Reporting & Assessing UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard (January-June 2014)
Achievement of KAI Targets in Brief (January-June 2014) Level of Achievement Number of KAIs Percentage (%) ≥ 100% (Excellent) 22 49 95% - 99% (Very Good) - - 60% - 94% (Good) 9 20 < 60% (Fair) 14 31 Total number of KAIs reported 45 100 Quarterly reporting 43 Biannual reporting 1 Annual reporting 13 Total number of KAIs 57
List of all KAIs: Perspective / Strategic Objective UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Key Amal Indicator Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan-June Achievement % STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE (6 Strategic Objectives / 12 KAIs) S 1: Globally Marketable and Outstanding Graduates S 2: Generate Opportunities for Life -Long Learning S 1. 1 Percentage of graduates employed at convocation time A 75% Yearly reporting - - S 1. 2 Number of students receiving awards at national and international level Q 150 76 112 147% S 2. 1 Number of life-long learning programmes Q 400 200 125 63% Q 3000 1500 3909 261% Q 600 300 208 69. 3% S 3. 1 S 3: Enhanced Entrepreneurial Ecosystem S 3. 2 Number of students involved in entrepreneurial training during their studies (headcounts) Number of staff with entrepreneurial exposure (headcounts) S 3. 3 Number of committed job creation projects Q 15 7. 5 0 0% S 3. 4 Number of start-up companies created by students Q 100 50 54 108% Number of higher institution centre of excellence (HICo. E) A 1 Yearly reporting - - S 4: Notable Technological S 4. 1 Research and Innovation Institution Q = Quarterly reporting B = Biannual reporting A = Annual reporting
UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Perspective / Strategic Objective Key Amal Indicator Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan -June Achievement % S 5. 1 S 6: Outstanding Contribution to Society A 350 Yearly reporting - - S 5. 2 QS World University Ranking (in Engineering & Technology) A Top 200 Yearly reporting - - S 5. 3 S 5: Reputable International Ranking QS World University Ranking QS-ASIAN University Ranking A 60 Yearly reporting - - S 6. 1 Number of community based participatory research projects Q 5 3 21 700% INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE (8 Strategic Objectives / 28 KAIs) P 1: Continuous Academic Quality Improvement P 2: Up to date and Industry-Relevant Curriculum P 3 : Innovative Students Transformation P 1. 1 Number of academic programmes initiated for international accreditation Q 4 2 15 750% P 2. 1 Percentage of academic programmes with industry advisory panel Q 80% 40% 100% 250% Q 50 26 30 115. 4% Q 3500 1750 1850 105. 71 Number of students holding leadership positions at national and International level Number of students engaged in community P 3. 2 engagement programmes P 3. 1
UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan -June Achievement % Q 80% 52% 65% Q 300 139 46% Q 6500 6, 500 1, 667 26% P 4. 4 Cumulative impact factor of publications Q 3000 871. 683 29% P 4. 5 Cumulative citation of publications Q 25, 000 31, 984 128% P 4. 6 Number of university linked spin-off companies Q 200 18 18% P 4. 7 Number of patents granted Q 15 8 1 13% P 4. 8 Number of commercialized products Q 6 3 3 100% P 4. 9 Number of technology know-how licensing Q 12 6 1 17% P 4. 10 Number of IPR Q 3500 3400 3622 107% P 4. 11 Research grants received (million) Q RM 150 m RM 45 m RM 30. 5 m 68% Perspective / Strategic Objective P 4. 1 Key Amal Indicator Percentage of academic staff involved as principal investigators of research grants P 4. 2 Number of active Post-Doctoral fellows P 4. 3 P 4 : Outstanding Leadership and Contribution in Research and Innovation Total number of publications in citation-indexed journals including refereed proceedings
UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan -June Achievement % Q 55% 47. 8% 87% P 5. 2 Percentage of Ph. D students to total PG students Q 35% 46. 6% 133% Percentage of GOT of Ph. D students to total Ph. D students Q 30% 35. 3% 118% B 360 180 204 113% Q 400 200 (Mo. A yang masih sah pada tahun semasa) 48% Q 200 60 3 5% Q 150 22 15% Q 100 50 58 116% Q 100 50 262 524% Perspective / Strategic Objective P 5. 1 P 5: Graduate. Focused University P 5. 3 Key Amal Indicator Percentage of postgraduate to total students (enrolment) P 5. 4 Number of Ph. D graduated in the year P 6. 1 P 6: Strong National and International Linkages and Positions Number of Mo. A's signed at national and international level Number of awards and recognition conferred by P 6. 2 national and international learned and professional bodies Number of staff involved in international joint P 6. 3 research projects Number of staffs appointed as chairmanship/committee positions for the P 6. 4 international professional bodies/associations at international level Number of staffs appointed as field P 6. 5 experts/advisor at national and international level 96
UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Perspective / Strategic Objective Key Amal Indicator Number of staff participating in community P 7: University Social P 7. 1 engagement activities Responsibility (USR) Number of students attended Service Learning P 7. 2 for Community Programmes Engagement and Amount of community engagement funding Outreach P 7. 3 received P 8: Excellent Service Delivery P 8. 1 Customer Satisfaction Index Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan -June Achievement % Q 500 250 268 107. 2% Q 1500 750 523 70% Q RM 1 m RM 0. 500 m RM 2, 114, 045 422. 81% A 80% Yearly reporting - - Q 75% 76. 68% 102. 24% Q 15% 12% 10. 46% 87% LEARNING AND GROWTH PERSPECTIVE (3 Strategic Objectives / 7 KAIs) L 1. 1 L 1: Competent and Productive Staff a. Percentage of academic staff with Ph. D/DSc, D. Eng. b. Percentage of academic staff with Professional Qualifications (such as medical, engineers, architects, accountants etc) L 1. 2 A 4. 5 / 5 Yearly reporting - - L 1. 3 L 2: State-of-the-art Facilities Competency Index for Non Academic Staff (1 -5 scale) Percentage of PPP engaged in Individual Development Plan (IDP) Q 60% 35% 19. 6% 56% L 2. 1 Number of accredited laboratories A 5 - 4 80% L 2. 2 Percentage increase of library digital content Q 15% 7. 8% 104%
UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan -June Achievement % A 95% Yearly reporting - - A 5% Yearly reporting - - Income generated from training courses (nondegree programme) / postgraduate fees R 2. 1 (leading to higher degree / franchise programme fees Q RM 35 m RM 17. 5 m RM 17. 74 m 101% R 2. 2 Income generated from consultancy Q RM 15 m RM 7. 5 m RM 4. 29 m 57% Perspective / Strategic Objective L 3: Conducive Environment L 3. 1 Key Amal Indicator Percentage of campus community satisfaction index on conducive campus RESOURCE PERSPECTIVE (3 Strategic Objectives / 10 KAIs) R 1: Prudent Resource Management R 2: Financial Sustainability R 1. 1 Percentage reduction of operational expenditure R 2. 3 Income generated from organising conferences and seminars in the field of expertise Q RM 1 m RM 0. 51 m 102% R 2. 4 Gifts (money, equipment, research materials, etc. ) worth ≥ RM 5, 000 each Q RM 2 m RM 1 m RM 0. 07 m 7% Income generated from product R 2. 5 commercialization / technology know-how licensing Q RM 7 m RM 3. 5 m RM 689, 110 20% R 2. 6 Endowment (RM mil) – cumulative Q RM 80 m RM 64. 6 m RM 50. 79 m 79%
UTM’s Achievement based on Balanced Scorecard January-June 2014 Perspective / Strategic Objective Key Amal Indicator Building Energy Efficiency Index R 3. 1 (EEI) (Kw. H/m 2 /yrs) R 3: Campus Sustainability Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan -June Achievement % - - A 110 Yearly reporting R 3. 2 Reduction of waste generation from normal campus routine activities (2 kg/person/day) A 10% Yearly reporting - - R 3. 3 Percentage of sustainable tropical campus development projects completed A 60% Yearly reporting - -
HIGHLIGHT UTM’s Achievement based on BSC in January-June 2014 Level of Achievement = < 60% (Fair) Perspective / Strategic Objective Key Amal Indicator Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan-June Achievement % Q 15 7. 5 0 0% P 4. 2 Number of active Post-Doctoral fellows Q 300 139 46% Total number of publications in citation. P 4. 3 indexed journals including refereed proceedings Q 6500 6, 500 1, 667 26% P 4. 4 Cumulative impact factor of publications Q 3000 871. 683 29% STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVE S 3: Enhanced Entrepreneurial Ecosystem S 3. 3 Number of committed job creation projects INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE P 4 : Outstanding Leadership and Contribution in Research and Innovation Q = Quarterly reporting B = Biannual reporting A = Annual reporting
Perspective / Strategic Objective P 4 : Outstanding Leadership and Contribution in Research and Innovation P 6: Strong National and International Linkages and Positions Key Amal Indicator Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan-June Achievement % P 4. 6 Number of university linked spin-off companies Q 200 18 18% P 4. 7 Number of patents granted Q 15 8 1 13% P 4. 9 Number of technology know-how licensing Q 12 6 1 17% 48% 96 Number of Mo. A's signed at national and P 6. 1 international level Q 400 200 (Mo. A yang masih sah pada tahun semasa) Number of awards and recognition conferred by P 6. 2 national and international learned and professional bodies Q 200 60 3 5% Q 150 22 15% P 6. 3 Number of staff involved in international joint research projects Q = Quarterly reporting B = Biannual reporting A = Annual reporting
Perspective / Strategic Objective Key Amal Indicator Frequency of Reporting Corporate Target 2014 Jan -June Target Jan-June Achievement % Q 60% 35% 19. 6% 56% Q RM 15 m RM 7. 5 m RM 4. 29 m 57% Q RM 2 m RM 1 m RM 0. 07 m 7% Q RM 7 m RM 3. 5 m RM 689, 110 20% LEARNING AND GROWTH PERSPECTIVE L 1: Competent and Productive Staff L 1. 3 Percentage of PPP engaged in Individual Development Plan (IDP) RESOURCE PERSPECTIVE R 2. 2 Income generated from consultancy R 2: Financial Sustainability R 2. 4 Gifts (money, equipment, research materials, etc. ) worth ≥ RM 5, 000 each Income generated from product R 2. 5 commercialization / technology know-how licensing Q = Quarterly reporting B = Biannual reporting A = Annual reporting
Скачать презентацию Reporting Assessing UTM s Achievement based on Balanced
0f01a298a7a371f165c8815ec34da6cf.ppt