KE FINLAND WB WORKSHOP Helsinki, Finland, 30 -31 August 2004 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN FINLAND – TRANSFORMATION INTO A KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY Professor Jorma Routti Helsinki University of Technology & CIM Creative Industries Management Helsinki, Finland www. cimfunds. com jorma. routti@cimfunds. com
VISION ECONOMY SAFETY SKENARIOS FOR OPERATING ENVIRONMENT S W O T CURRENT STATE SUSTAINABILITY SOLIDARITY
Fundamental changes taking place l. Globalization l. Knowledge-based economies l. Digital revolution
R&D input in some OECD countries Percentage of GDP 4. 5 Israel Sweden FINLAND Japan Iceland USA South Korea Germany France Singapore Denmark Canada Great Britain Austria Norway China 4. 0 3. 5 3. 0 2. 5 OECD total 2. 0 1. 5 1. 0 0. 5 est. Sources: OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators database, Statistics Finland (Finland 2002) and Statistiska centralbyrån (Sweden 2001, estimate). Docs 36109 02 -2003
The share of high tech exports in some OECD countries 1988 -2001 Exports of Finnish high tech products totalled 9. 9 billion euros in 2001, i. e. 21 % of total exports of goods EU USA Japan United Kingdom Netherlands FINLAND Switzerland France Sweden Germany Denmark Norway Source: Statistics Finland, according to the OECD product catalogue defined in 1995 Docs 32187 B 03 /02 -03
Competitiveness scoreboard Total ranking IMD Total competitiveness USA FINLAND Luxembourg Netherlands Singapore Denmark Switzerland Canada Hong Kong Ireland Sweden Iceland Germany France Japan 2002 2001 2000 1999 1 1 2 3 4 5 3 4 6 3 4 5 2 2 2 6 15 13 9 7 10 7 7 8 9 8 10 9 6 12 6 10 7 5 8 11 8 14 14 12 13 9 13 15 12 11 12 22 25 22 23 30 26 24 24 WEF Total growth competitiveness 2001 2000 1999 2 1 6 11. . 3 7 8 4 9 4 2 1 14 14 17 15 10 6 3 7 5 13 8 3 11 5 10 9 13 19 16 24 18 17 15 25 20 22 23 21 21 14 WEF Current competitiveness 2001 2000 1999* 2 2 1 1 1 2. . . 3 4 3 10 9 12 8 6 7 5 5 5 11 11 8 18 16 21 22 22 17 6 7 4 16 17 22 4 3 6 12 15 9 15 14 14 * Based on earlier competitiveness index of micro economy Sources: The World Competitiveness Yearbook (IMD) and The Global Competitiveness Report (WEF) Docs 36107 04 -2002
R&D financing R&D expenditures by source of funds Business enterprises Public sector Other national resources Abroad No breakdown Japan Korea Ireland Sweden Switzerland United States Belgium FINLAND OECD Germany Czech Rep. EU Denmark UK Norway Austria Canada Netherlands France Australia Spain Italy Iceland Turkey Hungary Poland N. Zealand Portugal Greece Mexico 0 20 40 60 80 100 % Source: OECD, MSTI database, April 1999 J 07/ 00 -06
Securing competitiveness in the Forest Industry INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Ø sensors, measuring and control Ø computational intelligence, simulation and machine vision Ø multimedia and telecommunication Ø tomography FORESTRY ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY Ø biofuels, combustion technology Ø ecobalances Ø closed cycles Ø energy-saving and emissions MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY Ø forestry machines Ø process and production machinery Ø material technology Y T R ogy es U S hnol ess D oc I N r tec ustry d pr T an pe nd CONSTRUCTION AND E S nd pa cts i inery R a du ach WOOD TECHNOLOGY F O ulp pro m P od , Ø modification of wood Ø Wo ines Ø construction Ø Mach technology and Ø architecture Ø logistics, assembly BIOTECHNOLOGY CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY Ø enzymes Ø paper and bleaching Ø rot prevention chemicals Ø gene technology Ø surface treatment substances Ø pigments, adhesives MARKETS Ø quality competitiveness Ø price competitiveness Ø environmental expertise A 11/ 99 -08
Co-operation between companies and universities and research institutes Share of innovative companies having co-operation agreements with universities (1994 -1996) Norway UK Sweden FINLAND Portugal Austria Netherlands Ireland Italy France Denmark Germany Belgium 0 EU Share of innovative companies having co-operation agreements with public research institutes (1994 -1996) Norway UK Sweden FINLAND Portugal Austria Netherlands Ireland Italy France Denmark Germany Belgium EU 20 40 60 % 0 20 40 60 % Source: Eurostat, Enterprise DG, 2 nd Community Innovation Survey J 05/ 00 -06
Nokia's Change Net sales USD 5. 2 billion 1988 Market capitalization USD 1. 4 billion at year end 1988 Floorings 1% Chemicals 2% Machinery 4% Net sales USD 19. 9 billion 1999 Market capitalization USD 236. 5 billion, as of February 28 th 2000 Mobile Phones 60% Infrastructure 33% Other 7% Electrical Wholesale 4% Mobile Telephones 5% Telecommunications 5% Rubber 6% Information Systems 23% Cables 9% Paper 10% Consumer Electronics 31% 1988 1998 2000
Services in the Mobile Information Society Information Entertainment Corporate access and e-mail Voice e. Videoeducation e-shopping and banking
FOCUS IN THE VALUE CHAIN CONTENT CREATORS CONTENT PRODUCERS CONTENT DISTRIBUTORS CREATES IDEA DEVELOPS COPYRIGHTS DISTRIBUTES COPYRIGHTS HOLDS IPRs PACKAGES IPRs MARKETS / BRANDS IPRs TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN IDEAS PROGRAMMING CONTENT DISTRIBUTION PLATFORMS CONSUMER TICKETS MAGAZINES BOOKS, CD, VIDEO, DVD, RADIO, TV NET, WAP/3 G
SUPPLY USERS s CREATORS DEMAND TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION ABSORTION CAPACITY RESEARCH CAPACI TY SOCIAL & HUMAN CAPITAL
USERS IRELAND TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION ABSORTION CAPACITY RESEARCH CAPACI TY SOCIAL & HUMAN CAPITAL
SUPPLY FINLAND TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION ABSORTION CAPACITY RESEARCH CAPACI TY SOCIAL & HUMAN CAPITAL
SOCIAL & HUMAN CAPITAL RESEARCH CAPACI TY USERS UK USA IRL FIN ITA s SWE FR DE CREATORS JAPAN DEMAND TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION ABSORTION CAPACITY SUPPLY
Composition of Regional Economies United States, 2001 Traded Clusters Local Clusters Natural Resource. Driven Industries 31. 6% 1. 7% 67. 6% 2. 8% 0. 8% -1. 0% $44, 956 133. 8 4. 5% $28, 288 84. 2 3. 7% $33, 245 99. 0 2. 0% 144. 1 79. 3 140. 1 Patents per 10, 000 Employees 21. 7 1. 3 7. 2 Number of SIC Industries 590 241 48 Share of Employment Growth, 1990 to 2001 Average Wage Relative Wage Growth Relative Productivity Note: 2001 data, except relative productivity which is 1997 data. Source: Cluster Mapping Project, Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School
Determinants of Regional Prosperity Cluster Strength and Wage Levels Average Regional Wage, 2001 Bay Area, CA New York, NY Boston, MA y = 96. 736 x + 16218 R 2 = 0. 377 Share of Traded Employment in Strong Clusters (LQ >. 8), 2001 Source: County Business Patterns; Michael E. Porter, The Economic Performance of Regions”, Regional Studies, Vol. 37, 2003
TIME – ENERGY - INFORMATION E=0 T = max I=0 I = max E = max T=0 Jorma. Routti@cimfunds. com
E enlightenment W wisdom U understanding K knowledge I information D data Jorma. Routti@cimfunds. com
Скачать презентацию KE FINLAND WB WORKSHOP Helsinki Finland 30 -31
d47b628e111932a7cfc394f2856e0d20.ppt