Скачать презентацию Inversion Towards Occupation A New Challenge to Скачать презентацию Inversion Towards Occupation A New Challenge to

5491ae457ab276637e6c613c058fdbc0.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 13

Inversion Towards Occupation • A New Challenge to Israel’s National Security Concept January 2007 Inversion Towards Occupation • A New Challenge to Israel’s National Security Concept January 2007

A New Challenge to National Security Crisis in Israel’s National Security Concept Israel is A New Challenge to National Security Crisis in Israel’s National Security Concept Israel is in Strategic Inferiority Palestinians may not fight for end of occupation Israel’s policy towards Hamas has failed 2

Crisis in Israel’s National Security Concept Objective Two-State Solution Anchor Israeli Strength Problem Security Crisis in Israel’s National Security Concept Objective Two-State Solution Anchor Israeli Strength Problem Security & Foreign Affairs USA Alliance with the Superpower Palestinians State & End of Occupation IDF Victory, Deter Logic Military Enemy 3 States and Organizations One-State Iranian Hegemony Structure of the Political System US Decline; Erosion of Israel’s Status in US Inversion Towards Occupation How to Win in Lebanon and Gaza? Political – Strategy of Implosion The Resistance Network

The Strategy of Implosion Purpose: Destruction of Israel Meshal: “If Hamas cannot Ahmadinejad: “The The Strategy of Implosion Purpose: Destruction of Israel Meshal: “If Hamas cannot Ahmadinejad: “The Palestinian protect the Palestinian people, Nasrallah: “We do not need Ahmadinejad: “Israel is on a refugees will be able to[Hamas] let the PA go to hell… return. tanks and planes… [Israel] is crash course… just like the The future of Palestine will be will not find it difficult to Soviet Uniona spider web. ” weaker than disappeared. ” determined by referendum the announce the dissolution of. ” (7/31/06) (12/2/06) (11/29/06) PA and a return to ground zero: an occupied nation. ” (3/19/06) Continuation of the Occupation War Against Occupation De-Legitimize Promote 1 SS Oppose 2 SS Military Means Israeli Implosion Single Arab State in its place 4

Inversion Towards Occupation 2005 Palestinians oppose PSPB Palestinians seek state (even PSPB) 2007 1967 Inversion Towards Occupation 2005 Palestinians oppose PSPB Palestinians seek state (even PSPB) 2007 1967 Inversion towards occupation? Palestinians oppose occupation ? 1937 Inversion towards 2 SS 5 1988 Int'l community supports 2 SS

Significance of the Inversion § Strategic Inferiority § Clash of Logics Political Logic: Ending Significance of the Inversion § Strategic Inferiority § Clash of Logics Political Logic: Ending Value Control < § Price and Value § Ending Control Grows Distant 6 Military Logic: Increasing Control Price Time

Hamas Accelerates the Inversion § Political Dead-End Meshal: Negotiation § Crisis of Palestinian Representation Hamas Accelerates the Inversion § Political Dead-End Meshal: Negotiation § Crisis of Palestinian Representation § Dismantling the PA 7 “If the international community won’t face the challenge, 2 SS Hamas will close the political chapter… and the Unilateral will collapse. ” PA (11/25/06)

Policy Options § Turning the PA into an Address § Consolidating Separation § Promoting Policy Options § Turning the PA into an Address § Consolidating Separation § Promoting Palestinian Statehood 8

Policies vis-à-vis Hamas Risks Palestinian Recogn- Battle with State ition of IL Hamas Obstruction Policies vis-à-vis Hamas Risks Palestinian Recogn- Battle with State ition of IL Hamas Obstruction 9 Exposure Confrontation 3 Demands + embargo No PA collapse Corridor of difficult decisions War against Hamas De-Jure De-Facto Already exists Bypassing Hamas Upgrading the PA Deal with Fatah Hamas doesn’t fall / change PA collapses Hostile PA Damage Abu Mazen PA collapses / terror Hamas wins Fatah disappoints

Policies vis-à-vis Hamas Obstruction Allow it to Govern Exposure Unity Gov’t Confrontation Civil War Policies vis-à-vis Hamas Obstruction Allow it to Govern Exposure Unity Gov’t Confrontation Civil War 10 Fatah wins at least in the WB Address

Answers are Bubbling Objective Two-State Solution One State Anchor Israeli Strength Iranian Hegemony Economic Answers are Bubbling Objective Two-State Solution One State Anchor Israeli Strength Iranian Hegemony Economic Sanctions & Military Tools Problem Security & Foreign Affairs Political System Political Reform USA Closeness with the Power US Decline Regional Alliances Palestinians State & End of Occupation Inversion Towards Occupation IDF Victory, Deter How to Win in Lebanon and Gaza? Logic Military Political – Strategy of Implosion Enemy 11 States and Organizations Resistance Network Exposure or Confrontation Winograd Commission Meridor Report “How to Break the Amoeba’s Bones? ”

Adaptive Challenge for National Security Technical Problem Semi-technical Problem Adaptive Challenge Problem Known Un-Known Adaptive Challenge for National Security Technical Problem Semi-technical Problem Adaptive Challenge Problem Known Un-Known Solution Known Un-Known Ron Heifetz 12 “Leadership without Easy Answers"

Conclusions of the Reut Institute Israel is dealing with a new strategy: Continuation of Conclusions of the Reut Institute Israel is dealing with a new strategy: Continuation of occupation leads to Israel’s implosion Thus, the Palestinians do not want or cannot end the occupation The policy against Hamas has failed Allow a unity government to govern Confront Hamas in a Palestinian Civil War The Commissions of Inquiry are not enough The problem lies in the National Security Concept The relevant commission has yet to be formed 13