Racial Profiling TCOLE Course # 3256 AND BCCO PCT #4 Power. Point UNIT ONE
ADMINISTRATIVE • Please complete the BCCO PCT #4 Registration form and turn it in now. • Make sure you sign TCOLE Report of Training (PID#, Full Name and DOB). • All cell phones off please – pay attention to course materials and show common respect & courtesy.
Your Instructor – Course Facilitator and Mentor Trainer Deputy Chief George D. Little A. S. & B. S. Criminal Justice & Sociology B. S. CJ Wayland Baptist University, San Antonio M. S. Criminology & Counter-Terrorism University of the State of New York(P) 2012 T. C. O. L. E. Professional Achievement Award Certified Crime Prevention Specialist (C. C. P. S. ) TCOLE Basic Instructor Certificate 1984 TCOLE Advanced Instructor 2012 TCOLE Master Peace Officer 1991 MP Special Operations Operator Counter-Terrorism 1988 Military Police Investigations (MPI) & Criminal Investigation Division (CID) Special Agent Graduate Drug Enforcement Administration Academy 1977 43 - years Law Enforcement Experience 39 -Years Teaching & Instructor Experience 3/19/2018 3
DISCLAIMER Due to the dynamic nature of law enforcement and the impact of court decisions and statutory changes on police it is important that each agency review this information to verify that it is consistent with current federal, state and local law and regulations, and with agency policy & procedure and/or SOP. This information is not
to substitute for the advice of legal counsel. You should speak with your legal advisor about the sufficiency of your agency’s manual, policy, curriculum, and training program. This material should not be used as the sole basis for compliance with any law or regulation, and agencies should not rely on this material as a legal defense in any civil or criminal
action. TCOLE has compiled and distributed this information as a guide for the individual agency, and the Bexar County Constable’s Office PCT#4 is not responsible for the content and delivery of this material by other law enforcement agencies.
“To stop and search an individual simply because of his race, gender, or economic level is unlawful as well as unconstitutional, and should not be tolerated in any law enforcement agency. ” Bexar County Constable’s Office PCT#4 Standing Operating Procedure
COURSE/LESSON OVERVIEW Participants will be able to identify profiling and the negative perceptions, and legal aspects of racial profiling.
Learning Objectives Learning Objective 1. 0: The participant will be able to understand profiling and explain the background and negative impact of racial profiling in law enforcement profession. Learning Objective 1. 1 : The participant will be able to identify the legal aspects of racial profiling
Learning Objective 1. 2 : The participant will be able to identify the legislative requirements placed upon peace officers and law enforcement agencies regarding racial profiling. Learning Objective 1. 2. 1 : The participant will able to identify and explain legislative requirements placed upon Peace Officers and their agencies regarding racial profiling.
Where did it all begin?
1. 0 Background on Racial Profiling A. In its broadest sense, racial profiling by law enforcement officers is the practice of some officers to stop, search, and investigate minorities, minorities both on the street and while traveling in vehicles, based solely on their racial or ethnic background, rather than on ethnic their actions.
B. Racial profiling is any police street or traffic stop, based solely on racial or ethnic stereotypes that has the end result of treating minorities significantly differently than non-minority citizens. This volatile issue can effectively polarize police agencies and the communities they serve
C. The majority of complaints alleging racial profiling follow vehicle stops by police.
1. 1 Legal Aspects of Racial Profiling Requirements Racial Profiling CCP 3. 05 Racial Profiling Prohibited CCP 2. 131
CCP 3. 05 RACIAL PROFILING. In this code, "racial profiling" means a law enforcement-initiated action based on an individual's race, ethnicity, or national origin rather than on the individual's behavior or on information identifying the individual as having engaged in criminal activity.
CCP 2. 131 RACIAL PROFILING PROHIBITED. A peace officer may not engage in racial profiling. may not
Law Enforcement Policy CCP 2. 132 On racial profiling Reports required for CCP 2. 133 Traffic & Pedestrian stops Liability CCP 2. 136 Racial Profiling education For Police Chiefs EC 96. 641
CCP 2. 132 Law Enforcement Policy on Racial Profiling. (a) In this article: (1) "Law enforcement agency" means an agency of the state, or of a agency county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state, that employs peace officers who make traffic stops
CCP 2. 132 in the routine performance of the officers' official duties. (2) "Race or ethnicity" means of a particular descent, including descent Caucasian, African, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American descent.
CCP 2. 132 (b) Each law enforcement agency in this state shall adopt a detailed written policy on racial profiling. The policy must: (1) clearly define acts constituting acts racial profiling; (2) strictly prohibit peace officers employed by the agency from engaging in racial profiling; engaging
CCP 2. 132 (3) implement a process by which an individual may file a complaint with complaint the agency if the individual believes that a peace officer employed by the agency has engaged in racial profiling with respect to the individual; (4) provide public education relating education to the agency's complaint process;
CCP 2. 132 (5) require appropriate corrective action to be taken against a peace officer employed by the agency who, after an investigation, is shown to have engaged in racial profiling in violation of the agency's policy adopted under this article;
CCP 2. 132 (6) require collection of information relating to traffic stops in which a stops citation is issued and to arrests resulting from those traffic stops, including information relating to: (A) the race or ethnicity of the individual detained; and detained (B) whether a search was conducted and, if so, whether the person detained consented to the search; & consented
CCP 2. 132 (7) require the agency to submit to the governing body of each county or municipality served by the agency an annual report of the information collected under Subdivision (6) if the agency is an agency of a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state.
CCP 2. 132 (c) The data collected as a result of the reporting requirements of this article shall not constitute prima facie evidence of racial profiling. (d) On adoption of a policy under Subsection (b), a law enforcement agency shall examine the feasibility of installing video camera and video transmitter-activated equipment in each agency law enforcement
CCP 2. 132 vehicle regularly used to make traffic stops and transmitter-activated equipment in each agency law enforcement motorcycle regularly used to make traffic stops. If a law enforcement agency installs video or audio equipment as provided by this subsection, the policy adopted by the agency under Subsection (b) must include standards for reviewing video
CCP 2. 132 and audio documentation. (e) A report required under Subsection (b)(7) may not include identifying not information about a peace officer who makes a traffic stop or about an individual who is stopped or arrested by a peace officer. This subsection does not affect the collection of information as required by a policy under Subsection (b)(6).
(f) On the commencement of an investigation by a law enforcement agency of a complaint described by Subsection (b)(3) in which a video or audio recording of the occurrence on which the complaint is based was made, the agency shall promptly provide a copy of the recording to the copy peace officer who is the subject of the complaint on written request by the CCP 2. 132 officer.
CCP 2. 133 (a) In this article, “race or ethnicity” has the meaning assigned by Article 2. 132(a). (b) A peace officer who stops a motor vehicle for an alleged violation of a law or ordinance shall report to the law report enforcement agency that employs the officer information relating to the stop,
CCP 2. 133 including: (1) a physical description of any description person operating the motor vehicle who is detained as a result of the stop, including: (A) the person’s gender; and gender (B) the person’s race or ethnicity, as race stated by the person or, if the person does not state the person’s race or
CCP 2. 133 including: ethnicity, as determined by the officer to the best of the officer’s ability; (2) the initial reason for the stop; reason (3) whether the officer conducted a search as a result of the stop and, if search so, whether the person detained consented to the search;
CCP 2. 133 including: (4) whether any contraband or other evidence was discovered in the course of the search and a description of the search contraband or evidence; (5) the reason for the search, search including whether: (A) any contraband or other evidence was in plain view; view
CCP 2. 133 including: (5)(B) any probable cause or probable reasonable suspicion existed to perform the search; or (C) the search was performed as a result of the towing of the motor vehicle or the arrest of any person in the motor vehicle;
CCP 2. 133 including: (6) whether the officer made an officer arrest as a result of the stop or the search, including a statement of whether the arrest was based on a violation of the Penal Code, a violation of a traffic law or ordinance, or an outstanding warrant and a statement of the offense charged;
CCP 2. 133 including: (7) the street address or approximate location of the stop; and location (8) whether the officer issued a written warning or a citation as a result of warning the stop.
CCP 2. 136 LIABILITY. A peace officer is not LIABILITY not liable for damages arising from an act relating to the collection or reporting of information as required by Article 2. 133 or under a policy adopted under Article 2. 132.
EC 96. 641 (a) The Bill Blackwood Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas shall establish and offer a program of initial training and a program of continuing education for police chiefs. The curriculum for chiefs each program must relate to law enforcement management issues.
EC 296. 641 The institute shall develop the curriculum for the programs. The curriculum must be approved by the Texas Commission On Law Enforcement. (b) Each police chief must receive at least 40 hours of continuing education 40 provided by the institute under this section each 24 -month period. The Texas Commission On
EC 296. 641 Law Enforcement by rule shall establish a uniform 24 -month continuing education training period. (c) An individual appointed or elected to that individual's first position as chief must receive not fewer than 80 hours of initial training for new chiefs in accordance with Subsections (d) and (e).
EC 296. 641 (d) A newly appointed or elected police chief shall complete the initial training program for new chiefs not later than the second anniversary of that individual's appointment or election as chief. The initial training program for new chiefs is in addition to the initial training and continuing education required by Chapter 1701, Occupations Code. The Texas
EC 296. 641 Commission on Law Enforcement by rule shall establish that the first continuing education training period for an individual under Subsection (b) begins on the first day of the first uniform continuing education training period that follows the date the individual completed the initial training program.
EC 296. 641 (e) The institute by rule may provide for the waiver of: (1) the requirement of all or part of the 80 hours of initial training for new chiefs to the extent the new chief has satisfactorily completed equivalent training in the 24 months preceding the individual's appointment or election;
EC 296. 641 (2) the continuing education requirements of Subsection (b) for an individual who has satisfactorily completed equivalent continuing education in the preceding 24 months. (f) An individual who is subject to the continuing education requirements of Subsection (b) is exempt from other continuing education requirements under Subchapter H, Chapter 1701, Occupations Code
EC 296. 641 (g) In this section, "police chief" or "chief" means the head of a police department. (h) The chief of a municipal police department must be licensed as a peace officer by the commission no later than one year after the date that the chief is appointed to the position of police chief. The commission shall establish requirements for licensing
EC 296. 641 and for revocation, suspension, cancellation, or denial of peace officer license for a police chief. (i) A police chief who does not comply with this section cannot continue to be the chief. (j) As part of the initial training and continuing education for police chiefs required under this section, the institute shall establish a program on
EC 296. 641 (j)-Cont’d: asset forfeiture under Chapter 59, Code of Criminal Procedure. The program must include an examination of the best practices for educating peace officers about asset forfeiture and monitoring peace officers' compliance with laws relating to asset forfeiture. (k) As part of the initial training and continuing education for police chiefs
EC 296. 641 (k)-Cont’d: required under this section, the institute shall establish a program on racial profiling. The program must include an examination of the best practices for: (1) monitoring peace officers' compliance with laws and internal agency policies relating to racial profiling; (2) implementing laws and internal
EC 296. 641 (k)(2)-Cont’d: agency policies relating to preventing racial profiling; and (3) analyzing and reporting collected information. (l) As part of the initial training and continuing education for police chiefs required under this section, the institute shall establish a program on de-escalation and crisis intervention techniques to facilitate interaction
EC 296. 641 (l)-Cont’d: persons with mental impairments. The program must include an examination of the best practices for: (1) monitoring peace officers' compliance with internal agency policies relating to de-escalation and crisis intervention techniques to facilitate interaction with persons with mental impairments; and
EC 296. 641 (l)(2)-Cont’d: implementing internal agency policies relating to those techniques. (m) A police chief may not satisfy the requirements of Subsection (l) by taking an online course on deescalation and crisis intervention techniques to facilitate interaction with persons with mental impairments.
TAKE A 10 -MINUTE BREAK
Training program OC 1701. 253 Training required for OC 1701. 402 Intermediate Certificate Definition of “Race or Ethnicity form TC 543 -202
OC 1701. 253 (a) The commission shall establish minimum curriculum requirements curriculum for preparatory and advanced courses and programs for schools subject to approval under Section 1701. 251(c)(1).
OC 1701. 253 (b) In establishing requirements under this section, the commission shall require courses and programs to provide training in: (1) the investigation and documentation of cases that involve: (A) child abuse or neglect; (B) family violence; and (C) sexual assault;
OC 1701. 253 (b) (2) issues concerning sex offender characteristics; and (3) crime victims’ rights under Chapter 56, Code of Criminal Procedure, and Chapter 57, Family Code, and the duty of law enforcement agencies to ensure that a victim is afforded those rights.
OC 1701. 253 (c) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the commission shall establish a statewide comprehensive education and training program on civil rights, racial sensitivity, and cultural diversity for persons licensed under this chapter.
OC 1701. 253 (d) Training in documentation of cases required by Subsection (b) shall include instruction in: (1) making a written account of the extent of injuries sustained by the victim of an alleged offense; (2) recording by photograph or videotape the area in which an alleged offense occurred and the victim’s injuries;
OC 1701. 253 (d) (3) recognizing and recording a victim’s statement that may be admissible as evidence in a proceeding concerning the matter about which the statement was made. (e) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements relating to the vehicle and traffic laws of this state, the commission shall require an education and training program on laws
OC 1701. 253 (e) Relating to the operation of motorcycles and to the wearing of protective headgear by motorcycle operators and passengers. In addition, the commission shall require education and training on motorcycle operator profiling awareness and sensitivity training.
(f) Training for officers and recruits in investigation of cases required by Subsection (b)(1)(B) shall include instruction in preventing dual arrest whenever possible and conducting a thorough investigation to determine which person is the predominant aggressor when allegations of family violence from two or more opposing persons are received arising from the OC 1701. 253 same incident.
OC 1701. 253 (g) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the commission shall establish a statewide comprehensive education and training program on asset forfeiture under Chapter 59, Code of Criminal Procedure, for officers licensed under this chapter. An officer shall complete a program established under this subsection not later than the second anniversary of
OC 1701. 253 (g) the date the officer is licensed under this chapter or the date the officer applies for an intermediate proficiency certificate, whichever date is earlier. (h) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the commission shall establish a statewide comprehensive education and training program on racial profiling for officers licensed
OC 1701. 253 (h) under this chapter. An officer shall complete a program established under this subsection not later than the second anniversary of the date the officer is licensed under this chapter or the date the officer applies for an intermediate proficiency certificate, whichever date is earlier. (i) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the commission shall
OC 1701. 253 (i) establish a statewide comprehensive education and training program on identity theft under Section 32. 51, Penal Code, for officers licensed under this chapter. An officer shall complete a program established under this subsection not later than the second anniversary of the date the officer is licensed under this chapter or the date the officer
OC 1701. 253 (i) applies for an intermediate proficiency certificate, whichever date is earlier. (j) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the commission shall require an officer to complete a statewide education and training program on de-escalation and crisis intervention techniques to facilitate interaction with persons with
OC 1701. 253 (j) impairments. An officer shall complete the program not later than the second anniversary of the date the officer is licensed under this chapter or the date the officer applies for an intermediate proficiency certificate, whichever date is earlier. An officer may not satisfy the requirements of this section or Section 1701. 402(g) by taking an online course on
OC 1701. 253 (j) -escalation and crisis intervention techniques to facilitate interaction with persons with mental impairments. (k) As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the commission shall establish a statewide comprehensive education and training program for officers licensed under this chapter that covers the laws of this state and of the United States pertaining to peace officers.
OC 1701. 402 PROFICIENCY CERTIFICATES. (a) CERTIFICATES The commission shall issue certificates that recognize proficiency based on law enforcement training, education, and experience. For this purpose the commission shall use the employment records of the employing agency.
The instructor staff of the Bexar County Constable’s Office PCT #4 Training Division Concurs, confirms and hereby certifies that: Deputy Constable John Q. OFFICER has successfully completed all the requirements of the 4 -hour RACIAL PROFILING Course Texas Commission On Law Enforcement (TCOLE) Course # 3256 at the Bexar County Constable Office, PCT #4 Training Division on this 4 th day of October 2014 __________________________ George D. Little, C. C. P. S. , Deputy Chief INTEL – Homeland Security & Training Robert M. Blount Constable, PCT #4
OC 1701. 402 (b) As a requirement for a basic proficiency certificate, the commission shall require completion of local courses or programs of instruction on federal and state statutes that relate to employment issues affecting peace officers and county jailers, including: • civil service; (2) compensation, including overtime compensation, and vacation time;
OC 1701. 402 (b) (3) personnel files and other employee records; (4) management-employee relations in law enforcement organizations; (5) work-related injuries; (6) complaints and investigations of employee misconduct; and (7) disciplinary actions and the appeal of disciplinary actions.
OC 1701. 402 (c) An employing agency is responsible for providing the training required by this section. (d) As a requirement for an intermediate proficiency certificate, an officer must complete an education and training program on asset forfeiture established by the commission under Section 1701. 253(g).
OC 1701. 402 (e) As a requirement for an intermediate proficiency certificate, an officer must complete an education and training program on racial profiling established by the profiling commission under Section 1701. 253(h). (f) As a requirement for an intermediate proficiency certificate, an officer must complete an education
OC 1701. 402 (f) and training program on identity theft established by the commission under Section 1701. 253(i). (g) As a requirement for an intermediate proficiency certificate or an advanced proficiency certificate, an officer must complete the education and training program described by Section 1701. 253 regarding deescalation and crisis intervention
OC 1701. 402 (g) techniques to facilitate interaction with persons with mental impairments.
TC 543 -202 FORM OF RECORD. (a) In this RECORD section, "race or ethnicity" means of a particular descent, including Caucasian, African, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American descent. (b) The record must be made on a form or by a data processing method acceptable to the department and
(b) must include: (1) the name, address, physical description, including race or ethnicity, date of birth, and driver's license number of the person charged; (2) the registration number of the vehicle involved; (3) whether the vehicle was a commercial motor vehicle as defined
(3) by Chapter 522 or was involved in transporting hazardous materials; (4) the person's social security number, if the person was operating a commercial motor vehicle or was the holder of a commercial driver's license or commercial driver learner's permit; (5) the date and nature of the offense, including whether the offense was a serious traffic violation as defined by
(5) Chapter 522; (6) whether a search of the vehicle was conducted and whether consent for the search was obtained; (7) the plea, the judgment, whether the individual was adjudicated under Article 45. 0511, Code of Criminal Procedure, and whether bail was forfeited;
(8) the date of conviction; and (9) the amount of the fine or forfeiture.
1. 2: Legislative Requirements for Peace Officers & Agencies for Racial Profiling A. Written agency policies or SOP 1. Definition of what constitutes racial profiling 2. Prohibition of racial profiling Prohibition 3. Complaint process Complaint 4. Public education
A. Written departmental policies/SOP 5. Corrective action Corrective 6. Collection of traffic-stop statistics 7. Annual reports B. Not prima facie evidence
C. Feasibility of use of video equipment D. Data does not identify officer identify E. Copy of complaint-related video evidence to officer in question
F. Vehicle stop report 1. Physical description of detainees: gender, race or gender ethnicity 2. Alleged violation 3. Consent to search Consent 4. Contraband 5. Facts supporting probable cause
F. Vehicle stop report 6. Arrest 7. Warning or citation issued G. Compilation and analysis of data H. Exemption from reporting – audio/video equipment (None in Texas) I. Officer non-liability CCP 2. 136 J. Funding
K. Required training in racial profiling 1. Police chiefs 2. All holders of intermediate certificates and/or two-year-old licenses as of 09/01/2001 (training to be completed no later than 09/01/2003) – see legislation 77 RSB 1074
L. Public education M. Corrective action N. Collection of traffic-stop statistics O. Annual reports
1. 3 Supreme Court & Other Court decisions Traffic Stops A. Whren v. United States, 517 U. S. 806, 116 S. Ct. 1769 (1996) 1. Motor vehicle search exemption 2. Traffic violation acceptable as pretext for further pretext investigation
A. Whren v. United States, 517 U. S. 806, 116 S. Ct. 1769 (1996) 3. Selective enforcement can be challenged B. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, 88 Ohio S. Ct. 1868 (1968) 1. Stop & Frisk doctrine Frisk 2. Stopping and briefly detaining a person detaining
B. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968) 3. Frisk and pat down Frisk C. Other cases 1. Pennsylvania v. Mimms, Mimms 434 U. S. 106, 98 S. Ct. 330 (1977) 2. Maryland v. Wilson, 117 Wilson S. Ct. 882 (1997)
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U. S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968) 1. Terry v. Ohio was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the Stop & Frisk doctrine, and outlined the Supreme Court’s guidelines for investigative stops.
Terry v. Ohio 2. The Court held that police may, in certain circumstances, approach and stop a person for the purpose of investigating possible criminal investigating behavior, even when there is not enough probable cause to make an arrest.
3. Under Terry, a police officer may stop and briefly detain a person only if the officer has a reasonable suspicion, supported by articulable facts, that the individual may be involved in criminal activity.
4. The Court also held that under certain circumstances, the person stopped could also be “frisked, ” in frisked that the police could conduct a limited search, or “pat down”, of limited the individual’s outer clothing to outer discover the presence of any weapons.
C. Other cases 3. Graham v. State, 119 Md. App 444, 705 A. 2 d 82 (1998) 4. Pryor v. State, 122 Md. App. 671 (1997) cert. denied 352 Md. 312, 721 A. 2 d 990 (1998) 5. Ferris v. State, 355 Md. 356, 735 A. 2 d 491 (1999)
Graham v. State, 119 Md. App 444, 705 A. 2 d 82 (1998) Passenger is “seized” for purposes of the 4 th Amendment when he is ordered to remain in a car remain stopped for speeding while officer checks the driver’s license and registration. Continued detention of passenger after purpose of stop is accomplished is unreasonable,
unless there is reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify continuing the detention. (driver’s detention license proved invalid, driver was arrested, yet passenger ordered to remain in the car after driver’s arrest to wait 25 minute for a K-9 unit).
Pryor v. State, 122 Md. App. 671 (1997), cert. denied 352 Md. 312, 721 A. 2 d 990 (1998) The 4 th Amendment permits the warrantless search of an warrantless automobile when there is probable cause to believe that the automobile contains contraband or evidence of criminal activity. . Note: there is no separate “exigency requirement” for the
automobile exception to apply; probable cause alone satisfies the automobile exception to the 4 th Amendment’s warrant requirement. Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U. S. 465, 119 S. Ct. 2013 (1999)(per curiam).
Ferris v. State, 355 Md. 356, 735 A. 2 d 491 (1999) The officer’s purpose in an ordinary traffic stop is to enforce the laws enforce of the roadway, and ordinarily to investigate the manner of driving with the intent to issue a citation or warning. Once the initial purpose of that stop has been fulfilled, the continued detention of the car and
the occupants amounts to a second detention. Once the underlying basis for the initial traffic stop has concluded, a police-driver encounter which implicates the 4 th Amendment is constitutionally permissible only if (1) the driver consents to the continuing consents intrusion; or (2) the officer has, at a minimum, a reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity is suspicion
afoot. Ferris v. State, 355 Md. 356, 735 A. 2 d 491 (1999). For example: Officer stopped driver stopped for suspected violations of motor vehicle laws, and continued to briefly detain him after learning that the license and registration were in order. Court found that officer harbored no more than a “hunch” hunch that the driver possessed drugs
and that the continued detention was not independently supported by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Therefore, drugs subsequently found in the vehicle were suppressed Munafo v. State, 105 Md. App. 662, 660 A. 2 d 1068 (1995).
Trooper issued driver a traffic citation, returned driver’s license and registration documents, and then asked driver if he would mind exiting his vehicle and stepping to the rear to answer a few questions. After several questions, driver admitted to smoking and possessing pot. Pot was suppressed because court found suppressed
trooper had insufficient reason to justify continuing the encounter after issuing citation. Ferris v. citation State, 355 Md. 356, 735 A. 2 d 491 (1999).
C. Other cases 6. New York v. Belton, 453 U. S. 454 (1981) Allowed that police may conduct a full search of a vehicle’s passenger compartment incidental to a custodial arrest of an occupant. A full search would not, however, be permitted in those situations where the officer merely issued a citation.
SUMMARY • What did you learn? • How will you apply what you’ve learned? • DEFINE & PROCESS UNIT ONE
DEFINE & PROCESS Define: Explain the background and negative impact of racial profiling in law enforcement profession Process:
SOURCES All Course Sources and/or Resources are listed in your Participant Handout RACIAL PROFILING TCOLE # 3256 Bexar County Constable Office PCT #4
Questions?
“Knowledge is “POWER” Stay informed, stay SAFE, stay Vigilant & stay Alive”
TAKE A 15 -MINUTE BREAK
Скачать презентацию Racial Profiling TCOLE Course 3256 AND BCCO
8f4caf5c9a2d1ffb255d3779b6030039.ppt