Скачать презентацию IP 12 JCAB and FAA Joint Paper UPR and Скачать презентацию IP 12 JCAB and FAA Joint Paper UPR and

efa81aaecb86928eff96ad4d0ccd6324.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 28

IP/12 JCAB and FAA Joint Paper UPR and PACOTS Update IP/12 JCAB and FAA Joint Paper UPR and PACOTS Update

PACOTS Track F UPR Trial • Operational Trial began July 25, 2013, to allow PACOTS Track F UPR Trial • Operational Trial began July 25, 2013, to allow Track F UPRs at least 50 nm south of PACOTS Tracks C & E. • Remain 50 nm South of Track E and Normal UPR Guidelines. • Guidelines published in KZAK NOTAM A 3212/13 and Oakland Website. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 2

Merging PACOTS Tracks C and E Federal Aviation Administration Merging PACOTS Tracks C and E Federal Aviation Administration

Operational Trial • March 13, 2013 began a 1 year operational trial of Merging Operational Trial • March 13, 2013 began a 1 year operational trial of Merging Tracks C and E when it provided an advantage. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 4

Procedural Proposal • This operational trial was a hybrid of different Pacific Oceanic Procedures. Procedural Proposal • This operational trial was a hybrid of different Pacific Oceanic Procedures. • Allow the merging of PACOTS Tracks C and E in the Oakland or Anchorage FIRs when it provides a savings advantage. • IPACG: Only merge PACOTS when there is at least a 200 lbs fuel savings. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 5

Track Advisory • When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged; • Track Advisory Track Advisory • When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged; • Track Advisory is used to manage the merging traffic at the point where the routes converged. • http: //www. faa. gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/ service_units/enroute/oceanic/pacific_track_advisory IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 6

Track Advisory • When PACOTS Tracks C and E are not merged: – Oceanic Track Advisory • When PACOTS Tracks C and E are not merged: – Oceanic Gateway Fix is the Start of the PACOTS Track as is currently done. • When PACOTS Tracks C and E are merged: – Oceanic Gateway Fix is the Merge point of Tracks C and E • If the merge point is a Waypoint, that will be the Gateway Fix. • If the merge point is a Lat/Long, the Gateway Fix for Track Advisory will be coded. – 41 W 40 = 41 N/140 W • The Latitude is always North and the leading 1 is dropped from the Longitude. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 7

 • Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks • When Track C and • Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks • When Track C and E are merged, the TDM will have “RMK/MERGE USE (point) FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL” A 0284/13 - (TDM TRK E 130122190001 1301221900 1301230800 BOXER FULMR FASEL 52 N 140 W 55 N 150 W 56 N 160 W 56 N 170 W ALDOZ ONEIL OPAKE OLCOT OPHET OGDEN OMOTO RTS/KSFO MOLEN BOXER KLAX RZS LIBBO BRINY BOARS BOXER OMOTO R 580 OATIS RMK/MERGE USE ONEIL FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL). IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 8

 • Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks A 0284/13 - (TDM TRK • Implementing Merged Track C and E Tracks A 0284/13 - (TDM TRK E 130122190001 1301221900 1301230800 BOXER FULMR FASEL 52 N 140 W 55 N 150 W 56 N 160 W 56 N 170 W ALDOZ ONEIL OPAKE OLCOT OPHET OGDEN OMOTO RTS/KSFO MOLEN BOXER KLAX RZS LIBBO BRINY BOARS BOXER OMOTO R 580 OATIS RMK/MERGE USE 52 W 40 FOR TRK ADVISORY GRL). IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 9

Track Advisory • Operators flight planning a merged Track C/E from the starting point Track Advisory • Operators flight planning a merged Track C/E from the starting point would request a Gateway reservation (TKF) prior to 1650 UTC. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 10

Merged Track C and E Operational Trial • OF THE FIRST 38 DAYS OF Merged Track C and E Operational Trial • OF THE FIRST 38 DAYS OF THE OPERATIONAL TRIAL; • TRACKS C & E MERGED 14 DAYS. • AVERAGE FUEL SAVINGS PER FLIGHT WAS 1120 LBS (10 DAYS) IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 11

Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties • April 22 -25, 2013 Oakland encountered difficulties Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties • April 22 -25, 2013 Oakland encountered difficulties with merging traffic on PACOTS Tracks C and E. • There were numerous traffic conflictions that required Oakland to negotiate with Japan and Anchorage for the use of Nonstandard altitudes. • If traffic did not permit the use on Nonstandard altitudes in Anchorage or Fukuoka FIRs, altitude assignments would have been significantly affected IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 12

Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties • On April 26, 2013, Oakland suspended the Merging Tracks C & E Difficulties • On April 26, 2013, Oakland suspended the Operational Trial to merge PACOTS Tracks C and E. • Oakland discovered several irregularities with the Track Advisory requested reservations: IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 13

4/22 -25 Track Advisory Issues IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 14 4/22 -25 Track Advisory Issues IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 14

Moving Forward C/E Trial • Operators must be better at meeting their Gateway Fix Moving Forward C/E Trial • Operators must be better at meeting their Gateway Fix reservation times. • Merging C/E requires the use of Non. Standard Altitudes. – Not an issue for NOPAC – Mix of Aircraft types – Gateway time errors IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 15

Moving Forward C/E Trial • When the PACOTS Tracks C and E would merge, Moving Forward C/E Trial • When the PACOTS Tracks C and E would merge, Oakland will coordinate with the next facility for the use of Non-Standard Altitudes for the next day. • If approval for the use of the necessary Non. Standard altitudes can be obtained, the tracks will be published with a merge. • If approval for the use of the necessary Non. Standard altitudes cannot be obtained, the tracks will be published without a merge in the Oakland FIR. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 16

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation D 50 30/30 ADS-C D 50 30/30 FD ATOP Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation D 50 30/30 ADS-C D 50 30/30 FD ATOP P 2 00 0 NO ADS-C ATOP ADS-C D 50 30/30 Current Status IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 17

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation c Tf fc ATOP ADS-C D 50 30/30 w Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation c Tf fc ATOP ADS-C D 50 30/30 w Lo Most T fc IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 18

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation TS c Tf si d/A w Lo c Tf Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation TS c Tf si d/A w Lo c Tf a PACO lan Is IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 19

Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation 30 / ATOP D 50 & 30 /30 ADS-C Anchorage ADS-C Distance Based Separation 30 / ATOP D 50 & 30 /30 ADS-C D 50 30/30 Planned IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 20

Moving Forward C/E Trial • Tentative Resume Date 02/19/2014 IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 Moving Forward C/E Trial • Tentative Resume Date 02/19/2014 IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 21

ASIA PTRO UPRs JAPAN Australia UPRs IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 ASIA ASIA PTRO UPRs JAPAN Australia UPRs IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 ASIA NZ/NC UPRs 22

Westbound PACOTS IPACG TRACK F UPRs Track C Track E Track F Track H Westbound PACOTS IPACG TRACK F UPRs Track C Track E Track F Track H Track I Track J Track K Track A B Track F Track H Track I Track J Track K Track A Track B IPACG HAWAII JAPAN PACOTS UPRs IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 TRACK H/I UPRs IPACG TRACK K UPRs 23

PACOTS TRACK C/E MERGE Track C Track IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 PACOTS TRACK C/E MERGE Track C Track IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 C Track E 24

Eastbound PACOTS IPACG PACOT TRACK 1 UPRs k 1 rac k 2 T c Eastbound PACOTS IPACG PACOT TRACK 1 UPRs k 1 rac k 2 T c Tra k 3 rac k 14 T c Tra ck 15 Track 11 12 Track IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 14 Track 15 Track J PACOT TRACK 3 Track J UPRs IPACG PACOT Track 11 Track 12 TRACK 14/15 IPACG UPRs JAPAN HAWAII PACOTS UPRs 25

Moving Forward C/E Trial IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 26 Moving Forward C/E Trial IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 26

? ? UPRs Far East Kg An. California 2. 88 M. Asia Hawaii Kg ? ? UPRs Far East Kg An. California 2. 88 M. Asia Hawaii Kg An. 1. 09 Kg Hawaii – PGUM/RPLL An. rage o Anch 1. 09 M. California tle Kg An. – RTE Seat d Entry Pts. klan a ver Vancou Los. Track 1 10 M. s gele An UPRs a k uo k Fu M a n i l a Over 32. 8 Mil Kg Fuel Savings Annually Ujung Br. 266 M. M is California o resby ba ne Singapore Kg An. RJAA– 2. 88 M. Australia Kg An. IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 O Kg An. M California – e 1017 Kg Hawaii x i (North Flightof c CEP) o 9. 61 M Tahiti California – South. An Kg Pacific Nadi Asia–New 2. 09 M. Zealand/ Kg An. Caledonia ? ? Hawaii –South Auckland Kg An. Pacific 27

IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014 IPACG 38 Meeting February 5 -6, 2014