Скачать презентацию PRELI MINA RY DR not fo AFT r Скачать презентацию PRELI MINA RY DR not fo AFT r

c343d685ebcffb5c38dc407046f52b1c.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 19

PRELI MINA RY DR not fo AFT r circu lation GREAT KEI 6000 Feasibility PRELI MINA RY DR not fo AFT r circu lation GREAT KEI 6000 Feasibility Study November 2013

GREAT KEI 6000 Feasibility Report prepared for Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements Great GREAT KEI 6000 Feasibility Report prepared for Eastern Cape Department of Human Settlements Great Kei Local Municipality 12 Murray Street, Tarkastad 5370 Tel. 045 846 -0033 Fax: 045 846 -0025 31 -33 Phillip Frame Road Chiselhurst Tel: +27 (0) 43 711 9735 by Kantey & Templer PO Box. . . , East London Tel; 041 373 -0738 CNd. V africa (Pty) Ltd environmental planning, urban design, landscape architecture 17 New Church Street Cape Town 8000 Tel; 021 424 -5022 Fax: 021 424 -6837 IQ Vision 110 Sarel Cillier Street Strand 7140 Tel; 021 853 -3902 September 2013

CONTENTS 4. 5. 1 INTRODUCTION 4. 5. 1. 1 Background to the Settlement 4. CONTENTS 4. 5. 1 INTRODUCTION 4. 5. 1. 1 Background to the Settlement 4. 5. 1. 2 Status of Housing projects and Waiting List 4. 5. 2 STATUS OF HOUSING PROJECTS AND WAITING LISTS 4. 5. 3 LAND IDENTIFICATION AND OWNERSHIP 4. 5. 4 ENGINEERING 4. 5. 4. 1 Bulk Services 4. 5. 4. 2 Internal Services 4. 5. 4. 3 Geotechnical Conditions 4. 5. 4. 4 Existing Internal Services 4. 5 Top Structure 4. 5. 4. 6 Traffic Impact Assessment 4. 5. 4. 7 Roads and Accessibility 4. 5. 4. 8 Project Feasibility 4. 5. 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL FACILITIES ENVIRONMENT 4. 5. 6 GEO-TECH 4. 5. 7 CURRENT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 4. 5. 8 DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL FACILITIES 4. 5. 9 CONCLUSION 4. 5. 9. 1 Summary 4. 5. 9. 2 Recommendations LIST OF MAPS Figure 4. 5. 1 a Figure 4. 5. 1 b Figure 4. 5. 2 Figure 4. 5. 4 a Figure 4. 5. 4 b Figure 4. 5. 5 Figure 4. 5. 6 Figure 4. 5. 7 a Figure 4. 5. 7 b Figure 4. 5. 8 Aerial Photograph Site Photographs Status of Housing Projects Engineering: Site Photographs Environment Geo-tech Current Spatial Development Framework Current Situation: Site Photographs Social Facilities LIST OF TABLES Table 4. 5 a Table 4. 5 b ……. Comparison of Existing Projects and Existing Population/ Units

INTRODUCTION 4. 7. 1 Background to Settlement • Great Kei Municipaliy is a coastal INTRODUCTION 4. 7. 1 Background to Settlement • Great Kei Municipaliy is a coastal municipality in the Eastern Cape. It’s abutted by Buffalo City LM to the west, Amahlathi LM to the north and Mnquma LM to east. COMPARISION OF EXISTING PROJECTS AND EXISTING POPULATION/UNITS Wards 1 – 6 • The housing project includes virtually all villages in the entire Great Kei Municipality save those that fall into ward 7. 4. 7. 1 2321 Population (2011 Cesnsus) 1531 Ex. Units (Tsolwana SDF 2010) 566 No. Households (2011 Census ) • Great Kei Municipality incorporates 7 administrative wards that comprise various settlement types ranging from urban to rural. Population (Tsolwana SDF 2010) 406 Proposed Units (EC DHS) 200 Waiting List 11. 9. 13 (Tsolwana LM) 35 Waiting List 17. 9. 13 68 Successful pre-screened beneficiaries 26 Status of housing projects and waiting list • 950 housing projects have been proposed for Daliwe. These 950 units will be individual subsidies into existing erven. • Currently on the housing waiting list are there approximately … housing beneficiary names have been identified and submitted as of … by the municipality/traditional leaders in the area. • Subsequently the cleaning of data received where duplications and insufficient data were removed was undertaken. This resulted in … beneficiaries being pre-screened. Table 4. 5 b Comparison of Existing Projects and Existing Population/ Units 4. 7

Status of Housing Projects and Waiting List Figure 4. 3. 8 Status of Housing Projects and Waiting List Figure 4. 3. 8

LAND IDENTIFICATION AND OWNERSHIP 4. 5. 3. 1 LAND IDENTIFICATION AND OWNERSHIP 4. 5. LAND IDENTIFICATION AND OWNERSHIP 4. 5. 3. 1 LAND IDENTIFICATION AND OWNERSHIP 4. 5. 3

SITE PHOTOS Sub Committee member responsible for Rocklands Structure built from local and 2 SITE PHOTOS Sub Committee member responsible for Rocklands Structure built from local and 2 nd hand materials Existing mud structure Toilets built on site on housing subsidy plots Structure built from local and 2 nd hand materials Eroded structure built on local materials Police station building School built on local materials Subsistance farming at the local clinic 4. 7. 2

ENGINEERING BULK SERVICES Existing Services Source of potable water is boreholes. Availability of water ENGINEERING BULK SERVICES Existing Services Source of potable water is boreholes. Availability of water is sporadic. Electricity is supplied by Eskom. There is no water-borne sewer system in the area. There is no bulk municipal stormwater management infrastructure in the area. Condition of existing infrastructure is reported to be in good working order. INTERNAL SERVICES Existing Services Potable water reticulation exists with communal stand pipes. No water-borne sewers. All households use VIP toilets. All roads are approximately 5 m wide, gravelled and generally with flat gradients. Unlined V-drains along the edges of the road, with stormwater pipes for road crossings with lined V-drains. Low voltage power lines in road reserves with house connections. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS Existing houses appear to be built on strip footings. No major cracking was observed on existing houses. Soil conditions appear favourable for housing development subject to confirmation by a detailed geotechnical investigation. EXISTING INTERNAL SERVICES ARE ADEQUATE AND REQUIRE NO UPGRADING. 4. 7. 7 TOP STRUCTURE A 40 square metre house with a water tank to be provided for all beneficiaries. House foundations expected to be strip foundations. Human Settlements norms and standards for top structures to be applied, such as ceilings, internal & external plaster and paint, concrete roof tiles, etc. No new VIP toilets required. TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT The proposed provision of top structures on existing erven does not increase the traffic load on the existing road infrastructure. Therefore no traffic impact assessment is required. ROADS AND ACCESSIBILITY Access is from a gravel trunk road that links to R 61. THE PROJECT IS FEASIBLE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN SETTLEMENTS.

Engineering Figure 4. 7. 6 Engineering Figure 4. 7. 6

ENVIRONMENT • There are no Critical Biodiversity issues in the municipality. • The municipality ENVIRONMENT • There are no Critical Biodiversity issues in the municipality. • The municipality is incised with many rivers, tributaries and wetlands. As a guideline a 32 m buffer ought to be maintained between housing development and any watercourse or wetland. • Development is discouraged where the land may be potentially good for agriculture and proclaimed cultivated areas. • Vulnerable vegetation must be protected. 4. 7. 4

Environment Figure 4. 7. 4 Environment Figure 4. 7. 4

DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL FACILITIES • The provision of social facilities is guided by the DISTRIBUTION OF SOCIAL FACILITIES • The provision of social facilities is guided by the population threshold available to use those facilities. • The challenge with rural settlements is their dispersed nature and the associated challenges of transportation and infrastructure to support facility provision. • Great Kei Municipality seems to well equipped with educational facilities south of the N 2, while north of the N 2 they are more clustered towards Komga, possibly due to the spread of settlements. • Theirs is an adequate provision of health facilities in the municipality. 4. 7. 6

Distribution of Social Facilities Figure 4. 7. 6 Distribution of Social Facilities Figure 4. 7. 6

CURRENT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK • The Spatial Development Framework has indicated areas where residential CURRENT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK • The Spatial Development Framework has indicated areas where residential extension can be located near the main settlements. 4. 7. 5

GEO-TECH Await K&T 4. 7. 3 GEO-TECH Await K&T 4. 7. 3

Geo-tech Figure 4. 7. 3 Geo-tech Figure 4. 7. 3

CURRENT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK • Residential extension is proposed southward, west of the main CURRENT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK • Residential extension is proposed southward, west of the main access road into Rocklands across the road from formerly cultivated fields. • Identified needs for Rocklands are housing formalisation, access road upgrading, new sites for public worship and cemetery extensions. 4. 7. 5

Current Spatial Development Framework Figure 4. 7. 5 Current Spatial Development Framework Figure 4. 7. 5

CONCLUSION 4. 5. 9. 1 SUMMARY • Great Kei ward 1 - 6 beneficiary CONCLUSION 4. 5. 9. 1 SUMMARY • Great Kei ward 1 - 6 beneficiary list comprised of … people as of the … • A total of … were consequently screened after data check and clean. 4. 5. 9. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS • In light of this assessment it is recommended that the construction of RDP houses can proceed in Great Kei ward 1 -6 following carefully the prescribes of the SDF. • The Umzi Choice program ought to be considered as a possible housing delivery instrument in the area. • … beneficiaries were successful while … failed the pre-screening process. • There adequate social facilities in Great Kei which are adequately spread and accessible to surrounding households. • A 32 m buffer from watercourses, water bodies and wetlands needs to be taken as general guideline. • The future housing site are in line with the SDF’s proposal for future housing expansion. 4. 5. 9