Скачать презентацию Part II OWL-S Technical Overview Profile Process Скачать презентацию Part II OWL-S Technical Overview Profile Process

7da7472a636a7183b2cdaefcaa6b9480.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 40

Part II: OWL-S Technical Overview § Profile, Process & Grounding ontologies § Next Steps Part II: OWL-S Technical Overview § Profile, Process & Grounding ontologies § Next Steps & Future Directions § SWSI, SWSL & SWSA David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

DAML-S Web Services Coalition BBN: Mark Burstein CMU: Katia Sycara, Massimo Paolucci* ICSI: Srini DAML-S Web Services Coalition BBN: Mark Burstein CMU: Katia Sycara, Massimo Paolucci* ICSI: Srini Narayanan Maryland / College Park: Bijan Parsia Nokia: Ora Lassila Stanford KSL: Sheila Mc. Ilraith* SRI: David Martin* Southampton: Terry Payne* USC-ISI: Jerry Hobbs Yale: Drew Mc. Dermott David Martin for DAML-S Coalition *Contributor to these slides 05/08/2003

What is OWL-S? • Ontology Web Language for Services • An OWL ontology/language for What is OWL-S? • Ontology Web Language for Services • An OWL ontology/language for (formally) describing properties and capabilities of Web services • An approach that draws on many sources • Description logic • AI planning • Workflow • Formal process modeling • Agents • Web services http: //www. daml. org/services/ David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Layered Approach to Language Development OWL-S: a major application of OWL Future versions will Layered Approach to Language Development OWL-S: a major application of OWL Future versions will build upon emerging layers (e. g. DAML-Rules) OWL-S (Services) DAML-? ? ? (Rules, FOL? ) DAML+OIL OWL (Ontology) RDFS (RDF Schema) RDF (Resource Description Framework) XML (Extensible Markup Language) David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

OWL-S Objectives Automation of service use by software agents Ideal: full-fledged use of services OWL-S Objectives Automation of service use by software agents Ideal: full-fledged use of services never before encountered: Discovery, selection, composition, invocation, monitoring, . . Useful in the “real world” Compatible with industry standards Incremental exploitation Enable reasoning/planning about services e. g. , On-the-fly composition Integrated use with information resources Ease of use; powerful tools David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Automation Enabled by OWL-S • Web service discovery Find me a shipping service that Automation Enabled by OWL-S • Web service discovery Find me a shipping service that transports goods to Dubai. • Web service invocation Buy me 500 lbs. powdered milk from www. acmemoo. com • Web service selection & composition Arrange food for 500 people for 2 weeks in Dubai. • Web service execution monitoring Has the powdered milk been ordered and paid for yet? David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Key: Discovery Process Model Grounding Profile Publication Simulation Selection Verification Composition Execution, Interoperation Monitoring, Key: Discovery Process Model Grounding Profile Publication Simulation Selection Verification Composition Execution, Interoperation Monitoring, Recovery Development David Martin for DAML-S Coalition … Deployment … Use … 05/08/2003

Upper Ontology of Services Ontology images compliments of Terry Payne, University of Southampton David Upper Ontology of Services Ontology images compliments of Terry Payne, University of Southampton David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Profile: “What does it do? ” High-level characterization/summary of a service Used for Service Profile: “What does it do? ” High-level characterization/summary of a service Used for • Populating service registries • A service can have many profiles • Automated service discovery • Service selection (matchmaking) One can derive: • Service advertisements • Service requests David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Profile: Functionality Description • Functional Specification of what the service provides in terms Service Profile: Functionality Description • Functional Specification of what the service provides in terms of parameters, subclassed as: – preconditions – inputs – outputs – effects • Summarizes the top-level Process David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Profile: Non. Functional Properties • Provides supporting information about the service. David Martin Service Profile: Non. Functional Properties • Provides supporting information about the service. David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Profile: Non. Functional Properties • These include – – – service. Name text. Service Profile: Non. Functional Properties • These include – – – service. Name text. Description quality. Rating service. Parameter service. Category contact. Information David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Profile: Non. Functional Properties - Actor David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 Service Profile: Non. Functional Properties - Actor David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Profile: Styles of use • Class-hierarchical yellow pages – – Implicit capability characterization Service Profile: Styles of use • Class-hierarchical yellow pages – – Implicit capability characterization Arrangement of attributes on class hierarchy Can use multiple inheritance Relies primarily on “non-functional” properties • Process summaries for planning purposes – – – More explicit Inputs, outputs, preconditions, effects Less reliance on formal hierarchical organization Summarizes process model specs Relies primarily on functional description David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Exploiting Profile Hierarchies Tie in with UDDI, UNSPSC, … DL Basis for matchmaking Multiple Exploiting Profile Hierarchies Tie in with UDDI, UNSPSC, … DL Basis for matchmaking Multiple profiles; multiple taxonomies David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Upper Ontology of Services David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 Upper Ontology of Services David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Model it work? ” Process Model: “How does it work? ” Process – Service Model it work? ” Process Model: “How does it work? ” Process – Interpretable description of service provider’s behavior – Tells service user how and when to interact (read/write messages) & Process control – Ontology of process state; supports status queries – (stubbed out at present) • Used for: – Service invocation, planning/composition, interoperation, monitoring • All processes have – Inputs, outputs, preconditions and effects – Function/dataflow metaphor; action/process metaphor • Composite processes – Control flow – Data flow David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Model / Process Model David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 Service Model / Process Model David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Function/Dataflow Metaphor Input: • customer name • origin • destination • weight • pickup Function/Dataflow Metaphor Input: • customer name • origin • destination • weight • pickup date • . . . Output: • confirmation no. • . . . Acme Book Truck Shipment truck available + ? valid credit card Y N • failure notification • … David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

AI-inspired Action/Process Metaphor Output: • confirmation no. • . . . Effect: • goods AI-inspired Action/Process Metaphor Output: • confirmation no. • . . . Effect: • goods at location if successful • credit card debited. . . Input: • customer name • origin • destination • pickup date • . . . Preconditions: • knowledge of the input • . . . Acme Book Truck Shipment truck available + ? valid credit card Output: Effect: David Martin for DAML-S Coalition Y N • failure notification • … 05/08/2003

Composite Process Input & Preconditions • • • Output & Effects Acme. Truck. Shpng Composite Process Input & Preconditions • • • Output & Effects Acme. Truck. Shpng • • • confirmation no. • . . . • • • customer name • location • car type • dates • credit card no. • . . . www. acmecar. com ? book car service • failure notification • … • confirmation no. • . . . • customer name • flight numbers • dates • credit card no. • • . . . www. acmeair. com book flight service ? • confirmation no. • dates • room type • credit card no. • . . . www. acmehotel. com book hotel service • • ? ? • failure notification • … • failure notification • errror information • … David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Atomic Process Example <!– Atomic Process Definition - Get. Desired. Flight. Details --> <rdfs: Atomic Process Example Airport Flight Date David Martin for DAML-S Coalition departure. Airport_In Get. Desired Flight Details outbound. Date_In 05/08/2003

Composite Process Example Composite Process Book. Flight Get Flight Details Get Contact Details Sequence David Martin for DAML-S Coalition Reserve Flight Sequence Confirm Reservation Sequence 05/08/2003

Simple and Composite Processes Acme. Truck. Shpng Expanded. Acme. Truck. Shpng Confirm Shipping Region Simple and Composite Processes Acme. Truck. Shpng Expanded. Acme. Truck. Shpng Confirm Shipping Region N Acme Truck Shipping expands truck available + valid credit card Y Get Quote Service Get Shipping Dates Book Truck Shipment David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Upper Ontology of Services David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 Upper Ontology of Services David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Service Grounding: “How to access it” • Implementation-specific • Message formatting, transport mechanisms, protocols, Service Grounding: “How to access it” • Implementation-specific • Message formatting, transport mechanisms, protocols, serializations of types • Service Model + Grounding give everything needed for using the service • Builds upon WSDL David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

OWL-S / WSDL Grounding • Web Services Description Language – Authored by IBM, Ariba, OWL-S / WSDL Grounding • Web Services Description Language – Authored by IBM, Ariba, Microsoft – Focus of W 3 C Web Services Description WG – Commercial momentum – Specifies message syntax accepted/generated by communication ports – Bindings to popular message/transport standards (SOAP, HTTP, MIME) – Abstract “types”; extensibility elements • Complementary with OWL-S David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

OWL-S / WSDL Grounding OWL-S Process Model Atomic Process Resources/Concepts Inputs / Outputs Message OWL-S / WSDL Grounding OWL-S Process Model Atomic Process Resources/Concepts Inputs / Outputs Message Operation Binding to SOAP, HTTP, etc. WSDL David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

OWL-S / WSDL Grounding (cont’d) David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 OWL-S / WSDL Grounding (cont’d) David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

OWL-S / WSDL Grounding (cont’d) WSDL Document input. X output. Y daml-property owl-s-process Atomic OWL-S / WSDL Grounding (cont’d) WSDL Document input. X output. Y daml-property owl-s-process Atomic Process David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Review: Upper Ontology of Services David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 Review: Upper Ontology of Services David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Path of Evolution Release 0. 5 (May 2001) Initial Profile & Process ontologies Release Path of Evolution Release 0. 5 (May 2001) Initial Profile & Process ontologies Release 0. 6 (December 2001) Refinements to Profile & Process; Resources ontology Release 0. 7 (October 2002) Initial DAML-S/WSDL Grounding; Profile, Process Model refinements; more complete examples Release 0. 9 (May 2003) - just announced DAML-S OWL-S Grounding: greater generality, flexibility Initial work on expressing conditions, security More community support (contributions pages) Towards 1. 0 Expressiveness issues; exceptions, lifecycle; process issues David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Critical Path to 1. 0 • OWL-final • Process Model – Exceptions – Process Critical Path to 1. 0 • OWL-final • Process Model – Exceptions – Process Control Ontology (lifecycle mgmt. ) – Roles, explicit messaging – Surface language? • Grounding – WSDL 1. 2 David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Semantic Web Services Initiative (SWSI) www. swsi. org David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 Semantic Web Services Initiative (SWSI) www. swsi. org David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

SWSI Objectives • Bring together US and European Semantic Web Services researchers • Engage SWSI Objectives • Bring together US and European Semantic Web Services researchers • Engage in collaborative standardization efforts – Semantic Web Services Language • DAML-S as a primary input • More attention to working with industry standards efforts – Semantic Web Services Architecture • Close collaboration with W 3 C directions – Web Service Choreography Working Group – Semantic Web Services Interest Group – Likely outcome is a W 3 C Note David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

SWSI Structure • Advisory Committee – Murray Burke, Hans-Georg Stork, Jim Hendler • Coordinating SWSI Structure • Advisory Committee – Murray Burke, Hans-Georg Stork, Jim Hendler • Coordinating Committee – Co-chairs: Dieter Fensel and Katia Sycara • Industrial Advisory Board – Co-chairs: Michael Uschold and ? ? ? • Language Technical Committee – Co-chairs: David Martin and Michael Kifer • Architecture Technical Committee – Co-chairs: Mark Burstein and Christoph Bussler David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

End of Part II Extra Material Follows David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 End of Part II Extra Material Follows David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

Challenges • Profiles: relationship with processes • Process modeling: many issues – – Variability Challenges • Profiles: relationship with processes • Process modeling: many issues – – Variability of public/private aspects of Processes Extending to offline (sub)processes Generalizing to multiple roles Failure, transactions • Where and how to go beyond OWL? – Interface between DL ontology, logical expressions, algorithm/workflow representation • Connecting with Industry – Showing compelling value – Not promising too much – Providing an incremental path David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003

(Some) Related Work Related Industrial Initiatives • UDDI • eb. XML • WSDL • (Some) Related Work Related Industrial Initiatives • UDDI • eb. XML • WSDL • . Net • XLANG • Biztalk, e-speak, etc These XML-based initiatives are largely complementary to OWL-S aims to build on top of these efforts enabling increased expressiveness, semantics, and inference enabling automation. Related Academic Efforts • Process Algebras (e. g. , Pi Calculus) • Process Specification Language (Hoare Logic, PSL) • Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) • Business Process Modeling (e. g. , BMPL) • Onto. Web Process Modeling Effort David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003