PROCESS n TECHNOLOGY

SOME TYPICAL GOVERNMENT RISKS Economic changes such as lower economic growth reduce tax revenue SOME TYPICAL GOVERNMENT RISKS Economic changes such as lower economic growth reduce tax revenue and opportunities to provide a wider range of services or limit the availability or quality of existing services Failure to innovate leading to substandard services Loss or misappropriation of funds through fraud or impropriety Environmental damage caused by failure of regulations or government inspection regime Project delays cost overruns and inadequate quality standards Inconsistent policy objectives resulting in unwanted outcomes Achieving Service Delivery Failure to monitor implementation Inadequate service plans to maintain continuity of service delivery Inadequate skills or resources to deliver services as required Failure to measure performance adequately Failure of contractors, partners or other government agencies to provide services as required Failure to properly evaluate pilot projects before a new service is introduced may result in problems when the service becomes fully operational Technical risk – failure to keep pace with technical developments, or investment in inappropriate or mismatched technology

Event identification o AN AGENCY’S EVENT IDENTIFICATION METHODOLOGY MAY BE COMPRISED OF A COMBINATION Event identification o AN AGENCY’S EVENT IDENTIFICATION METHODOLOGY MAY BE COMPRISED OF A COMBINATION OF TECHNIQUES, TOGETHER WITH SUPPORTING TOOLS o TECHNIQUES VARY WIDELY IN LEVEL OF SOPHISTICATION

EXAMPLES OF TECHNIQUES FOR IDENTIFYING EVENTS: • • EVENT INVENTORIES (LISTING COMMON POTENTIAL EVENTS) EXAMPLES OF TECHNIQUES FOR IDENTIFYING EVENTS: • • EVENT INVENTORIES (LISTING COMMON POTENTIAL EVENTS) INTERNAL ANALYSIS (COMPLETED AS PART OF A ROUTINE PLANNING CYCLE PROCESS, TYPICALLY THROUGH STAFF MEETINGS) ESCALATION OR THRESHOLD TRIGGERS (COMPARE CURRENT TRANSACTIONS OR EVENTS WITH PREDEFINED CRITERIA) FACILITATED WORKSHOPS AND INTERVIEWS (DRAW ON ACCUMULATED KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE OF MANAGEMENT, STAFF AND STAKEHOLDERS THROUGH STRUCTURED DISCUSSIONS)

Event identification o POTENTIAL EVENTS ARE ALSO IDENTIFIED ON AN ONGOING BASIS IN CONNECTION Event identification o POTENTIAL EVENTS ARE ALSO IDENTIFIED ON AN ONGOING BASIS IN CONNECTION WITH ROUTINE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS n n n INDUSTRY/TECHNICAL CONFERENCES PEER WEBSITES BENCHMARKING REPORTS TRADE & PROFESSIONAL JOURNALS MEDIA REPORTS MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORTS

Event identification o ANOTHER USEFUL TOOL IS TO INTRODUCE AN INTERMEDIATE STEP IDENTIFYING WHAT Event identification o ANOTHER USEFUL TOOL IS TO INTRODUCE AN INTERMEDIATE STEP IDENTIFYING WHAT YOU DEPEND UPON TO ACHIEVE YOUR OBJECTIVES o THIS IS SOMETIMES MUCH EASIER THAN TRYING TO THINK ABOUT ALL THE EVENTS THAT COULD PREVENT SUCCESS

Event identification o o EVENTS DO NOT OCCUR IN ISOLATION – ONE EVENT CAN Event identification o o EVENTS DO NOT OCCUR IN ISOLATION – ONE EVENT CAN TRIGGER ANOTHER AND EVENTS CAN OCCUR CONCURRENTLY MANAGEMENT SHOULD UNDERSTAND HOW EVENTS RELATE TO ONE ANOTHER

Event identification o IT MAY BE USEFUL TO GROUP EVENTS INTO CATEGORIES (i. e. Event identification o IT MAY BE USEFUL TO GROUP EVENTS INTO CATEGORIES (i. e. GROUPS OF SIMILAR POTENTIAL EVENTS) o SIMILAR EVENTS SHOULD BE COMBINED TO DEVELOP AN INITIAL RISK UNIVERSE AND DETERMINE HOW TO TRACK AND UPDATE THE LISTING OF POTENTIAL EVENTS AND RISKS

Event identification o FINANCIAL FOLKS NEED TO REMEMBER THAT: EVENT IDENTIFICATION NEEDS TO INVOLVE Event identification o FINANCIAL FOLKS NEED TO REMEMBER THAT: EVENT IDENTIFICATION NEEDS TO INVOLVE A COMPLETE CROSS-SECTION OF MANAGEMENT, AS POSSIBLE EVENTS INCLUDE BUSINESS SCENARIOS OF WHICH FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT MAY NOT BE AWARE

INDICATORS THAT THE ERM OBJECTIVE SETTING PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED 1. THE ORGANIZATION DEFINES GOALS INDICATORS THAT THE ERM OBJECTIVE SETTING PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED 1. THE ORGANIZATION DEFINES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE ENTERPRISE AS A WHOLE 2. AN EFFECTIVE STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS IS IN PLACE TO FORMULATE STRATEGIES THAT WILL ENABLE THE ORGANIZATION TO ACHIEVE ITS BUSINESS OBJECTIVE

INDICATORS THAT THE ERM OBJECTIVE SETTING PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED (CONT’D) 3. BUSINESS STRATEGIES ARE INDICATORS THAT THE ERM OBJECTIVE SETTING PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED (CONT’D) 3. BUSINESS STRATEGIES ARE CLEARLY ARTICULATED WITH OBJECTIVES LINKED TO EACH 4. THE RISK IDENTIFICATION PROCESS IS DESIGNED TO MAKE A CLEAR LINK BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATION’S OBJECTIVES AND THE ASSOCIATED RISKS

INDICATORS THAT THE ERM OBJECTIVE SETTING PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED (CONT’D) 5. RISK TO THE INDICATORS THAT THE ERM OBJECTIVE SETTING PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED (CONT’D) 5. RISK TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES IS EVALUATED TO ENSURE IT DOES NOT EXCEED THE LEVELS OF RISK DETERMINED BY MANAGEMENT AS ACCEPTABLE 6. ACCEPTABLE TOLERANCE LIMITS ON THE RISK TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF KEY OBJECTIVES HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. 7. MANAGEMENT USES MEANINGFUL PERFORMANCE MEASURES IN MONITORING RESULTS AGAINST OTHER SET TOLERANCES

INDICATORS THAT THE ERM EVENT IDENTIFICATION PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED 1. DATA ON THE BUSINESS INDICATORS THAT THE ERM EVENT IDENTIFICATION PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED 1. DATA ON THE BUSINESS OPERATING ENVIRONMENT – POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, ETC. , EVENTS IS CAPTURED AND REGULARLY EVALUATED IN TERMS OF THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACT UPON THE ORGANIZATION’S BUSINESS OBJECTIVES 2. A PORTFOLIO OF EVENTS THAT COULD AFFECT THE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES – INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL – HAS BEEN PREPARED 3. EVENTS ARE LINKED TO AND RISK EVALUATED BY INDIVIDUAL OBJECTIVE

INDICATORS THAT THE ERM EVENT IDENTIFICATION PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED (CONT’D) 4. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES INDICATORS THAT THE ERM EVENT IDENTIFICATION PRINCIPLES ARE IMPLEMENTED (CONT’D) 4. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR IDENTIFYING EVENTS AND THE RELATED RISKS EXIST AND ARE COMMUNICATED TO ALL SEGMENTS OF THE ORGANIZATION 5. RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOUNTABLES FOR RISK IDENTIFICATION ARE CLEARLY DEFINED AND UNDERSTOOD 6. RISK IS CONSIDERED IN TERMS OF NOT JUST ISOLATED EVENTS BUT ALSO INTER-RELATED EVENTS 7. EVENTS ARE CATEGORIZED INTO USEFUL GROUPS TO FACILITATE THE AGGREGATION OF INFORMATION FOR PURPOSES OF ASSESSING RISKS 8. THE ORGANIZATION EVALUATES EVENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE POTENTIAL UPSIDES (OPPORTUNITIES) AS WELL AS THE DOWNSIDE (RISKS)

Event identification o THE NEXT TOPIC, OR THE RISK ASSESSMENT COMPONENT, ALLOWS AN AGENCY Event identification o THE NEXT TOPIC, OR THE RISK ASSESSMENT COMPONENT, ALLOWS AN AGENCY TO CONSIDER THE EXTENT TO WHICH POTENTIAL EVENTS MIGHT HAVE AN IMPACT ON ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES

SECTION IV RISK ASSESSMENT SECTION IV RISK ASSESSMENT

Risk Assessment o o Risk is “the possibility that an event will occur and Risk Assessment o o Risk is “the possibility that an event will occur and adversely affect the achievement of objectives. ” Thereby decreasing value for the entity’s stakeholders.

Risk Assessment - Risks are analyzed and assessed as to their likelihood and impact Risk Assessment - Risks are analyzed and assessed as to their likelihood and impact - Management considers the mix of future events, both expected & unexpected - Useful first step – often a “brainstorming” session - What is the “worst that could happen, ” or the “worst that happened? ”

Consider the “Risk Appetite” o o o Broadly defined as amount of risk an Consider the “Risk Appetite” o o o Broadly defined as amount of risk an entity is willing to accept in pursuing its objectives. For most government entities: risk appetite is fairly low! Related is risk tolerance: “tolerable level of variation associated w/ a particular objective. ”

Consider Both Inherent & Residual Risk o o Inherent – Risk without any management Consider Both Inherent & Residual Risk o o Inherent – Risk without any management activity or before controls are in place. Example: inherent risk mitigated by payment card’s policies and procedures. o o Residual – level of risk that remains after management has a plan in place to deal with the risk. Example: residual risk remains after payment card policies are in place.

Consider both Likelihood and Impact o o Likelihood: possibility an event will occur, measured Consider both Likelihood and Impact o o Likelihood: possibility an event will occur, measured in “low, medium, high, ’ percentage or some frequency of occurrence. Impact: Effect on an agency on others.

Risk Assessment Uses Qualitative and Quantitative Methods o o o Quantitative methods more precise Risk Assessment Uses Qualitative and Quantitative Methods o o o Quantitative methods more precise Qualitative methods are necessary in situations where business activity does not lend to quant. evaluation, or is not cost/effective. Choice should reflect needs of the business unit and its employees.

Consider Risk in Objective Setting o o o The framework of objectives: strategic, operational, Consider Risk in Objective Setting o o o The framework of objectives: strategic, operational, reporting, compliance, (see COSO cube). Typically considerable overlap. Several examples follow.

Example: Operational o Risk that subrecipients in HIV/AIDS program are being reimbursed for unsupported Example: Operational o Risk that subrecipients in HIV/AIDS program are being reimbursed for unsupported expenditures. o Assessment – Extent of reimbursement and frequency is analyzed. Note that paying subrecipient invoices for which no documentation exists subjects agency to possible fraud.

Example: Reporting o Risk that management does notify the Comptroller’s Office of overpayments; and Example: Reporting o Risk that management does notify the Comptroller’s Office of overpayments; and failure to recover funds. o o Assess why a breakdown in both state policy and actual recoupment. Lack of notification negates possibility of a thorough investigation.

SECTION V RISK RESPONSE SECTION V RISK RESPONSE

V – Risk Response o “Having assessed relevant risks, management determines how it will V – Risk Response o “Having assessed relevant risks, management determines how it will respond, reviewing likelihood and impact, evaluating costs and benefits, and selecting options that bring residual (remaining risk) within the entity’s risk tolerances. ”

The Four Categories of Risk Response: o o Avoidance – not participating in events The Four Categories of Risk Response: o o Avoidance – not participating in events that give rise to risk. Reduction: Specific actions taken to reduce likelihood or impact or both. Sharing: Reducing likelihood or impact by sharing portion of the risk (insurance) Acceptance: No action taken. “learns to live with the risk, ” and monitor it. . .

Additional Factors in Risk Response o o o - For many risks, responses are Additional Factors in Risk Response o o o - For many risks, responses are obvious & well accepted. - Response to risk may affect other factors, or affect likelihood/impact differently. - Cost/Benefit – often cost side easier to analyze; benefit side may be more subjective. - Risk response may lead to improvements in service areas or additional value. - Considers both inherent and residual risk.

A Portfolio Perspective o o o ERM approach requires that risk be considered from A Portfolio Perspective o o o ERM approach requires that risk be considered from a “portfolio” or entity-wide perspective. Management first determines risk in each division or business unit. Develops a composite assessment of risk reflecting unit’s residual risk profile relative to its objectives & risk tolerances.

A Portfolio View of Risk: o o o Can be depicted in several ways A Portfolio View of Risk: o o o Can be depicted in several ways – focusing on major risk or event categories across divisions, program units, etc. While risk in a program unit may be within risk tolerance; taken together they may exceed the risk appetite of entity. Or have common elements that raise concerns.

Back to our previous examples: o 1. Subrecipients in HIV/AIDS programs are routinely reimbursed Back to our previous examples: o 1. Subrecipients in HIV/AIDS programs are routinely reimbursed for unsupported expenditures. o 1. After further analysis corrective action plan identified and remedies failures in the reimbursement process, a cost/effective methodology to monitor expenditures.

And our other example… o 2. Management did notify the Comptroller of the Treasury And our other example… o 2. Management did notify the Comptroller of the Treasury of overpayments and failed to recoup overpaid funds. o 2. Corrective action plan requires compliance with Policy 11; reviews recoupment procedures.

SECTION VI CONTROL ACTIVITIES SECTION VI CONTROL ACTIVITIES

Integration with Risk Responses v Control activities generally are established to ensure risk responses Integration with Risk Responses v Control activities generally are established to ensure risk responses are carried out. However, control activities themselves are risk responses.

Integration with Risk Responses q Risk responses Ø Share risk q Ø Reduces likelihood Integration with Risk Responses q Risk responses Ø Share risk q Ø Reduces likelihood and impact, e. g. Disaster recovery plan in place to reduce the impact of a natural disaster. Risk Avoidance q Ø Agency participates in state’s collateral pool or risk management fund. Policies that forbid certain “risky business” e. g. , agency not authorized to invest in certain risky investment instruments. Risk Acceptance q Monitoring of certain activities that are deemed high risk e. g. , high risk investments.

CONTROL ACTIVITIES o o A single control activity can address multiple risk responses or CONTROL ACTIVITIES o o A single control activity can address multiple risk responses or Multiple control activities may be needed for one risk response.

Types of Control Activities Ø Types of Control Activities o o Preventive Detective Manual Types of Control Activities Ø Types of Control Activities o o Preventive Detective Manual (People Based) Automated (System Based)

Types of Control Activities o Preventive Controls are more reliable 1. 2. Prevents errors Types of Control Activities o Preventive Controls are more reliable 1. 2. Prevents errors Proactive approach – frees up people resources

Types of Control Activities Types of Control Activities

Types of Control Activities q Reconciliations (Detective) q q Personnel approving or executing transactions Types of Control Activities q Reconciliations (Detective) q q Personnel approving or executing transactions should not perform reconciliations. Reviews (Detective) q q q Budget to Actual Current to prior period comparisons Performance measurements

Types of Control Activities o Approval/Authorizations (Preventive) n n Policies and procedures Limits to Types of Control Activities o Approval/Authorizations (Preventive) n n Policies and procedures Limits to authority Supporting documentation Question unusual items

Types of Control Activities o Assets Security (Preventive and Detective) n n n Physical Types of Control Activities o Assets Security (Preventive and Detective) n n n Physical safeguards Record retention Periodic counts/Inventories

Types of Control Activities o Segregation of Duties (Preventive and Detective) n The following Types of Control Activities o Segregation of Duties (Preventive and Detective) n The following functions should be segregated o o o Approval Accounting/Reconciling Asset Custody

Levels of Control Activities o Entity Level Controls n Controls management implement to establish Levels of Control Activities o Entity Level Controls n Controls management implement to establish the appropriate tone at the top. (Strategic Objectives) o o Process Level Controls n o E. g. , Employees sign a code of conduct Mitigate risks involved in initiating, recording, processing or reporting transactions. IT and Application Controls n Further mitigates process level risks

Levels of Control Activities o Pervasive Level n n o Adequate training of personnel Levels of Control Activities o Pervasive Level n n o Adequate training of personnel Access restrictions Authorization Segregation of duties Specific Level n n Validation Reconciliation

CONTROL ACTIVITIES o The Writing on The Wall n n Applying too narrow a CONTROL ACTIVITIES o The Writing on The Wall n n Applying too narrow a focus to the identification of risks can lead to overlooking potential risks and issues. Think about risks without considering the existing processes and controls in place.

Effectiveness and Efficiency o o Control activities must be tested to ensure there are Effectiveness and Efficiency o o Control activities must be tested to ensure there are no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Management should also ensure that control activities are carried out in a timely manner. n Internal auditors may support management by providing assurance on the effectiveness and efficiency of control activates.

Control Activities Worksheet provided in Section VI can be used as a template for Control Activities Worksheet provided in Section VI can be used as a template for documenting risks and related controls Divided into 3 parts n n n Part I Strategic, Operations, and Reporting Objectives Part II Compliance Objectives Part III Fraud

Control Activities Worksheet o o o Worksheet is NOT all inclusive. N/A responses need Control Activities Worksheet o o o Worksheet is NOT all inclusive. N/A responses need to be addressed. Remember the writing on the wall. Any policy or procedure used as a risk response in Part I or III should be addressed in Part II, Compliance. Template may be modified.

Control Activities Worksheet Part I Strategic, Operations, and Reporting Objectives n Categorized by business Control Activities Worksheet Part I Strategic, Operations, and Reporting Objectives n Categorized by business processes. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Budget Process Cash Disbursement/Expenditures Cash Receipts/Revenues Cash Management Liabilities Capital Assets/Inventory/Equipment Information Systems/Data Processing Personnel/Employee Compensation Financial Reporting Accounts Receivable Investments

Control Activities Worksheet Part III Fraud o Categorized by the Association of Certified Fraud Control Activities Worksheet Part III Fraud o Categorized by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiner’s Categories of Fraud. n n n Misappropriation of assets Corruption Fraudulent Reporting

Control Activities Worksheet Part III Fraud o q Categories should be applied to each Control Activities Worksheet Part III Fraud o q Categories should be applied to each business process. Fraud control risk management should be integrated into the agency's philosophy, practices and business plans rather than be seen or practiced as a separate program. When it is integrated, risk management becomes the business of everyone in the organization.

Control Activities Worksheet Part III Fraud q Core areas to focus on q q Control Activities Worksheet Part III Fraud q Core areas to focus on q q q q q Information systems; Contracts; Grants and other payments or benefits programs; Purchasing; Services provided to the community; Revenue collection; Use of government credit cards; Travel allowance and other common allowances; Salaries; And Property and other physical assets including physical security.

Other Considerations o Risks with large or moderate impact and probable (high) or reasonably Other Considerations o Risks with large or moderate impact and probable (high) or reasonably possible (medium) likelihood of occurrence are your significant risks. These are the risks you need to address with control activities. n n No risk response is needed for insignificant risks but BE CAUTIOUS AND OBJECTIVE. Insignificant risks still need to be documented on the worksheet. Explanation of insignificant nature should be documented.

Other Considerations Inherent Risks - Control Activities= Residual Risks n Ensure you evaluate all Other Considerations Inherent Risks - Control Activities= Residual Risks n Ensure you evaluate all insignificant risks not addressed with control activities on an aggregate basis to ensure your residual risk is within your risk tolerance. ü All risks (regardless of significance) should still be included.

Other Considerations o If any of the risks already included in the worksheet are Other Considerations o If any of the risks already included in the worksheet are deemed as having a low impact or remote likelihood of occurrence, treat as as a risk that is not applicable to your agency and document explanation on worksheet. o Don’t forget about abuse.

SECTION VII INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SECTION VII INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION

Information o Needed at all levels of an organization n o o to identify, Information o Needed at all levels of an organization n o o to identify, assess, and respond to risks to run the entity to achieve its objectives Internal and external sources Financial and nonfinancial

Strategic and Integrated Systems o o o Data processing and data management become a Strategic and Integrated Systems o o o Data processing and data management become a shared responsibility IS architecture needs to be flexible and agile to effectively integrate with affiliated external parties Has management’s risk management techniques contemplated organizational goals in making technology selection and implementation decisions?

Integration with Operations o Applications facilitate access to information previously trapped in functional or Integration with Operations o Applications facilitate access to information previously trapped in functional or departmental silos n o Information becomes available for widespread use Transactions are recorded and tracked in real time n Managers have immediate access to financial and operating information more effectively to control agency activities

Depth and Timeliness of Information o Information infrastructure sources and captures data in a Depth and Timeliness of Information o Information infrastructure sources and captures data in a timeframe and at a depth consistent with an entity’s need to n n o identify, assess, and respond to risks, and remain within risk tolerances Timeliness needs to be consistent with the rate of change in the entity’s internal and external environments

Information Quality o o o Data reliability is a critical attribute of information systems Information Quality o o o Data reliability is a critical attribute of information systems and data-driven automated decision systems Inaccurate data results in unidentified risks or poor assessments and bad management decisions Quality of information includes ascertaining whether informational content is n n n Appropriate Timely Current Accurate Accessible

Communication o o o Inherent in information systems Must provide information to appropriate personnel Communication o o o Inherent in information systems Must provide information to appropriate personnel to carry out strategic, operating, reporting, compliance, and stewardship responsibilities Must deal with n n n expectations, responsibilities of individuals and groups Other important matters

Internal Communication o Behavioral expectations and responsibilities of personnel n n o Clear statement Internal Communication o Behavioral expectations and responsibilities of personnel n n o Clear statement of entity’s risk management philosophy and approach Clear delegation of authority Should effectively convey n n The importance and relevance of effective ERM The entity’s objectives, risk appetite, risk tolerances A common risk language Roles and responsibilities of personnel in effecting and supporting the components of ERM

External Communication o Open external communication channels n n o Constituents provide highly significant External Communication o Open external communication channels n n o Constituents provide highly significant input on design and quality of products and services Enables an entity to address evolving customer demands or preferences Recognize such implications n n n Investigate Take necessary corrective actions Focus on impact on financial reporting and compliance as well as operating objectives

Means of Communicating o o Actions speak louder than words Actions influenced by the Means of Communicating o o Actions speak louder than words Actions influenced by the entity’s history and culture n n o Operating with integrity Culture is well understood throughout the organization Embed communications on ERM into an entity’s broad-based, ongoing communications programs and into the fabric of the organization

SECTION VIII MONITORING SECTION VIII MONITORING

Monitoring o o Assessing the presence and functioning of components over time Accomplished through Monitoring o o Assessing the presence and functioning of components over time Accomplished through n n n o Ongoing monitoring activities Separate evaluations Combination of the two ERM changes over time n n n Once effective risk responses become irrelevant Control activities become less effective or no longer are performed Entity objectives might change

Ongoing Monitoring Activities o Occur through regular management activities n n n Variance analysis Ongoing Monitoring Activities o Occur through regular management activities n n n Variance analysis Comparisons of information with disparate sources Dealing with unexpected occurrences

Scope and Frequency o Evaluations of ERM depend on n o o significance of Scope and Frequency o Evaluations of ERM depend on n o o significance of risks importance of risk responses and related controls in managing the risks Address application in strategy setting with respect to significant activities Scope depends on which objectives categories are addressed

Who Evaluates o Self assessments n n n n Person responsible for particular unit Who Evaluates o Self assessments n n n n Person responsible for particular unit or function determines effectiveness of ERM for their activities Division/function head Line managers Controller Senior management Internal auditors (management cannot delegate its responsibility) External auditors (caution!)

The Evaluation Process o o o Evaluating ERM is a process in itself Approaches The Evaluation Process o o o Evaluating ERM is a process in itself Approaches and techniques vary Consistent and disciplined approach should be brought to the process n n n Understand entity activities and components of ERM being addressed Determine ERM system actually works Discuss with personnel who actually perform or are affected by ERM Analyze ERM process design and results of tests performed Determine if process provides reasonable assurance with respect to the stated objectives

Methodology o A variety of evaluation methodologies and techniques are available n n o Methodology o A variety of evaluation methodologies and techniques are available n n o o Checklists Questionnaires Flowcharting techniques Comparing or benchmarking to best in class entity Planning steps Performance steps

Documentation o o o Varies based on the entity’s size, complexity, and similar factors Documentation o o o Varies based on the entity’s size, complexity, and similar factors Evaluations more effective and efficient with appropriate level of documentation Document and retain n n Evaluation process itself Descriptions of tests and analyses Support for statement to external parties regarding ERM effectiveness Retention policy

Reporting Deficiencies o Deficiencies noted from n n n o o o Ongoing monitoring Reporting Deficiencies o Deficiencies noted from n n n o o o Ongoing monitoring procedures Separate evaluations External parties Reported directly to persons directly responsible for achieving business objectives affected by the deficiency Report specific types of deficiencies to senior management and/or oversight body Corrective actions taken or to be taken should be reported back to relevant personnel

What Is Reported o All identified ERM deficiencies that affect an entity’s ability n What Is Reported o All identified ERM deficiencies that affect an entity’s ability n n o Must report significant deficiencies and material weaknesses n o to develop and implement its strategy and to set and achieve its objectives Use qualitative and quantitative materiality Report identified opportunities to increase the likelihood entity objectives will be achieved

To Whom to Report o o o Determining right party is critical Immediate superiors To Whom to Report o o o Determining right party is critical Immediate superiors through normal channels They in turn communicate upstream or laterally so the information ends up with someone who has the authority to act n o e. g. , senior management, department head, audit committee, other oversight body Consider alternative channels for reporting sensitive information n Fraud and illegal or improper acts