06b660804cfa4a5c4b36a99a2ad3462e.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 66
MR Venography Ivan Pedrosa, M. D. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston, MA
Why MR Imaging? • Conventional venography – – – Multiple injections I. V. access in affected edematous extremity Radiation / iodinated contrast • US – Limited in central veins – Limited FOV and anatomic landmarks
Why MR Imaging? • CT – Radiation – Iodinated contrast – Pitfalls due to poor opacification / mixing artifacts • Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) – Increased indications for non-contrast MRV
MRV • Techniques – Dark Blood Imaging – Bright Blood Imaging – Gd-enhanced MRV • Clinical Applications – Chest – Abdomen – Pelvis
MRV techniques Non-contrast MRV Dark blood Sequences Bright blood Sequences Double IR Spin echo Double IR SSFSE Dynamic SSFSE TOF GRE (Cine) FIESTA (Cine) Phase Contrast Gd-enhanced MRV 3 D FS T 1 -W GRE (VIBE, LAVA, THRIVE)
Spin Echo (“dark blood”) 180º 90º
HAlf-Fourier Single shot Turbo Spin Echo (HASTE or SSFSE) K space 180º 90º • One second to collect the whole image • Dark blood • Protons exit slice • Slow flow - ↑↑ SI • Thrombus - ↓↑ SI SSFSE/HASTE
Dynamic HASTE • Intravascular signal void • Valsalva – intrathoracic P – Venous return • T 2 of blood is long VALSALVA
Dynamic HASTE • Valsalva – intrathoracic P – Venous return • T 2 of blood is long VALSALVA
DB HASTE (“dark blood”) 180º 90º TI 180º
Double IR T 1 FSE IR-T 1 W Cardiac-gated 1 slice (~16 sec) breath-hold 2 slices with ASSET IR-HASTE ~20 slices ( sec) breath-hold
Bright blood Sequences • • TOF GRE (Cine) FIESTA (Cine) Phase Contrast
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
Time-of-Flight (TOF)
TOF
TOF optimization for slow flow
TOF: in-plane saturation Sagittal Axial acquisition Gad-MRV Sagittal
TOF optimization for slow flow • Slice perpendicular to vessel of interest • Decrease slice thickness • Cardiac gating? ECG Tracing Blood flow (Pulse Oximeter) Systole (arterial)
True FISP / FIESTA / Balanced FFE • True Fast Imaging with Steady-state Precession • Gradients are fully balanced in order to recycle the transverse magnetization in long T 2 species • Contrast – T 2 / T 1 ratio – Blood vessels are bright (T 2 of blood is )
True FISP Pros • Fast – Road map • No breathing artifacts • Thrombus – Filling defect SI • Cine True FISP – FIESTA Cons • Artifacts – Pulsatile flow – Off-resonace • Acute / subacute thrombus
True FISP
True FISP Gd-enhanced MRV
True FISP L True FISP Gd-enhanced MRV Pedrosa I. AJR 2005
Phase Contrast (PC) • 2 equal and opposite Venc gradients between the excitation and echo. • With stationary protons, phase shifts induced by the first gradient are reversed and canceled by the second gradient. • In moving protons, the second gradient does not quite cancel out phase shifts induced by the first gradient • These phase shifts are detected and proportional to the amount of motion in the direction of the encoding gradients
Phase Contrast (PC) High velocity flow towards the head (Ascending aorta) Moderate velocity flow towards the head (Pulmonary artery) • Venc gradient applied in the slice (superior-inferior) direction • In the phase (velocity) image – Gray represents stationary background tissues – White represents blood flowing caudally (towards feet) – Black represents blood flowing cranially (towards head) – The intensity of white or black represents the magnitude of velocity in the respective directions Moderate velocity flow towards the feet (SVC) Phase Image High velocity flow towards the feet (Descending aorta) Magnitude Image
Phase Contrast (PC) • If Venc is chosen to be too low, aliasing (“wrap-around artifact”) occurs when velocities exceed that value causing velocities to mimic a “lower” value Venc set to 140 cm/sec, appropriate for this volunteer • If Venc is chosen to be too high, sensitivity to slow flow and accuracy of quantitative analysis of velocity/flow are diminished Venc set to 70 cm/sec, too low for this volunteer. Aliasing or “wrap-around” results in the high-velocity flow areas of the aorta. • Venc for venous imaging? – 40 -60 cm/sec Phase Images
Phase Contrast (PC) Venc = 40 cm/sec
Phase Contrast (PC) 3 D PC
Gadolinium-enhanced MRV • Indirect MRV • Direct MRV
Indirect Venography • I. V. access in any peripheral vein – Antecubital vein (Right UE) • Gadolinium – Single dose (~20 cc) @ 2 cc/seg – Single dose (~20 cc) @ 0. 8 cc/seg – 20 cc saline @ 0. 8 cc/seg • 3 D GRE T 1 • Subtractions – Venogram-like MIP reconstructions Double dose Gd Single injection/dual rate
Timing arterial phase
Indirect Venography VENOUS PHASE = ARTERIAL PHASE SUBTRACTION
Indirect Venography SUBSTRACTION MIP
Direct Venography • I. V. access in affected extremity or bilateral • Gadolinium – 5 cc Gd in 100 cc saline (1: 20) • Tourniquet in lower extremities • 3 D GRE T 1 Li W et al. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8(3): 630 -3
Direct Venography
Thrombus Characterization – Bland thrombus No enhancement – Variable SI – – Tumor thrombus – Enhancement on Gd-MRV » Subtractions! » Absence of enhancement does NOT exclude tumor thrombus – SI on T 2 -weighted images
Tumor thrombus: Intravenous leiomyomatosis U
Staging • Acute thrombus – Enlargement of vein by intraluminal thrombus – SI on T 2 -weighted images • Vessel wall • Thrombus – Perivascular soft tissue edema – SI on T 1 -weighted images (subacute) • Chronic thrombus – Vein attenuated or not visible – Venous collaterals – ↓ SI on all sequences
Acute thrombosis of the portal vein
T 2 W T 1 W post-contrast
Paget von Schrotter syndrome or “effort” thrombosis
Chronic Thrombosis
Venous thrombosis Is the thrombosis acute or chronic? Do I need to anticoagulate this patient?
Acute/subacute thrombosis
brachiocephalic vein: chronic occlusion
Central catheter malfunction Fibrin sheath
Clinical Indications
SVC syndrome
Venous Access • Central catheters – – Hemodyalisis Chemotherapy Parenteral nutrition Thrombosis in first 3 months (10%) • MRV chest – 15 pts with occlusion or stenosis central veins – Venous access possible in 14 pts Shinde TS et al. Radiology 1999; 213: 555 -560
IVC in Renal Cell Carcinoma 51 yo male with PE Papillary carcinoma
Pulmonary Embolism
Isolated Iliac Vein DVT
Conclusion • Central veins of the chest, abdomen and pelvis – Limited evaluation with US • Whole-body venous roadmap – Vascular access • Pregnancy
06b660804cfa4a5c4b36a99a2ad3462e.ppt