Скачать презентацию Managing the Other Patient in Long-Term Care Skills Скачать презентацию Managing the Other Patient in Long-Term Care Skills

150bd6bbabe4775ee43aacf974db4c8d.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 44

Managing the “Other” Patient in Long-Term Care: Skills for Working with Families Daniel Bluestein, Managing the “Other” Patient in Long-Term Care: Skills for Working with Families Daniel Bluestein, MD, Certificate Added Qualifications-Geriatrics Professor & Director, Geriatrics Division Department of Family & Community Medicine Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk, Virginia Patricia Latham Bach, Psy. D, RN, MS Post-Doctoral Fellow Center for Neuropsychological Services Kaiser-Permanente Sacramento, California

Need for Geriatrics Education • A demographic imperative • Need knowledge, skills & attitude: Need for Geriatrics Education • A demographic imperative • Need knowledge, skills & attitude: • Part of job as Family Physician • Self-efficacy for same

Not always the easiest “sell” • Especially in longterm care. • Solutions • Experiences Not always the easiest “sell” • Especially in longterm care. • Solutions • Experiences with mentors • Build on core Family Medicine Precepts (transferable). • Active role

Families, LTC, & Education • Opportunity to apply Family Systems Concepts • Family Medicine Families, LTC, & Education • Opportunity to apply Family Systems Concepts • Family Medicine learner in leadership role • Transferable to other settings, types of pts • Rewarding • Responding to need • Families often appreciate

OBJECTIVES 1. Discuss the Pearlin Stress Process Model as a conceptual framework. 2. Review OBJECTIVES 1. Discuss the Pearlin Stress Process Model as a conceptual framework. 2. Review Family Systems concepts that can impact communication with families. 3. Summarize principles for conduct of family meetings. 4. Questions and discussion

Family in LTC-we know… • Placement may be stressful (not always) • Continued involvement Family in LTC-we know… • Placement may be stressful (not always) • Continued involvement persists post placement • Nature of this involvement focuses on ADL/IADL assistance, not social roles • Benefit of family involvement and of interventions to facilitate this involvement suggested but not established • Gaugler JE. Family involvement in residential long-term care: a synthesis and critical review. Aging Ment Health 2005; 9(2): 105 -18.

Family in LTC research-limits • • • Cross-sectional designs Small samples Use range of Family in LTC research-limits • • • Cross-sectional designs Small samples Use range of LTC settings, not just NHs Quantitative rather than qualitative approach Need for ethnic diversity in study populations

Caveats • Our empirical database is limited • Lots of ways to do this Caveats • Our empirical database is limited • Lots of ways to do this (what we describe worked for us). • It’s not just a meeting but a process of continuing communication

Pearlin Caregiver Stress Process Model Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving Pearlin Caregiver Stress Process Model Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist 1990 ; 30(5): 583 -94.

Family Dysfunction predictors of negative outcomes • Caregivers who reported poor family functioning had Family Dysfunction predictors of negative outcomes • Caregivers who reported poor family functioning had higher ratings of strain and burden. • Family dysfunctions included: • • Negative expressed emotion (hostility, criticism, sadness…) Poor problem solving Impaired delegation of practical & emotional tasks Excessive emotional distance or closeness • Caution: cross sectional study • Corollary: These are red flags Heru AM, Ryan CE, Iqbal A. Family functioning in the caregivers of patients with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19(6): 533 -7.

Structural Family Theory (Minuchin) • Family interactions are regulated predictable patterns that determine how Structural Family Theory (Minuchin) • Family interactions are regulated predictable patterns that determine how family members: communicate, • manage disagreements, • distribute leadership roles, • form alliances, • negotiate distance or closeness. • Relatively stable and resistant to change. • Whereas healthy families adapt, others become rigid or disorganized under stress such as LTC placement.

Common patterns-Enmeshment • Family members have poor • • boundaries, limited autonomy, and high Common patterns-Enmeshment • Family members have poor • • boundaries, limited autonomy, and high emotional reactivity Cope poorly with stress Closed off to outside influence (from staff or MD). Indicators: • Speak for each other • Interrupt • Sit closely May be very demanding, unrealistic expectations, “us vs. them” mentality, insist on aggressive care. Mitrani VB, et al. Adapting the structural family systems rating to assess the patterns of interaction in families of dementia caregivers. Gerontologist 2005; 45(4): 445 -55.

Case • Ms B, aged 90, progressive dementia-Daughter from California (LCSW), calls daily, into Case • Ms B, aged 90, progressive dementia-Daughter from California (LCSW), calls daily, into “alternative medicine” , dislikes “chemicals” (but insists mom has bottle of scotch in her room) • Dtr looks like younger version of mom, speaks for her, answers questions for her.

Common patterns-Disengagement • Family members are emotionally distant or unresponsive • ? Depressed, burnout, Common patterns-Disengagement • Family members are emotionally distant or unresponsive • ? Depressed, burnout, poor physical health • Neglect • Use of denial or diversion when problems to be discussed • No discussion of care preferences, advanced directives.

Case Example-Disengagement • 79 yo Hispanic male in assisted living • Arthritis, anxiety & Case Example-Disengagement • 79 yo Hispanic male in assisted living • Arthritis, anxiety & possible OCD, reflux, mild memory deficits, smokes. • Always dissatisfied, has demanded moves from several prior facilities • Life-long conflicted relationships with children • Lonely, high utilization of care, • Daughter lives 1 mile away, never visits, leading to increased isolation, somatization behavior. • Unwilling to transport to outside appointments • Feels father should be “no-code” despite mild degree of memory & physical impairment

Common patterns-Hierarchical • MD may unwittingly threaten authority of family leader-set up for conflict Common patterns-Hierarchical • MD may unwittingly threaten authority of family leader-set up for conflict & adversarial relationship. • Leader may be the "health expert" • person you want on your side or at least want to know about. • If “expert’s” advice contradicts yours, you will be ignored Thrower SM; Bruce WE; Walton RF. The family circle method for integrating family systems concepts in family medicine. J Fam Pract 1982; 15(3); 451 -7.

Case Example-Hierarchical • 95 yo Caucasian woman with renal failure, DJD, dementia • Failing Case Example-Hierarchical • 95 yo Caucasian woman with renal failure, DJD, dementia • Failing in her apartment, staff wishes her to move to long-term care. • Son, a physician, challenges her degree of cognitive decline, demands meeting with staff, critical of staff competence, when neuropsych testing recommended, brings her to his institution to use his “own” consultant • Agrees to placement thereafter

Other key concepts-Triangulation • Occurs when a 3 rd person is drawn into a Other key concepts-Triangulation • Occurs when a 3 rd person is drawn into a 2–person system to diffuse anxiety or conflict or to communicate with each other through a 3 rd party. • Corollaries: • If the index pt buffers conflict among other family members, they may be unwilling to limit care. • May gang up on you

Case-example, triangulation • 81 yo Caucasian woman, multiple hospitalizations related to cognitive impairment. • Case-example, triangulation • 81 yo Caucasian woman, multiple hospitalizations related to cognitive impairment. • Daughter & son-in-law: argue when visiting. • Relate better & work as “team” when mom develops pressure ulcer, criticizing care.

Coalitions • When 2 people collude against a 3 rd • May exclude other Coalitions • When 2 people collude against a 3 rd • May exclude other key family members. • Trap for MD-recognize and don’t take sides. There may be deliberate effort to draw you in

Coalitions –case example • 90 yo man-PD, CHF, mild dementia. Family has received conflicting Coalitions –case example • 90 yo man-PD, CHF, mild dementia. Family has received conflicting information about prognosis during recent hospitalization for CHF. Goals of care discussed /w wife (POA) & daughters. • Older Daughter calls you later to express her & her sister’s concerns, feels her mother is not acting in her father’s interest (e. g. , wife seeks conservative care) • Criticizes her mother as someone who never made a dime but happy to spend what dad earned, wants his $$ rather than spend on his care…

Overview • • Develop a baseline Crates positive 1 st impression of reaching out. Overview • • Develop a baseline Crates positive 1 st impression of reaching out. Facilitates their understanding of this philosophy Creates alliances Enhances cultural competence Goal is to develop a win-win at the outset Environmental pre-assessment also important Identify family as experts about their loved one

Family meeting ≠ Family therapy session • • • Boundaries different Use of “I” Family meeting ≠ Family therapy session • • • Boundaries different Use of “I” different Don’t need to modify behavior as a rule Common ground established (pt) Different assessment measures Conducting supportive rather than therapeutic intervention

Planning the Family Meeting • • • Set goals Establish empathetic, common ground Elicit Planning the Family Meeting • • • Set goals Establish empathetic, common ground Elicit Family concerns Assess the family in relation to patient Provide overview of careplan Mc. Daniel S, Campbell TL, Seaburn DB. Family-Oriented Primary Care: a Manual for Medical Providers. Springer-Verlag, Inc. , New York: 1990. 73 -86.

Set goals • • Find out who the players are & how they interact Set goals • • Find out who the players are & how they interact Information & collateral history? Buy-in to treatment plan “Philosophy of care” (e. g. , code status, Aggressiveness of testing and therapeutic modalities) • Assistance-e. g. help overcome patient resistance, social support for depressed patients… • Support of caregivers • Avoid trouble

Set the stage • Thank them for coming • Review purpose of meeting • Set the stage • Thank them for coming • Review purpose of meeting • Elicit their expectations • What do you of your loved one’s condition & prognosis (what do you expect from here? ) • Functional assessment

Building partnership • What is your relationship to the patient? -e. g. , spouse, Building partnership • What is your relationship to the patient? -e. g. , spouse, child, etc • How long have you been a caregiver? • What are things that have been most stressful to you with this transition, how can we most help you? • What concerns do you have for the future? • Acknowledge the ongoing stress of having family member in LTC

Patient Assessment, Basic • Geriatric • MMSE & Clock-draw • GDS • Basic & Patient Assessment, Basic • Geriatric • MMSE & Clock-draw • GDS • Basic & Instrumental ADLs. • Medical-what is the status and prognosis of the patient's various chronic illnesses: • • • CHF COPD Renal Failure Cancers Other

Functional Assessment, family perspective& collateral History • Neuropsychiatric Inventory (10 minutes) • Behavior • Functional Assessment, family perspective& collateral History • Neuropsychiatric Inventory (10 minutes) • Behavior • Mood • Some cognition • Some functional • Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (10 minutes) • Cognition • ADLs • IADLS Have Family complete prior to visit if possible

Facilitation techniques • Allow 1 person to speak at a time • Be sure Facilitation techniques • Allow 1 person to speak at a time • Be sure everyone has a chance to say something if they choose • Use reflection for clarification • Normalizing (when faced with this situation, many people are [stressed/depressed/angry/guilty/etc. ]. Is this the case for you? ) • Emphasize strengths & positives (how have they coped successfully in the past)

Unobtrusive Assessment-verbal • • Who talks & who doesn't Who argues or agrees with Unobtrusive Assessment-verbal • • Who talks & who doesn't Who argues or agrees with whom Who is the leader or “health expert What they say, how they say it,

Unobtrusive Assessment-nonverbal • • Who’s there & who’s not Who sits near whom Body Unobtrusive Assessment-nonverbal • • Who’s there & who’s not Who sits near whom Body language How they act • Be ready for emotion • Have tissues handy

Historical appraisal • Any other recent changes or stressors • How they have handled Historical appraisal • Any other recent changes or stressors • How they have handled stressful situations in the past. • Where are they in terms of the “family lifecycle? ” • Are there prior medical experiences or medical beliefs that shape current situation

Presenting information • Present your assessment of patient's status • Goal setting & priorities-jointly Presenting information • Present your assessment of patient's status • Goal setting & priorities-jointly establish ”philosophy of care” • Know what they already know or believe • Reconcile various sources of info (e. g. , “different” information from other physicians). • Are all family members “on the same page”?

What if you recognize dysfunction • Your goal is to assist the family in What if you recognize dysfunction • Your goal is to assist the family in communicating or managing conflict sufficiently enough to address the immediate patient care issues, not "fix" family conflicts.

Mediating differences of opinion • Facilitate healthy communication • Everyone has a chance to Mediating differences of opinion • Facilitate healthy communication • Everyone has a chance to speak • “I” statements • Reframe negative or judgmental comments • Facilitate rational decision-making • Brainstorming to problem-solve • Help group objectively weigh risks & benefits • “Punt” • Arrange a follow-up meeting if consensus not possible • Suggest consultation & referral Lang F, Marvel K, Sanders D, Waxman D, Beine KL, Pfaffly C, Mc. Cord E. Interviewing when family members are present. Am Fam Physician 2002; 65(7): 1351 -4.

Referrals • Consider when a high level of unresolved conflict • • affects care. Referrals • Consider when a high level of unresolved conflict • • affects care. Suggest support groups Link with informational resources Referral for family counseling (if all else fails over several meetings). Set boundaries as to what you can and cannot do, ensuring that all needed information has been provided (“ball in their court”).

When you are on shaky ground • Build trust • Get “the high ground” When you are on shaky ground • Build trust • Get “the high ground” • Be informed • Be proactive • Project calm caring wisdom (don’t let frustration show) • It’s a process

Pitfalls • Talking rather than listening • Being pulled into coalitions. • Not having Pitfalls • Talking rather than listening • Being pulled into coalitions. • Not having a meeting • Excluding the patient (if lucid)

Evaluating resistance & dissatisfaction • Caregiver not acting in patient’s best interest • Depressed Evaluating resistance & dissatisfaction • Caregiver not acting in patient’s best interest • Depressed • $$$ incentives • Conflictual relationship with patient • Covert or absent players-Are there conflicting views of the approach to care? • Disconnect between culture of medicine & family health beliefs?

You are a part of the system (Like it or not) • Your own You are a part of the system (Like it or not) • Your own skills, attitudes & behavior reflect what you learned in your family of origin. Corollary: Understanding where you come from can make you more effective. • The clinician (and the facility and staff) are also now part of the index family’s system

Team-based approach • Geriatrics is a team sport. Players include but not limited to: Team-based approach • Geriatrics is a team sport. Players include but not limited to: • Psychologists, • Social workers /case-managers, • Nursing (RNs and CNAs), • Chaplains, • PT/OT • Dietician • Other team members will observe things you may not pick up on, ask questions in a different style. • “Good Cop/Bad Cop”

There is no 1 best way • Your approach will depend on time available, There is no 1 best way • Your approach will depend on time available, other team members, style… • Flexibility maximizes the possibilities of success. • No matter what you do, the return on your investment of effort & time is worth it.

Further reading • Mc. Goldrick M, Gerson R, Shellenberger S. Genograms: Assessment and Intervention Further reading • Mc. Goldrick M, Gerson R, Shellenberger S. Genograms: Assessment and Intervention (2 nd edition). New York, W. W. Norton & Co. 1999.