Old Spanish Village CLUP Map Amendment Zoning Code

Old Spanish Village CLUP Map Amendment, Zoning Code Text Amendment, Change in Zoning, PAD Mixed Use Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Request Page 1 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Overview of presentation § § § 2 Requested applications As-of-right vs. proposed project Basis for recommendation Alternative recommendation (mitigation conditions) Findings of fact Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Requested applications The request is for one development proposal which includes six separate applications (pgs. 1 -2): 1. Amend CLUP map to designate property for commercial use to allow for proposed commercial mixed-use development. 2. Amend Zoning Code text to expand existing MXD 1 boundary one block south to Malaga Avenue. 3. Amend Zoning Map to designate property with commercial zoning to be consistent with proposed commercial land use designation. 3 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Requested applications (cont. ) 4. PAD mixed-use site plan review for a proposed project consisting of multi-family and townhouse residential units and commercial retail and office uses. 5. Proposed street and alley vacations and dedications required to allow proposed reconfiguration of on-site circulation. 6. Special location site plan review for the award of Mediterranean design bonuses. 4 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

1. CLUP map amendments 5 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

2. Zoning Code text amendment Sec. 3 -5(b), “Mixed-Use District 1” “ 1. Location eligibility. All properties zoned for C-Use and located within the following described geographic area shall be eligible to use the standards set forth herein for Mixed-use District No. 1. a. The area bounded by Southwest Eighth Street to the north, Palermo Malaga Avenue to the south, Douglas Road to the east and Le. Jeune road to the west. (3326)” 6 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

3. Change in zoning 7 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

4. PAD mixed-use site plan review (Attachment E, pg. 10) 8 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

5. Street and alley vacations and dedications (Attachment E, pg. 16) 9 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

6. Special location site plan review 10 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

“As-of-right” vs. proposed project pgs. 10 -12 11 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

3 -d Model 12 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Basis of recommendation • Staff recommends denial of the 6 applications. • While the applications meet many City objectives, Staff cannot support due to inconsistencies, incompatibilities, and insufficiencies. • Recommendation of denial based on professional planning practices and principles, and application’s ability to meet CLUP Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs), 2002 Charrette Report, Zoning Code, and Staff’s findings of fact. 13 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Basis of recommendation (cont. ) Inconsistent CLUP GOPs (pg. 3) 1. § 8 inconsistent objectives/policies (pgs. 19 -20). • § Incompatible uses, buffering, infrastructure, traffic, parking, landscaping… Remaining SF home not a part of application and results in inconsistency/incompatibility between proposed land uses. Incompatible zoning w/ existing SF residence 2. § Remaining SF home not a part of application and results in inconsistency/incompatibility between proposed zoning designations • • § 14 (pg. 3) Incompatible with fundamental planning principle of transitioning between uses. Would result in “spot zoning” of SF home. Staff met with applicant and SF homeowner to address the issue, but no resolution was achieved. Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Remaining SF home 15 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06

Remaining SF home 16 Planning Department PZB, 06. 14. 06