Скачать презентацию Making Linux POCs successful Andy Greco Mainline Information Скачать презентацию Making Linux POCs successful Andy Greco Mainline Information

e83c72fde8b5ca1cbd103974fb87cac7.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 23

Making Linux POCs successful Andy Greco Mainline Information Systems andy. greco@mainline. com Making Linux POCs successful Andy Greco Mainline Information Systems andy. greco@mainline. com

CONTENTS • • • Why Mainline? Why linux on z Series? Steps for a CONTENTS • • • Why Mainline? Why linux on z Series? Steps for a successful POC What apps make sense? POC organizational issues Next steps after successful POC

About Mainline • Founded in 1989; 20 year partnership with IBM • Specializing in About Mainline • Founded in 1989; 20 year partnership with IBM • Specializing in System z, System p, System i, System x, System Storage, Software Networking, Retail and Services • Has grown to become an IBM Premier Business Partner and global provider of information technology and infrastructure solutions with more than 600 employees nationwide • Offices are located in Tallahassee, Los Angeles, Chicago, Jersey City, Nashville Sao Paulo, and Monterrey

Revenue Growth *millions $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 2001 Revenue Growth *millions $900 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Product Mix Software System z Maintenance Services System l System x System p Storage Product Mix Software System z Maintenance Services System l System x System p Storage

2007 Performance Highlights • Top IBM SP 1 Solution Provider (buy direct from IBM) 2007 Performance Highlights • Top IBM SP 1 Solution Provider (buy direct from IBM) • #1 IBM System z SP 1 • #1 IBM System Storage SP 1 • #1 IBM System p SP 1 • #1 IBM System i SP 1 • #1 IBM System x SP 1 • #1 IBM Software SP 1 “Mainline has set the standard for business excellence by delivering unique solutions as well as high customer satisfaction. ” Ravi Marwaha, general manager, IBM Global Business Partners • #1 IBM IGS SP 1 • #1 IBM IGF SP 1 98% Customer Satisfaction | Premier Business Partner Status Awards Beacon Award BP Leadership Award BP Growth Award Wyse Rookie of the Year First National VMware Partner

Local Teams, National Coverage Nationwide | Cross Brand Technical Team - Number of resources: Local Teams, National Coverage Nationwide | Cross Brand Technical Team - Number of resources: 155 Central West 2008 CENTRAL Objectives • Revenue $169. 5 M Central East Northeast West Region 2008 WEST Objectives • Revenue $171. 5 M New York City BPIC Chicago| BPIC Mid-Atlantic Tallahassee BPIC 2008 MIS Objectives • Revenue $813 M Southeast 2008 EAST Objectives • Revenue $472 M

Why linux on z series? • Leverage classic strengths of the z. Series – Why linux on z series? • Leverage classic strengths of the z. Series – High availability – High i/o bandwidth capabilities – Flexibility to run disparate workloads concurrently – Requirement for excellent disaster recovery capabilities – Security • Shortening end to end path length for applications – Collocation of applications – Consolidation of applications from distributed servers – Reduction in network traffic – Simplification of support model

MIPS Shipped New Workload IBM System z Workload Growth Worldwide IFLs Source: IBM Market MIPS Shipped New Workload IBM System z Workload Growth Worldwide IFLs Source: IBM Market Research + z. IIPs + z. AAPs + Core Business

What System z brings to Linux • The most reliable hardware platform available – What System z brings to Linux • The most reliable hardware platform available – Redundant processors and memory – Error detection and correction – Remote Support Facility (RSF) • Centralized Linux systems are easier to manage • Designed to support mixed work loads – Allows consolidation while maintaining one server per application – Complete work load isolation – High speed inter-server connectivity 10 • Scalability – System z 10 EC scales to 64 application processors – System z 9 EC scales to 54 application processors – System z 9 BC scales to 7 application processors – e. Server z. Series 990 scales to 32 application processors – Dedicated I/O processors – Hundreds of Linux virtual servers

TCO Impact of Mainframe Consolidations • Potential for dramatic reductions in software expense for TCO Impact of Mainframe Consolidations • Potential for dramatic reductions in software expense for processor based licenses Web Trading Application Costs Web. Logic/Oracle 3 Year TCO • Significant reductions in power and cooling costs are typical • Reductions in Floor Space • People savings from virtualization • Increased processor utilization Other People Software Maintenance Software 3 -Year IT Expense (M$) –Cost curve is not linear: when will infrastructure break? 4. 9 x Hardware Maintenance Hardware 2. 3 x Source: Capricorn whitepaper Workload consolidation using Competitive UNIX Linux on a mainframe can result in significant TCO savings Source: Scorpion Study 1999 - 2005 Linux on Intel Linux on System z 9 and z. Series

Bank consolidates 45 Oracle x 86 Servers to one System z ! 72% reduction Bank consolidates 45 Oracle x 86 Servers to one System z ! 72% reduction in SW maintenance costs 95% reduction in connectivity costs 75% reduction in power/cooling costs 60% reduction in System Admin costs Note: Upgrade required for mainframe; Dell and HP were existing HW details on next slide

What is the greatest facility problem with your primary data center? “Power and cooling What is the greatest facility problem with your primary data center? “Power and cooling will be a top 3 issue with all CIO’s in the next 6 -12 months” Michael Bell – Gartner Group Gartner 2006 Spending (US$B) $300 Robert Frances Group, January 2006 $250 $200 Installed Base (M Units) Power and cooling costs x 8 Server mgmt and admin costs x 4 New server spending $150 $100 $50 $0 19 96 19 97 19 9 19 8 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04 20 05 20 0 20 6 07 20 08 20 09 20 10 “Power and cooling costs will increase to more than one-third of the total IT budget” 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Source: IDC, Virtualization 2. 0: The Next Phase in Customer Adoption, Doc #204904, Dec 2006 IDC 2006

Business Case for Linux on System z 1. 2. 3. § § 4. § Business Case for Linux on System z 1. 2. 3. § § 4. § § 5. 14 Increased solutions through Linux application portfolio Large number of highly skilled programmers familiar with Linux Integrated business solutions Data richness from System z Wide range of Linux applications Industrial strength environment Flexibility and openness of Linux Qualities of service of System z Unique ability to easily consolidate large number of servers

Steps in a successful POC • • • Pick appropriate application, appropriately sized for Steps in a successful POC • • • Pick appropriate application, appropriately sized for a POC Build POC organization / team Detail project plan with success criteria Execute the plan Present results to customer management Define next steps

What makes best fit? • Leverage classic strengths of the System z – High What makes best fit? • Leverage classic strengths of the System z – High availability – High i/o bandwidth capabilities – Flexibility to run disparate workloads concurrently – Requirement for excellent disaster recovery capabilities – Security • Shortening end to end path length for applications – Collocation of applications – Consolidation of applications from distributed servers – Reduction in network traffic – Simplification of support model • Consolidation Effect – Power requirements – Software costs – People Costs – Real Estate – Workloads requiring EXTREME Flexibility

Best Fit applications Websphere MQ Series DB 2 Connect CICS Transaction Gateway , IMS Best Fit applications Websphere MQ Series DB 2 Connect CICS Transaction Gateway , IMS Connect for Java SAP Web. Sphere and JAVA applications development Web. Sphere Application Server (WAS), Portal Domino Network Infrastructure, FTP, NFS, DNS etc. . , Oracle Database Applications requiring top end disaster recovery model Com. Server and Communications Controller for Linux Virtualization and Security Services Info. Sphere/Cognos Communigate Pro (Vo. IP) Weblogic

What Makes Good Fit Applications • Evaluate server choices • Shortening end to end What Makes Good Fit Applications • Evaluate server choices • Shortening end to end path length for applications – – – Correct application availability, Supporting applications, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Politics within the organization. Porting issues – Collocation of applications – Consolidation of applications from distributed servers – Reduction in network traffic – Simplification of support model • Consolidation Effect • Power requirements • Software costs • People Costs • Real Estate • Workloads requiring EXTREME flexibility

Good Fit Application Workloads • • UDB (DB 2) Informix, (IDS) Apache web serving Good Fit Application Workloads • • UDB (DB 2) Informix, (IDS) Apache web serving SAMBA TIM/TAM (LDAP Services) TSM Existing Linux Workloads

Selecting an application • Performance on System z CPUs is superior to any other Selecting an application • Performance on System z CPUs is superior to any other CPUs on any other platforms – CPU speed is not the entire story – it’s in the architecture! – Architecture designed for multiple or consolidated workloads – System z has definite advantage with applications that have mixed CPU and I/O – System z 10 Enterprise Quad Core 4. 4 GHZ • System z and z/VM provide the best virtualization capabilities – All workload types are eligible • Good planning is essential • Mainline with IBM’s assistance can: – Perform sizing estimate with actual server statistics – Perform Application Assessment – Perform TCO Business Case Analysis (Alinean tool, RACEv) – Assist with planning and initial installation needs 20

Organizational issues that need to be addressed • Need executive sponsor • Customer must Organizational issues that need to be addressed • Need executive sponsor • Customer must provide systems, application and network representation • Customer must have dedicated resource for the POC • Get distributed team engaged • Customer assigned tasks and accountability • Status calls required on a weekly basis measuring progress

Detailed project plan • Project plan clearly defined and agreed upon by all parties Detailed project plan • Project plan clearly defined and agreed upon by all parties involved (examples are available upon request) • CLEARLY defined success criteria must be agreed upon (examples available upon request) • Dates and names assigned to each task • Loaner equipment (if required) needs lead time for paperwork to be processed and equipment installed • Determine loaner software (if needed) with required lead time • Weekly status calls required for measure of progress • Engage technical resources (MIS and IBM) when issues arise

What’s next after success? • • • Present success story to customer management Get What’s next after success? • • • Present success story to customer management Get management commitment for production Plan for production Develop support organization structure within customer Plan for additional applications Develop a cross platform virtualization strategy