Скачать презентацию Recruitment and Retention of Tumor Registrars the Missouri Скачать презентацию Recruitment and Retention of Tumor Registrars the Missouri

84a470f0fc0037ef78dc17b94a0bf24c.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 37

Recruitment and Retention of Tumor Registrars: the Missouri experience J. Jackson-Thompson, MSPH, Ph. D Recruitment and Retention of Tumor Registrars: the Missouri experience J. Jackson-Thompson, MSPH, Ph. D Sue Vest, BA, CTR Missouri Cancer Registry, University of Missouri, Columbia

Missouri Cancer Registry • A collaborative partnership between the Missouri Department of Health & Missouri Cancer Registry • A collaborative partnership between the Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services (DHSS) and the University of Missouri - Columbia (MU); • Supported by CDC/NPCR Cooperative Agreement #U 55/CCU 721904 -04 and a contract between the University of Missouri and the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services

Acknowledgments Sue Vest, CTR, MCR Project Manager Othr MCR operations staff – Nancy Cole, Acknowledgments Sue Vest, CTR, MCR Project Manager Othr MCR operations staff – Nancy Cole, CTR & Audra Herkelman (MCR) Reporting facility staff Centers for Disease Prevention & Control National Program of Cancer Registries (CDC/NPCR)

Objectives Brief history of Missouri Cancer Registry (MCR); Introduce MCR operations staff; Identify some Objectives Brief history of Missouri Cancer Registry (MCR); Introduce MCR operations staff; Identify some ways MCR has successfully dealt with recruitment & retention; and Outline some challenges still to be faced.

MCR Gold Celebration 2005 MCR Gold Celebration 2005

History of MCR Historical: 1972 - voluntary agreement State mandate – 1984, implemented ‘ History of MCR Historical: 1972 - voluntary agreement State mandate – 1984, implemented ‘ 85 Received NPCR funding - 1995 – Reference year - 1996 Expanded reporting – 1999 – 192. 650 – 192. 657 RSMo NAACCR certification – 1998 dx. year NPCR quality indicators – ongoing ↑

MCR Database 36, 000 – 40, 000 records per year 28, 000 unduplicated MO MCR Database 36, 000 – 40, 000 records per year 28, 000 unduplicated MO cases per year >300, 000 unduplicated Missouri cases – 1996 and later Historical database - > 300, 000 records – 1995 and earlier

Challenges We All Face Timeliness: 90% at 12 months; 95% at 24 months Completeness: Challenges We All Face Timeliness: 90% at 12 months; 95% at 24 months Completeness: – ≥ 95% of expected cases – Treatment Accuracy: – Pass edits: 100% – Missing/unknown data elements: ranges from 2% 3% • Race, sex, age, county of residence – Death certificate only (DCE) cases ≤ 3%

Additional challenges many registries had (or still have) Early 1996: – Outdated hardware & Additional challenges many registries had (or still have) Early 1996: – Outdated hardware & software – Non-standard data elements & layout – Non-competitive salaries • Outdated job specifications (preelectronic) – Too few staff • Limited education & training opportunities • Difficulty retaining staff

1996 Assess the Situation 1996 Assess the Situation

Need: Meet NPCR requirements Timeliness, completeness and quality Expanded cancer reporting statute Case-sharing agreements Need: Meet NPCR requirements Timeliness, completeness and quality Expanded cancer reporting statute Case-sharing agreements Advisory Board Data in standard NAACCR layout Collect required & recommended data elements

First Steps (Right off the Bat) Increase NPCR funding Upgrade hardware & buy commercial First Steps (Right off the Bat) Increase NPCR funding Upgrade hardware & buy commercial software Hire more CTRs – Rewrite job specs to reflect responsibilities – Obtain permission to hire at top of pay scale – Make working for MCR desirable Appoint Advisory Board Obtain case-sharing agreements

More Early Steps (Line Drives) Improve relationships with reporting facilities – From “There’s a More Early Steps (Line Drives) Improve relationships with reporting facilities – From “There’s a law - our way or the highway” to “Partners for better patient outcomes” Provide service to reporting facilities – Offer training for hospital registry staff – Go to bat for hospital CTRs – talk to administrators

Meet the Challenges … And what do you get? More Challenges! Meet the Challenges … And what do you get? More Challenges!

1999 (Extra base hit) Additional CTR positions funded by NPCR – No FTEs available 1999 (Extra base hit) Additional CTR positions funded by NPCR – No FTEs available Revise plan – Strengthen existing external relationship – Decrease state government – eliminate FTEs Outsource Operations! – Overnight, MCR operations staff became University staff

Next Steps (Home run) Impact of outsourcing – Greater flexibility in creating and filling Next Steps (Home run) Impact of outsourcing – Greater flexibility in creating and filling positions – More understanding of need to maintain competitive salaries, retain staff – Obtained NAACCR certification – Met most NPCR requirements

How? (Home run #2) Flexible schedules for staff – Adjust hours to meet MCR How? (Home run #2) Flexible schedules for staff – Adjust hours to meet MCR staff needs – Added benefit – improved service to reporting facilities Allow telecommuting, working off-site – Find a good CTR, don’t let distance/circumstances be an issue Set standards – Must be CTR or CTR-eligible to be cancer data coordinator

Other Avenues (to the playoffs) Increase training opportunities – Send all MCR staff to Other Avenues (to the playoffs) Increase training opportunities – Send all MCR staff to training of their choice – Develop/improve training for hospital registrars Encourage staff to take advantage of tuition reimbursement Restructure operations to meet registry & staff needs

Further avenues (world series) Promote from within Annual salary increases Encourage staff to – Further avenues (world series) Promote from within Annual salary increases Encourage staff to – Reach for the stars/achieve their dreams – Submit abstracts to NAACCR/make presentations – Get involved in research proposals Build a winning team

In Their Own Words In Their Own Words

Database Management Unit Saba Yemane, BS Iris Zachary, BS, CTR Database Administrator Assistant Database Database Management Unit Saba Yemane, BS Iris Zachary, BS, CTR Database Administrator Assistant Database Administrator

Quality Assurance Unit Electronic Deb Smith, CTR Senior Cancer Registrar Cate Ellis, CTR, BSN Quality Assurance Unit Electronic Deb Smith, CTR Senior Cancer Registrar Cate Ellis, CTR, BSN Cancer Data Coordinator

Quality Assurance Unit – Manual and Circuit-riding Brenda Lee, CTR Keri Grier Senior Cancer Quality Assurance Unit – Manual and Circuit-riding Brenda Lee, CTR Keri Grier Senior Cancer Registrar Health Program Assistant

Audit Unit Debbie Douglas, CTR Senior Cancer Registrar Audit Unit Debbie Douglas, CTR Senior Cancer Registrar

Non-hospital Unit Nancy Cole, CTR Senior Cancer Debra Eccleston Health Program Assistant Non-hospital Unit Nancy Cole, CTR Senior Cancer Debra Eccleston Health Program Assistant

Administration Jeannette Jackson. Thompson, MSPH, Ph. D, Operations Director Sue Vest, CTR Project Manager Administration Jeannette Jackson. Thompson, MSPH, Ph. D, Operations Director Sue Vest, CTR Project Manager

Surveillance, Research and Special Projects Unit Gonza Namulanda, MS Research Assistant Gentry White, BA, Surveillance, Research and Special Projects Unit Gonza Namulanda, MS Research Assistant Gentry White, BA, BS, MA, Ph. D Candidate Research Assistant

Audra Our Office Support Staff Audra Our Office Support Staff

Challenges Still to be Faced Hospital pay scales outstripping MCR pay scales – Department Challenges Still to be Faced Hospital pay scales outstripping MCR pay scales – Department & University HR supportive Change from exempt to hourly for CTRs Need for additional positions Restrictions placed on contract

Staff Frustrations & Wishes More staff in QA, Non-hospital and Audit units Salary commensurate Staff Frustrations & Wishes More staff in QA, Non-hospital and Audit units Salary commensurate with responsibilities, training & expertise Space Two bureaucracies – MU & DHSS – Lack of knowledge about registry operations – Lack of support Not enough time

Where are we now? Where are we now?

NPCR Quality Indicators Dx Year 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 Age Co. 0. NPCR Quality Indicators Dx Year 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 Age Co. 0. 00 0. 01 0. 00 0. 02 Sex Race 0. 00 0. 47 0. 00 0. 40 0. 00 0. 16 0. 00 0. 28

Can we stop here? Overall completeness exceeds 95% at 24 months Completeness estimates vary Can we stop here? Overall completeness exceeds 95% at 24 months Completeness estimates vary – By race and sex – By site

The Future Electronic reporting capabilities Increased information on web site More non-hospital reporting More The Future Electronic reporting capabilities Increased information on web site More non-hospital reporting More use of database for research

Research Trends – Incidence – Stage at Dx – Treatment – Age, sex, race/ethnicity Research Trends – Incidence – Stage at Dx – Treatment – Age, sex, race/ethnicity Public health practice Outcomes

Contact Information Jeannette Jackson-Thompson, MSPH, Ph. D Operations Director, Missouri Cancer Registry and Research Contact Information Jeannette Jackson-Thompson, MSPH, Ph. D Operations Director, Missouri Cancer Registry and Research Assistant Professor, Health Management & Informatics, University of Missouri-Columbia Phone – 573 882 -7775 Toll-free for reporting facilities – 1 800 292 -2829 E-mail – jacksonthompsonj@health. missouri. edu MCR website: http: //mcr. umh. edu

MCR Gold Celebration 2005 MCR Gold Celebration 2005