a7268808d837625e6e07e21cf0149a97.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 18
OCLC Online Computer Library Center NAST Report Attributes ALA Midwinter 2007 Meeting January 21, 2007 David Millikin Product Manager, Library Logistics OCLC david_millikin@oclc. org
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Report Attributes – Agenda § Objectives § Methodology § Discussion Group Findings § Storage Facilities Overview § Report Attributes Desired § Attributes Needing Further Discussion § “Nice to Have’s” § Alternative Report Uses § Next Steps
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Objectives § Test usefulness of a report with potential users § Shared database of collections in storage § Offer tools and reports for comparing stored collections across institutions / groups § Libraries could use this information to inform their collection development decision § Determine attributes desired on report
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Methodology § Two Discussion Groups § Current storage issues § Usefulness of report concept § Specific report attributes desired § Review Results § NAST report team § OCLC Collection Analysis, Market & Data Analysis § This advisory group
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Methodology – Discussion Groups § First Group: Members of libraries who are very familiar with discussions § University of California § California Digital Library § Library of Congress § The Ohio State University § Vanderbilt University § Washington Research Library Consortium
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Methodology – Discussion Groups § Second Group: Members of libraries who have not participated in discussions § Boston College § University of Guelph § Purdue University § University of Texas at Austin § University of Washington
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Methodology – Review Results § NAST report team § Melissa Trevvett, Paul Gherman, Constance Malpas, Glenda Lammers § Ensure progress & preview findings § OCLC Collection Analysis, Market & Data Analysis § Glenda Lammers, Rob Ross, Janet Hawk, Joanne Cantrell § Review discussion group findings § Confirm attributes identified are detailed enough to take action
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Methodology – Review Results § This advisory group § Review report attributes § Discuss questionable attributes § Confirm next steps
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Facilities § Common Findings § All institutions interviewed have stored collections § All institutions circulate stored collections § Exceptions: Photos, Special, Rare Collections § Storage facilities are nearing capacity § Most have plans for increase of storage capacity § Storage initially filled without consistency in selecting items for storage
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Facilities § Disparate Findings § Facility Layout / Design § Environmental Conditions of Facilities § Weeding Practices of Facilities § Methods of Addressing Space Limitations
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Report § Institutions employ various techniques to make weeding / collection decisions § Benchmarking § Circulation Statistics § Item Age, Condition § Availability as e-Content (e-Journals; e-Books less frequent) § Preservation Goals § Report would be useful that draws from other institutions’ collection data for weeding and/or collection decision-making
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Report § Report Attributes Desired § Physical Location / Ownership of Stored Items § Age of Stored Items § Item is in a Special Collection § Condition of Storage Facilities § Physical Condition of Stored Items § Number of Stored Items § Ability to Export Report to Spreadsheet
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Report § Report Attributes Desired (Policies) § Knowledge of: § Institutions that don’t weed § Formalized lending, weeding & retention policies § Preservation policies § Last-copy policies § Circulation Availability: § Circulation policies (Does the item circulate? ) § Lending policies (How quickly will I receive item I requested; how long will I have the item? )
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Report § Report attributes needing further discussion 1. Number of Copies per Institution 2. Physical Location of Copies within an Institution § Second Group felt distinction that an item is in Storage versus regular circulating collection is not needed § If it exists within partner’s circulation, assume accessibility to the item 3. Knowledge of Circulation Frequency (low-circulating items)
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Report § Report “Nice to Have’s” § Knowledge of other institutions’ collection interests § Geographic proximity of other institution § Flag when an item exists in few institutions (rarity) § Scheduled reporting § Consortium-centric reports § Ensure copy preservation within a consortium § Consortial lending agreements § Extra-consortial reports § Preferred partners registry to inform reports
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Discussion Group Findings – Report § Alternative Report Uses § Retention & preservation decisions § Collection development (possibly via integration with ILL policies registry) § Inform other institutions about holdings to increase usage of stored collections
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Next Steps § Confirm questionable report attributes § Identify preliminary steps / groundwork of data / databases needed
OCLC Online Computer Library Center THANK YOU!
a7268808d837625e6e07e21cf0149a97.ppt