Lecture 6 PHRASEOLOGY I Collocability Word-Groups Lexical

Lecture 6 PHRASEOLOGY

I. Collocability. Word-Groups. Lexical and Grammatical Valency. Motivation in Wordgroups. II. Types of Phraseological Units. III. Types of Transference of Phraseological Units. IV. Origin of Phraseological Units. V. Proverbs, Sayings, Quotations.

PHRASEOLOGY STUDIES such collocations of words (phraseologisms, phraseological units, idioms), where the meaning of the whole collocation is different from the simple sum of literal meanings of the words, comprising a phraseological unit.

Phraseological units are stable word-groups with partially or fully transferred meanings (Kunin A. V. ). Phraseological unit is a lexicalized, reproducible bilexemic or polylexemic word group in common use, which has relative syntactic and semantic stability, may be idiomatized, may carry connotations, and may have an emphatic or intensifying function in a text (Rosemarie Glaeser).

The aptness of a word to appear in various combinations is described as its lexical valency or collocability. Words habitually collocated in speech tend to constitute a cliché (arms race).

The structure of word-groups may also be described in relation to the head-word(the pattern. to take +N to build +N

Predicative word-groups have a syntactic structure similar to that of a sentence, e. g. he went, John works. Non-predicative word-groups may be subdivided into subordinative (e. g. red flower, a man of wisdom) and coordinative (e. g. women and children, do or die).

Endocentric word-groups are those that have one central member functionally equivalent to the whole word-group, i. e. the distributionof the whole word-group and the distribution of its central member are identical. red flower, kind to people nominal groups or phrases (e. g. red flower), adjectival groups (e. g. kind to people), verbal groups (e. g. to speak well), etc.

Exocentric word-groups are those that have no central component and the distribution of the whole word-group is different from either of its members. side by side

TYPES OF MEANING IN WORD-GROUPS The meaning of word-groups can be divided into: 1) lexical and 2) structural (grammatical) components.

The lexical meaning of the word-group may be defined as the combined lexical meaning of the component words (the lexical meaning of the word-group red flower may be described denotationally as the combined meaning of the words red and flower). NB! The lexical meaning of the word-group predominates over the lexical meanings of its constituents.

The structural meaning of the word-group is the meaning conveyed mainly by the pattern of arrangement of its constituents. school grammar school

The meaning of the word-group is derived from the combined lexical meanings of its constituents and is inseparable from the meaning of the pattern of their arrangement.

MOTIVATION IN WORD-GROUPS A word-group is lexically motivated if the combined lexical meaning of the group is deducible from the meanings of its components, e. g. red flower, heavy weight, teach a lesson. If the combined lexical meaning of a word-group is not deducible from the lexical meanings of its constituent components, such a word-group is lexically non-motivated, e. g. red tape ('official bureaucratic methods'), take place ('occur').

Completely non-motivated or partially motivated word-groups are described as phraseological units or idioms.

A phraseological unit can be defined as a reproduced and idiomatic (non-motivated) or partially motivated unit built up according to the model of free word-groups (or sentences) and semantically and syntactically brought into correlation with words.

TYPES OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS According to the degree of idiomaticity phraseological units can be classified into three big groups: phraseological fusions, phraseological unities and phraseological collocations.

Phraseological fusions are completely nonmotivated word-groups, e. g. as mad as a hatter — 'utterly mad'; white elephant — 'an expensive but useless thing'.

Phraseological unities are partially nonmotivated as their meaning can usually be perceived through the metaphoric meaning of the whole phraseological unit, e. g. to bend the knee — 'to submit to a stronger force, to obey submissively'; to wash one's dirty linen in public — 'to discuss or make public one's quarrels'.

Phraseological collocations are not only motivated but contain one component used in its direct meaning, while the other is used metaphorically, e. g. to meet the requirements, to attain success. In this group of phraseological units some substitutions are possible which do not destroy the meaning of the metaphoric element, e. g. to meet the needs, to meet the demand, to meet the necessity; to have success, to lose success.

Phraseological transference is a complete or partial change of meaning of an initial (source) word-combination (or a sentence) as a result of which the word-combination (or the sentence) acquires a new meaning and turns into a phraseological unit. Phraseological transference may be based on simile, metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche, etc. or on their combination

SIMILE Transference based on simile is the intensification of some feature of an object (phenomenon, thing) denoted by a phraseological unit by means of bringing it into contact with another object (phenomenon, thing) belonging to an entirely different class (e. g. English and Russian phraseological units: (as) pretty as a picture (as) fat as a pig to fight like a lion to swim like a fish

METAPHOR Transference based on metaphor is a likening of one object (phenomenon, action) of reality to another, which is associated with it on the basis of real or imaginable resemblance. to bend somebody to one's bow

METONYMY Transference based on metonymy is a transfer of name from one object (phenomenon, thing, action, process, etc. ) to another based on the contiguity of their properties, relations, etc. a silk stocking

SYNECDOCHE Synecdoche is a variety of metonymy. Transference based on synecdoche is naming the whole by its part, the replacement of the common by the private, of the plural by the singular and vice versa. flesh and blood We've been writing to each other for ten years, but now he's actually going to be here in the flesh and blood. Thousands of fans flocked to Dublin to see their heroes in the flesh and blood. Synecdoche is usually found in combination with other types of transference, e. g. metaphor: to hold one's tongue — 'to say nothing, to be discreet'.

ORIGIN OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS According to their origin all phraseological units may be divided into two big groups: native and borrowed.

The main sources of native phraseological units 1) terminological and professional lexics, e. g. physics: center of gravity, specific weight; navigation: cut the painter , lower one's colours; military sphere: fall into line; 2) British literature, e. g. the green-eyed monster; like Hamlet without the prince; fall on evil days; a sight for sore eyes How goes the enemy?

The main sources of native phraseological units 3) British traditions and customs, e. g. baker's dozen; 4) superstitions and legends, e. g. a black sheep the halcyon days

The main sources of native phraseological units 5) historical facts and events, personalities, e. g. as well be hanged for a sheep as a lamb to do a Thatcher

The main sources of native phraseological units 6) phenomena and facts of everyday life, e. g. carry coals to Newcastle to get out of wood

The main sources of borrowed phraseological units 1) the Holy Script, e. g. the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing the kiss of Judas

The main sources of borrowed phraseological units 2) ancient legends and myths belonging to different religious or cultural traditions, e. g. to cut the Gordian knot a Procrustean bed

The main sources of borrowed phraseological units 3) facts and events of the world history, e. g. to cross the Rubicon — 'to do something which will have very important results which cannot be changed after‘ (Julius Caesar started a war which resulted in victory for him by crossing the river Rubicon in Italy); to meet one's Waterloo — 'be faced with, esp. after previous success, a final defeat, a difficulty or obstacle one cannot overcome (from the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo 1815)';

The main sources of borrowed phraseological units 4) variants of the English language, e. g. a heavy hitter — 'someone who is powerful and has achieved a lot' (American); a hole card — 'a secret advantage that is ready to use when you need it' (American); be home and hosed — 'to have completed something successfully' (Australian);

The main sources of borrowed phraseological units 5) other languages (classical and modern), e. g. second to none (from Latin: nulli secundus); for smb's fair eyes (from French: pour les beaux yeux de qn. ); the fair sex (from French: le beau sex); let the cat out of the bag (from German: die Katze aus dem Sack lassen); tilt at windmills (from Spanish: acometer molinos de viento); every dog is a lion at home (from Italian: ogni cane e leone a casa sua).

PROVERBS, SAYINGS, QUOTATIONS A proverb (from Latin pro ‘forward’+ verb ‘word’) is a collection of words that has been disseminated forth, and states a general truth or gives advice. You can take the horse to the water, but you can’t make him drink. If you sing before breakfast, you will cry before night. A new broom sweeps clean. A saying (from Old English: say (tell) + ing gerund suffix) is any common, colloquial expression, or a remark often made. Charity begins at home. It takes two to tango.

A. V. Koonin includes proverbs in his classification of phraseological units labeling them communicative phraseological units. As the quotient of phraseological stability in a word-group is not below the minimum, it means that we are dealing with a phraseological unit. (Кунин А. В. Фразеология современного английского языка. М. , 1972)

Phraseological units rather frequently originate from the proverbs making it difficult to draw any rigid or permanent border-line between them. Compare the following examples: the last straw The last straw breaks the camel’s back; birds of a feather Birds of a feather flock together; spill the milk There is no use crying over the spilt milk.

Proverbs and saying possess such characteristics of phraseological units: 1) they are introduced in speech ready-made; 2) their components are constant; 3) their meaning is traditional and mostly figurative; 4) many proverbs and sayings are metaphorical (Time is money. Little drops make the mighty ocean. Rome wasn’t built in a day. Words can cut like a knife. Make hay while the sun shines).

Familiar quotations come from literature and gradually become part of the language. Lots of quotations come from Shakespeare: Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. To be or not to be: that is the question. I must be cruel, only to be kind. The rest is silence.

Some quotations come from Alexander Pope, the English poet and satirist: Who shall decide when doctors disagree? To err is human. To forgive divine. a little learning is a dangerous thing.

QUESTIONS 1. What is a phraseological unit? 2. What kinds of word-groups can be singled out according to the syntactic pattern? 3. What classes of word-groups can be singled out according to the criterion of distribution? 4. What word-groups are called endocentric? 5. What word-groups are called exocentric? 6. In what way do the lexical and structural types of meaning of word-combinations interact? What does the connection between lexical and structural types of meaning of word-groups imply? 7. What is meant by the lexical motivation of a word-group? 8. In what cases is a word-combination considered to be lexically non-motivated? 9. What degrees of motivation can be singled out? 10. What does the structural similarity between word-groups and phraseological units consist in? 11. What are the characteristic features of phraseological units? 12. What is meant by phraseological transference? 13. What does the transference based on simile mean? 14. What is the metaphoric transference? 15. What does the metonymical transference imply? 16. What types of phraseological units can be distinguished according to the degree of idiomaticity? Characterize each type. 17. What types of phraseological units can be singled out from the point of view of their origin? 18. What are the main sources of origin of native phraseological units? 19. What are the main sources of origin of borrowed phraseological units? 20. How do proverbs differ from phraseological units?