MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT STEVE M SMITH 616 240

MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT STEVE M SMITH (616) 240 -3926 STEVEMSMITH@PEOPLEPC. COM

WHAT THE HOMEOWNER WANTS TO KNOW • • • “Do I have lead in my house? ” “Where is it? ” “What do I do now? ” or “How do I get rid of it” • “How much is this going to cost!!”

CONCLUSIONS 2. 1 Report Summary – Lead Based Paint hazards were found at this address. The table below describes the location of these hazards. Significant hazard reduction will occur if existing original windows are replaced. Window troughs tested very high for the presence of lead indicating that these painted windows are contributing to lead dust buildup. The kitchen area tested positive for lead hazards primarily in what remains of the kitchen cabinets. Surprisingly, the kitchen floor and window sill did not indicate lead finding above HUD approved thresholds. The kitchen window trough was not tested as the window would not open. Recent renovation activities at this house do not appear to be a major contributing factor to the lead hazards discovered during this Risk Assessment.

2. 2 Table of Lead Based Paint Hazards and Recommended Corrective Action Room / Component Location of Hazard Level of severity Recommendation Cost stimate Kitchen Cabinet frames and sides 1 Removal of cabinets and replacement with new cabinets since the majority of the cabinets have already been removed $3500 Windows Exterior windows 1 Replace older windows with exterior peeling paint $3400 Exterior wood doors Front and side doors 2 Replace these doors with steel pre-hung units, encapsulate trim $1500 Garage All painted garage siding 2 Encapsulate or vinyl side garage $1750 Bathtub Tub glazing 3 Do not use abrasives – owner refinishing Play area Soil 1 Remove soil and replace with new, uncontaminated soil TOTAL COSTS 1 – most severe 2 – very severe 3 - somewhat severe $0 $600 $10, 750

2. 3 Positive XRF Readings No Insp Flr Side Room Strc Sub Feat Cnd Clr Result Pbc error 20 SMS 1 B Bath Wall Metal Bathtub Intact White POS 5. 01 1. 9 42 SMS 1 C Kitchen Door Wood Jamb Fair White POS 3. 41 1. 03 45 SMS 1 D Kitchen Window Wood Stool Fair White POS 2. 28 1. 11 46 SMS 1 D Kitchen Window Wood Sash Fair White POS 1. 72 0. 83 47 SMS 1 D Kitchen Cabinet Wood Door Out Fair White POS 2 1. 42 49 SMS A Outside 0 Door Wood Door Intact White POS 7. 35 2. 53 50 SMS A Outside 0 Window Wood Sash Ext Poor White POS 2. 29 0. 59 52 SMS D Outside 0 Window Wood Sash Ext Poor White POS 5. 4 2. 09 53 SMS D Outside 0 Door Wood Door Poor White POS 3. 44 1. 07 56 SMS A Outside 0 Garage Wood Wall Fair White POS 2. 7 0. 92 57 SMS B Outside 0 Garage Wood Wall Fair White POS 1. 14 0. 19

2. 4 Dust Wipe Sample Results Sample Number Room Location Component Area Wiped in sq/ft Pb Concentration in ug/sqft #1 Room 1 – dining room Window sill 11 3/8 x 3 1800 #2 Room 1 –dining room Window trough 9 ½ x 4 1/8 3100 #3 Room 1 –dining room Floor 16 x 16 1150 #4 kitchen Window sill 11 ¼ x 3 190 #5 kitchen Floor 16 x 16 Below reporting limits #6 Room 2 – living room Floor 10 ½ x 10 ½ 21 #7 Room 4 – child’s bedroom Window sill 10 ½ x 3 1/8 Below reporting limits #8 Room 4 – child’s bedroom Window trough 9 5/8 x 4 6600 #9 Room 4 – child’s bedroom Floor 10 x 8 ¼ 2500 HUD reporting limits – floors, 40 ug/ft 2, window sills, 250 ug/ft 2, window troughs 400 ug/ft 2

2. 5 Soil Sample Results Sample Number Location Results in Parts per Million #13 Side C – drip line 53 #14 Side B – drip line 99 #15 Side A – drip line 97 #16 Side D - drip line 290 #17 Play area 15, 000 Note – lead in soil is considered a hazard at 1200 ppm or greater. Play areas for children at 400 ppm.

KEY ELEMENTS OF A RISK ASSESSMENT WHAT MICHIGAN REGULATIONS REQUIRE

KEY ELEMENTS • • • Date of inspection Address Date of construction Name, address, and phone # of owner Name, signature and cert. # of Risk Assessor Testing methods, devices and sampling procedures employed including quality control data and if used serial number of XRF

LEAD INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 1118 N Vermont Royal Oak , MI 48067 Prepared For: Mr. and Mrs. Marsh 1118 N Vermont Royal Oak, MI 48067 (586) 212 -8100 Report Prepared and Submitted by: Steve M. Smith Certified Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor P – 2309 Michigan Department of Community Health Lead Hazard Remediation Program 3423 N Martin Luther King Blvd PO Box 30195 Lansing, MI 48909 (616) 240 -3926 Date of Inspection: May 12, 2004

APPENDIX DATA 9. 12 Laboratory Dust and soil samples were analyzed by State of Michigan Department of Community Health Trace Metals Laboratory located at 3335 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. , Lansing, Michigan 48909 (517 -335 -9490). The Michigan Department of Community Health Environmental Lead Laboratory participates in the Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) quality control rounds and is approved by the National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). 9. 13 Soil Sampling Soil samples, if deemed appropriate by the Risk Assessor, were collected following HUD guidelines from areas of exposed soil located within the boundaries of the property, such as sandbox, play areas, and foundation drip line. Composite samples from the upper 1/ inch of soil were collected analyzed by State of Michigan Department of Community Health Trace Metals Laboratory. Results are reported in parts of lead per million parts of sampled soil.

6. 0 RE-EVALUATION AND MONITORING SCHEDULE All painted components require periodic re-evaluation and monitoring. Reevaluation typically is scheduled on a bi-annual basis but more frequent reevaluations may be required depending on site conditions. All painted surfaces must remain in good / intact condition. Painted surfaces that are peeling, cracking, blistering or causing dust from friction or impact must be corrected immediately to prevent hazardous exposure to possible lead based paint sources. All repairs must follow HUD Guidelines for the interim control and abatement of lead based paint hazards.

KEY ELEMENTS CON’T • Specific locations of each painted component tested – typically part of XRF • Name, address and phone of each recognized lab conducting analysis • Results of laboratory analysis • Description of the location, type and severity of identified lead paint hazards • Description of abatement or interim control (or both) of each identified lead based paint hazard • Recommended maintenance and monitoring schedules for encapsulants and enclosures if used to remediate lead hazards • Visual inspection results

VISUAL INSPECTION FORMAT 1. Paint Condition Form – Selected Surfaces Building Component Siding Location Notes Deterioration due to friction or impact? Deterioration due to moisture? Location of painted component with visible bite marks Intact but chalking No No Na Wrapped in aluminum Intact No No Na Exterior windows Need replacing Poor Friction / weathering Yes Na Exterior doors Need replacing Poor Impact Yes Na Railings NA Porch floors Front porch Poor Friction Yes Na Other porch surfaces NA Interior doors Most have been replaced Intact No No Na Ceilings Ok throughout Intact No No Na Exterior trim Vinyl siding Paint Condition (intact, poor, not present)

2. 4 Dust Wipe Sample Results Sample Number Room Location Component Area Wiped in sq/ft Pb Concentration in ug/sqft #1 Room 1 – dining room Window sill 11 3/8 x 3 Below reporting limits #2 Room 1 –dining room Window trough 9 ½ x 4 1/8 3100 #3 Room 1 –dining room Floor 16 x 16 Below reporting limits #4 kitchen Window sill 11 ¼ x 3 190 #5 kitchen Floor 16 x 16 Below reporting limits #6 Room 2 – living room Floor 10 ½ x 10 ½ 21 #7 Room 4 – child’s bedroom Window sill 10 ½ x 3 1/8 Below reporting limits #8 Room 4 – child’s bedroom Window trough 9 5/8 x 4 6600 #9 Room 4 – child’s bedroom Floor 10 x 8 ¼ Below reporting limits #10 Stairway to second floor Tread 10 x 10 3/8 120 #11 Room 5 – upstairs bedroom Window sill 11 x 2 ½ Below reporting limits #12 Room 5 – upstairs bedroom Floor 11 x 8 7/8 Below reporting limits HUD reporting limits – floors, 40 ug/ft 2, window sills, 250 ug/ft 2, window troughs 400 ug/ft 2

2. 2 Table of Lead Based Paint Hazards and Recommended Corrective Action Room / Component Location of Hazard Level of Severity Recommendation Cost Estimate Kitchen Cabinet frames and sides 1 Removal of cabinets and replacement with new cabinets since the majority of the cabinets have already been removed $3500 Windows Exterior windows 1 Replace older windows with exterior peeling paint $3400 Exterior wood doors Front and side doors 2 Replace these doors with steel prehung units, encapsulate trim $1500 Garage All painted garage siding 2 Encapsulate or vinyl side garage $1750 Bathtub Tub glazing 3 Do not use abrasives – owner refinishing Play area Soil 1 Remove soil and replace with new, uncontaminated soil TOTAL COSTS 1 – most severe 2 – very severe 3 - somewhat severe $0 $600 $10, 750

CREATE A RISK ASSESSMENT TEMPLATE • In my template 60% of the information is routine or simple to add – i. e. testing methods, certifications, background info, re-evaluation schedules, etc. • 40% is new data that is applied quickly to predesigned tables NOTE: these tables are also used for the field investigation

BOTTOM LINE • Cost savings – reduces the time needed to produce a Risk Assessment • Consistency of format in terms of report data • Easily modified to incorporate future rule changes • CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ! !