Скачать презентацию NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems UAS Program Gary Wick Скачать презентацию NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems UAS Program Gary Wick

8e1e6c95692e709fd1cd954a36187ff7.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 19

NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program Gary Wick, Pacific Testbed Co-lead Robbie Hood, Program NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program Gary Wick, Pacific Testbed Co-lead Robbie Hood, Program Director Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Earth System Research Laboratory 17 June 2009

Outline • • Background/Organization Missions NASA Global Hawk Potential wind lidar applications Outline • • Background/Organization Missions NASA Global Hawk Potential wind lidar applications

Overview The NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program is evaluating the feasibility of UAS Overview The NOAA Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Program is evaluating the feasibility of UAS platforms to meet the NOAA Mission’s goals in o Climate o Weather and Water o Ecosystems o Commerce and Transportation The evaluation will be based on NOAA observational requirements, technology readiness assessments, UAS science demonstrations and Analysis of Alternatives for potential UAS acquisitions

Why UAS? • Fulfill a key gap in the existing observing system • Hazardous Why UAS? • Fulfill a key gap in the existing observing system • Hazardous conditions • Remote areas • Long endurance • Stealthy performance

Limitations • Airspace access – Flights in US airspace require a Certificate of Authorization Limitations • Airspace access – Flights in US airspace require a Certificate of Authorization (COA) from the FAA – Primary limitation is “see and avoid” – Many current demonstrations in military or foreign airspace • Affordability

General Program Plan • Phase I (FY 08 -10) : Test and evaluate possible General Program Plan • Phase I (FY 08 -10) : Test and evaluate possible applications o Evaluate UAS platforms o Conduct Analysis of Alternatives for platforms and concept of operations o Submit “go/no go” UAS acquisition recommendation to NOAA management by FY 10 • If a “go” recommendation is accepted: • Phase II (FY 11 -13) : Acquire and operate a first set of major UAS • Phase III (FY 14 and beyond) : Expand to global coverage NOAA UAS Conference - 19 May 2009 6

Personnel • Matrix team comprised of ~15 team members represented by OAR, OMAO, NOS, Personnel • Matrix team comprised of ~15 team members represented by OAR, OMAO, NOS, NWS, and NMFS • Total staffing budget is ~6 FTE funded by the UAS Program • OMAO contributes 1 FTE • NOS, NWS, NMFS contribute. 25 FTE each • Testbeds are co-led by research and operational scientists NOAA UAS Conference - 19 May 2009 7

The Aircraft The Aircraft

Science Activities • Arctic Testbed – Greenland ice mapping – Ice seal observations • Science Activities • Arctic Testbed – Greenland ice mapping – Ice seal observations • Gulf / Atlantic Testbed – Hurricane Noel flight • Pacific Testbed – Air-sea fluxes and atmospheric rivers – Fishery surveillance • Observing System Simulation Experiments

First 7 Mission Concepts • • An operational UAS mission concept to monitor Arctic First 7 Mission Concepts • • An operational UAS mission concept to monitor Arctic ice seals for the NMFS using low altitude UAS platforms launched from a NOAA ship An research UAS mission concept to study climate change issues such as atmospheric composition and Arctic sea ice and ecosystems A research UAS mission concept to study air-sea interactions in the boundary layer of hurricanes using low altitude UAS platforms A research/operational UAS mission concept to evaluate high altitude UAS platforms and sensors for monitoring hurricane intensity and structure changes A research UAS mission concept to evaluate low and high altitude platforms and sensors to improve our understanding of atmospheric rivers of water vapor over the Pacific ocean which impact rainfall and flooding predictions on the USA West Coast An operational UAS mission concept to evaluate low altitude platforms launched from NOAA ships to monitoring of national marine monuments for NOS An research UAS mission concept to evaluate UAS platforms to provide realtime information needed for improved understanding and prediction of fire weather. This activity is being funded by Economic Stimulus Funding provided to NIST.

Global Hawk UAS Global Hawk. UAS Two Global Hawk UAS platforms have been acquired Global Hawk UAS Global Hawk. UAS Two Global Hawk UAS platforms have been acquired by NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, CA (AV-6 & AV-1). • Fully autonomous • Wingspan 116 ft • 210 - 335 KTAS • 1500 - 2000 lb payload, 10 k. VA payload power • Performance: Alt 65, 000 ft, Range 11, 000 nm, Endurance 31 hrs • First flight later this month • First science mission (Glo. Pac) later this year Zones are pressurized spaces Zones are unpressurized

Dropsonde Development • • Form a collaborative partnership between NOAA, NCAR, NASA to build Dropsonde Development • • Form a collaborative partnership between NOAA, NCAR, NASA to build and integrate an automated dropsonde system on the Global Hawk UAS Rely on NCAR/EOL’s long experience with dropsonde development and launching for new system Use the new MIST sonde: smaller and lighter than current dropsondes Target a 100 -sonde/8 channel system for optimal performance on 30+ hr flights Preliminary MIST Sonde Specifications • • • Mass: 175 g Length: 30. 5 cm Diameter: 4. 7 cm Fall speed: 11 m/s at sea surface Measures pressure, temperature, humidity @ 2 Hz rate Measures Winds @ 4 Hz rate

Missions of Interest • NASA Hurricane Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) Mission – Missions of Interest • NASA Hurricane Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) Mission – Fall 2010 • Atmospheric Rivers – 2011 -2012 – Eastern Pacific

Zhu & Newell (1998) concluded in a 3 -year ECMWF model diagnostic study: 1) Zhu & Newell (1998) concluded in a 3 -year ECMWF model diagnostic study: 1) 95% of meridional water vapor flux occurs in narrow plumes in <10% of zonal circumference. 2) There are typically 3 -5 of these narrow plumes within a hemisphere at any one moment. 3) They coined the term “atmospheric river” (AR) to reflect the narrow character of plumes. Given the above: ARs are very important from a global water cycle perspective.

Observational studies by Ralph et al. (2004, 2005, 2006) extend model results: 1) 2) Observational studies by Ralph et al. (2004, 2005, 2006) extend model results: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Long, narrow plumes of IWV >2 cm measured by SSM/I satellites considered proxies for ARs. These plumes are typically situated near the leading edge of polar cold fronts. P-3 aircraft documented strong water vapor flux in a narrow (400 km-wide) AR (along AA’). Airborne data also showed 75% of the vapor flux was below 2. 5 km MSL. Moist-neutral stratification <2. 8 km MSL, conducive to orographic precip. boost & floods. Atmos. river 400 km

2 Jan 02 am; SSM/I IWV (cm) Global Hawk Atmospheric River/Tropical Tap Flight Plan 2 Jan 02 am; SSM/I IWV (cm) Global Hawk Atmospheric River/Tropical Tap Flight Plan EDW J DINTY I K F H A E G D B C IWV (cm) Distance (DINTY-DINTY): - ~7600 nmi or ~14, 000 km Assumed Speed: - 335 knots or 172. 4 m/s Flight Duration: - EDW-DINTY RT: ~4. 5 hours - DINTY-DINTY: ~22. 7 hours Sampling Legs - A-B: 1460 km - B-C: 1000 km - C-D: 700 km - D-E: 1000 km - F-G: 1000 km - H-I: 1000 km - J-K: 1000 km Dropsonde spacing: 100 km 75 total dropsondes

Global Hawk Flight plan (detailed): Dates: ? Number of flights: ? Cruising Alt: ~18 Global Hawk Flight plan (detailed): Dates: ? Number of flights: ? Cruising Alt: ~18 km Cruising speed : ~175 m/s Max. duration/range: 30 h/18900 km Actual duration/range: -~4. 5 h EDW-Dinty RT, plus -~20. 6 h flight (~12984 km) 16 Feb 04 pm; SSM/I IWV (cm) P 3 inset box es 2 50 km d si e ls r to o co C t n fro D B G E 0 50 c c se or km MRY t P-3 flight track er rivr. os cto m at se H F J I EDW Dinty ry /d r rm to wa sec L 35 GH dropsondes K 35 GH drops A 100 km IWV (cm) A-B: 1250 km B-C: 250 km C-D: 250 km D-E: 250 km E-F: 250 km F-G: 250 km G-D: 250 km D-E: 250 km E-G: 355 km G-H: 250 km H-I: 250 km I-F: 250 km F-H: 335 km H-J: 250 km J-K: 250 km J-I: 250 km I-L: 560 km complete multi-box 5730 km times 2 + 1022 km + 422 km + 80 km Instrumentation Dropsondes (70 total) channels: 8 descent time: 30 min resolution: 80 km (min >40 km)

Contact Information NOAA UAS Web Site http: //UAS. noaa. gov Gary Wick, Gary. A. Contact Information NOAA UAS Web Site http: //UAS. noaa. gov Gary Wick, Gary. A. Wick@noaa. gov Robbie Hood NOAA UAS Program Director Robbie. Hood@noaa. gov 303 -497 -3008 (office) / 303 -905 -3411 (cell) 18

Atmospheric Rivers • What are Atmospheric Rivers? – Narrow plumes of enhanced water vapor Atmospheric Rivers • What are Atmospheric Rivers? – Narrow plumes of enhanced water vapor flux – Responsible for 95% of the meridional flux in less than 10% of the circumference • Why we care – The storms of greatest concern along the west coast – All 7 major floods of Russian River since 1997 have been fed by atmospheric rivers – Responsible for as much as 50% of the water supply in the Sierra Nevada Atmospheric river White River in Oregon, 7 November 2006 Photo courtesy of Doug Jones