Скачать презентацию NOAO Gemini Science Center NGSC Taft Armandroff for Скачать презентацию NOAO Gemini Science Center NGSC Taft Armandroff for

ca37bd9e28731e388750078586614294.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 19

NOAO Gemini Science Center (NGSC) Taft Armandroff for NOAO Users’ Committee October 2003 NOAO Gemini Science Center (NGSC) Taft Armandroff for NOAO Users’ Committee October 2003

Overview of NGSC Activities • NGSC User & Observing Proposal Support • NGSC Operations Overview of NGSC Activities • NGSC User & Observing Proposal Support • NGSC Operations Support • NGSC Outreach to U. S. Astronomical Community • NGSC Instrumentation Activities • “Aspen” Next-Generation Gemini Instrumentation Process

NGSC User Support • Call for U. S. Gemini proposals & their evaluation – NGSC User Support • Call for U. S. Gemini proposals & their evaluation – Community education • • NOAO Newsletter, NGSC section U. S. Gemini Web information AAS Meetings Power. Point presentations at U. S. universities – Proposal technical review – Support TAC evaluation – Transmit ranked list to Gemini; interface via ITAC • Support of U. S. Gemini proposers & users – Help. Desk, e-mail & phone contact – Support & checking of U. S. Phase II submissions • 2003 B: GMOS, NIRI, & Phoenix (44 U. S. ) • Provide reduction packages for Gemini data – Collaboration with NOAO Data Products Program and Gemini

2003 B U. S. Gemini Requests • 107 proposals • Gemini North: 107. 8 2003 B U. S. Gemini Requests • 107 proposals • Gemini North: 107. 8 nights in 60 proposals – GMOS-N: 49. 3 nights in 28 proposals – NIRI: 38. 0 nights in 21 proposals – Michelle: 20. 5 nights in 13 proposals • Gemini South: 106. 9 nights in 52 proposals – – T-Re. CS: 32. 1 nights in 18 proposals GMOS-S: 41. 9 nights in 17 proposals Phoenix: 30. 4 nights in 15 proposals Acq. Cam: 2. 5 nights in 2 proposals • Oversubscription: 2. 6 at GEM-N, 2. 7 at GEM-S • Oversubscription systematically underestimated due to non-inclusion of weather & technical losses

2004 A U. S. Gemini Requests • 133 proposals • Gemini North: 175. 2 2004 A U. S. Gemini Requests • 133 proposals • Gemini North: 175. 2 nights in 77 proposals – GMOS-N: 112. 7 nights in 50 proposals – NIRI: 62. 5 nights in 29 proposals – 10 of NIRI proposals included ALTAIR • Gemini South: 123. 4 nights in 59 proposals – – T-Re. CS: 60. 8 nights in 25 proposals Phoenix: 46. 1 nights in 23 proposals GMOS-S: 16. 5 nights in 12 proposals Acq. Cam: no requests • Oversubscription: 3. 0 at GEM-N, 2. 5 at GEM-S

NGSC Operations Support • Phoenix high-resolution IR spectrograph: service observing on Gemini South – NGSC Operations Support • Phoenix high-resolution IR spectrograph: service observing on Gemini South – 50 science nights scheduled in 2003 A – Hinkle, Blum, van der Bliek, & Ridgway support • NGSC Staff involvement in Commissioning & System Verification for new Gemini instruments – GMOS South: M. Bergmann, C. Smith – T-Re. CS: 2 System Verification programs of NGSC Staff – Many NGSC Staff proposing for ALTAIR + NIRI SV, MICHELLE imaging SV, GMOS-South IFU SV • Develop arrangement to help support Hokupa’a-85 + Abu Adaptive Optics Imager on Gemini South • Develop a remote operations capability in Tucson (GROC) & La Serena using high-speed video and computer links to Cerro Pachón and Mauna Kea

Community Outreach • Host special-topic science & analysis workshops – Future NGSC workshop ideas: Community Outreach • Host special-topic science & analysis workshops – Future NGSC workshop ideas: • • mid-IR observing opportunities at Gemini Integral Field Unit (IFU) opportunities at Gemini Using IRAF to reduce your Gemini data GNIRS observing & calibration • NGSC at AAS meetings: booth at Seattle AAS (posters, brochures & Observing Tool demonstr. ) – do same at Atlanta AAS (January 2004) • • • NGSC presentations at U. S. institutions NGSC Webcast on Gemini 2004 A Proposals Postdoc program (2 general; 3 South American) Gemini Science Meeting in 2004 (NGSC Support) U. S. Gemini SAC is NGSC’s community-based advisory council

NGSC Instrumentation Activities • Mission – instrument procurement in U. S. for Gemini telescopes NGSC Instrumentation Activities • Mission – instrument procurement in U. S. for Gemini telescopes – analogous function in other partner countries • Activities – NGSC let all the current U. S. instrument contracts – provide advice & liaison to the instrument teams – carry out management oversight • Co. DR, PDR, CDR, acceptance testing • Quarterly Reviews • release of payments only when specified milestone met – report progress to International Gemini; coordinate communications between the instrument team & Gemini

U. S. Instrument Developments • T-Re. CS: mid-infrared imager and spectrograph for Gemini South U. S. Instrument Developments • T-Re. CS: mid-infrared imager and spectrograph for Gemini South (Florida) – Delivered to Gemini South 12 April 2003 – Followed by integration, acceptance testing, & commissioning – First light took place 2 June 2003 – TAC-approved science programs beginning execution! • GNIRS: workhorse infrared long-slit / IFU spectrograph for Gemini South (NOAO) – Pre-shipment acceptance test completed 15 October 2003 – GNIRS shipment to Gemini South imminent – Mounting GNIRS on Gemini South planned for December 2003 – GNIRS first light planned for January 2004

U. S. Instrument Developments • NICI: dual-beam coronagraphic infrared imager for Gemini South (MKIR) U. S. Instrument Developments • NICI: dual-beam coronagraphic infrared imager for Gemini South (MKIR) – NASA funded – Procurement / fabrication phase ending; integration phase beginning – December 2004 delivery planned • Flamingos-2: multi-object IR spectrograph and imager (Florida) – Management Review in late January 2003 – NGSC assisting Florida personnel in project management techniques (Gaughan & Eklund) – Flamingos-2 contract approved and signed in early May – Critical Design Review took place in August – December 2005 delivery planned

US Next-Gen Gemini Sci/Inst Planning • Workshop: May 29 -31; Tempe, Arizona • Goal: US Next-Gen Gemini Sci/Inst Planning • Workshop: May 29 -31; Tempe, Arizona • Goal: Key Gemini Science Programs for 2008 -2010 Realm – High-impact science questions / projects – What observations are needed to answer the science question? • 40 participants; diverse in science interests & institutional affiliation (includes most of the U. S. Aspen delegates) • E-mail & telecon preparatory discussions • Four Science Breakout Groups – Stars, the Solar System, and Extra-Solar Planets (leader: J. Valenti) – Star Formation Processes and the ISM (leader: M. Meyer) – Structure and Evolution of the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies (leader: R. Wyse) – Formation and Evolution of Distant Galaxies and the High-Redshift Universe (leader: K. Glazebrook) • Written report on Tempe conclusions on Web • Two briefings/discussions on Tempe results for U. S. Aspen delegates; firm up U. S. consensus

Tempe Over-Arching Questions • Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems • Formation of Stars Tempe Over-Arching Questions • Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems • Formation of Stars & Brown Dwarfs over the Mass Spectrum • Origin of the Elements • Origin of the Hubble Sequence • Dark Matter and the Formation of Galaxies from Substructure • Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound • Reionization History of Universe • Feedback from Stars & AGN on Galactic Evolution

Aspen International Gemini Next. Generation Instrumentation Meeting • • June 27 -28, 2003; Aspen, Aspen International Gemini Next. Generation Instrumentation Meeting • • June 27 -28, 2003; Aspen, CO Half of delegates from U. S. Half of science group chairs from U. S. Written report on science questions and instrumental requirements • National Gemini Offices (NGSC) then estimated ROM costs for each instrument concept • “Aspen” report submitted to Gemini Science Committee for its October 13 -14 meeting • To be considered by Gemini Board at its November meeting

“Aspen” Instrument Summary “Aspen” Instrument Summary

Open NGSC/Gemini Issues • Are the science needs of U. S. community at large Open NGSC/Gemini Issues • Are the science needs of U. S. community at large aperture being met by Gemini? Any issues impeding user science? • Do the “Aspen” instruments represent a bright scientific future for Gemini? • What are the near-term priorities for commissioning Gemini instruments? • What data reduction software is most needed for U. S. Gemini users? • Is there demand for both Queue and Classical observing with Gemini by our community? • The U. S. Gemini SAC has discussed all these questions.

Begin Reserve Slides May be of use for specific committee questions Begin Reserve Slides May be of use for specific committee questions

Recent U. S. Gemini Papers • “Detection of Nine M 8. 0 -L 0. Recent U. S. Gemini Papers • “Detection of Nine M 8. 0 -L 0. 5 Binaries: The Very Low Mass Binary Population and Its Implications for Brown Dwarf and Very Low Mass Star Formation, ” Close et al. , Ap. J, 2003 • “Resolved Mid-Infrared Emission in the Narrow. Line Region of NGC 4151, ” Radomski et al. , Ap. J, 2003 • “Mid-Infrared Imaging of the Protostellar Binary L 1448 N IRS 3(A, B), ” Ciardi et al. , Ap. J, 2003 • “Fluorine Abundances in the Large Magellanic Cloud and Omega Centauri: Evidence for Neutrino Nucleosynthesis? , ” Cunha et al. , AJ, 2003