Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) FIRST DRAFT OF A PROPOSAL TO IANPHI October 2017 1
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) Mandate: UN Global Health Crises Task Force, final report Request for Proposals: Joint Rfp from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust to be issued soon October 2017 2
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Initial grant from Skoll Global Threats Fund to Chatham House (following proposal in March 2016) • Global scoping meeting (March 2017) of stakeholders in external monitoring and accountability of preparedness for to identify gaps (Chatham House and Graduate Institute), Geneva – Academic institutions (including Harvard, Johns Hopkins, LSHTM) – Regional and global international organisations/development banks (including World Bank, UN office of Disaster Risk Reduction (Sendai Framework), WHO, UN High Commission on Human Rights) – Foundations (including Skoll Global Threats Fund, Rockefeller Foundation, Wellcome Trust) – National Public Health Institutes (including CDC, PHE, Robert Koch) – NGOs (including GHSA, JEE Alliance, WEF) – Geneva-based diplomatic mission health attaches representing countries (including Norway, USA, UAE, UK, Haiti, Germany, Sierra Leone, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Portugal, India) October 2017 3
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Gaps identified (no external monitoring and/or accountability mechanisms) – One health platforms – Travel and trade restrictions during outbreaks – Sharing of data and specimens during outbreaks – Research and development for preparedness October 2017 4
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Activities in preparation for global monitoring and accountability since March – One health platforms • Preparation of background paper reviewing existing indicators from various sources including OIE, WHO and FAO • Organisation of roundtable in November to review background paper and come to final set of preliminary indicators – Travel restrictions during outbreaks • Meeting with WEF in May to review case studies of airlines and discussion of reasons some did not fly to Ebola outbreak countries, why others did fly • Preparation of background paper with consdierations as to what needs to be monitored as preparedness so that travek can continue • Organisation of roundtable in November to review background paper and come to final set of preliminary indicators October 2017 5
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Activities in preparation for global monitoring and accountability since March (……. . continued) – Sharing of data and specimens during outbreaks • Participation in WHO blueprint activities at Wellcome Trust, WHO and Chatham House – Trade restrictions during outbreaks • Background paper on the issues involved being developed – Research and Development for preparedness • No activities – discussions with WHO planned in mid-November – Indicators for other capacities for preparedness • To be determined early in the life of the next project if grant proposal successful October 2017 6
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Proposed governance – Broad partnership with academic institutions, national public health institutes, NGOs with informal governance – Advisory board of global public health experts – Physical IANPHI secretariat in one institute, with virtual focal points/partners from other national public health institutes – IANPHI external monitoring and accountability of willing countries through technical cooperation among countries October 2017 7
• Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) Proposed role of partners based on comparative advantage – Academia • Participate in indicator identification/development • Develop background papers/assess quality of data/prepare reports • Monitor at global and regional levels/collect indicator information – National Public Health Institutes • Participate in indicator identification/development • Provide external monitoring at country level • Provide data to secretariat – IANPHI (as secretariat) • Loosely coordinate all partners • Prepare annual report from data collected from Academia and National Public Health Institutes October 2017 8
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Points for discussion – Does IANPHI feel that this is an appropriate activity – does it fit with its mandate? – Is IANPHI able to take on a secretariat role? • If so what staffing requirements would be required and where would it be based – Which public health institutes would be willing to participate either in the secretaeriat, as representatives of IANPHI at roundtables and other meetings, and in external monitoring activities? – What would be the “dream team” for the advisory group? October 2017 9
Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP) • Potential partners (expressed interest to Chatham House) – Graduate Institute Geneva (Centre on Global Health) – IANPHI – London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine – Sendai Framework – Sci. Dev – The Lancet – JEE Alliance – World Economic Forum – Others to be sought from Africa, Asia and Latin America – Chatham House October 2017 10
Скачать презентацию Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness MAP FIRST DRAFT
dc60b8f079666d9efe61e13f786ff3d9.ppt