Скачать презентацию Performance of the analytical techniques employed Скачать презентацию Performance of the analytical techniques employed

d324be376542b5fbe875022e50a1d6d7.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 40

 • Performance of the analytical techniques employed in characterization and certification of stainless • Performance of the analytical techniques employed in characterization and certification of stainless steel materials by Ingemar Gustavsson Analytical Chemistry Group Corrosion and Metals Research Institute Drottning Kristinas väg 48 SE 114 28 Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: ingemar. gustavsson@simr. se

Definitions of RMs and CRMs according to ISO-Guides 30 -35 ______________ • Reference Material Definitions of RMs and CRMs according to ISO-Guides 30 -35 ______________ • Reference Material (RM) • A material, sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to one or more properties, which have been established to be fit for its intended use in a measurement process • Certified Reference Material (CRM) • An RM characterized by a metrologically valid procedure, accompanied by a certificate that states the value of the specified property, its associated uncertainty, and a statement of metrological traceability

Characteristic steel elements Concentrations given in % (m/m) • C, Si, Mn, P, S, Characteristic steel elements Concentrations given in % (m/m) • C, Si, Mn, P, S, Cr, Mo, Ni, N, (Fe) • • • C Mn S Mo N • Low alloy steel C, Si, Mn, P, S, N • • High alloy steel C, Si, Mn, P, S, Cr, Mo, Ni, N (Stainless steel) • • • Tool steel C, Si, Mn, P, S, Cr, Mo, Ni, N, W, V, Co ”Special steel” C, Si, Mn, P, S, Cr, Mo, Ni, N plus e. g. Al, Si, Nb, Ti, Cu, Ce 0, 01 - 2 0, 3 - 12 0, 0005 - 0, 2 0, 005 - 5 0, 001 - 0, 3 Si P Cr Ni Fe 0, 05 - 3 0, 001 - 0, 02 0, 1 - 30 0, 01 - 30 35 - 99

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • C and S Combustion - infrared detection • Chemical analysis of stainless steel • C and S Combustion - infrared detection • (C - 0, 003 -4, 5 %; S - 0, 0005 - 0, 2 %) – Oxidation by oxygen gas at 2100 o. C; formation of CO 2 and SO 2 – Calibration against Ba. CO 3; Na 2 CO 3 or sucrose – Calibration against K 2 SO 4 – (Calibration against CRMs)

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Si - Spectrophotometry (0, 01 -0, 2%) – Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Si - Spectrophotometry (0, 01 -0, 2%) – – – Dissolution by H 2 SO 4/HNO 3 Filtartion Ignition of acid-insoluble Si with Na 2 O 2 Add Mn. O 4 - - solution - pink solution Add Mo. O 4 2 - - solution Add ascorbic acid solution - formation of molybdosilicate complex (blue) – Measurement at 810 nm – Calibration against ”Si. O 2 -solution” • Si - Gravimetry (0, 1 - 5 %) – Oxidation by HCl. O 4 -fuming-formation of Si. O 2 – Filtration – Addition of HF - formation of Si. F 4 – Ignition – Weighing

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Mn - AAS - flame (0, 002 - Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Mn - AAS - flame (0, 002 - 2 %) – – – Dissolution by HCl/HNO 3 (HF) Add HCl. O 4 - fuming Filtration Measurement at 279, 5 nm Calibration against matrix-matched Mn solution

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • P - Spectrophotometry (0, 001 - 1, 0 Chemical analysis of stainless steel • P - Spectrophotometry (0, 001 - 1, 0 %) – Dissolution by HCl/HNO 3 (HF) – Add HCl. O 4 - fuming – Cr content > 0, 1 % is removed by addition of HCl - formation of volatile Cr. O 2 Cl 2 – Add Na. NO 2 - reduction of dichromate – Add H 3 BO 4 - formation of tertafluoroboric acid – Add metavanadate and heptamolybdate solutionsformation of phosphovanadomolybdate complex – Extraction with 4 -methyl-2 -pentanone – Measurement of organic solvent at 355 nm – Calibration against KH 2 PO 4 (orthophosphate) - solution

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Cr and V - Potentiometric titration Cr (1 Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Cr and V - Potentiometric titration Cr (1 - 30 %); V (0, 5 - 10 %) – Dissolution by HCl/HNO 3/HF in a. Teflon pressure vessel in micro-wave assisted system – Add H 3 PO 4/H 2 SO 4 - oxidation to Cr(VI) and to V(V), respectively – Titration with Fe(II) giving Cr(III) and V(IV) – Oxidation with Mn. O 4 - -solution giving V(V) and not Cr(VI) – Excess of Mn. O 4 - is reduced by NO 2– Excess of NO 2 - is eliminated by urea – Standardisation using pure K 2 Cr 2 O 7

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • N - Melt extraction - Thermal Conductivity (0, Chemical analysis of stainless steel • N - Melt extraction - Thermal Conductivity (0, 002 - 0, 6 %) – Melt extraction at 2700 o. C in graphite crucible and purging helium – Calibration against KNO 3 – (Calibration against CRMs)

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • O - Melt extraction - Infrared detection (0, Chemical analysis of stainless steel • O - Melt extraction - Infrared detection (0, 0001 - 0, 02 %) – Melt extraction at 2200 o. C in graphite crucible and purging helium – Calibration against KNO 3 – Calibration against Dy 2 O 3 alt Te. O 2 – (Calibration against CRMs)

Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Trace elements (< 0, 01 %) • Li, Chemical analysis of stainless steel • Trace elements (< 0, 01 %) • Li, Be, B. . . Ti…Nb, Mo…Sn, Sb… Ce, La…W…Pb, Bi, Th, U – Dissolution in HCl/HNO 3/(HF) in a Teflon pressure vessel using a micro-wave assisted system – Dilution to suitable analytical volume – Addition of internal standard (usually 1 - 3) of Y, Rh, In, Re, Ir, Tl – Calibration against matrix-matched elemental solutions

Round-Robin test. Concentrations of 30 elements in a high alloy steel - JK 37. Round-Robin test. Concentrations of 30 elements in a high alloy steel - JK 37. n = number of participating laboratories; concentrations in g/g Major element n Cert. value 17120 35 3 17300 Micro elements Si 1350 100 P 157 6 V 740 35 Co 601 29 Ce 1213 65 Pr 141 11 Nd 365 9 3 4 5 5 5 1410 160 750 580 1230 - Trace elements B 9 2 Al 77 19 Ti 39 6 Ga 45 9 As 40 1 Nb 13 1 Sb 6. 1 1. 5 Te 2. 9 2. 3 W 84 8 Pb 1. 32 0. 23 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 12 80 37 Mn 36 (Cert. values (%) : Cr-26. 72; Ni-30. 82; Mo-3. 55)

Cont`d Round-Robin test. Concentrations of ultra-trace elements in a high alloy steel - JK Cont`d Round-Robin test. Concentrations of ultra-trace elements in a high alloy steel - JK 37. n = number of participating laboratories; concentration in g/g Ultra-trace elements Be Pd Ag Ba Ta Ir Pt Tl Bi <0. 1 <1 <0. 4 <1 <0. 20 0. 03 <0. 2 0. 33 0. 13 n 4 2 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 Trace or ultra-trace elements ? Ca Zn Se <12 <5 <10 4 2 2 Cert. value

ICP-TOFMS - LECO Renaissance ICP-TOFMS - LECO Renaissance

Laser Ablation System CETAC LSX-200 plus Laser Ablation System CETAC LSX-200 plus

Instrument installation Instrument installation

ICP-TOFMS Flight tube ICP-TOFMS Flight tube

LECO - Renaissance Typical fly times for ten elements LECO - Renaissance Typical fly times for ten elements

ICP-TOFMS Analysis of wet-digested low alloy steel samples Concentrations given in µg/g (ppm) ICP-TOFMS Analysis of wet-digested low alloy steel samples Concentrations given in µg/g (ppm)

ICP-TOFMS Analysis of wet-digested high alloy steel samples Concentrations given in µg/g (ppm) *Figures ICP-TOFMS Analysis of wet-digested high alloy steel samples Concentrations given in µg/g (ppm) *Figures in italics refer to earlier determinations carried out by five different laboratories

Laser Ablation Copper scanning- spot size 200 µm Laser Ablation Copper scanning- spot size 200 µm

Laser Ablation Analysis of Copper samples: BAM 381 BAM 383 BAM 382 BAM 385 Laser Ablation Analysis of Copper samples: BAM 381 BAM 383 BAM 382 BAM 385 All BAM samples above have been determined in a traditional wet chemical way by ICP-TOFMS LASER measurements: Calibration with BAM 381, 384 and 385 Internal standard Sn 118 or Ag 107 Determination of BAM 383

LA-ICP-TOFMS and ICP-TOMS Comparison of trace element determinations LA-ICP-TOFMS and ICP-TOMS Comparison of trace element determinations

Laser Ablation Analysis of Steel Samples: JK 1 C ECRM 090 -1 EZRM 179 Laser Ablation Analysis of Steel Samples: JK 1 C ECRM 090 -1 EZRM 179 -2 HOØ 47 (Ovako) Pure Iron Carbon Steel Tool Steel Ball Bearing Steel Calibration with: JK 1 C, ECRM 090 -1, EZRM 179 -2 Internal standards: Samples analysed: Ga and Ni HOØ 47 (Ovako)

Laser Ablation Comparison of determinations Laser Ablation Comparison of determinations

Laser Ablation Analysis of Zircaloy samples: 9 authentic samples Calibration with: Jaeri-Z 11 and Laser Ablation Analysis of Zircaloy samples: 9 authentic samples Calibration with: Jaeri-Z 11 and two in-door samples Internal standards:

Laser Ablation - Zircaloy samples Calibration for Cr 50 with internal standard Laser Ablation - Zircaloy samples Calibration for Cr 50 with internal standard

Laser Ablation - Zircaloy samples Calibration for Cr 50 with no internal standard Laser Ablation - Zircaloy samples Calibration for Cr 50 with no internal standard

Laser Ablation - Zircaloy samples Comparison of trace element determinations Laser Ablation - Zircaloy samples Comparison of trace element determinations

Laser Ablation Depth profiling analysis of Al Parameters: Spot size Energy Frequency Integ. time Laser Ablation Depth profiling analysis of Al Parameters: Spot size Energy Frequency Integ. time Data points Al-layer content: (100 µm thickness) 50 µm 3. 8 m. J 20 Hz 102 ms 1760 / isotope Si 7. 4 ± 0. 2 % Mn <0. 01 % Mg <0. 01 % Pb 0. 01 % Ti <0. 01 %

Laser Ablation Depth profiling graph for two Al-layers Laser Ablation Depth profiling graph for two Al-layers

Three coating layers of a cutting tool Thickness of coating layers according to: - Three coating layers of a cutting tool Thickness of coating layers according to: - Ti. N 1 µm - Al 2 O 3 4 µm - Ti (C, N) 1 µm

Laser Ablation - Transient signals of the elements Al, Co, Ti and W on Laser Ablation - Transient signals of the elements Al, Co, Ti and W on a cutting tool

Laser Ablation - Depth profile curve for Hg of an old zinc coated steel Laser Ablation - Depth profile curve for Hg of an old zinc coated steel sheet Thickness of Hg-layer - 16. 3µm

Laser Ablation - Depth profile curve for Hg of a scrap steel sample Thickness Laser Ablation - Depth profile curve for Hg of a scrap steel sample Thickness of Hg-layer - 3. 8 µm

Conclusions LA-ICP-TOFMS vs ICP-TOFMS: - a fast method compared with wet chemical analysis - Conclusions LA-ICP-TOFMS vs ICP-TOFMS: - a fast method compared with wet chemical analysis - a fast method for depth profile analysis - a tool for trace element determinations in steel and metals - a promising tool for determination of inhomogenieties (inclusions) in steel and metals