Medical Microbiology & Immunology Course Perspectives Kirsten A. Larson, Ph. D Drexel University College of Medicine
Thank you! AMSMIC members and past/present Educational Strategies Participants The data and the directory represent individuals who completed the survey by Friday, April 25 th. 82 individuals 73 schools
Number of years as a faculty member teaching medical students (attendees) 25 15 10 30+ 26 -30 21 -25 16 -20 11 -15 0 6 -10 5 1 -5 % of attendees 20 # of years N=57
35 25 91 -100 30 91 -100 81 -90 71 -80 61 -70 51 -60 41 -50 31 -40 21 -30 11 -20 90 81 -90 0 100 71 -80 5 95 61 -70 10 51 -60 15 41 -50 20 31 -40 mean 30% (SD 25) 21 -30 25 11 -20 Research 1 -10 0 1 -10 5 0 10 % effort 15 0 N=79 % of respondents mean 27% (SD 18) % of respondents 91 -100 Administrative % effort 91 -100 81 -90 71 -80 20 81 -90 35 71 -80 30 61 -70 25 61 -70 30 51 -60 41 -50 31 -40 21 -30 11 -20 1 -10 0 % effort % of respondents 35 51 -60 41 -50 31 -40 21 -30 11 -20 1 -10 0 % effort % of respondents Responsibilities Clinical mean 3% (SD 11) 15 10 5 0 Teaching mean 40% (SD 24) 20 15 10 5 0
% of responding faculty Faculty Teaching 100 90 80 70 60 13% of faculty teach non-M/ID/I courses 50 40 30 20 10 0 Microbiology Infectious Disease Immunology 80 responses
Faculty Teaching % of responding faculty 0 5 10 15 20 25 Micro only ID only Imm only Micro / ID ID / Imm Micro / ID / Imm 80 responses 30
Course Hours * • 88 schools had courses that included microbiology or immunology in their title Topic Hours Microbiology & Immunology Microbiology (only) Immunology (only) # of schools 120 (SD 38) 100 (SD 38) 44 (SD 29) 37 34 21 * Curr. MIT (www. aamc. org/currmit) query class of 2009 on 4/30/08
Microbiology and Immunology in the Curriculum 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Year 1 only Year 2 only Year 1&2 Other Microbiology n = 66 schools Immunology n = 63 schools
Microbiology and Immunology in the Curriculum Microbiology responding schools (%) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Immunology responding schools (%) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Yr 1 - fall/winter Yr 1 – spring & Yr 2 Yr 1 - spring Yr 2 –part of year Year 1 Yr 2 – part of year Yr 1 & 2 N=63 schools other
Format of Microbiology Content % of responding schools 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Organism-focused manner Organ-based manner Organism- & organ-based PBL hybrid n=69 schools
Format of Immunology Content % of responding schools 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 A separate section within the microbiology course Integrated into a stand alone microbiology course Stand alone course and grade Integrated into the preclinical curriculum PBL hybrid Other N= 68 schools 45
Formats Used in Teaching 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Lecture Wet lab Virtual lab Computer driven activities Self-study Student presentations Patient-oriented problem solving (POPS) Problem-based learning (PBL) Team-based learning (TBL) Other small group discussions N=71 schools
Procedure for Addressing Microbiology or Immunology Failures 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Remediation exam (in house) Remediation exam (NBME) Summer course Repeat the course/material Not applicable due to curricular integration 69 schools responded
Use of Streaming Video and Podcasting 0 Administrative information (e. g. , HIPPA training) Periodic medical updates (e. g. , the week in review) Some year 1 and 2 courses but not all Virtually all courses We generally do NOT use this technology 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Streaming video (67 schools responded) Podcasting (59 schools responded)
Conclusions • Microbiology, immunology, and infectious disease faculty have unique teaching experiences and responsibilities. • There are many different ways to teach microbiology, immunology, and infectious disease.
Acknowledgments • AMSMIC members and Educational Strategies Participants who completed the survey • Cynthia Rabuck for completing the Curr. MIT query
Скачать презентацию Medical Microbiology Immunology Course Perspectives Kirsten A
b85527bae1c3953d2c152080fff883b1.ppt