PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 UNDER THE

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 UNDER THE CENTRALLY SPONSORED SCHEME ON NATIONAL HORTICULTURE MISSION Date : Venue : 21 st March 2012. Room No. 142, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi. STATE HORTICULTURE MISSION RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH

Budget Sanction & Received Amount Under NHM (`. in Crore) Sanction Year Received Amount %age of expenditure against Expenditure sanctioned amount GOI Share State share Total 2005 -06 50. 29 0. 00 50. 29 23. 68 0. 00 23. 68 3. 42 7 2006 -07 111. 92 0. 00 111. 92 55. 00 0. 00 55. 00 47. 33 42 2007 -08 91. 03 16. 06 107. 09 62. 52 7. 50 70. 02 33. 57 31 2008 -09 107. 49 18. 97 126. 46 30. 00 8. 83 39. 00 84. 76 67 2009 -10 68. 46 12. 08 80. 54 60. 00 10. 59 78. 48 97 2010 -11 97. 75 17. 25 115. 00 96. 57 17. 04 113. 61 97. 94 85 2011 -12* 93. 50 16. 50 110. 00 85. 00 100. 00 98. 73 90 Total - 620. 44 80. 86 701. 30 412. 77 58. 96 471. 90 444. 23 94 * Expenditure up to 15 th March, 2012.

Information of Land Total Area Cultivable Irrigated Non-irrigated Fallow (lakh Ha. ) 137. 9 47. 5 13. 23 34. 27 3. 47 Area under Micro Irrigation (Ha. ) Drip Sprinkler Total 7843 71, 812 79, 655 Area Sl. No. Area under Horticulture Before NHM (2004 -05) (Area in lakh ha. ) Post NHM (2011 -12) (Area in lakh ha. ) 1. Fruits 0. 46 1. 82 2. Vegetables 1. 23 3. 40 3. Spices 0. 28 0. 80 4. Medicinal & Aromatics 0. 02 0. 09 5. Flowers 0. 02 0. 12 2. 01 6. 23 Total -

Area & Production of Horticulture Crops 2004 -05 2011 -12 Sl. No. Crops 1. Fruits 0. 46 3. 24 7. 00 1. 82 15. 51 8. 52 2. Vegetables 1. 23 12. 50 10. 12 3. 40 43. 25 12. 72 3. Spices 0. 28 1. 70 5. 97 0. 80 5. 22 6. 52 4. Medicinal & Aromatics 0. 02 0. 11 5. 70 0. 09 0. 33 3. 66 5. Flowers 0. 02 0. 03 1. 88 0. 12 0. 86 7. 16 2. 01 17. 58 8. 72 6. 23 65. 17 10. 46 Total - Area (lakh ha. ) Yield / Production Area Production Productivity (lakh Mt. ) (lakh ha. ) (lakh Mt. ) (Mt. /Ha. )

Production trend of Horticulture • Area of fruit and vegetable is increased sharply from 2005 -06 to 2007 -08 but now it is static. • Production of fruits grew at the rate of 40% initially but later production has declining due to the fact that new orchards are in their gestation period and old orchards are becoming senile. • The productivity of all major horticulture crops except Okra, Coriander, Cashew-nut, Lime and Banana, is lower than its potential. • Although productivity is increasing but still far below than the expected yield potential. In Mango (-4. 1 Mt. /ha. ), Litchi (-1. 08 Mt. /ha. ), Custard apple (-3. 99 Mt. /ha. ), Okra (-1. 1 Mt. /ha. ), Ginger (-5. 8 Mt. /ha. ) and Turmeric (-4. 1 Mt. /ha. ) have shown decline in yield in last 5 years.

Year wise Sectoral Percentage Share of Sanctioned Allotment (in %age) Sl. No. Components 1. Production of Planting Material 6 2 3 3 5 8 3 3. 88 2. Establishment of New Gardens 32 32 35 43 39 38 41 14. 81 3. Creation of Water Resources 6 15 12 25 4 13. 61 4. Protected Cultivation 1 1 5 2 8 3 4 9. 38 5. INM/IPM & Organic farming 1 35 31 17 14 12 19 2. 64 6. HRD 19 7 6 2 4 2 1 3. 27 7. Post Harvest Management 0 1 0 0 9 9 16 30. 62 8. Marketing Infrastructure 7 0 0 0 11 11 1 12. 45 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13

Focus Activities MIS Protected Cultivation Marketing PHM Capacity Building

Proposed Focus Activities Sl. No. Crop Area (in Ha. ) Production (in Mt. ) Proposed Focus Activities 1. Mango 57, 590 2, 85, 070 Ripening Chamber, Grading & Packaging, Processing / VA 2. Litchi 4361 23, 988 Area expansion, Processing / VA 3. Guava 14, 933 1, 16, 479 Area expansion, Grading & Packaging, Processing / VA 4. Cashew nut 21, 656 10, 828 Area expansion, Processing / VA, Rejuvenation 5. Banana 16, 335 3, 91, 235 Area expansion, Ripening Chamber, Processing of Fiber 6. Chili 32, 056 2, 04, 838 CA Cold Storage, Grading, Packaging & Drying 7. Ginger 10, 316 1, 13, 483 Marketing & Processing / VA 8. Turmeric 9830 84, 151 Marketing & Processing / VA

Proposed Focus Activities Sl. No. Crop Area (in Ha. ) Production (in Mt. ) Proposed Focus Activities 9. Marigold 2112 14, 005 Marketing 10. Rose 962 2040 11. Gladiolus 1988 5866 12. Rajnigandha 2191 8328 13. E. citridora 3248 13, 612 Marketing & Processing / VA 14. Lemon grass / Khus / Pama rosa / Jama rosa 5044 18, 694 Marketing & Processing / VA 43, 24, 949 Cold Chain, Grading, Packaging, Processing / VA & Protected Cultivation in some crops 15. Vegetable crops 3, 39, 745 Protected Cultivation, Marketing & Packaging

Area Expansion Under NHM Year Horticulture Area (in Ha. ) Area Expansion per year – NHM (in Ha. ) 2004 -05 2, 01, 556 -- 2005 -06 3, 03, 710 3585 2006 -07 3, 88, 663 16, 633 2007 -08 4, 84, 696 31, 111 2008 -09 5, 00, 259 31, 043 2009 -10 5, 39, 152 18, 472 2010 -11 5, 97, 526 18, 075 2011 -12 6, 21, 866 (Provisional) 21, 300 Total - 6, 21, 866 1, 40, 219

Focus Crops – Area Expansion Crops Area Expansion in last 6 years under NHM (in Ha. ) Average Area Expansion per year (in Ha. ) 1. Mango 18307 3051 2. Cashew 12826 2138 3. Banana 6607 1101 4. Litchi 4414 736 5. Lime 3864 644 6. Guava 2530 422 7. Chili 32780 5463 8. Turmeric 8860 1477 9. Ginger 8129 1355 10. Coriander 4867 811 Sl. No. Fruits - Spices - (Contd. . . )

Focus Crops – Area Expansion Crops Area Expansion in last 6 years under NHM (in Ha. ) Average Area Expansion per year (in Ha. ) 11. Rajnigandha 3300 550 12. Marigold 2938 490 13. Gladiolus 2850 475 14. Rose 495 83 15. Gerbera 391 65 Sl. No. Flowers - Medicinal & Aromatic 16. E. citridora 9726 1621 17. Palmarosa/Jamarosa 6276 1046 18. Lemon grass 5954 992 19. Aloevera 2584 431 20. Khus 2257 376

Ratio of Self Production and Out-sourcing of Planting Material Year Self Production %age Out-sourcing %age 2005 -06 47 53 2006 -07 46 54 2007 -08 31 69 2008 -09 45 55 2009 -10 58 42 2010 -11 57 43 2011 -12 82 18

Area Expansion • Around 10 -20% of total allocation. • Objective – Ø As introduction of new variety or new species (crop) with proven results in a new area. Ø As replacement of useless and un-productive variety or a variety which has become susceptible to a particular disease or particular micro climate. Ø As introduction of rare and expensive variety - The cost of seeds/planting material farmers initially can not afford.

Requirement of Planting Material – 2012 -13 Variety wise availability in Departmental Out Sourcing Nurseries Sl. Name of the Physical Total No. Crop Target requirement No. of Plants Name of the Name of Variety No. of Plants availability Agency Dashehari 1, 08, 726 ----Langda 63, 193 ----Chausa 13, 592 ----1. Mango 120000 Mallika 11, 580 ----Fazali 1990 ----Amrapali 8016 ----Total - 2, 07, 097 ----2. Litchi 420 63000 Muzaffarpur 66, 398 ----3. Lime 495 137115 Kagji (Air layering) 3, 08, 615 ----790+135 Allahabadi Safeda 4. Guava ----2, 35, 056 =925 (Air layering) V-1 20, 000 Odisha State Cashew V-4 40, 000 Cashew Development Corporation 5. 400 80000 nut H/16 20, 000 Total 80, 000 6. Banana 1000 2252000 G/9 (Tissue Culture) 7. Rose 150 315000 Gladiator 8. Gerbera 150 163500 TC CG State Seed and Agriculture 22, 52, 000 Development Corporation Ltd. Raipur by Approved State Tissue 3, 15, 000 Culture Labs 1, 63, 500 • Mother plants of Cashew and Sitaphal has been newly planted in Govt. Nurseries. Grafted plants will be produced in near future in departmental nurseries. • Tissue culture Banana plants are procured from the 2 tissue culture labs established in the state.

Requirement of Seeds – 2012 -13 Sl. No. Crops 1. Chili (Hybrid Seeds) Unit Area Seed Total Seed (Ha. ) per ha. Requirement Self Out Source Sourcing Kg 500 0. 3 150 --- 150 2. Coriander (Certified Seeds) Kg 500 20 10000 --- 10000 3. Ginger (Tuber) Kg 1000 175000 --- 175000 4. Turmeric (Tuber) Kg 1000 258000 --- 258000 5. Tube rose (Tuber) Nos 100 5696200 --- 5696200 6. Gladiolus (Tuber) Nos 300 14285500 --- 4285500 7. Marigold (Hybrid Seeds) 95 47500 --- 47500 8. Vetiver (Slips) 31250 1562500 --- Pkt 500 (100 seed) Nos 50

Rejuvenation (Till 2011 -12) Area in ha. Mango Annual target for rejuvenation (in Ha. ) 655 (2012 -13) 2404 655 1305 Guava Area already rejuvenated (in Ha. ) 2404 Name of Crops 604 Cashew 215 Ber 280 Total - 2404

Year wise Establishment of Model Nurseries & Increase in Plant Production Capacity Ø There are 117 departmental nurseries – 2. 50 Crore plants per year. Infrastructure Developed No. of model nurseries Agro Shednet Total established Green House Increase in plant production capacity (Annual) Sl. No. Year 1. 2005 -06 7 14 42 56 14, 000 2. 2006 -07 7 14 42 56 14, 000 3. 2007 -08 11 11 44 55 22, 000 4. 2008 -09 14 --- 112 28, 000 5. 2009 -10 18 --- 126 36, 000 6. 2010 -11 10 --- 126 20, 000 7. 2011 -12 5 --- 84 84 10, 000 72 39 576 615 1, 44, 000 Total -

REQUIREMENT & PROCUREMENT • In the last six years – average requirement was about 15 lakh fruit plants each year. • During last three years of NHM – most of the planting material was procured from CG State Seed and Agriculture Development Corporation Ltd. • Since last three years – about 80% of the planting material is produced in departmental nurseries. • But in case of hybrid seeds situation is dismal.

STRENGTHENING OF NURSERIES • There are 117 departmental nurseries. • Most of the nurseries were very old and without appropriate infrastructure to produce quality planting material. • Since last three years 72 nurseries are upgraded and modernized to produce about 1 crore good quality plants per year. • This program ensures production of high quality grafted / other planting material and timely supply.

STRENGTHENING OF NURSERIES • Infrastructure created in five years – 576 Shed net Houses (57, 600 sq. mtr. ) - Size 100 sq. mtr. each Production 5, 000 plants per batch Total capacity created 115 lakh plants per year 30 -40 days cycle 24 Mist Chambers (3600 sq. mtr. ) - Size 150 sq. mtr. each Production 20, 000 plants per batch Total capacity created 20 lakh plants per year 25 -40 days cycle

STRENGTHENING OF NURSERIES • Infrastructure created in five years – 24 Hardening Yards (6000 sq. mtr. ) - Size 250 sq. mtr. each Production 35, 000 plants per batch Total capacity created 30 lakh plants per year 20 -30 days cycle 39 Green Houses (3900 sq. mtr. ) • All these protected structures created total 72, 000 sq. mtr. area to produce about 1 crore high quality plants per year.

Post Harvest Management, Processing & Marketing Sl. No. Component No. of Units Established during last one year 1. Cold Storages 4 5000 MT. 2. Pack House 319 9 x 6 mtr. 3. Zero Energy Cool Chamber 860 100 Kg. 4. Whole Sale Markets 2 --- 1177 --- Total - Capacity

Issues in PHM • Lack of awareness among farmers in the field of PHM. Department is also not properly equipped with knowledge / resources to motivate farmers. • Capital intensive activity, it requires huge capital investment and technical know-how to establish entire cold-chain. • To make PHM successful activity about 300 -400. 00 crore rupees are required within 5 years. Neither the farmers nor the entrepreneurs of Chhattisgarh are financially capable of investing this huge capital amount. Therefore intervention from government is required. • Subsidy given for PHM and marketing is not attractive and lucrative. Provision of credit linked back ended subsidy in some activities, is major de -motivating factor for availing subsidy.

Issues in PHM • At present horticulture is a individual activity, there is no system of group farming or contract farming. Since entire cold chain management requires sufficient quantity of raw material to operate it efficiently and optimally. For bulk production, compact production cluster of particular produce is required. • For processing, round the year availability of raw material is essential to make it viable. To ensure availability of raw material during off-season safe storage of raw material in the glut season is required. • In marketing sector private entrepreneurs are not coming forward due to various reason like capital investment APMC Act, geographical remoteness and mind set and barnding.

Issues in PHM • APMC Act prohibits transaction outside the regulated mandis and does not allow direct marketing and direct procurement of agriculture produce from farmers fields. APMC implementation restricts the setting up of markets other than by the state government. This restricts the scope for corporate houses venturing into horticulture sector. • In absence of institutions like Grower Associations, Farmers Cooperative/Society, Common Enterprise Group, Contract Farming etc. , marketing sector is unable to organize and strengthen. • Single gateway to regulated market would save time and improve efficiency.

Issues in PHM • Participation of private sector to contract farming and leasing arrangements will allow accelerated technology transfer, capital flow and assured market for horticulture. • Food processing industry on part of private sector should be simplified and encouraged, therefore backward linkages of horticulture crop can be developed. • Most of the produce is directly procure from the field of big farmers by commission agents / middle man from outside the state. • Small farmers are depend on village merchants or on nearby rural markets to lift their surplus produce. Infrastructure development at all the tires of market is essential to organize small farmers having no bargaining power, quality incentive and share in final consumer price. • Vertical coordination of farmers with cooperatives / societies, contract farming and retail chain would facilitate them to deliver better output due to lower risk, better infrastructure, better price and created awareness to prevailing technology.

New Interventions Proposed • Create and develop micro irrigation infrastructure and popularization of micro irrigation system by establishing viable micro irrigation networks. • Bring more area under protected cultivation to fulfill the demand of vegetables in urban areas throughout the year. • Create appropriate infrastructures like pack house, cold storage, low energy cool chambers, ripening chambers and marketing facilities to minimize post harvest losses special package of 75 -90% subsidy for PHM is proposed for the state. • Focus 2 -3 crops will be selected in different regions of the state.

USP of the state in term of horticulture • Production of lean period vegetables and fruits like Banana – Oct planting & Nov/Dec harvesting (5000 Mt. surplus), Papaya – Feb planting & Nov/Dec harvesting (55, 000 Mt. ), Brinjal – Jun planting & Sep/Nov harvesting (8000 Mt. ), Cauliflower - Jun planting & Sep/Nov harvesting (31, 500 Mt. ), Tomato - Jun planting & Sep/Nov harvesting (2, 11, 000 Mt. ), Kharif Potato (2, 27, 00 Mt. ), Okra – Feb planting & Apr/May harvesting (3000 Mt. ) and Chili – Jun planting & Oct/Nov harvesting (8000 Mt. ) can be further strengthened and developed due to favorable climatic condition. • Surplus of fruits and vegetables like Cashew-nut (5000 Mt. ), Mango (55, 000 Mt. ), Tomato (2, 000 Mt. ) and Chili (20, 000 Mt. ) can be used for processing, value addition and export.

• Good network of department nurseries (117 with production capacity of 2. 50 crore plants) that can be strengthened to produce quality planting material and reduce the demand supply gap (50% shortfall, especially due to TC Banana). • Good transport network to get access to in-land markets aswell-as exporting the products outside the state. • Convergence with MNREGS helps in effective implementation of NHM through providing protection, irrigation, maintenance etc. , to the plantation crops. • Locational advantage of sharing borders with state like Orissa, M. P. , A. P. , Maharastra and Jharkhand that have huge market demand for fruits and vegetables, can be encashed as a pull factor for promotion of horticulture.

Strategy – Key issues • Area, production and productivity has increased but due to lack of PHM practices there is considerable post harvest losses (25 -40%) and ultimately reduction in net return. • No facility for proper collection and storage of surplus produce at farm-gate level as-well-as off-farm level and absence of organize market network from rural market to terminal market. • Absence of forecasting facilities both in term of weather/ disease and price of products, it makes position of farmers vulnerable and increases the risk factor. • Lack of exposure as-well-as orientation of both the farmers and departmental staff towards modern horticulture practices.

Strategy – Key Focus Areas • Increasing productivity of horticulture crops. • Reduce / minimize post harvest losses at farm-gate level. • Strengthening and consolidating organic cultivation and achieving organic certification. • Developing network of cold storages and cold chain. • Developing market infrastructure across the state, identify target consumers through market segmentation. • Developing new institutions like Grower Associations or Farmers Cooperative / Society, Common Enterprise Groups and strengthening the old ones like existing SHGs / WUAs / Micro Credit Groups for production, processing and marketing of the product.

Strategy – Implementation A. Increase in crop productivity – Ø Productivity is low and declining – Ø Considerable gap in yield potential and average yield. This gap can be reduce through i. Creating assured irrigation facility – • • Cost effective with in-line drip system. Drip irrigation facility with multiple use of laterals as per crop option through crop planning. Exploring new and existing sources of surface water in the village like pond, tanks etc. De-silting and rejuvenation of existing canal systems of the state. To achieve this goal apart from support from NHM and MIS institutional linkage will be developed with irrigation department and convergence with MNREGS.

Yield Potential & Gap in Horticulture Crops in Mt.

ii. Ensuring Plant health to ensure effective protection of crops and efficient pest management through - • Setting up of disease forecasting units (8), bio-control labs (18) and plant health clinics (36) are required to reduce the risk of losses from pest and diseases. • Capacity building of farmers and staff in the field of IPM and aggressive campaigning in support of IPM. To achieve the goal along with inputs from NHM, institutional linkages will be developed with agriculture universities for research inputs, private research institutes and laboratories and KVKs for dissemination of information.

Ensuring Soil health for knowing status of macro & micro nutrient in the soil and their availability to the plant through - iii. • Setting up of leaf-tissue analysis lab (5) to identify the status of micro nutrients in the plant to know the nutritional status of the crop. • Soil testing of all the beneficiaries and preparation of soil health card for individual farmer. This will be helpful to identify the status of micronutrient and their appropriate requirement in the soil, that will help in crop planning, nutritional management and introduction of new crops. (In Dhamtari & Janjgir-Champa district process is complete with the help of RKVY but in NHM districts there is no such provision). To achieve the goal along with inputs from NHM, institutional linkages will be developed with soil testing labs of Agriculture department and University for soil testing and KVKs for dissemination of information.

Trends in yield for major horticulture crops Sl. Crops No Average Gains Yield potential of Yield National yield in Chhattisgarh Gap average 2004 -05 2010 -11 yield (SAU recommendation) 1 Mango 7. 45 4. 76 -2. 69 8 3. 24 6. 30 2 Litchi 2. 28 5. 47 3. 19 6 0. 53 6. 00 3 Lime 6. 01 6. 63 0. 62 8 1. 37 9. 00 4 Guava 7. 09 7. 70 0. 61 16 8. 30 11. 10 5 Banana 7. 10 23. 75 16. 65 40 16. 25 35. 90 6 Papaya 7. 09 23. 31 16. 22 50 26. 69 33. 40 Cashew Custard 8 apple Jack 9 fruit 0. 42 0. 47 0. 05 2 1. 53 0. 80 6. 96 3. 21 -3. 75 4 0. 79 --- 6. 58 15. 24 8. 66 --- --- 10 11. 00 14. 45 3. 45 25 10. 55 19. 90 7 Potato

Average Yield potential of Gains in yield Chhattisgarh yield (SAU recommendation) 2004 -05 2010 -11 Sl. No Crops 11 Tomato 10. 14 14. 63 4. 49 12 Brinjal 11. 09 16. 46 11. 11 13 Cabbage Yield Gap National average 15 0. 37 17. 90 5. 37 20 3. 54 17. 00 17. 52 6. 41 25 7. 48 22. 20 14 Cauli- flower 10. 60 16. 64 6. 04 20 3. 36 18. 10 15 Okra 9. 95 17. 42 7. 47 10 -7. 42 10. 30 16 Onion 10. 75 15. 55 4. 80 20 4. 45 15. 10 17 Peas 7. 89 9. 24 1. 35 --- 8. 20 18 Arbi 10. 85 13. 48 2. 63 --- --- 19 Chilli 5. 74 6. 19 0. 45 17. 5 11. 31 1. 60 20 Coriander 3. 33 3. 74 0. 41 3 -0. 74 0. 60 21 13. 63 10. 90 -2. 73 20 9. 10 3. 50 22 Turmeric 11. 25 8. 48 -2. 77 25 16. 52 4. 60 23 7. 35 5. 35 -2. 00 7. 5 2. 15 4. 80 Ginger Garlic

B. Creating credit linkages • The estimated loan distributed for horticulture crops is around `. 150. 38 crores by co-operative and other banks. Which is about 12. 7% of total agricultural loan. • Per ha. loan distribution is around `. 2520. 00 for horticulture crops. Which comes about 2% (Spices and non-perennial fruits) and 5 -6% (Fruits and Vegetables) of total production cost. Credit situation is very poor. • Most of the forms of the banks that needed to be filled up by the farmers are in English that creates a hindrance for dissemination of information. The selection criteria for getting the loan from the bank is also such that most of the farmers can not avail the facilities.

• Grooming and sensitization of bank staff is needed. Co-ordination between bank staff and agriculture department is not very satisfactory. • It is required to take the landless, marginal and small farmers of the state in the fold of financial institutions like banks through creating awareness among the farmers about their entitlements, better coordination with banks and government agencies to reduce the cumbersome processing practices. To achieve the goal linkages will be developed with Lead Banks, nationalized banks, Rural Banks & Primary Agricultural Societies and SFAC. For creating infrastructure venture capital assistance from SFAC will be very helpful.

C. Proper Harvesting and Post Harvest Management of Crops – Shifting of focus from expansion of area to PHM, Marketing and Processing of the produce throughü The state has identified 96 potential production clusters and collection centers. The analysis has been made to identify the quantum of produces that needs to be stored. Based on the volume of produce further analysis is being made to design the storage facilities with requisite space. Based on the calculation establishment of 41 cold storages and 75 low cost onion storage is planned which are distributed across the state. • • To give access to the farmers in different agro-climatic zones. To reduce transportation cost and promote horticulture cultivation. ü Among the horticulture crops in the state Tomato (60, 000 Mt. ), Mango (55, 000 Mt. ) and Cashew-nut (4000 Mt. ) are identified as major target crops for further processing and value addition. The crops are identified based on their surplus production. • To make it economically viable for processing.

ü Based on the production and collection centers of horticulture products a market network is planned. • To cater to the need of the farmers right from the village level to the terminal market. Focus is being made to develop a network of primary rural markets with appropriate infrastructure (113), whole sale market (13), terminal market (1) across the states to give benefit to the farmers just after the farm-gate level. • Analysis is made based on the crop wise production volume (8. 53 lakh Mt. vegetable and fruits) that can be marketed and designed. • Input support for marketing of the products by creating precooling units (18), zero energy based cool chamber (3155), low energy cool chambers (44), mobile pre-cooling unit (1), ripening chamber (16) and pack houses (848) for increasing the price premium of the crops.

ü It is planned to develop institution such as Farmers Interest Groups (FIGs) at villages level and Farmers Producer Organization (FPOs). • Formation of FIGs with mobilizing 15 -20 farmers in each FIGs. • Association of FIGs to form FPOs at appropriate federating point. For improved input and output market access and negotiating power. • Identification of local market aggregator at FPO level and State/National market aggregator. • Whole sale markets will be developed at the blocks/district level based on the potential of the crops. FIGs/farmers will get the opportunity to participate in the open auction to sell the products in the wholesale market. To achieve this goal SFAC will act as coordinator and resource organization. To develop market setup linkage will be developed with CG Rajya Krishi Vipran Board (Mandi Borad) and financial assistance from NHM & RKVY will be taken.

Organizational Structure of FPO 1 Local Market Aggregator Villages 15 - 20 Clusters / FIG 45 -60 Farmers 600 - 1200

ü Establishment of network for disseminating real time information of product prices. A market information system will be developed. Farmers can access the real time information related to product prices through the e-kiosks to be set at the primary rural market / wholesale market / terminal market level where information will be uploaded about the prices of the major mandis of the state as well as other cities of the country. The farmers can also get registered in the mobile phone network through which they will be receiving information in their mobile phone periodically. • This will help farmers gaining better bargaining power, price forecasting and planning for marketing their products. To achieve this goal linkages will be developed with ORG NIELSEN. The firm has already started the base work for collection of data related to production, processing and marketing of horticulture products from all the districts of the state.

ü Developing Management Information System (MIS) right from point of production to collection, storage, processing and marketing at different levels using Geographic Information System (GIS). • To facilitate effective decision making both at the Mission Management Level and Farm Level. To achieve this goal linkages will be developed with the firms having experience of developing and implementing such programs in natural resource based activities.

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Training Proposed Participants Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes For Farmers - - Formation of SHGs, and CEGs - Group Management - Conflict Management skills Institution Selected - Leadership development building and Farmers and management SHG - Financial management at the district members level - Participatory planning and monitoring skills - Convergence with existing programs like MNREGA, NRLM etc Institutionalized production of horticulture crops, visible impact in terms of better economic, IBRAD and other social and ecological organizations having return at the cluster similar experiences level, integration with existing programs for pulling of resources and facilities

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Proposed Training Participants For Farmers - Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes Though the issues will be identified based on the district specific requirements but the After the training emphasis will be on issues like farmers will be able to Improved Production increase the - High density plantation productivity and there - Canopy management KVKs, Extension will be increase in Farmers - Pruning of fruit trees departments of Issue based in production of crops. (50 farmers - Vermi compost preparation Agriculture Colleges, situ Training The post harvest losses in a batch at - Integrated Pest Management NGOs having at district will be reduced both at the district - MIS, fertigation and experience in level the farm gate level and level) conducting such automation during transit, shelf life trainings - Water conservation methods of the crops will be - In situ mulching for moisture increased and farmers conservation will get increased - Hybrid seed production return. mar - Precision farming - Protected cultivation - Integrated farming

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Proposed Training Participants For Farmers - Issue based in Farmers (50 situ Training farmers in a at district batch at the level district level) Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes Improved Production - Climate change adaptation through horticulture for rural livelihood After the training - High value cropping and farmers will be able to diversification of agriculture increase the - Nursery raising productivity and there KVKs, Extension Post Harvest Management will be increase in departments of - PHM and value addition of production of crops. Agriculture Colleges, horticulture produce The post harvest losses NGOs having - Packaging and Preservation will be reduced both at experience in the farm gate level and - Processing of selected conducting such during transit, shelf life products trainings of the crops will be Marketing increased and farmers - Developing Marketing will get increased Network of horticulture return. mar produces - Application of ICT for marketing - Organic Certification

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Proposed Training Participants For Farmers - Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes The focus will be on - Tissue culture cultivation of banana, papaya etc - Organic cultivation practices - Improved seed production and Certification - Agribusiness practices - Advanced Technology for oil KVKs, Extension departments of palm production Selected This will lead to Issue based Agriculture Colleges, farmers from - Integrated production and post enhanced productivity Training at NGOs having harvest management of tropical cluster of and better return for the state level experience in tuber crops districts the farmers conducting such - Management of Honey bee colonies for effective pollination trainings - Integrated nutrient management - Integrated farming system - Innovative vegetable and fruits production techniques - Orchard planning and establishment

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Training Proposed Participants Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes For Farmers - Focus will be on developing - Training skills - Training management Institute’s having experience in Selected conducting TOTs for farmers at - Developing Technical Skills to The trained the farmers. Training of different agro improve production participants will in turn Experienced subject Trainers climatic act as trainer for the matter specialists from techniques, post harvest regions with management, value addition local farmers reputed institutes will follow up be invited as resource and marketing of selected persons for specific crops of the region like topics banana, litchi, mango, cashew, chilly, tomato, aloevera etc

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Training Proposed Participants Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes For Farmers - Focus will be on - Production of high value crops and management The training will be delivered in Hybrid - Nursery raising Distance Learning - Grafting After learning the skills mode. The participants the participants can will have Personal - Organic cultivation Developing Educated develop as Contact Program for Integrated Pest Management Para Rural Youth entrepreneurs and also about 15 days spreaded Horticultur- (minimum - Irrigation management can earn through over four months ists at the class XII - Post Harvest Management providing services to coupled with practical like Grading, Sorting, state level pass) the farmers of their implementation of the Packaging, Storage of area skills learned in products selected nurseries and - Processing of selected field as well as web products etc based tutorial classes. - Improved vegetable and fruit cultivation

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Training Proposed Participants Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes For Farmers - Focus will be on - Protected cultivation - Micro climate and soil management Developing Educated - Integrated nutrient Para Rural Youth management Horticulturist (minimum s at the state class XII - Precision farming level pass) - Marketing and financial management - Inventory management and record keeping The course module can be developed and the After learning the skills course can be the participants can coordinated by IBRAD develop as who have experience of entrepreneurs and also running such courses at can earn through national level. Inputs providing services to for designing the course the farmers of their will be taken from area subject matter specialists of the relevant topics.

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Proposed Tentative areas to be covered Training Participants For the Technical staff/Field functionaries - Tissue culture - High Density Plantation - Rejuvination of senile orchards - Irrigation and fertigation techniques in greenhouse - Raising nursery in mist Resource chamber Person Technical - Greenhouse management and Development staff and production program field with study functionaries - Production of high value tour outside crops under poly house and the state management - Nursery management - Innovations in vegetable, fruits and flower production - Plug type vegetable cultivation - Post Harvest Management of crops Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes Institute of Horticulture Technology, Noida BAIF, Pune Indian Institute of After training, the Horticulture Research, participants can in Bangalore CFTRI, turn train the local Mysore Post Harvest farmers Technology Centre, IIT, Kharagpur, National Institute of Organic Farming, Noida, MANAGE, Hyderabad

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Training Proposed Participants Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes For the Technical staff / Field functionaries - Training skills Organisations having experience in organizing To. Ts for the officials will be the - Training management training coordinator. Training of They will invite Selected Trainers for After training they will resource persons from ADHO and selected in turn conduct reputed institutions like RHEO from officials at Central Tuber Crops - Specific skills related to crop training in the state level Research Institute, specific production, post Kerala, Directorate of harvest management and Cashew and Cocoa, marketing like cashew, Indian Institute of banana, mango, litchi, tuber Horticulture, BCKV, crops etc IGKV as required

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Proposed Tentative areas to be covered Training Participants For the Technical staff/Field functionaries - Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes - Climate Change and Horticulture management - Management of Extension Participants will learn System the contemporary - High value cropping and issues, potentials and National institute of Selected diversification of agriculture skills in horticulture organic farming, Refreshers ADHO and - Contribution of Horticulture and will be able to Institute of Courses RHEO from towards CDM apply them in the field Horticulture - Organic Certification of the state to increase horticulture Technology IBRAD Horticulture crops production and - Gender sensitization and gender productivity budgeting - Participatory Planning and monitoring Exposure visits can be - ICT in Horticulture organized at Indian - Improved Vegetable and fruit Participants will get Institute of Horticulture production technology Orientation Senior exposure and can apply Research, Tamil Nadu Training with officials of - Seed production and the skills learnt in the Agriculture University, certification study tour the state Coimbatore, IIT, state Kharagpur BCKV - Organic farming GBPUm Pantnagar

PROPOSAL FOR CAPACITY BUILDING AT DIFFERENT LEVEL Type of Training Proposed Participants Tentative areas to be covered Expected outcomes Potential Training Institutes Mission Management staff - Project Management - Project planning Training on Mission Project Management staff - Monitoring Efficient Institute’s having implementation of experience in the project will be conducting such ensured trainings like IBRAD

Schedule of Training Activities - Pert A) TRAINING FOR FARMERS / PANCHAYAT FUNCTIONARIES Sl. Training No. Activities 1 Seed Sowing Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Implementation of Micro Irrigation 7 System and its Maintenance Cultivation of 2 Fruit and Vegetable Crops 3 Seed Production Propagation and 4 Plant Production Use of 5 Micronutrients 6 Organic Farming

B) TRAINING FOR MALI'S (DEPARTMENTAL) Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Training Activities Seed Sowing and Seed Bed Preparation Vegetative Propagation Methods Training and Pruning of Mother Plants Preparation of Bud Stick Top Working Technique of Plant Production in Mist Chamber, Green House and Root Trainer Mulching and Drip Technique Utilization of Micro Elements, Fertigation through Drip System Preparation of Bordaux Mixture and Bordaux Paste Maintenance and Operation of Modern Horticulture Equipments Tissue Culture Plantation High Density Fruit and Vegetables Preservation Canopy Management Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

C) TRAINING FOR FRONT LINE STAFF (RHEO, SHDO & HDO)/EXTENSION OFFICERSSl. No. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 8 Integrated Farming System 9 Organic Farming 10 Precession Farming 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12 13 14 15 Training Activities Management of Extension System Improved Vegetable Production Technology Hybrid Seed Production and Certification Enhancing Agricultural Productivity through pressurized irrigation system Mushroom Cultivation Management of Honey Bee Colonies for effective Pollination Water Conservation method in Horticulture Protected Cultivation of Horticulture Crops Human Resources Development Promotion of Integrated Pest Management PHM and Value Addition of Horticulture Produce Agricultural and Horticultural Marketing Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

D) TRAINING FOR SENIOR LEVEL OFFICIALS (DDH / ADH) Sl. No Training Activities High value cropping and diversification of Agriculture Climate change and 2 Agriculture Management ICT in Agriculture / 3 Horticulture 4 Horticulture Export Value Addittion and 5 Agribusiness Intensive Horticulture Production under climate 6 change system for rural livelihood Advanced technology for resource management for 7 sustainable Oil Palm Production Integrated Production with 8 Post Harvest Management in Tropical Tuber crop. 9 Training Management Gender Sensitization Modules (GSM) to cutting 10 edge level extension functionaries. 1 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

E) CERTIFICATE COURSE TO DEVELOP PARA PROFESSIONALS Sl. Training Activities Apr May Jun No. Model Nursery 1 Training Course Plant Protection 2 Training Course Mali Training 3 Course Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar F) TRAINING FOR STATE HORTICULTURE MISSION STAFF Sl. Training Activities Apr May Jun No. Training on Project Management - Plan, 1 Design, Implement and Controll 2 Organic Farming Protected 3 Cultivation Horticulture 4 Mechanization 5 Rejuvenation Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

Linkage of Production Clusters with PHM No. of proddistrict uction Cluster 1. 167 2. --- Total Proposed cold chain unit with Total expected location & expenditure for each expected Surplus item like Cold storage, Pack Proposed Total production Production houses, Refrigerated vans, processing unit area available for Packaging unit, Pre-cooling units, with location, (in ha. ) marketing cold chain/ Zero energy cool chamber, On- capacity (Mt. ) processing farm collection & storage unit & (Mt. ) other unit suitable to the cluster 4. 5. 84, 134 15, 11, 975 6. 7. 8. 7, 65, 435 i. Pack House – 488 ii. Cold Storage – 21 iii. Pusa Zero Energy Cool Chamber – 1430 iv. Low Energy Cool Chamber – 129 v. Preservation Unit – 125 vi. Low Cost Onion Storage Unit – 70 vii. Pre-cooling Unit – 1 Tomato Processing Unit – 2 & Cashew nut Processing Unit – 1

Linkage of Production Clusters with Markets No. of Total No. of district production collection area of existing proposed clusters centre crops nearest forwarding Primary Whole (a place (in ha. ) market Market/ Rural Market from linkage Terminal Market where (Haat/ Market produce is Bazar) collected & directly goes to various markets) No. of proposed Terminal Market 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 96 80 51726 209 57 113 13 1

Change in cropping pattern Observation – – Overall food grain sector has experienced a decline in area of paddy ( -1. 97%) and coarse cereals (-29. 45%) in last 7 years. This shift is in area from food grains is towards fruits (260. 70%), vegetables (171. 20%), spices (171. 57%) and oil seeds (10. 91%). – The gain in horticulture area is a collective impact of diversification of production pattern of farmers and increase demand of consumers due to shift in their consumption pattern. Sl. No. Crop 2004 -05 2010 -11 % age increase in the area during last 7 years 1. Paddy 39, 43, 800 38, 66, 000 -1. 97 2. Wheat 99, 200 1, 10, 000 10. 88 3. Oilseeds 2, 89, 400 3, 21, 000 10. 91 4. Coarse cereals 1, 94, 200 1, 37, 000 -29. 45 5. Fruits 46, 247 1, 66, 813 260. 70 6. Vegetables 1, 23, 491 3, 34, 917 171. 20 7. Spices 28, 399 77, 126 171. 57 8. Flowers 1508 7130 372. 81

Feasibility of shift towards horticulture Observation – – – – Cost-benefit ratio of horticulture is more than CBR of cereals. Thus it is more profitable for farmers to diversify towards fruit and vegetable cultivation then cereals, especially paddy and coarse grain. Issue of diversification is needed to meet the increasing domestic demand of fruit and vegetables beside the improving income. Share of Mango in total fruit area change is about 31% and it is the only crop which is grown across the all agro-climatic zones. Cashew-nut (15%), Banana (12%), Guava (12%), Lime (8%), Papaya (7%) and vegetable Tomato (21%), Brinjal, Okra and Cauliflower (10% each) among spices Chili (48%), Coriander (22%), Turmeric (12%) and Ginger (15%) have seen major changes in the area in last 10 years. Due to shorter duration of winter period Banana and Papaya are grown and supplied to other states, for whom these are off-season crops. Kharif Potato is fast emerging crop, major portion of which is exported outside of the state.

Change in Area under Major Horticulture crop (in ha. ) Sl. No. Crops 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Mango Cashew Banana Guava Lime Papaya Jack Fruits Custerd Apple Litchi Total Fruits 1 Turmeric 2 Ginger 3 Chilli 4 Coriander 5 Garlic Total Spices - %age Increase in Area Total Area up Change in during 2000 -2004 during 2005 -2009 during 2000 -2009 to 2008 -09 area 3. 481 77 215 2165 235 144 353 1241 497 5408 4740 3408 1269 454 386 10257 4. 30633 15408 12160 9712 7848 7187 5281 3474 3424 95127 21284 8025 7091 6274 1652 44326 5. 31114 15485 12375 11877 8083 7331 5634 4715 3921 100535 26024 11433 8360 6728 2038 54583 6. 49765 19677 14800 13353 9975 10597 6065 3911 5059 201070 31576 13091 9600 8636 3949 109166 7. 30. 95 15. 40 12. 31 11. 81 8. 04 7. 29 5. 60 4. 69 3. 90 100 47. 68 20. 95 15. 32 12. 33 3. 73 100

Change in Area under Major Horticulture crop (in ha. ) Sl. No. Crops 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Tomato Brinjal Cauliflower Okra Cabbage Potato Onion Arbi Peas Total Vegetable 1 2 Merigold Tube Rose Chrysanth 3 emum 4 Gladiouls 5 Rose Total Flowers - %age Increase in Area Total Area up Change in during 2000 -2004 during 2005 -2009 during 2000 -2009 to 2008 -09 area 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 4737 22537 27274 42919 21. 51 2832 22030 24862 36419 19. 60 2204 15002 17206 25233 13. 57 1440 15564 17004 26703 13. 41 669 12547 13216 18384 10. 42 468 10089 10557 14715 8. 32 693 7300 7993 11196 6. 30 536 4909 5445 7627 4. 29 540 2725 3265 10355 2. 57 14119 112703 126822 253644 100 90 30 1466 1317 1556 1347 1961 1347 32. 50 28. 13 0 1296 1353 27. 07 20 20 160 444 105 4628 464 125 4788 955 182 9576 9. 69 2. 61 100

Production trend of horticulture crop in Mt.

Area expansion trend of horticulture crop in Ha.

Area & Production of horticulture crop (Area in lakh ha. /Production in lakh Mt. ) 2004 -05 Sl. No Crops 1. Fruits 2. 3. Are a Pro d 2005 -06 Are a Pro d 2006 -07 Are a Pro d 2007 -08 Are a Pro d 2008 -09 Are a Pro d 2009 -10 Are a 0. 46 3. 24 0. 75 6. 43 1. 00 6. 81 1. 25 9. 32 1. 30 9. 78 1. 46 Pro d 2010 -11 Are a Pro d 14. 1 12. 1 1. 67 4 0 Vegetabl 12. 5 24. 3 23. 4 29. 2 29. 0 41. 4 35. 8 1. 23 1. 96 2. 36 2. 93 2. 94 3. 13 3. 35 6 es 0 2 0 5 4 9 Spices 0. 28 1. 70 0. 29 1. 68 0. 41 1. 99 0. 54 2. 89 0. 62 4. 26 0. 64 3. 94 0. 77 4. 87 Medicinal 4. & 0. 02 0. 11 0. 02 0. 10 0. 59 0. 12 0. 66 0. 11 0. 64 0. 12 0. 85 Aromatic 5. Flowers Total - 0. 02 0. 03 0. 02 0. 04 0. 02 0. 07 0. 04 0. 13 0. 07 0. 27 2. 01 17. 5 32. 8 42. 1 43. 8 61. 5 52. 7 3. 04 3. 89 4. 86 5. 00 5. 38 5. 98 1 8 8 3 9 1 8

Domestic Demand & Supply (Unit – in Kg. person per annum) Per capita consumption (201011) - in Kg. /person/ annum Per capita demand Total production (2020) – in (2010 -11) – in lakh Mt. Kg. /person /annum Mt. * ** & *** Total production (2020) – in lakh Mt. **** Fruit Vegetable Fruit Vegetable 12. 1 64. 5 14. 09 41. 49 5. 45 19. 33 17 95 13. 9 41. 34 (Source – National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) collects data on house hold consumption by sample survey techniques. This study uses data from consumer expenditure survey of National Sample Survey (NSS) of rounds number 55 pertaining to year 1999 -2000). * Demand projection is made on assumptions about populations, urbanization, poverty and economic growth per capita demand. ** Future population growth will follow the past population growth trend and urban population proportion in total population will also follow past trends. *** 8% GDP growth rate per year is assumed. **** Future production of horticulture crop will follow the current trend of 3% growth per annum. Observation Chhattisgarh in-spite of being one of the largest producers of vegetables and spices does not have much export volume because of huge domestic demand. Besides this there are supply constraints and huge post harvest losses which lead to lower net availability of produces.

Supply Chain from Farm-gate to Market 2010 -11 (Unit – in. Lakh Mt. ) Commodity Total annual production Post harvest losses 1. 2. 3. Total annual consumption within the state (raw form) 4. Fruit 14. 09 4. 23 Vegetables 41. 49 12. 44 Raw material used for processing Total surplus for export to other states Total import from other states 5. 6. 7. 3. 08 0. 83 * 1. 54 *** 1. 54 16. 44 1. 24 ** 9. 13 **** 1. 65 ***** (Source – National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) collects data on house hold consumption by sample survey techniques. This study uses data from consumer expenditure survey of National Sample Survey (NSS) of rounds number 55 pertaining to year 1999 -2000). * Mango is the main crop used for processing Amchoor and Pickle. ** Tomato is the main crop used for processing Ketchup and Purie. *** Papaya, Cashew-nut, Banana and Mango are the main crops exported to other states. **** Tomato, Cauliflower, Cabbage, Kharif Potato, Brinjal, Okra, are the main crops exported to other states. ***** Potato, Onion and Garlic are major crops imported from other states. Observation The annual per capita consumption of vegetable has increased. The increase in consumption levels of vegetable and fruits has been quite similar in both the rural and urban areas.

Supply Chain from Farm-gate to Market (2010 -11) (in Lakh Mt. )

Planting Material Sub-Plan 2012 -13 Target No. of (in ha. ) plants per ha. Procurement Total no. of plants required Self Out sourcing Sl. No. Fruit crop 1. Mango 1200 1, 20, 000 2, 26, 715 --- 2. Litchi 420 150 63, 000 77, 640 --- 3. Lime 495 277 1, 37, 115 2, 75, 352 --- 4. Guava 790 277 2, 18, 830 2, 35, 690 --- 5. Guava (High Density) 135 1600 2, 16, 000 --- 1, 99, 140 6. Banana (TC) 2000 2500 50, 000 --- 50, 000 7. Cashew nut 400 200 80, 000 --- 80, 000 Total - 5440 --- 2, 35, 001 2, 15, 403 1, 79, 191

Planting Material Sub-Plan 2012 -13 Sl. Target Seed rate per Total Seed Spices crop No. (in ha. ) ha. (in Kg. ) Requirement (in Kg. ) Procurement Self Out sourcing 1. Chilli 700 0. 30 210 --- 210 2. Coriander 500 20 10000 --- 10000 3. Turmeric 1000 250000 --- 250000 4. Ginger 1000 175000 --- 175000 4200 --- 4, 35, 210 Total -

Planting Material Sub-Plan 2012 -13 Sl. No Flower crop 1. Rose 150 2100 (Plants) 2. Gerbera 150 3. Rajnigandha 4. 5. Self Out sourcing 3, 15, 000 --- 3, 15, 000 1090 (Plants) 1, 63, 500 --- 1, 63, 500 100 56, 962 (Bulbs) 56, 96, 200 --- 56, 96, 200 Gladiolus 300 14, 225 (Bulbs) 42, 67, 500 --- 42, 67, 500 Marigold 500 95 (Pkt. ) 47, 500 --- 47, 500 1200 --- 1, 04, 89, 700 Total - Sl. Aromatic crop No 1. Procurement Total Target Plant/Seed/Bulb (in ha. ) rate per ha. Requirement Vetiver Target in ha. Plant/Seed/ Slips per ha. Total Plant/Seed/ Bulb Requirement 50 31, 250 (Slips) 15, 62, 500 Procurement Self Out sourcing --- 15, 62, 500

Component wise financial break-up of AAP 2012 -13 under NHM Sl. No. A. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. C. D. F. Component Plantation Infrastructure & Development Production of Planting Material Establishment of New Gardens Rejuvenation Creation of Water Resources Protected Cultivation Promotion of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)/Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Organic Farming Pollination support through Beekeeping Horticulture Mechanization Technology Dissemination through demonstration/Front Line Demonstration (FLD) Human Resource Development (HRD) Integrated Post Harvest Management Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for Horticulture Produce Mission Management Total - Financial (`. in Lakhs) GOI State Total % share of total 367. 84 1402. 45 83. 51 1289. 27 888. 63 64. 91 247. 49 14. 74 227. 52 156. 82 432. 75 1649. 94 98. 25 1516. 79 1045. 45 3. 84 14. 64 0. 87 13. 46 9. 27 17. 00 3. 00 20. 00 0. 18 262. 65 21. 68 290. 49 46. 35 3. 83 51. 26 309. 00 25. 50 341. 75 2. 74 0. 23 3. 03 21. 25 3. 75 25. 00 0. 22 386. 31 2899. 44 68. 17 511. 67 454. 48 3411. 10 4. 03 30. 26 1179. 38 208. 13 1387. 50 12. 31 466. 33 9581. 53 82. 29 1690. 86 548. 63 11272. 39 4. 92 100. 00

Component wise financial break-up of AAP 2012 -13 under NHM Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for Horticulture Produce 12% Mission Management 5% Production of Planting Material 4% Establishment of New Gardens 15% Rejuvenation 1% Creation of Water Resources 14% Integrated Post Harvest Management 31% Protected Cultivation 9% Promotion of Integarted Organic Farming Nutrient Management Pollination support through Technology Dissemination 2% (INM) / Integrated Pest Horticulture Mechanization Beekeeping through demonstration / Human Resource 3% 0% Management (IPM) Front Line Demonstration Development (HRD) 0% (FLD) 3% 0%

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Programme Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) I. Research Central Government Institutes under ICAR, CSIR and others will take up research & development works out of their existing budget for which a Research Advisory Committee will identify the thrust areas. A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 1. Production of planting material i) Model Nursery (a) Model Nursery (2 to 4 ha. ) in Public No. Sector (`. 6. 25 lakh / one ha. unit) 25. 000 8 200. 00 170. 00 30. 00 (b) Model Nursery (2 to 4 ha. ) in Private No. Sector (`. 6. 25 lakh / one ha. unit) 25. 000 12. 500 4 50. 00 42. 50 7. 50 12 250. 00 212. 50 37. 50 Sub Total -

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 1. Production of planting material ii) Small Nursery (a) Small Nursery (1 ha. ) in Public Sector No. 6. 250 3 18. 75 (`. 6. 25 lakh / one ha. unit) (a) Small Nursery (1 ha. ) in Private Sector No. 6. 250 3. 125 8 25. 00 (`. 6. 25 lakh / one ha. unit) Sub Total 11 43. 75 iii) Rehabilitation of existing Tissue Culture (TC) units (b) Rehabilitation of existing Tissue Culture (TC) units in Private No. 15. 000 7. 500 1 7. 50 Sector (@ 50% subsidy) Sub Total 1 7. 50 Sl. No Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 15. 94 2. 81 21. 25 3. 75 37. 19 6. 56 6. 38 1. 13

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Programme Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 1. Production of planting material iv) Setting up of new TC units (b) Setting up of new TC units in Private Sector (@ 50% subsidy) No. 100. 00 50. 00 Sub Total - v) Seed production and distribution for Vegetables (a) Seed Production Ha. 0. 500 (Public sector) (b) Seed Production (Private sector) - @50% subsidy. Ha. Sub Total - 0. 500 0. 250 2 100. 00 85. 00 15. 00 38 19. 00 16. 15 2. 85 50 12. 50 10. 63 1. 88 88 114 31. 50 432. 75 26. 78 367. 84 4. 73 64. 91

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Go. I Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Share Target (lakh) Assistance) (85%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 2. Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) I. Fruits (a) Cost intensive crops (For a maximum area of 4 ha. per beneficiary) iii) Banana (TC) Ha. 0. 832 0. 312 (@50% subsidy) - 75% subsidy on planting material in Ha. 0. 832 0. 312 1000 312. 02 265. 21 1 st year. Sub total 1000 312. 02 265. 21 (b) High density planting (Guava) - Ha. 0. 628 0. 314 @50% subsidy. Sl. No - 60% subsidy on planting material in Ha. 0. 314 1 st year. Sub total - 0. 188 State Share Remark (15%) 46. 80 135 25. 42 21. 61 3. 81

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 2. Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) I. (c) (i) Fruit crops other Sl. No than cost intensive crops Ha. using normal spacing. (@75% subsidy) 0. 400 0. 300 - 60% subsidy on planting material in 1 st year a) Mango (Grafted) Ha. 0. 220 0. 099 b) Litchi (Gooti) Ha. 0. 235 0. 106 c) Lime (Gooti) Ha. 0. 3534 0. 159 d) Guava (Budded) Ha. 0. 2195 0. 0988 Sub total - 20% subsidy on planting material in 2 nd year a) Mango Ha. 0. 220 0. 033 b) Litchi Ha. 0. 235 0. 0353 c) Lime Ha. 0. 3534 0. 053 e) Guava Ha. 0. 2195 0. 033 f) Custard Apple Ha. 0. 220 0. 033 Sub total - Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 1200 420 495 790 2905 118. 80 44. 42 78. 72 78. 03 319. 97 100. 98 37. 75 66. 91 66. 33 271. 97 17. 82 6. 66 11. 81 11. 70 48. 00 970 340 245 50 30 1635 32. 01 11. 99 12. 99 1. 65 0. 99 59. 62 27. 21 10. 19 11. 04 1. 40 0. 84 50. 68 4. 80 1. 95 0. 25 0. 15 8. 94

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 2. Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) I. (c) (i) Fruit crops other Sl. No than cost intensive crops using normal spacing. (@75% subsidy) Ha. 0. 400 0. 300 Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) - 20% subsidy on planting material in 3 rd year a) Mango Ha. 0. 220 0. 0330 995 32. 84 27. 91 4. 93 b) Litchi Ha. 0. 235 0. 0353 100 3. 53 3. 00 0. 53 c) Lime Ha. 0. 3534 0. 0530 100 5. 30 4. 51 0. 80 d) Aonla Ha. 0. 2334 0. 0350 200 7. 00 5. 95 1. 05 Sub total 1395 48. 66 41. 36 7. 30 Total 7070 765. 69 650. 83 114. 85 II. Mushrooms (a) Integrated mushroom unit for spawn, compost production and training ii) Publice Sector Unit 50. 000 1 50. 00 42. 50 7. 50 (b) Spawn making unit i) Public Sector Unit Total - 15. 000 4 60. 00 51. 00 9. 00 1 Unit at Dhamtari 5 110. 00 93. 50 16. 50

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 2. Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) III. Flowers (For a maximum of 2 ha. per beneficiary) (a) Cut Flowers i) Small & Marginal Farmers (@50% subsidy). a) Rose Ha. 0. 700 0. 350 150 52. 50 b) Gerbera Ha. 0. 700 0. 350 150 52. 50 Sub total 300 105. 00 (b) Bulbulous Flowers Small & Marginal Farmers (@50% subsidy). a) Rajnigandha Ha. 0. 900 0. 450 100 45. 00 b) Gladiolus Ha. 0. 900 0. 450 300 135. 00 Sub total 400 180. 00 (c) Loose Flowers i) Small & Marginal Farmers (@50% subsidy). a) Marigold Ha. 0. 240 0. 120 500 60. 00 Sub total 500 60. 00 Total 1200 345. 00 Sl. No Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 44. 63 89. 25 7. 88 15. 75 38. 25 114. 75 153. 00 6. 75 20. 25 27. 00 51. 00 293. 25 9. 00 51. 75

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Programme Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 2. Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) IV. Spices (For a maximum area of 4 ha. per beneficiary) Seed spices and Rhizomatic Spices. (@50% subsidy) b) Chilli Ha. 0. 250 0. 125 500 62. 50 53. 13 9. 38 c) Coriander Ha. 0. 250 0. 125 500 62. 50 53. 13 9. 38 e) Ginger Ha. 0. 250 0. 125 1000 125. 00 106. 25 18. 75 f) Turmeric Ha. 0. 250 0. 125 1000 125. 00 106. 25 18. 75 3000 375. 000 318. 750 56. 250 Total - V. Aromatic Plants (For a maximum area of 4 ha. per beneficiary) (a) Cost intensive aromatic plants (Patchouli, Geranium, Rosemary, etc. ) - @50% subsidy (b) Other aromatic plants. (@50% subsidy) c) Vetiver Ha. 0. 250 0. 125 50 6. 25 5. 31 0. 94 Total - 50 6. 25 5. 31 0. 94

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Go. I State Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Share Remark Target (lakh) Assistance) (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 2. Establishment of New Gardens (Area Expansion) VI. Plantation crops (For a maximum area of 4 ha. per beneficiary) (a) Cashew & Cocoa including replanting - Ha. 0. 400 0. 200 (@50% subsidy). - 60% subsidy on planting material in 1 st Ha. 0. 200 0. 120 400 48. 00 40. 80 7. 20 year. Total 400 48. 00 40. 80 7. 20 Total Sr. No. 2 (I to VI) 1649. 94 1402. 45 247. 49 Rejuvenation / replacement of senile plantation including 3. Canopy management. Ha. 0. 300 0. 150 655 98. 25 83. 51 14. 74 (@50% subsidy to a limited of 2 ha. per beneficiary) Sl. No

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Go. I State Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Share Remark Target (lakh) Assistance) (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 4. Creation of water resources (a) Community Tanks i) Community tanks/on farm ponds/on farm water reservoirs with use of plastic/RCC lining - (10 ha. of command area, with pond size of 100 m x 3 m) - In Plain areas No. 15. 000 50 750. 00 637. 50 112. 50 - In Hilly areas No. 17. 250 10 172. 50 146. 63 25. 88 Sub total 60 922. 50 784. 13 138. 38 (b) Water harvesting system for individuals - for storage of water in 20 m x 3 m ponds/wells @Rs. 100. 00 cum (@50% subsidy) - In Plain areas No. 1. 200 0. 600 266 159. 60 135. 66 23. 94 - In Hilly areas No. 1. 380 0. 690 1 0. 69 0. 59 0. 10 Sub total 267 160. 29 136. 247 24. 044 (c) Bore-wells - In Plain areas No. 0. 700 600 420. 00 357. 00 63. 00 - In Hilly areas No. 0. 700 20 14. 00 11. 90 2. 10 Sub total 620 434. 00 368. 900 65. 100 Total 937 1516. 79 1289. 27 227. 519 Sl. No

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Programme Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 5. Protected Cultivation 1. Green House Structure (a) Fan & Pad System (`. 1465. 00 sq. mtr. @50% Sq. subsidy of the cost Mtr. limited to 4000 sq. mtr. per beneficiary). 0. 01465 0. 00733 20000 146. 50 124. 53 21. 98 0. 00935 0. 00468 40000 187. 00 158. 95 28. 05 0. 00375 0. 00188 25000 46. 88 39. 84 7. 03 65000 233. 88 198. 79 35. 08 (b) Naturally ventilated Systemi) Tubular Structure (`. 935. 00 sq. mtr. @50% Sq. subsidy of the cost Mtr. limited to 4000 sq. mtr. per beneficiary). i) Bamboo Structure (`. 375. 00 sq. mtr. @50% Sq. subsidy of the cost limited to 5 unit not to Mtr. exceed 200 sq. mtr. per beneficiary). Sub total -

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 5. Protected Cultivation 2. Plastic Mulching (@50% subsidy of the Ha. 0. 200 0. 100 500. 00 total cost limited to 2 ha. per beneficiary). 3. Shade Net House - i) Tubular Structure (`. 600. 00 sq. m. @50% Sq. subsidy of the cost 0. 006 0. 003 35000 105. 00 Mtr. limited to 1000 sq. mtr. per beneficiary). ii) Wooden Structure (`. 410. 00 sq. m. limited to 5 units not to exceed Sq. 0. 0041 0. 0021 4000 8. 20 200 sq. mtr. per Mtr. beneficiary) - @50% subsidy. Sl. No Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 425. 00 75. 00 89. 25 15. 75 6. 97 1. 23

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 5. Protected Cultivation 3. Shade Net House - Sl. No iii) Bamboo Structure (`. 300. 00 - @50% Sq. subsidy of the cost limited to 5 units not to Mtr. exceed 200 sq. mtr. per beneficiary). 0. 003 0. 0015 6500 9. 75 8. 29 1. 46 45500 Sub total 4. Plastic Tunnels (`. 30. 00 sq. m. @50% subsidy of cost limited to 1000 sq. mtr. per beneficiary). 5. Anti Bird/Anti Hail Nets (`. 20. 00 per sq. mtr. @50% subsidy of cost limited to 5000 sq. m. per beneficiary). Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 122. 95 104. 51 18. 44 Sq. Mtr. 0. 0003 0. 0002 137000 20. 55 17. 47 3. 08 Sq. Mtr. 0. 0002 0. 0001 70000 7. 00 5. 95 1. 05

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 5. Protected Cultivation - Sl. No 6. Cost of planting material of high value vegetables grown in poly house (`. 105. 00 Sq. per sq. m. @50% Mtr. subsidy of cost limited to 500 sq. m. per beneficiary). 0. 0011 7. Cost of planting material of flowers for poly house (`. 500. 00 Sq. per sq. m. @50% 0. 005 Mtr. subsidy of cost limited to 500 sq. m. per beneficiary). Total - Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 0. 0005 23000 12. 08 10. 26 1. 81 0. 0025 1000 2. 50 2. 13 0. 38 1045. 45 888. 63 156. 82

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Go. I State Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Share Remark Target (lakh) Assistance) (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 6. Promotion of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) / Integrated Pest Management (IPM) - Sl. No ii) Promotion of IPM/INM (`. 2000. 00/ ha. @50% subsidy of cost No. subject to a maximum of `. 1000. 00/ha. limited to 4 ha. /beneficiary). 0. 020 0. 010 2000 20. 00 17. 00 3. 00 Total --20. 00 17. 00 3. 00 7. Organic Farming (a) Adoption of organic farming (Rs. 20, 000. 00 - @50% subsidy of cost limited to Rs. 10, 000. 00/ha. for a maximum area of 4 ha. per beneficiary) i) 40% subsidy in 1 st year. Ha. 0. 100 iii) 30% subsidy in 3 rd Ha. 0. 100 year. Sub total - 0. 040 900 36. 00 30. 60 5. 40 Cary forwarded incomplete activity of 500 ha. of AAP 2011 -12 0. 030 1500 45. 00 38. 25 6. 75 2400 81. 00 68. 85 12. 15

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Go. I State Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Share Remark Target (lakh) Assistance) (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 7. Organic Farming (b) Organic Certification (Rs. 5. 00 lakh for a cluster of 50 ha. ) - Sl. No i) 30% subsidy in 1 st year Cluster 5. 000 1. 500 27. 00 22. 95 4. 05 Cary forwarded incomplete activity of 500 ha. of AAP 2011 -12 60. 00 51. 00 9. 00 87. 00 73. 95 13. 05 470 141. 00 119. 85 21. 15 470 2408 141. 00 274. 00 119. 85 232. 90 21. 15 41. 10 18 iii) 40% subsidy in 3 rd 5. 000 2. 000 30 year. Sub total 48 (c) Vermi compost units/organic input production unit i) 50% of cost conforming for permanent structure to the size of 30' x 8' x 2. 5' No. dimension to be administered on pro-rata basis. Sub total Total - 0. 600 0. 300

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 8. Pollination support through beekeeping - Sl. No (c) Honey bee colony (`. 1400. 00/colony of 4 farmers @50% subsidy No. of cost limited to 50 colonies/ beneficiary). (d) Hives (`. 1600. 00/hive @50% subsidy of cost No. limited to 50 colonies/beneficiary). (e) Equipment including honey extractor (4 farmer), food grade container (30 kg), net, No. etc. (`. 14, 000. 00/set @50% subsidy of the cost limited to one set per beneficiary). Total - Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 0. 014 0. 007 720 5. 04 4. 28 0. 76 0. 016 0. 008 720 5. 76 4. 90 0. 86 0. 140 0. 070 210 14. 70 12. 50 2. 21 1650 25. 50 21. 68 3. 83

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Programme Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 9. Horticulture Mechanization (a) Power operated machines/ tools including Power Saw and Plant No. Protection equipments etc. (@50% subsidy limited to one set per beneficiary). (b) Power Machines (up to 20 HP) & with rotavator/equipment - No. @50% subsidy limited to one set per beneficiary. (c) Power Machines (20 HP & above including accessories/equipments) - No. @50% subsidy limited to one set per beneficiary. 0. 350 0. 175 110 19. 25 16. 36 2. 89 3. 000 1. 500 115 172. 50 146. 63 25. 88 3. 000 1. 500 150. 00 127. 50 22. 50 Total 325 341. 75 290. 49 51. 26 10. Technology Dissemination through demonstration/Front Line Demonstration (FLD) i) Public Sector Ha. 25. 000 1 25. 00 21. 25 3. 75 Total 1 25. 00 21. 25 3. 75

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 10. Human Resource Development (HRD) (b) HRD for Gardeners. No. 15. 000 1 15. 00 (c) Training of Farmers Sl. No i) Within the district (`. 400. 00/ day per farmer No. excluding transport, 2 days training is proposed. i) Within the State (`. 750. 00/ day per farmer No. excluding transport, 6 days training is proposed. iii) Outside the State (`. 1000. 00 /day per farmer excluding No. transport, 7 days training is proposed. ) Sub total - Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 12. 75 2. 25 0. 008 4000 32. 00 27. 20 4. 80 0. 045 2800 126. 00 107. 10 18. 90 0. 070 1500 105. 00 89. 25 15. 75 8300 263 223. 55 39. 45

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 10. Human Resource Development (HRD) (e) Exposure visit of farmers Sl. No Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) i) Within the district (`. 250. 00 / day per farmer No. excluding transport, 1 day visit is proposed. 0. 0025 3700 9. 25 7. 86 1. 39 ii) Within the state (`. 300. 00 / day per farmer No. excluding transport, 6 day visit is proposed. 0. 0030 2650 7. 95 6. 76 1. 19 iii) Outside the State (`. 600. 00 /day per farmer excluding transport, 7 days visit is proposed. 0. 042 1525 64. 05 54. 44 9. 61 No. iv) Outside of India (`. 3. 00 No. lakh per participant) Sub total - 3. 000 15 45. 00 38. 25 6. 75 Carry forward incomplete activities of AAP 2011 -12 7890 126. 25 107. 31 18. 94

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Programme Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) A. Plantation Infrastructure & Development - 10. Human Resource Development (HRD) (f) Training/Study Tour of Technical Staff/Field Functionaries ii) Within the state (`. 200. 00 day per participants @ `. 650. 00/day per No. participant plus TA/DA, as admissible, 7 days tour is proposed). ii) Study tour to progressive Sates/Units (group of minimum 5 participants @ `. 650. 00/day per No. participant plus TA/DA, as admissible, 7 days tour is proposed). iii) Outside of India (`. 5. 00 No. lakh per participant) Sub total Total - 0. 046 80 3. 64 3. 09 0. 55 0. 046 35 1. 59 1. 35 0. 24 5. 000 9 45. 00 38. 25 6. 75 Carry forward incomplete activities of AAP 2011 -12 124 16315 50. 23 454. 48 42. 70 386. 31 7. 53 68. 17

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) C. Integrated Post Harvest Management - Sl. No i) Pack house/On farm collection & storage unit (`. 3. 00 lakh/per unit with No. size of 9 m x 6 m - @50% subsidy). Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 3. 000 1. 500 300 450. 00 382. 50 67. 50 15. 000 6. 000 5 30. 00 25. 50 4. 50 ii) Pre-cooling unit (a) Credit linked backended subsidy @40% of the cost of project in No. General areas for 6 MT capacity. iii) Cold storage units (Construction/Expansion/Modernization) (a) `. 6000. 00/MT credit linked back-ended subsidy @40% of the capita cost of project in General areas for 5000 MT capacity. No. 300. 000 120. 000 7 840. 00 714. 00 126. 00

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) C. Integrated Post Harvest Management - Sl. No Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) iii) Cold storage units (Construction/Expansion/Modernization) (b) `. 6000. 00/MT credit linked back-ended subsidy @55% of the No. capita cost of project in Hilly & Scheduled areas for 5000 MT capacity. 300. 000 Sub total iv) Processing units (a) Cashew nut processing unit credit No. 15. 000 linked back-ended subsidy @40%. (b) Tomato processing unit credit linked back- No. 20. 000 ended subsidy @40%. Sub total - 165. 000 4 660. 00 561. 00 99. 00 11 1500. 00 1275. 00 225. 00 6. 000 1 6. 00 5. 10 0. 90 8. 000 2 16. 00 13. 60 2. 40 3 22. 00 18. 70 3. 30

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) C. Integrated Post Harvest Management v) Refer vans/Containers - Sl. No (a) `. 24. 00 lakh/unit credit linked back-ended subsidy @40% of the capita cost of No. project in General areas for 6 MT capacity. 24. 000 9. 600 Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 1 9. 60 8. 16 1. 44 vi) Primary / Mobile / Minimal processing unit (a) `. 6000. 00/MT credit linked back-ended subsidy @40% of the capita cost of No. project in General areas for 5000 MT capacity. 300. 00 120. 00 102. 00 18. 00 300. 000 120. 000 2 240. 00 204. 00 36. 00 vii) Ripening chamber (a) `. 6000. 00/MT credit linked back-ended subsidy @40% of the capita cost of No. project in General areas for 5000 MT capacity.

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) C. Integrated Post Harvest Management vii) Ripening chamber (b) `. 6000. 00/MT credit Sl. No linked back-ended subsidy @55% of the No. capita cost of project in Hilly & Scheduled areas for 5000 MT capacity. 300. 000 165. 000 1 165. 00 140. 25 24. 75 3 Sub total viii) Evaporative / low energy cool chamber (8 No. MT) - @50% subsidy. ix) Preservation unit (low cost) - `. 2. 00 lakh/ No. unit for new unit @50% subsidy. x) Low cost onion storage structure (25 No. MT) - @50% subsidy. Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 405. 00 344. 25 60. 75 4. 000 2. 000 305 610. 00 518. 50 91. 50 2. 000 100 100. 00 85. 00 1. 000 0. 500 297 148. 50 126. 23 22. 28

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) C. Integrated Post Harvest Management - Sl. No xi) Pusa Zero energy cool chamber (100 kg) - @50% subsidy. No. 0. 040 0. 020 800 16. 00 Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) 13. 60 2. 40 Total 1826 3411. 10 2899. 44 511. 67 D. Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for Horticultural Produce i) Terminal markets (`. 150. 00 crore/project @25% to 40% (limited to `. 50. 00 crore) as Public-Private Partnership mode through competitive bidding. No. 1000. 000 ii) Rural Markets / Apni Mandies / Direct Markets (a) Credit linked backended subsidy @40% of Unit 20. 000 8. 000 the capital cost of project in General areas. 1 1000. 00 850. 00 150. 00 27 216. 00 183. 60 32. 40

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Scale Per Subsidy Go. I State Phy. Fin. Programme Unit (Proposed Share Remark Target (lakh) Assistance) (85%) (15%) D. Establishment of Marketing Infrastructure for Horticultural Produce - Sl. No iii) Retail Markets / Outlets (environmentally controlled) Credit linked back-ended subsidy @55% in case of Hilly & Scheduled areas Unit for individual entrepreneurs. iv) Market extension, quality awareness & market led extension activities for fresh No. products (100% assistance to State Govt. / SHM / Public Sector Agencies). v) Static/Mobile Vending Cart/ Platform with cool Unit chamber (@50% subsidy). 10. 000 5. 500 29 159. 50 135. 58 23. 93 3. 000 2 6. 00 5. 10 0. 90 0. 300 0. 150 40 6. 00 5. 10 0. 90 Total Project Cost - --- 1387. 50 1179. 38 208. 13 10717. 51 9088. 63 1603. 88

PROPOSED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 -13 (`. in lakhs) Sl. No Scale Per Subsidy Phy. Fin. Unit (Proposed Target (lakh) Assistance) Programme Go. I State Share Remark (85%) (15%) F. Mission Management I. State Level (a) State & Districts Mission Offices and implementing agencies for administrative expenses, L. S. project, preparation, computerization, contingency etc. 535. 87 455. 49 80. 38 (c) Seminars, conferences, workshops, exhibitions, Kisan Mela, horticulture shows, honey festivals etc. ii) State level (`. 2. 00 lakh per event of two days). No. 3. 000 1 3. 00 2. 55 0. 45 ii) District level (`. 2. 00 lakh per event of two No. days). 2. 000 8 16. 00 13. 60 2. 40 --- 554. 87 471. 64 83. 23 Total Grand Total - 11272. 39 9581. 53 1690. 86

THANKS …. .

SWOT Analysis Strength – • Climatic condition favors growing frost resistant crops that are supplied as off-season crops to other states. • Traditionally farmers, especially tribals, are vegetable grower and collector of wild fruits that helps in easy transfer of technology and availability of skilled labours. • Good network of road and rail. • Demand-driven market at local as-well-as in other states due to increase purchasing power of people and rapid industrialization/urbanization in the state. • Existing network of departmental nurseries. • Convergence of MNREGS in the state for effective implementation of NHM.

Weakness – • Low and declining productivity. • Poor exposure of farmers and staff to modern practices. • Open grazing practices for 8 months in the year causing damage to crops. • Net irrigated area is lower. • Lack of well trained extension person in the remote blocks. • Lack of infrastructure for processing, value addition and post harvest management. • Lack of organized market/Mandis at block level. • Lack of appropriate transport facilities.

Opportunities – • Presence of culturable fallow land 5. 13 lakh ha. • Scope for crop diversification from traditional paddy/coarse grain farming to horticulture. • Huge demand increase in production of offseason crops. • Presence of technical institutions like IGKVV, 18 - KVK, 17 - Horticulture Colleges may help in tapping modern knowledge in the field. • Processing of surplus produces for value addition. • Establishing network for organized agri-business through PPP.

Threat – • Excessive expansion of area without PHM may create de-motivation among farmers. • Absence of weather and disease forecasting mechanism will adversely effect crop protection. • Excessive withdrawal of ground water will lead to ecological imbalance. • Excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticide will cause ecological imbalance and decrease in productivity. • Lengthy procedure to access credit facilities from banks de-motivate the farmers.

Cluster Total Districts 43 Sarguja 231 Durg 43 Korba 30 Kabirdham 38 Raigarh 106 Jagdalpur 55 Raipur 150 Jashpur 32 Rajnandgaon 24 Korea Total - Crop Cluster Bilaspur 18 NHM Districts 51 11 803

Year wise Sectoral Allotment & Expenditure under NHM (`. in lakh) 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 Total Sl. Components Fin. Fin. No. Fin. Tr. Ach. 1. Production of Planting Material 158 126 249 (80%) 18 (7%) 372 78 (21%) 299 482 403 272 (161%) (68%) 924 520 301 (56%) 188 2706 1684 (62%) Establishment 827 144 3387 1715 4479 2315 4339 4193 3131 3670 4383 4422 4550 5713 25096 22172 2. of New (17%) (51%) (52%) (97%) (117) (101%) (100%) (88%) Gardens 3. 4. 5. Creation of Water Resources Protected Cultivation INM / IPM & Organic farming. 160 0 0 21 (47%) 0 0 16 124 0 0 1550 735 1490 18 2480 1106 350 956 (1%) 579 (45%) (273%) 103 242 296 617 673 (18%) (123%) (109%) 594 491 (100%) 335 88 (26%) 210 7115 3619 (43%) 492 (51%) 281 2410 1441 (90%) (60%) 3755 1746 3945 532 1720 1537 1100 1646 1404 1447 2117 1487 13957 8395 (46%) (13%) (89%) (150%) (103%) (94%) (60%) (Contd. . . )

Year wise Sectoral Allotment & Expenditure under NHM (`. in lakh) 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 Total Sl. Components Fin. Fin. No. Fin. Tr. Ach. 489 6. 30 8. 725 178 213 415 345 77 273 238 135 29 2905 1198 HRD (6%) 7. 725 231 Post Harvest Management 4 (32%) 0 92 0 (195%) 0 0 0 192 Marketing Infrastructure 0 0 1867 0 (25%) 0 0 0 (22%) 738 38 (5%) 0 0 864 0 0 (87%) (21%) (41%) 1054 642 1808 527 3696 1207 (61%) (31%) 1252 1246 1111 (100%) 0 0 (33%) 3419 1246 (36%) 301 9881 4444 11589 3223 9292 8030 7546 7331 10218 9197 11005 8435 61304 40962 Total (16%) (45%) (28%) (86%) (97%) (90%) (71%) (67%)

Year wise Requirement, Availability from Departmental Nurseries & Out Sourcing of Planting Material Sl. Name of Year No. Crop 1. 2. State Sector 4. 180100 0 269600 58780 210820 150000 500 75000 250000 380 105260 0 6877 779960 369140 47 410820 State Sector 200506 Litchi 5. 126540 0 National Horticulture Mission 150000 0 150000 14154 276540 126540 46 150000 National Horticulture Mission Lemon Sub Total - 1. Mango 2. Cashew nut Plants %age purchased availability from out sourcing agencies 2696 Mango 3. Cashewnut Scheme Plants %age Required available availability Target No. of from depart- from depart(in Ha. ) Plants mental nurseries 200607 Sub Total - 53 54 (Contd. . . )

Year wise Requirement, Availability from Departmental Nurseries & Out Sourcing of Planting Material Sl. Name of Year No. Crop 1. 2. Scheme Plants %age Required available availability Target No. of from depart- from depart(in Ha. ) Plants mental nurseries Plants %age purchased availability from out sourcing agencies State Sector Mango 137700 0 Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna 105700 0 105700 5888 1800 988 700 1150 800 100 300 14260 588670 180000 160750 105000 318550 80000 10000 83100 1779470 0 0 318550 0 10000 0 83100 549350 31 588670 180000 160750 105000 0 80000 0 1230120 3. 4. Cashewnut 5. Sitaphal 200708 6. Litchi National 7. Lemon Horticulture Mission 8. Aonla 9. Jamun 10. Bel 11. Ber Sub Total - 69 (Contd. . . )

Year wise Requirement, Availability from Departmental Nurseries & Out Sourcing of Planting Material Sl. Name of Year No. Crop 1. Scheme Plants %age Required available availability Target No. of from depart- from depart(in Ha. ) Plants mental nurseries State Sector 1941 Mango National 2. 5550 Horticulture Mission 3. Litchi 1080 200809 4. Lemon 1250 National Horticulture 5. Aonla 500 Mission 6. Sitaphal 550 7. Cashewnut 2000 Sub Total 12871 1. State Sector 1941 Mango 2. 1900 3. Litchi 980 20094. Lemon 900 National 10 Horticulture Mission 400 5. Aonla 6. Sitaphal 800 7. Cashewnut 1000 Sub Total 7921 Plants %age purchased availability from out sourcing agencies 194100 0 555000 60000 495000 162000 346250 50000 55000 200000 1562350 194100 190000 147000 249300 40000 221600 100000 1142000 100000 346250 0 700350 194100 70000 147000 249300 0 660400 45 58 62000 0 50000 55000 200000 862000 0 120000 0 0 40000 221600 100000 481600 55 42 (Contd. . . )

Year wise Requirement, Availability from Departmental Nurseries & Out Sourcing of Planting Material Sl. Name of No. Crop 1. Mango 2. 3. Lime 4. Aonla 5. Sitaphal 6. Cashewnut 7. Coconut 8. Sweet Lime 9. Nashpati 10. Mango 11. Litchi 12. Lemon 13. Aonla 14. Guava 15. Sitaphal 16. Cashewnut Plants %age Required available availability Target No. of from depart- from depart. Year Scheme (in Ha. ) Plants mental nurseries State Sector 2240. 7 224070 106000 0 180 49860 12000 0 Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna 470 130190 0 22500 0 95 9500 0 200 55400 0 2010 - Rashtriya Krishi 11 Vikas Yojna 65000 215000 178099 500 75000 500 138500 National Horticulture 50000 0 Mission 650 180050 250 69250 0 1000 200000 0 Sub Total 10790. 7 1602320 910579 57 Plants %age purchased availability from out sourcing agencies 0 106000 0 12000 130190 22500 9500 55400 0 36901 0 0 50000 0 69250 200000 691741 43 (Contd. . . )

Year wise Requirement, Availability from Departmental Nurseries & Out Sourcing of Planting Material Sl. Name of Year No. Crop Scheme Plants %age Required available availability Target No. of from depart- from depart(in Ha. ) Plants mental nurseries Plants %age purchased availability from out sourcing agencies 1. Mango 90000 0 2. Litchi 400 60000 0 3. Lemon 69250 0 4. Guava 2011 - National Horticulture 250 12 Mission 650 180050 0 5. Sitaphal 200 55400 150 30000 2550 484700 399300 82 85400 18 3715659 49 3911681 51 6. Cashewnut Sub Total Grand Total - 69423. 7 7627340

Information about Clusters Formed under NHM Sl. Year Name of No. of villages Area No. of Main Crops Remark No. Districts clusters in the cluster (Ha. ) beneficiaries 1 Bilaspur 5 54 580 1219 Litchi, Mango, Lime, 2 Sarguja 15 87 2361 3283 Cashew, Ginger, Chili, No. of 3 Durg 4 78 1190 1214 Garlic, Patchouli, distircts 2005 -06 Jamarosa, Pamarosa, 4 Korba 5 50 1940 3421 selected - 06 E. citridora, Khus, 5 Kabridham 3 52 1720 3033 Lemon grass, 6 Raigarh 4 61 1619 1710 Total 36 382 9410 13880 ----1 Bilaspur 5 34 450 745 Litchi, Mango, Lime, 2 Durg 4 78 1190 1241 Cashew, Ginger, Chili, No. of 3 Jagdalpur 6 113 2050 2701 Garlic, Patchouli, distircts 2006 -07 Jamarosa, Pamarosa, 4 Sarguja 6 37 700 1392 selected - 06 Aloevera, E. citridora, 5 Kabridham 8 74 950 1546 Khus, Lemon grass 6 Korba 5 50 1940 3421 Total 34 386 7280 11046 ----1 Raipur 15 152 3216 3084 2 Bilaspur 10 89 1140 2517 Litchi, Mango, Lime, 3 Durg 9 101 1475 2229 Sitaphal, Aonla, 4 Jagdalpur 13 173 4923. 4 5221 Cashew, Jamun, Bel, 5 Sarguja 15 51 2040 3364 No. of Ginger, Chili, Garlic, 6 2007 -08 Kabridham 11 104 2165 3203 Coriander, Marigold, districts Rose, Tuberose, selected - 11 7 Jashpur 5 28 800 2223 Patchouli, Pamarosa, 8 Raigarh 11 103 1827 3916 Aloevera, E. citridora, 9 Korba 5 37 3300 5236 Khus, Lemon grass, 10 Rajnandgaon 10 101 2000 2096 11 Korea 9 49 1950 1646 Total 113 988 24836. 4 34735 -----

Information about Clusters Formed under NHM Sl. Year Name of No. of villages Area No. of Main Crops Remark No. Districts clusters in the cluster (Ha. ) beneficiaries 1 Raipur 10 102 2140 2044 Litchi, Mango, Lime, 2 Bilaspur 8 47 900 1568 Sitaphal, Aonla, 3 Durg 7 13 3151 1630 Cashew, Banana, 4 Jagdalpur 11 132 3169 4122 Ginger, Chili, 5 Sarguja 21 65 3000 3518 No. of Turmeric, Coriander, 6 2008 -09 Kabridham 4 99 1967 1392 districts Garlic, Marigold, Rose, selected - 11 7 Jashpur 6 24 1250 1526 Tuberose, Gailardia, 8 Raigarh 12 133 2569 3884 Pamarosa, Aloevera, 9 Korba 3 24 2350 2237 E. citridora, Khus, 10 Rajnandgaon 5 63 1592 2189 Lemon grass 11 Korea 8 44 1700 1509 Total 95 746 23788 25619 ----1 Raipur 14 71 1100 1667 2 Bilaspur 5 48 400 1145 Litchi, Mango, Lime, 3 Durg 3 12 260 313 Sitaphal, Aonla, 4 Jagdalpur 10 64 1161 1458 Cashew, Banana, Chili, 5 Sarguja 45 163 4646. 22 6394 No. of Turmeric, Coriander, districts 6 2009 -10 Kabridham 4 42 925 396 Marigold, Rose, Tuberose, Gailardia, selected - 11 7 Jashpur 5 18 381 296 Gladiolus, Aloevera, 8 Raigarh 16 23 1460 635 E. citridora, Khus, 9 Korba 5 31 2400 3185 Lemon grass 10 Rajnandgaon 3 13 400 482 11 Korea 12 68 1750 2593 Total 122 553 14883. 22 18564 -----

Information about Clusters Formed under NHM Sl. No. 1 2 3 4 5 Year Name of Districts Raipur Bilaspur Durg Jagdalpur Sarguja No. of villages Area No. of Main Crops Remark clusters in the cluster (Ha. ) beneficiaries 36 542 2370 3513 Litchi, Mango, Lime, Sitaphal, Aonla, 7 43 600 1603 No. of Cashew, Banana, 10 62 410 416 districts Ginger, Chili, 6 25 416 334 Turmeric, Coriander, selected - 11 49 188 2646. 4 6657 Garlic, Methi, 6 2010 -11 Kabridham 4 135 1490 834 Marigold, 7 Jashpur 8 30 500 487 Rose, Tuberose, 8 Raigarh 34 113 880 909 No. of Gerbera, Gailardia, 9 Korba 2 9 620 4046 districts Gladiolus, Aloevera, E. citridora, Khus, selected - 11 10 Rajnandgaon 4 23 700 1658 Lemon grass 11 Korea 13 59 1250 2244 Total 173 1229 11882. 4 22701 ----1 Raipur 75 1275 2995 6157 2 Bilaspur 3 17 200 500 3 Durg 6 19 225 169 Litchi, Mango, Lime, 4 Jagdalpur 9 16 50 77 Guava, Aonla, Cashew, 5 Sarguja 80 262 4280 9652 No. of Banana, Ginger, Chili, 6 2011 -12 Kabridham 4 162 1460 2425 Turmeric, Coriander, districts Methi, Marigold, Rose, selected - 11 7 Jashpur 8 77 400 598 Tuberose, Gladiolus, 8 Raigarh 29 85 990 1218 Aloevera, E. citridora 9 Korba 5 30 350 2000 10 Rajnandgaon 2 18 500 230 11 Korea 9 39 450 1105 Total 230 2000 11900 24131 ----Grand Total 803 6284 103980. 02 150676 -----

Status of Electrical Tariff Applicable for Primary Processing, Cold Storage, CA / MA Storage & Food Ripening Units • At present Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission has kept the primary processing units, cold storages, CA/MA storages and food ripening units etc. , under tariff LV-5, LT industry (applicable to light and fan and power for industries) and the energy charges are `. 3. 00 per unit. • SHM Chhattisgarh has written a letter to Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Chhattisgarh regarding fixing of tariff for these industries under tariff order of LV-4, LT Agriculture allied activities where the energy charges are of `. 2. 40 per unit (letter no. 1356 dated 31. 03. 2010). • The matter is under consideration.

Information about Technical Staff Position of Chhattisgarh State Sanctioned Positioned Required Staff strength sanctioned in State 1026 716 -- Contractual employees 136 108 -- Sl. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Name of Post Sanctioned post Director Horticulture Joint Director Horticulture Deputy Director Horticulture Assistant Director Horticulture Senior Horticulture Development Officer Rural Horticulture Development Officer Gardner (4 th class) Total - 1 3 7 19 No. of post Vacant post filled 1 0 3 0 7 0 8 11 73 42 31 92 70 22 427 195 232 404 1026 390 716 14 310

Literature Published • • • Success story of Horticulture in Chhattisgarh – I (under NHM). Success story of Horticulture in Chhattisgarh – III (under NHM). Vermi compost – Assistance provided to villagers from National Horticulture Mission & Chhattisgarh Government. Technical document on – Banana Processing & Value Addition “End to End Approach”. Technical document on – Aloevera Processing & Value Addition “End to End Approach”. Field Training Manual of Horticulture Survey. Technical document on – Cashew Nut “End to End Approach”. Technical document on – “Safal Bagwani Ke Upaye”.

B. Expansion of area – i. Shifting of focus from cultivating only high yielding variety to – • Introduce variety of crops with increased shelf-life and compatible for processing. • Increase disease resistance capacity of crops. To achieve the goal institutional linkages will be developed with Agriculture Universities to get research inputs.

ii. Crop diversification by shifting from coarse grain and paddy production to horticulture crops through - • Crop planning. • Re-allocation of culturable fellow land (5. 13 lakh ha. ) and up-land under cereals (71, 500 ha. ). • Lowering of establishment (due to high labour input) and maintenance cost (especially due to open grazing system) of horticulture crop. To achieve the goal proper crop planning and appropriate subsidy for area expansion will be given from NHM. Institutional linkages will be developed with KVK for motivation of farmers.

iii. Preparation of Comprehensive Land Use Plan to introduce horticulture cultivation in • Culturable fallow land (5, 13, 000 ha. ). • Marginal land & Common land (3, 44, 000 ha. ). • Land under miscellaneous tree crops (1000 ha. ) and old orchards on common land (3000 ha. ). To achieve the goal area identified for horticulture development shall be put before land use board and a comprehensive plan shall be made. Land identified for the horticulture shall not be diversified for the other purpose.

C. Organic Farming and Organic Certification – Chattisgarh is by-default practicing organic cultivation especially in the tribal belt, mainly due to the low paying capacity for modern agri-inputs of the farmers. Thus the state does not need to invest much for promotion of organic farming systems rather the need is – • To identify and develop a network of resource persons to integrate the modern technical knowledge of vermicomposting and Integrated Pest Management with the traditional knowledge base. • For promotion of organic cultivation in the state, it neither requires high capital inputs nor a paradigm shift from inorganic to organic practices but an intensive awareness and sensitization campaign through demonstration is needed.

Already existing organic practices in the state create a conducive environment to go for organic certification of products. Therefore – • The state has already identified target species like Mango, Cashew nut, Lime, Banana, Papaya and Aloevera for organic certification (11, 000 ha. ). • The emphasis of the state will be on persuing different stages for certification through promotion of Good Agriculture Practices (GAP). To achieve the goal, along with inputs from NHM, institutional linkages will be developed with KVKs, NGOs and Training Organizations for capacity building and skill up-gradation and certification bodies like CGCERT. To institutilize organic certification system and setting-up of ICS help of NERAMC will be taken up.

E. Production of planting material for assured supply of quality planting material through - • Strengthening the existing nurseries, developing model nurseries (114), small nurseries (133 in private sector), setting up new Tissue Culture units (9) and Rehabilitation of existing TC (4). To achieve this goal financial assistance from NHM & RKVY and technical assistance from training institutions (for gardeners) and NERAMC will be taken.

F. Promotion of Horticulture Mechanization – To increase the efficiency and increase in productivity promotion of horticulture mechanization will taken up in a big way through – • Introduction of small tractors (1645), rotavators (2200), levelers, power tillers, earth augers, seed drillers, ridge and furrow makers, reapers, power sprayers, tractor mount sprayers, power operated pruning saw/chain saw, weed/bush cutters (1760) and plastic crates, to help in increasing productivity. To achieve this goal financial assistance from NHM & RKVY and technical assistance from CG Seed Corporation Limited will be taken.

H. Human Resource Development – ü It is very important to build the capacity of both the farmers and the staff on issues related to production, harvesting, post harvest management of products on the one hand soft skills and managerial skills like inter-personal communication, leadership, institution building, group management and financial management on the other. It is extremely important to build efficient resource persons from within the department and also from among the farmers who can act as peer educators and change agents to implement the program especially adoption of new practices / technology. Capacity building programs are designed in the following model – • Training Need Assessment (TNA) – § i. Training will not be uniform in nature rather modules will be developed based on training need assessment of the stakeholders keeping in mind the project objectives, project deliverables and existing gaps in performance. For the farmers – § § Issue based in situ training within the district for a batch of 50 farmers per training. Exposure visits/study tours within the district, within the state, outside the state

ii. For the Technical Staff / Field Functionaries • • • Refreshers course at the district level Training of Trainers for selected officials at the state level Resource Person Development program with study tour outside the state. iii. For the Supervisors and Entrepreneurs • • Training of supervisors on project management and project monitoring. Training of Entrepreneurs from among the progressive farmers on entrepreneurship development, modern techniques of agri-business. iv. For the Gardeners • Training on garden management and rejuvenation of senile orchards. To achieve this goal help of the prestigious training institutes will be taken. Such type of Capacity Building Interventions in the form of training is already going on in the state.

Schedule of training activities - Pert Phase - I Sl. No Training Activities 1. Training for farmers & PRI in the state 2. Training for farmers & PRI outside the state 3. Training of Trainers 4. Resource persons development program 5. Project Management for mission staff 6. Refreshers course for senior level officials 7. Refreshers course for extension officers Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Schedule of training activities - Pert Phase - II Sl. No. Training Activities 1. Training for farmers & PRI in the state. 2. Training for farmers & PRI outside the state. 3. 4. 5. 6. Training of Trainers. Project Management for mission staff. Refreshers course for extension officers. Certificate course to develop para professionals. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Schedule of training activities - Pert Sl. No Training Activities 1. Training for farmers & PRI in the state 2. Training for farmers & PRI outside the state 3. 4. 5. Project Management for mission staff Refreshers course for extension officers Certificate course to develop para professionals Phase - III Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Impact of NHM Sl. No. 1. 1. Output Phy. Exp. (`. No. of (Production Activity Unit Impact Increase in lakhs) Beneficiaries in Mt. ) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Establishment of New Gardens 1. Fallow land brought under cultivation. A. Perennial crops - 2. Employment generation at rural a. Mango Ha. 16, 234 1811. 38 level. b. Litchi Ha. 4024 450. 14 3. Support to eco-system through c. Lime Ha. 3481 399. 56 plantation. 38, 609 4. Although fruit orchards are in d. Aonla Ha. 1036 66. 09 gestation period but initiation of e. Custard Ha. 1880 208. 71 flowering and fruiting develop Apple confidence in beneficiaries & encourage other farmers for area f. Cashew Ha. 11, 676 656. 77 expansion. B. Annual Crops - 1. Returns from Banana is very high. 2. Farmers are getting 40 to 45 Mt. average yield per ha. 3. Banana is exported to the other states from Chhattisgarh. 2764 Banana Ha. 6341 1428. 60 2, 53, 640 4. Whole sale traders from Delhi, UP. are purchasing farmers produce from farm gate. Farmers need not to pay charges of harvesting, packing & transport to market.

Impact of NHM Sl. No. Activity 1. 2. Output Phy. Exp. (`. (Production Unit Increase in lakhs) in Mt. ) Impact No. of Beneficiaries 7. 8. Spices crops - 3. 4. 5. 6. Ha. 30, 804 3546. 03 1, 84, 824 b. Onion Ha. 500 56. 25 7790 c. Coriander Ha. 2658 310. 92 7442 d. Turmeric Ha. 7684 915. 48 53, 788 e. Ginger Ha. 7200 857. 50 56, 160 a. Chili 1. Under Spices Chilli has become main crop and it occupies highest position both in area & production. 2. Due to cluster approach larger area of spices developed in a cluster which increased the bargaining power & also facilitate the farmers to send their produce 52, 393 to distant markets where they fetched good prices. 3. Farmers are now inclined to grow these crops in larger area at their own cost. 4. Chili is exported to the adjoining states from Chhattisgarh.

Impact of NHM Sl. No. 1. 3. 4. 5. Output Phy. Exp. (`. No. of (Production in Activity Unit Impact Increase in lakhs) Beneficiaries Mt. ) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Floriculture crops - 20 to 25 lakhs 1. Production of Cut flowers of a. Rose Ha. 250 87. 50 cut flower Roses, Gerbera, Tuberose & 1. 22 to 1. 31 Gladiolus in the field of local lakhs cut b. Gerbera Ha. 231 80. 71 farmers fulfilling the local flower need of the state & also 160 to 175 increased their income & 9032 lakhs cut c. Tuberose Ha. 2913 1309. 50 open a new area of cultivation. flower initially 2. Farmers are also exporting 527 lakh sticks the cut flowers to adjacent d. Gladiolus Ha. 2530 1147. 46 approx. markets like Nagpur, e. Marigold Ha. 2659 318. 97 31893 approx. Culcutta out of state. f. Chrysanthemum Ha. 150 18. 00 450 approx. 1. About 11, 500 ha. area is brought under irrigation Community through bore-wells. Nos. 4629 2955. 15 --17, 316 Bore-wells 2. Productivity of crops increased due to assured irrigation. Farmers are motivated to use traditional old techniques for Organic Farming Ha. 5790 524. 99 --7179 production of crops. Process of certification of the produce is in progress.

Impact of NHM Sl. No. Activity 1. 6. 2. b. Portable HDPE unit 8. Impact No. of Beneficiaries 7. 8. Vermi compost units - a. Pucca Tanka 7. Output Phy. Exp. (`. (Production in Unit Increase in lakhs) Mt. ) 3. 4. 5. 6. Nos. Ha. Establishment of Nos. Model Nurseries HRD Nos. 2250 37, 007 1. Use of vermi compost is 675. 00 33. 75 lakh CFT. improving soil health and increasing production. 2. Cost of cultivation is also reduced due to less use of chemical fertilizer. 4973. 22 106 lakh CFT. 3. Farmers are also using vermi wash as growth hormones. 64 1281. 72 --- 1. Plant production capacity of departmental nurseries is increased. 2. 30. 80 lakhs plants produced in the year 2011 -12 in model 64 nurseries of NHM. 48, 343 927. 40 --- Training & exposure visits of the farmers have been done. 14, 921 48, 343

Plant Production Sl. No. Year No. of Plants 1. 2005 -06 69, 97, 854 2. 2006 -07 68, 85, 187 3. 2007 -08 51, 35, 680 4. 2008 -09 58, 97, 597 5. 2009 -10 71, 15, 973 6. 2010 -11 73, 21, 693 7. 2011 -12 67, 27, 690