Nuclear weapons Victoriya Shepeleva The Ministry of

Nuclear weapons Victoriya Shepeleva

The Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kazakh Ablai khan University of International Relations and World Languages Faculty of the Second Higher and Further Education Department of Language and Professional Training Study Programme 5 B 020700 – Translation Studies Subject: Oral translation of social-and-political and religious texts Subject code: UPT 4305 PROJECT WORK Theme: Nuclear weapons Module 1 March 2013 Compiled by: Victoriya Shepeleva Group 207 Superviser: N. A. Aubakir Almaty 2013

Introduction An all-out nuclear war between Russia and the United States would be the worst catastrophe in history, a tragedy so huge it is difficult to comprehend. Even so, it would be far from the end of human life on earth. The dangers from nuclear weapons have been distorted and exaggerated, for varied reasons. These exaggerations have become demoralizing myths

Why is a nuclear weapon more dangerous than any other weapon? A nuclear weapon can be considered more dangerous than another weapon in several ways. The blast radius of a hydrogen bomb is much more than that of a nuclear fission device used at the end of World War II. The blasts in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were known to vaporize humans and melt the buildings of the cities. Pools of steel were all that remained. No humans. The long term effects of the weapon, also known as "fallout" can devastate the land. In other words, it mutates the people, the crops, the animals, and in general, it would be unwise to venture into these contaminated lands for, say 60 years, give or take a decade. Of course, the nuclear weapons used on Japan released only 7% of the power of the mass. In theory, anti-matter releases 100% of its mass energy when it comes into contact with any other matter. However, CERN, the leading authority on anti-matter production, would take roughly one billion years to produce enough anti-matter to match the energy levels of a Hiroshima-sized blast.

Relevance of the topic In a cataclysmic strike, resulting in the destruction of present life forms on the planet, these weapons would also obliterate the past and future, destroying both human memory and possibility. They would obliterate every sacred part of being, leaving vast ruin and emptiness where once life, love, friendship, decency, hope and beauty had existed. Goal know more about nuclear weapons policy

Which countries have nuclear weapons

Script 0: 00 Now we are told 0: 01 that Iran isn't enormous danger to this country. They might be developing nuclear 0: 06 weapons in fact one of the american press this crime. 0: 11 Iran is changing its game plan. Iran could now be more willing to attack the USA 0: 15 at home and abroad. Iran may be more ready even ever 0: 18 to launch terrorist acts inside the United States 0: 22 There's a good chance that this Persian gulf region 0: 25 could explore within a matter of months 0: 29 USA officials warn however that the runs massive stockpile of ballistic 0: 32 missiles 0: 33 as the more serious weapons. 0: 35 Iran 0: 36 will cable producing enough highly enriched uranium for weapons. 0: 40 How alarming is this report from mister clapper. 0: 43 Is alarming because this is the newest that facing the USA 0: 48 That flight 0: 00 Теперь нам говорят, 0: 01, что Иран не несет огромную опасность этой стране. Они могут разрабатывать ядерное 0: 06 оружие на самом деле. Из американской прессы об этом происшествии 0: 11 Иран меняет свой план игры. Иран сейчас более склонен атаковать США 0: 15 у себя и за рубежом. Иран может быть более чем готов 0: 18 для совершения террористических актов в Соединенных Штатах 0: 22 Существует неплохая возможность, что этот регион Персидского залива 0: 25 могли бы изучить в течение нескольких месяцев 0: 29 Чиновники США предупреждают, однако, что происходит массовый запас баллистических 0: 32 ракет 0: 33 как более серьезного оружия. 0: 35 Иран 0: 36 будет производить достаточное количество высокообогащенного ураном кабеля для производства оружия. 0: 40 На сколько это тревожный звонок из данного доклада. 0: 43 Вызывает тревогу и то, что это впервые перед США 0: 48 Этот полет

Script 0: 49 would be the world's first line of defense. 0: 51 They're prepared to take on just about anything Iran through that them 0: 56 Well you can't beat the USA media for propaganda. 0: 59 If you watch that day in and day out, you think: Oh my God! Around of nuclear weapons 1: 04 This such dangerous!. . . 1: 12 There's a problem we have facts on the show we present to you 1: 15 and it's a real big problem, if you try to k new propaganda, because look the same to 1: 19 look at the world map. Who actually has nuclear weapons. 1: 23 Well know that Russia is a town ten thousand USA as uh. . . eight thousand 1: 27 five hundred 1: 28 desert. Let's look at the countries in the middle east. 1: 30 Only later that Israel appears to have a 0: 49 будет первой в мире линией обороны. 0: 51 Они готовы взять на себя все, что угодно, что Иран их 0: 56 Вы не можете побороться со СМИ США в пропаганде. 0: 59 Если вы смотрите это изо дня в день, то вы думаете: Боже мой! Вокруг ядерное оружие… 1: 04 Это так опасно!. . . 1: 12 Есть проблема, у нас есть факты демонстрирующие вам это 1: 15 и это действительно большая проблема, если вы пытаетесь узнать о пропаганде, потому что выглядит это так, 1: 19 посмотрев на карту мира. Кто на самом деле имеет ядерное оружие 1: 23 Хорошо известно, что Россия как город десять тысяч США, как э. . . восемь тысяч 1: 27 пятьсот 1: 28 пустынь. Давайте посмотрим на страны Ближнего Востока 1: 30 только позже, что Израиль, похоже,

Script 1: 33 that's a lot of nuclear weapons. 1: 35 China of course, France, the UK, et cetera, India, Pakistan and they've got a 1: 39 lot of nukes there. 1: 41 Wonder what's missing. 1: 42 Now let's take a look at the second. All that's right. 1: 45 Iraq. Their dispute - zero 1: 48 It doesn't have any news. 1: 50 But yet when you look at the USA media 1: 53 they're saying 1: 54 out of all those countries, 1: 56 which was a nuclear problem 1: 58 Iran is 2: 00 not the countries with the nuclear weapons there not a problem at all 1: 33 имеет очень много ядерного оружия 1: 35 Китай, конечно, Франция, Объединенное Королевство, и т. д. Индия Пакистан и у них есть 1: 39 много ядерного оружия. 1: 41 Удивительно, чего не хватает. 1: 42 Теперь давайте взглянем на второе. Всё верно. 1: 45 Ирак. Их спор – ноль. 1: 48 Об этом нет никаких новостей. 1: 50 но все же, когда вы смотрите СМИ США, 1: 53 они говорят, 1: 54 из всех тех стран, 1: 56 которые были ядерной проблемой 1: 58 Иран, 2: 00 страна с ядерным оружием там не проблема вообще.

Problems which appeared during the translation Specific sounds of the speaker’s speech. The difficulties with memory. You have to listen twice or more because you have to understand each word in speech to provide proper translation. The positive moment during translation was the intonation of speakers.

Conclusion Nuclear weapons continue to present a real and present danger to humanity and other life on Earth. Basing the security of one’s country on the threat to kill tens of millions of innocent people, perhaps billions, and risking the destruction of civilization, has no moral justification and deserves the strongest condemnation. It will not be possible to prevent proliferation of nuclear weapons without fulfilling existing legal obligations for total nuclear disarmament. Preventing nuclear proliferation and achieving nuclear disarmament will both be made far more difficult, if not impossible, by expanding nuclear energy facilities throughout the world. Putting the world on track for eliminating the existential threat posed by nuclear weapons will require new ways of thinking about this overarching danger to present and future generations.

Thank you for your attention!