b93522e191ec508d5bc46fbae1f3179e.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 35
OMB Uniform Guidance Training “Super-Circular” 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
Uniform Guidance Presentation April 28, 2016 A-87 A-122 A-50 A-89 2 CFR 200 A-102 A-110 A-21 A-133 Uniform Guidance is a combined, simplified, version of 8 circulars.
Presentation by Sunny Colombe, Chief Administrative Officer, Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Health Board Date: 04/28/2016 UNIFORM GUIDANCE
Grant Regulations Section 1 Section 2 Speak Clearly: Terminology Section 3 Raising the Bar: Thresholds and Limits Section 4 It Takes a Village: New Family-friendly Policies Section 5 Remedies The 5 W’s: Who, What, Where, When, Why Truth and Consequences: Audit Transparency and
5 Ws Section 1 The 5 W’s : Who, What, Where, When, Why
. Grant Regulations-Who http: //cfo. gov/cofar//
Grant Regulations-What “Super-Circular” 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
Grant Regulations-Where A-133, A-50 Administrative Requirements PART 200 2 CFR Part 215 (A-110) Sub Part A: Definitions ----------------------- A-102/Common Rule, A-89 Sub Part B: General Provisions Sub Part C: Pre-Award Requirements Sub Part D: Post Award Requirements -----------------------Sub Part E: Cost Principles -----------------------Sub Part F: Audit Requirements 2 CFR Part 225, 220, 230 (A-87, A-21, A-122)
Grant Regulations-When December 26 th, 2014 Effective Date: 12/26/14 • • • New Awards Additional Funding Increments Audits for Fiscal Year after December 26 th, 2014 * Existing Awards governed by Terms and conditions-except for Audit change
Grant Regulations-Why Better Outcomes • • Performance Measurements-described in Award Standardize Business Processes Well-Trained Workforce Clearer Funding Opportunities Spending Accountability • • • Target Risk and Add Transparency Standardize Data Collection and Add Analytics Strong Oversight and Increased Audit Resolution Administrative Burden • Minimize Burden on Grantees and Federal Agencies
Speak Clearly Section 2 and “should” Speak Clearly: The difference between “must”
Must vs. Should Must = Requirement Should = Best Practices or recommended approach Which provisions are “Have-to” vs. “Nice to do? ”
Non-Federal Entity and Pass-Though Non-Federal Entity = New all inclusive term A state, local government, Indian tribe, institution of higher education (IHE), or nonprofit organization that carries out a Federal award as a recipient or Subrecipient Pass-through Entity = Non-Federal entity that subawards to a subrecipient
State vs. Tribal Government State = any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any agency or instrumentality thereof exclusive of local governments Definition change only Indian Tribe =tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or -doesn’t affect award relationship community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians New Grant Regulations |
Contractor vs. Vendor Contractor = means an entity that receives a contract. (The term ‘‘contractor’’ includes entities that, in other contexts, may be referred to as ‘‘vendors’’) Contract = means a legal instrument by which a non-Federal entity purchases property or services needed to carry out the project or program under a Federal award. Subaward. Vs. Contract: The type of relationship is more important than what you call the document
Award Federal Award = (1) Federal financial assistance that a non-Federal entity receives directly from a Federal awarding agency or indirectly from a pass-through entity (2) Certain cost-reimbursement contracts under the Federal Acquisition Regulations Does not include other contracts that a Federal agency uses to buy goods or services from a contractor or a contract to operate Federal government owned, contractor operated facilities (GOCOs) Award can mean $$$ or document, depending on context
Raising the Bar Section 3 Raising the Bar: Thresholds and Limits
Indirect Cost Rate New 10% de minimis Indirect Cost Rate • • For non-federal entities that never had a negotiated cost rate in place Can elect to use this rate indefinitely One-time Extension • • One-time extension of existing negotiated cost rate proposal up to 4 years Subject to review and approval from Cognizant Agency
Purchases Purchasing • • Micro-purchase $3000 no competition-if reasonable Fixed Amount Subawards-not to exceed Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $150, 000 (prior written approval) Strengthen Conflict of Interest requirements Purchases of computers under capitalization requirements can be treated as supplies
Internal Controls and Pre-Award Both Federal Agencies and Pass-through Review entities must do risk Internal Controls and Pre-Award Review • • • Establish and maintain effective internal controls Evaluate and monitor compliance Pre-Award framework includes risk assessment Mandatory Conflict of Interest, and Violation of Law Disclosures Agency must describe the merit review process in the Funding Opportunity assessment
New Certifications Certification of Costs ‘‘By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete, and accurate, and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the Federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims or otherwise” • • Signed by Official who can legally bind organization Penalties under False Claims Act
Single Audit Threshold • • • Raised to $750, 000 Still covers 99% of Federal $$$ Awarded Relieved burden for 5000 organizations
It Takes a Village Section 4 It Takes a Village: Family-friendly Policies
Promote Women in the Sciences Promote Women in Science and Technology • • • Support Family Friendly Policies Balance Work and Family Responsibilities Targeted Travel and Conference Costs
Conferences Conference Spending • • • Cost of determining locally-available child-care resources are Allowable But not the cost of the actual child-care Focus still on limiting excessive conference and meeting spending
Travel Costs • • Temporary dependent care costs that result directly from travel to conferences and meet specified standards are Allowable Must be a direct result of travel for the Award Temporary and consistent with Travel Policy Doesn’t Include costs of travel
Fringe Benefits • • • Can include Family-friendly Policies Consistently applied Better allow employees to balance their personal responsibilities while maintaining successful careers contributing to Federal awards
Family-related Leave Family Related Leave • • • Explicitly allows Family-related Leave Policies Consistently applied Provided under established written leave policies
Truth and Consequences Section 5 Remedies Truth and Consequences: Audit Transparency and
Making Internal Controls More Visible Internal Controls • • Moves from A-133 Audit Requirements to earlier in Grant Lifecycle Now in Administrative Requirements Must provide reasonable assurance Focus area
Personally Protected Identifiable Information Personally Identifiable Information (PPII) • • • Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and sensitive information More and more information will be captured in various databases Must sign statement that reports don’t include PPII and authorize publishing reports on the internet
Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) Federal Audit Clearinghouse • • Centralize Audit Reports and findings For both recipients and sub-recipients Reduce duplication of reports-no separate copy to pass-through entity Some exceptions for Indian Tribes
Analytics to Reduce Repeat Offenders Analytics • • Identify and reduce repeat findings Use Cooperative Audit Resolution practices Increased Threshold for likely questioned costs from 10 K to 25 K New tools for agencies to track resolution
Q & A and Wrap-up UNIFORM GUIDANCE
Questions?
b93522e191ec508d5bc46fbae1f3179e.ppt