Parliament of the Republic of South Africa Presentation

Parliament of the Republic of South Africa Presentation to the Portfolio Committee for Provincial and Local Government on the Property Rates Bill 30 May 2003

Purpose of this presentation 4 To address questions asked about the purpose of Municipal Property Rates in South Africa and the purpose of this Bill 4 To inform the debate on the basis of valuation and rating 4 To outline the scope of policy issues still to be addressed

Purpose of Municipal Property Rates 4 Questions asked at work shop and during hearings…. 4 “ where did the current notion of property rates come from? ” 4 “ what is the purpose of property rates? ” 4 “what do property rates pay for? ” 4 “what is this Bill about? ”

Property rates in South Africa: origins of current notion 4 Property rates has a long tradition in SA 4 Has traditionally been used as the single most important source of local own- source discretionary revenue 4 However historically only existed in urban WLA s 4 Amalgamation of municipalities -bring former BLA s, R 293 towns etc into prop tax base

Property rates in South Africa origins of current notion. . . 4 Correlation between who paid property rates before and level of infrastructure and public services 4 Rallying points for rent boycotts, non payment of service charges and one city one tax base 4 Result of history both decision -makers and rate payers think of rates as a price paid for specific services

Purpose of property rates in South Africa-significance 4 When compared to revenue (and profits from consumption-based tariff funded services and inter-governmental transfers) still the most NB source of own- source discretionary revenue for local authorities 4 Former WLA s 1/5 of all local revenue (+R 4 bn or 20. 2 % of own source revenue or 19. 7 % of total revenue)

Significance compared 4 Property rates as % of total government tax revenue (comparison done for ‘ 90 s by IMF) 4 SA: 6. 74 % 4 Developing Countries: 3. 30% 4 Industrialized Countries: 5. 54 %

Significance. . . 4 As % of sub-national government revenue (90 s) 4 SA: 11. 44 % 4 Developing Countries: 9. 63 % 4 Industrialized Countries: 12. 99 %

Purpose of property rates… what do rates pay for? 4 “ a means to distribute the cost of general local government activities or community services among rate payers in accordance with their ability to pay, as measured by the (market) value of property” 4 To pay for services that generally provide benefits that accrue broadly across an areaand are not users or sub-groups

What should this Bill aim to achieve? 4 Legitimacy 4 Uniformity 4 Common tax base 4 Common valuation cycle 4 Horizontal and vertical Equity 4 Efficiency 4 Enforceability

What should this Bill aim to achieve? 4 Openness 4 Sound monitoring of standards 4 Simple and transparent appeals processes 4 Relief from extraordinary tax burdens 4 Redistribution amongst individuals 4 Redistribution amongst localities

The debate on the basis of valuation and rating Issues, Options, Arguments and Evidence

Valuation and rating …issues 4 What to value ? 4 What to tax? 4 Who should set the rate and determine the relief? 4 How should this be done ?

What to value i. e. which base should be taxed? 4 Bahl ‘ 98 Long standing debate if property tax base should include improvements 4 Thus far no uniform world wide practice has evolved 4 If there is a trend then it is towards valuing and rating the total value of property 4 However what are the cases put forward?

The case for land only 4 Cost of valuation process is lower 4 Administrative efficiencies are better, updating of property records and data maintenance is easier 4 land value based valuation and rating is seen as a possible incentive for investment as improvements and maintenance of improvements are excluded from taxation

The case for land only. . . 4 Land taxation has a strong relation to the notion of public good 4 Improvements are a matter of private choice 4 Based on an economic theory that the supply of land is essentially fixed (inelastic) 4 Site value rating is said to be neutral to land use 4 Taxes on land discourage speculation

The case for land improvements 4 Total property value is easily understood 4 The concept of willing buyer willing seller is widely 4 4 accepted two thirds of property value lies in improvement in real estate land improvements recognizes wealth in assets and therefore treats all citizens equal land improvement is easy to administer because source data is readily available land improvement valuation does not prevent land only rating

The case for land improvements. . . 4 Valuing land improvements allows greater flexibility in lowering the nominal rate than a tax based only the capital value of land 4 This provides in a politically palatable tax base 4 Valuing land improvement holds promise of optimizing the local tax base

The case for land improvements. . . 4 Record of sales of vacant land in urban areas not as rich as sale of properties at total value 4 Hence sites has to be valued by residual method, ie first determine the bundled property value then deduct the value of the improvements 4 SVR is more subjective than total value

Land versus land improvements (some thoughts) 4 The test of transparency, understandability and acceptability 4 The test of horizontal equity (owners of high value properties on small sites) 4 The test of real local government income and basis for inter-governmental transfers 4 Political palatability

Comparative options The current UK property tax system. . . 4 The amount paid is set by the local authority in accordance with a prescribed formula 4 As example two adults living in a 30 000 pound house (band A) will pay 2/3 as much tax as those living in a band D house (80 000) and those in band H (320 000) twice as much

Comparative options The current UK property tax system? 4 Foundations (Law, Henry : April 2000) - occupiers of commercial properties pay uniform business rate (UBR) based on annual rental value - rate is set annually at national level - total amount collected is distributed to local authorities through complex formula - 50 % of full rate can be levied on vacant properties - agricultural land buildings are exempt from UBR

Comparative options The current UK property tax system. . . 4 Residential properties are subject to Council tax 4 Council tax is based on the selling price at the time of the valuation (currently ‘ 91) 4 Properties are assigned to 8 valuation bands ranging from A - H 4 A under 40 000 pounds H over 320 000 pounds

Comparative options The current UK property tax system. . . 4 Advantages of UBR and Council tax - easy to administer taxes are difficult to evade and avoid ensuring compliance is easy because the taxes are tied to property they can be applied by any LG structure 4 Disadvantages of UBR and Council tax - valuations involve inspection of premises many appeals are generated when valuations are received financial disincentive to improve and develop the tax rewards the owner of vacant and undeveloped land

Disadvantages. . . - valuations are insufficient and infrequent (up and down turns) - exemption of agricultural properties distorts the property market - allocation of all UBR income to local authorities gives rise to high gearing of discretionary local government spending - local authorities have no direct interest in promoting improvements - the tax is regressive in that an undue proportion of the burden is borne by low value properties - the tax is also regressive across local authorities (Westminster with highest concentration of high value properties has lowest rates) - banding avoids valuation of individual properties which leads to fortuitous advantages and disadvantages for those value is close to the step between one band the next - Council tax generates insufficient income

Rating processes Issues and Options

Rating: issues and options 4 Site rating (the base of the tax is land values only) 4 Flat Rating (the base of the tax is land improvements with both taxed at the same rate) 4 Composite rating (the base of the tax is land improvements, they are both taxed but at different rates)

Who must decide - the basis and the rate 4 Section 229 - rate setting a local power or an unfettered local power? 4 Most Govt. 's do not give unlimited powers. (Bahl ‘ 98)

Evidence 4 US - Oates & Schwab ‘ 79/80 Pittsburg SVR, graded or composite rating “played significant role city’s econ resurgence”. 4 Yet no US states to date have authorised site value tax.

Number of local authorities using Site, Flat or Composite Rating 4 Province Site Flat Composite Total Percent 4 Cape 4 89 72 165 44. 5 4 Natal 34 1 32 67 18. 1 4 OFS 10 8 33 51 13. 7 4 Transvaal 78 2 8 88 23. 7 4 Total 126 100 145 371 100. 0 4 Percent 34. 0 27. 0 39. 1 100. 0 Source: CSS (1994)

Shift in Share between Commercial and Residential Properties (1990 Total Value to 1997 Site Value) 70 1990 total value 60 1997 site value 50 40 % 30 20 10 0 Commercial properties Residential properties Source: City of Cape Town, Department of Finance, Rating and Valuation project. Staff compilations

Shift in Share from 1990 Total Value to 1997 Site Value in CBD M O N T H L Y R A T E S (M I L L I O N S) 12 10 1990 total value 8 6 4 1997 site value 2 0 200 400 600 800 NUMBER OF PROPERTIES 1, 000

Shift in Incidence from a Sample of CBD Properties with High Improvement Values to Properties with Lower Values (1990 Total Value to 1997 Site Value) 3 M I L L I O N S 1990 rates 1997 rates 2 1 0 High improvement values Lower values