Скачать презентацию IPv 6 Address Assignment and Route Selection for Скачать презентацию IPv 6 Address Assignment and Route Selection for

1acf0dac01e0e0522408f7b6a51f4495.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 7

IPv 6 Address Assignment and Route Selection for End-to-End Multihoming draft-ohira-assign-select-e 2 e-multihome-02. txt IPv 6 Address Assignment and Route Selection for End-to-End Multihoming draft-ohira-assign-select-e 2 e-multihome-02. txt Kenji Ohira Kyoto University IETF #58 in Minneapolis 1

Overview • Theme: – A layer 3 architecture which suits for multi-home available architectures Overview • Theme: – A layer 3 architecture which suits for multi-home available architectures on layer 3. 5 or layer 4 • Target: – Small networks such as a home network or an office network with multiple upstream ISPs – So called ISP multi-homing is NOT a goal of this memo • Method: – Hierarchical Addressing (Multi-address model) – Source Address Based Routing (SABR) IETF #58 in Minneapolis 2

Layer Composition Application TCP-MHO, SCTP Legacy TCP LIN 6, HIP, MAST, SIM IP Layer Layer Composition Application TCP-MHO, SCTP Legacy TCP LIN 6, HIP, MAST, SIM IP Layer 7 Layer 4 Layer 3. 5 Layer 3 They merge several IP addresses into a connection. This memo concerns about it. Route selection on them. IETF #58 in Minneapolis 3

Updates from -01 • Clarify the conditions of a target site – in order Updates from -01 • Clarify the conditions of a target site – in order to make a consensus about small site at least • Clarify what kind of information should be announced – and how to distribute it automatically IETF #58 in Minneapolis 4

Basic capabilities 3. 1. 1 Redundancy 3. 1. 2 Load Sharing 3. 1. 3 Basic capabilities 3. 1. 1 Redundancy 3. 1. 2 Load Sharing 3. 1. 3 Performance yes both incoming and outgoing no information between upstream ISPs is required 3. 1. 4 3. 1. 5 3. 1. 6 3. 1. 7 3. 1. 8 expressed as a filter rule very simple out of scope not so much fine Policy Simplicity Transport Survivability Impact on DNS Packet Filtering IETF #58 in Minneapolis 8

Additional capabilities 3. 2. 1 Scalability 3. 2. 2 Impact on Routers 3. 2. Additional capabilities 3. 2. 1 Scalability 3. 2. 2 Impact on Routers 3. 2. 3 Impact on Hosts 3. 2. 4 Host-Routing interaction fine required unless single-homed not required 3. 2. 5 Operations & Management no co-operative work required 3. 2. 6 Cooperation between not required Transit Providers 3. 2. 7 Multiple Solutions? 4 Security Considerations maybe not referred IETF #58 in Minneapolis 9

Test Result of SABR • Free. BSD (5. 1) – pf (packet filter) • Test Result of SABR • Free. BSD (5. 1) – pf (packet filter) • pass out quick route-to (dc 0 fe 80: : 1) from 3 ffe: 516: 7000: f 00: : /64 to any • pass out quick route-to (dc 1 fe 80: : 1) from 2001: 200: 190: f 00: : /64 to any • Net. BSD (1. 6. 1) – ECMP Extension & ipfilter (need some modifications) • route add default fe 80: : 1%fxp 0 • route add default fe 80: : 2%fxp 0 -sabrnet 2001: 200: 190: f 80: : -sabrmasklen 64 • Cisco (IOS 12. 3 -3) – Not Available for IPv 6 We intend to link this with DHCP/RA. IETF #58 in Minneapolis 10